Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:02 PM Jan 2014

Edward Snowden ‘fears for his life,’ according to Russian state-run media

By Agence France-Presse
Tuesday, January 21, 2014 12:14 EST


The Russian lawyer of Edward Snowden said Tuesday that the fugitive US intelligence leaker has feared for his life since reading of explicit threats against him by unnamed Pentagon officials.

“There are real threats to his life out there that actually do exist,” Snowden’s lawyer Anatoly Kucherena told Russia’s state-run Vesti 24 rolling news channel.

“These statements call for physical reprisal against Edward Snowden,” Kucherena said.

Read more: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/01/21/edward-snowden-fears-for-his-life-according-to-russian-state-run-media/
104 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Edward Snowden ‘fears for his life,’ according to Russian state-run media (Original Post) Cali_Democrat Jan 2014 OP
Putin will kill him the minute he becomes an inconvenience. nt onehandle Jan 2014 #1
“In a world where I would not be restricted from killing an American, Pholus Jan 2014 #2
Now, is this fear legit, or courtesy of his KGB lawyer to divert from some things? Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #3
Of course it is legit RobertEarl Jan 2014 #35
!!! Tarheel_Dem Jan 2014 #100
Baseless nonsense from a traitorous whiner MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #4
"He's never seen his name on the President's secret kill list" ProSense Jan 2014 #5
Forcing down the plane of a sovereign head of state MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #6
You think President Obama is trying to "kill" Snowden? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #7
oh yeah.... msanthrope Jan 2014 #10
Which part of "I don't know?" do you have difficulty understanding MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #11
So you think there is a possibility that President Obama is trying to "kill" Snowden? ProSense Jan 2014 #13
Sure. MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #15
There is no evidence the President had anything to do with that treestar Jan 2014 #18
nah, he's backing off. I can smell the flop sweat. Whisp Jan 2014 #26
OK... why did Evo Morales' plane land in Austria last July? MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #52
I recall it was debated here at length treestar Jan 2014 #72
I'll take that as your acknowledgement of being checkmated in three more moves. MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #80
Uh no treestar Jan 2014 #87
"Sure. Probably not -"? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #19
What was the question you asked? nt MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #22
You can see it. What was the question you tried to answer? ProSense Jan 2014 #23
Is it really that hard to understand? Vattel Jan 2014 #40
It makes no friggin sense. It's a trying-to-have-it both ways response ProSense Jan 2014 #46
wow Vattel Jan 2014 #47
LOL! n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #48
You and I seem to have a strange understanding of the English language MannyGoldstein Jan 2014 #53
"Sure. Probably not -"? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #56
" He's gotta be hella-angry."??? The President? sheshe2 Jan 2014 #31
Agreed, sheshe2! there is no evidence jazzimov Jan 2014 #38
Amazing, jazzimov. sheshe2 Jan 2014 #45
I wish you had the courage of your convictions to clearly state what you think the President msanthrope Jan 2014 #20
I think he's a bit busy being shocked and appalled at what a horrible sadistic place the world is Number23 Jan 2014 #85
The Ivy education, it must be. He's resorted to replying to me and then deleting in another thread. msanthrope Jan 2014 #98
"The Ivy education" I think you nailed it. Which is why his constant harping and the slew of Number23 Jan 2014 #101
A cushy bubble of privilege that gives rise to a rage when people do not act as expected....nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #102
Do you think that the statements of the 'secret' officials who say they would be willing to kill sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #57
How the hell would I know? What does that have to do with my question? n/t ProSense Jan 2014 #59
Why are you angry at ME, I'm just trying to figure out what the hell is going on in this country? sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #64
And you think asking me if some "secret officials" are "being hyperbolic" is going to help? ProSense Jan 2014 #66
What was your question again? I know that there has been a threat to Snowden's life. I'm wondering sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #69
Go back and check. It had nothing to do with "secret officials," and ProSense Jan 2014 #71
Okay! sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #73
Wait...is President Obama trying to kill Emo Morales, too??? nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #8
that plane was 'downed' by Obama Whisp Jan 2014 #14
ODS....in spades. nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #16
Yup. He's still sad that Obama won in 2008... SidDithers Jan 2014 #103
Makes my Soul Itch.....nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #104
Actually, there's no evidence whatsoever that anyone "forced down" Morales' plane struggle4progress Jan 2014 #54
"forcing"? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #32
Actually, there's no evidence whatsoever that anyone "forced down" Morales' plane struggle4progress Jan 2014 #37
When has anything like evidence EVER made a difference with some of this crowd? Number23 Jan 2014 #83
I hope he doesn't read DU mindwalker_i Jan 2014 #9
Right? Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #28
From that post, it looks like Snowden's view evolved mindwalker_i Jan 2014 #51
Or maybe his views haven't evolved in any substantive way: he still seems an ideologue struggle4progress Jan 2014 #60
Right. He changed his mind because of all the things he said he saw. randome Jan 2014 #70
and as usual they exaggerate about "police states" and "spying" on everyone treestar Jan 2014 #76
The problem I have with Bobbie Jo Jan 2014 #77
"we have crackpots talking about Obama forcing down planes" Number23 Jan 2014 #84
"The first thing we do, let's kill all the lawyers." pinboy3niner Jan 2014 #12
Hey!!! nt msanthrope Jan 2014 #21
What about lawyers that no longer practice? ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #55
I asked the Pope, and he said we can give you a Special Dispensation pinboy3niner Jan 2014 #58
"Praise The Lord"!!! n/t 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #62
Haven't you heard - in context it's a compliment! treestar Jan 2014 #74
It's a funny line pinboy3niner Jan 2014 #78
Those folks in the National Lawyers Guild are pretty cool as well. U4ikLefty Jan 2014 #88
Right on! pinboy3niner Jan 2014 #91
Julian II treestar Jan 2014 #17
Interesting how anything Snowden does now, or anyone connected with him does, is attacked pinboy3niner Jan 2014 #24
He is a "discredit" to his country... VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #34
You realize, of course, that there are differing opinions about that--even here pinboy3niner Jan 2014 #36
Yes I do...however...some people have a very low threshold for hero worship too. VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #42
Funny that you'd mention an attack that also was leveled at Daniel Ellsberg pinboy3niner Jan 2014 #49
what "attack"? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #50
Call it what you want, Ellsberg was smeared to discredit the info he released pinboy3niner Jan 2014 #92
smeared is different than having the truth told about you isn't it? VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #93
So a claim that "he fears for his life" is a fact? pinboy3niner Jan 2014 #94
How would anyone know...he is so prone to hyperbole! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #95
Still, how does this prove "He is a 'discredit' to his country"? pinboy3niner Jan 2014 #96
because he ran away! VanillaRhapsody Jan 2014 #97
It doesn't bother you, even a LITTLE jazzimov Jan 2014 #41
He's never defected and he left China on his own volition Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #61
was he headed for China... wildbilln864 Jan 2014 #65
What was illegal? They had a FISA warrant? treestar Jan 2014 #75
Attack the messenger. U4ikLefty Jan 2014 #90
Oh, poor Snowden, he is all alone, doesn't matter if he may have placed others in danger. Thinkingabout Jan 2014 #25
That's right, his own group would more likely prefer that Whisp Jan 2014 #29
And China doesn't want him.... jazzimov Jan 2014 #44
He never wanted to stay in Hong Kong from the get go. Luminous Animal Jan 2014 #63
He trusts Putin? HipChick Jan 2014 #27
Why not? davidpdx Jan 2014 #67
You mean the Russian Bear isn't protecting him...sheesh. Historic NY Jan 2014 #30
Maybe he should of thought about that when he was leaking.. HipChick Jan 2014 #33
ooh poor, little baby! Bless his little heart!! BluegrassDem Jan 2014 #39
I would be scared too. The pentagon kills a lot of people. They are good at it. Vattel Jan 2014 #43
yes, the dude is an extreme paranoid Pretzel_Warrior Jan 2014 #68
Did you read the comments from NSA and Pentagon officials in the Buzzfeed article? Number23 Jan 2014 #86
.0001% nilesobek Jan 2014 #79
Oh is this where it was going from. Union Scribe Jan 2014 #81
I read that piece on Buzzfeed. Number23 Jan 2014 #82
Coupled with his adult-onset "seizure disorder," I'd say Snowden is genuinely msanthrope Jan 2014 #99
How silly. Our peaceloving, honest, honorable, government has never killed anyone. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2014 #89

Pholus

(4,062 posts)
2. “In a world where I would not be restricted from killing an American,
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:11 PM
Jan 2014

I personally would go and kill him myself,” a current NSA analyst was further quoted as saying.

So much for the vaunted professionalism of their service. All base thugs sound alike when frustrated, it seems.

That might be unfair of course. After all, the term "analyst" generally implies a skill set for a person they don't trust with pointy objects.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
35. Of course it is legit
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:39 PM
Jan 2014

He was a spy who cracked their game in two and exposed them for fools.

The real problem is: Where will the next spy come from who steals NSA info? That is what Americans should be worried about. All our info is just sitting there waiting to be stolen by a real crook... like maybe another bush or cheney.

Do you support that collection of info just sitting there waiting to be plucked like Snowden did?

Did you know the info on the Jewish people in Nazi Germany was how they so easily rounded them up?

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
4. Baseless nonsense from a traitorous whiner
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:25 PM
Jan 2014

He's never seen his name on the President's secret kill list, so what right does he have to complain?

Take it to the President's Secret Court, Snowden - they'll tell you that you have NO standing because you can't show that you're on the secret kill list!

Regards,

TWM

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
5. "He's never seen his name on the President's secret kill list"
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:26 PM
Jan 2014

You think President Obama is trying to "kill" Snowden?

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
6. Forcing down the plane of a sovereign head of state
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:32 PM
Jan 2014

ain't exactly chopped liver. That's not done unless someone's pretty @#$%ing serious.

But, who knows? It's a *secret* kill list.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
11. Which part of "I don't know?" do you have difficulty understanding
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:43 PM
Jan 2014

I can try explaining it differently, if it might help?

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
13. So you think there is a possibility that President Obama is trying to "kill" Snowden?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:44 PM
Jan 2014

You "don't know"?

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
15. Sure.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:54 PM
Jan 2014

Probably not - Snowden's in Russia and the President wouldn't want to start a row with them, plus Obama's not known to extrajudicially-execute people who "look like Americans"... but since Snowden is doling out our most important national secrets (or whatever the kids are calling it these days), there's certainly a possibility.

When was the last time a President forces down the planes of sovereign head of state? Unheard of! He's gotta be hella-angry.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
18. There is no evidence the President had anything to do with that
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:59 PM
Jan 2014

Funny how he you are willing to assume him guilty of that.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
26. nah, he's backing off. I can smell the flop sweat.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:17 PM
Jan 2014

just took a bit too big of a chew this time.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
72. I recall it was debated here at length
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:14 AM
Jan 2014

It wasn't even the US. ODS is a strange thing; it appears to get worse over time.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
80. I'll take that as your acknowledgement of being checkmated in three more moves.
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:43 AM
Jan 2014

At least be a gracious loser.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
23. You can see it. What was the question you tried to answer?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:05 PM
Jan 2014

Let me ask it again: Do you think there is a possiblity that the President is trying to "kill" Snowden?

Yes or no?

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
40. Is it really that hard to understand?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:55 PM
Jan 2014

Sure = Yes, it is possible that Obama is trying to kill him. Probably not = It is unlikely that Obama is trying to kill him. These are not contradictory claims.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
46. It makes no friggin sense. It's a trying-to-have-it both ways response
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:03 PM
Jan 2014

after implying something beyond absurd.

Still, I'm glad you "understand" it.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
53. You and I seem to have a strange understanding of the English language
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:32 PM
Jan 2014

Must be the "reefer" I "toked" in high school.

sheshe2

(83,765 posts)
31. " He's gotta be hella-angry."??? The President?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:25 PM
Jan 2014

"When was the last time a President forces down the planes of sovereign head of state? Unheard of! He's gotta be hella-angry."

WOW Manny, just wow.

jazzimov

(1,456 posts)
38. Agreed, sheshe2! there is no evidence
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:48 PM
Jan 2014

that the plane was "forced down" by anyone.

In fact, the evidence is that they were taking advantage of "head-flamers" to justify the change in flight plans.

sheshe2

(83,765 posts)
45. Amazing, jazzimov.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:02 PM
Jan 2014

Love the spin and the CT.

Wow, I am trying to picture the President in his flightgear, bringing down the plane single handed.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
20. I wish you had the courage of your convictions to clearly state what you think the President
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:01 PM
Jan 2014

has done.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
85. I think he's a bit busy being shocked and appalled at what a horrible sadistic place the world is
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:25 AM
Jan 2014

can be, and always has been to lots and lots and lots of people. Must be nice to have lived in such a cushy bubble one's whole life.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
98. The Ivy education, it must be. He's resorted to replying to me and then deleting in another thread.
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 07:40 AM
Jan 2014

You know..the one where the census is a Nazi or something.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
101. "The Ivy education" I think you nailed it. Which is why his constant harping and the slew of
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 05:46 PM
Jan 2014

clapping seals rushing to K&R every mundane utterance are nothing but constant sources of amusement.

I've been to some damn good schools myself but I'm not the slightest bit protected or naive. Between my upbringing as a black kid in a single parent home in an urban environment to having traveled the world and seeing GUT WRENCHING poverty and/or disenfranchisement, I couldn't pretend naivete if I wanted to. I don't think I've seen anyone that clueless since I hit puberty.

Like I said, must be nice to have lived in such a cushy bubble all of these years. I honestly wouldn't know anything about that.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
57. Do you think that the statements of the 'secret' officials who say they would be willing to kill
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:42 PM
Jan 2014

Snowden are just being hyperbolic? Or is it possible that there are rogue elements, right wingers of course left over from the old Bush/Cheney years, who might be willing to kill anyone who threatens Bush's Private Security Corps money flow?

Frankly I have no problem believing that Bush/Cheney operatives STILL running our 'security' would stop at nothing to keep the money flowing. Call me a cynic, but the killed over one million human beings already so maybe I'm not so much cynical as logical.

It's all about 'patriotism' of course. Like it was way back when Bush/Cheney were caught spying on the American people who we all know, are the REAL enemy.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
64. Why are you angry at ME, I'm just trying to figure out what the hell is going on in this country?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:56 PM
Jan 2014

Shouldn't these people who are threatening to kill a Whistle Blower at least be ferreted out and charged with something? He has not been convicted of anything and if you or I were to threaten murder we would certainly be subject to charges.

Is anyone interested in tracking them down and charging them with something? Seems like free for all to me, once again confirming that we have abandoned the rule of law. But what do I know, I'm just an observer of all these events.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
66. And you think asking me if some "secret officials" are "being hyperbolic" is going to help?
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:01 AM
Jan 2014

That has nothing to do with my question.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
69. What was your question again? I know that there has been a threat to Snowden's life. I'm wondering
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:04 AM
Jan 2014

why nothing has been done to try to find the Perpetrators. I worry about these things.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
71. Go back and check. It had nothing to do with "secret officials," and
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:12 AM
Jan 2014

it was directed to a specific poster.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
14. that plane was 'downed' by Obama
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:49 PM
Jan 2014

don't you remember?

yeh, it sounded as sinister as it was intended. Downed. Meaning, brought down and not on a landing strip.

lol, the comedy and tragedy of DU

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
54. Actually, there's no evidence whatsoever that anyone "forced down" Morales' plane
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:37 PM
Jan 2014

There was a statement from the Portuguese that they had notified the Bolivians, at leadst twenty-four hours before the plane left Moscow, that refueling at the Lisbon airport would be impossible due to problems at the airport, and the Bolivian pilot therefore refiled his flight plan to show no stop at Lisbon but instead a refueling in Gran Canaria. But once enroute, the plane contacted the Portuguese again and sought permission for an emergency refueling stop at Lisbon. The plane had just started to traverse the Alps and was instructed to return to the nearest airport, perhaps because at one point the pilot said they seemed to be low on fuel and suggested possible equipment failure. A request for an emergency landing in Austria was granted, where the plane refueled

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
37. Actually, there's no evidence whatsoever that anyone "forced down" Morales' plane
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:47 PM
Jan 2014

There was a statement from the Portuguese that they had notified the Bolivians, at leadst twenty-four hours before the plane left Moscow, that refueling at the Lisbon airport would be impossible due to problems at the airport, and the Bolivian pilot therefore refiled his flight plan to show no stop at Lisbon but instead a refueling in Gran Canaria. But once enroute, the plane contacted the Portuguese again and sought permission for an emergency refueling stop at Lisbon. The plane had just started to traverse the Alps and was instructed to return to the nearest airport, perhaps because at one point the pilot said they seemed to be low on fuel and suggested possible equipment failure. A request for an emergency landing in Austria was granted, where the plane refueled

Number23

(24,544 posts)
83. When has anything like evidence EVER made a difference with some of this crowd?
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:20 AM
Jan 2014

Of all of the "Obama BAAADD!" stories that cover this web site like ticks on a hound, this has got to be one of the laziest, stupidest and most easily disproven. And the fact that someone keeps flinging it around speaks volumes about where their interests truly lie.

mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
9. I hope he doesn't read DU
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 09:38 PM
Jan 2014

There have been some opinions, shall we say, about what sort of fate he should meet.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
28. Right?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:21 PM
Jan 2014
Leakers should be “shot in the balls”
Snowden may have leaned libertarian on some issues, but he also exhibited strong support for America's security state apparatus. He didn't just work for it as a quiet dissident. Four years before he would leak the country's secrets, Snowden was cheering its actions and insisting that it needed healthy funding. To anyone who questioned US actions in his favored online hangout, he could be derisive.

Livid about the across-the-board defense cuts that were planned under Obama, Snowden acidly joked that "aybe we could just outsource our defense needs to india."

Worse yet, during a remarkable January 2009 chat, Snowden wrote that Obama had "appointed a fucking politician to run the CIA." In that same conversation, he vented his rage over reading a New York Times article about US actions in Iran, which was based on confidential leaks.

< TheTrueHOOHA> HOLY SHIT

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/11/washington/11iran.html?_r=1&hp

< TheTrueHOOHA> WTF NYTIMES
< TheTrueHOOHA> Are they TRYING to start a war?
Jesus christ
they're like wikileaks
< User19> they're just reporting, dude.
< TheTrueHOOHA> They're reporting classified shit
< User19> shrugs
< TheTrueHOOHA> about an unpopular country surrounded by enemies already engaged in a war
and about our interactions with said country regarding planning sovereignity violations of another country
you don't put that shit in the NEWSPAPER
< User19> meh
< TheTrueHOOHA> moreover, who the fuck are the anonymous sources telling them this?
< TheTrueHOOHA> those people should be shot in the balls.



http://www.democraticunderground.com/10023102239




mindwalker_i

(4,407 posts)
51. From that post, it looks like Snowden's view evolved
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:11 PM
Jan 2014

I would say that he was initially wrong. Maybe he got into the NSA and changed his mind once he knew what was going on, or perhaps he said that as cover. Regardless, I disagree with him on that statement.

When someone leaks information on what the government is doing that's illegal, I'm thankful. This includes leaks about torture and domestic spying. Possibly it includes leaks about non-domestic spying, if that violates treaties.

What pisses me off are people who condemn Snowden for telling us about ow we're are being fucked over. It seems like they don't even want to know that we are becoming (or have become) a police and/or surveilance state, what I think is a really bad thing.

struggle4progress

(118,282 posts)
60. Or maybe his views haven't evolved in any substantive way: he still seems an ideologue
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:44 PM
Jan 2014

who advocates vigilante action

Back then he thought it would be OK to shoot people who didn't share his views, and now he thinks it's OK to hand intelligence information to the Chinese and Russians in order to undermine a President he doesn't like

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
70. Right. He changed his mind because of all the things he said he saw.
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:08 AM
Jan 2014

But he won't ever tell us what he saw. Just amorphous claims of nefarious doings followed by the 'revelation' of metadata collection that we've known about since 2007 and followed by the 'revelation' that the NSA spies on other countries.

He didn't change his mind about anything and that's the problem. He is a loner who never finished anything in his life, including high school, and who dreamed of being a hero.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]"There is a crack in everything. That's how the light gets in."
Leonard Cohen, Anthem (1992)
[/center][/font][hr]

treestar

(82,383 posts)
76. and as usual they exaggerate about "police states" and "spying" on everyone
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:20 AM
Jan 2014

provably untrue stuff of Eddie's delusions and then we get people believing in Eddie's delusions.

Bobbie Jo

(14,341 posts)
77. The problem I have with
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:26 AM
Jan 2014

the whole thing is that by the time everyone has attached their own narrative to the story, we have crackpots talking about Obama forcing down planes, constructing "secret kill lists," or pulling up your 7th grade diary to use against you when applying for a mortgage.

No, there are numerous agendas attached to this particular "truth telling," and to turn a blind eye to the motivations involved is incredibly naive. As always, the actual truth is buried beneath layer upon layer of bullshit.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
78. It's a funny line
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:36 AM
Jan 2014

But personaly, I have a lot of respect for lawyers.

And when I was volunteering for Kerry in Ohio, it was a bunch of young civil rights lawyers who gave me a ticket and took me to see Springstein, Forgerty, R.E.M. and Bright Eyes in a Vote for Change concert.

LAWYERS ROCK!


U4ikLefty

(4,012 posts)
88. Those folks in the National Lawyers Guild are pretty cool as well.
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:43 AM
Jan 2014

They have taught me a lot & trained me to be a legal observer during Occupy.

Good people.

Hey niner!!! How are ya?

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
91. Right on!
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:56 AM
Jan 2014

Man, I missed you. Was hoping to have a chance to be together in the streets again. But I know that will happen.

Wishing the best for you and your family...

Love & Peace,
pinboy3niner

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
24. Interesting how anything Snowden does now, or anyone connected with him does, is attacked
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:12 PM
Jan 2014

As if that discredits his exposure of illegal acts.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
36. You realize, of course, that there are differing opinions about that--even here
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:42 PM
Jan 2014

There are no defnitive, declarative statements. Only opinions.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
50. what "attack"?
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:10 PM
Jan 2014

you have a very low threshold for "attack" apparently.


And Ellsberg didn't run away and hide behind Putin did he?

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
94. So a claim that "he fears for his life" is a fact?
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 04:01 AM
Jan 2014

And one that somehow is relevant to hs document release? And proves that "He is a 'discredit' to his country"? THOSE are the kinds of "facts" that matter? Seriously?

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
96. Still, how does this prove "He is a 'discredit' to his country"?
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 04:08 AM
Jan 2014

You dismiss taking any meaning from this as ridiculous because it's "hyperbole". Yet you pronounce a conclusion.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
97. because he ran away!
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 05:04 AM
Jan 2014

to not one but 2 far more invasive than the U.S. ....it makes him look like a kook!

jazzimov

(1,456 posts)
41. It doesn't bother you, even a LITTLE
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:00 PM
Jan 2014

it doesn't bother you even in the LEAST that he claimed to "represent Free Speech" and defected to the 2 countries LEAST known for free speech?

Of all the countries in the world he could have gone to and made his point, he went to CHINA who eventually kicked him out and so he had to go to Russia... who didn't exactly welcome him with open arms?

I mean.. WTF?

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
61. He's never defected and he left China on his own volition
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:47 PM
Jan 2014

Russia was a stop over to central or South America. He was in transit but unable to leave because the state department yanked his passport.

But of course you knew all this.

 

wildbilln864

(13,382 posts)
65. was he headed for China...
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:00 AM
Jan 2014

or was he just forced to land & stay there for some reason?
I've heard differing accounts.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
75. What was illegal? They had a FISA warrant?
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:18 AM
Jan 2014

And he skipped the Whistleblower Protections. And could have put CIA agents in danger, or all of us. He's the one so delusional he's claiming they are spying on us all, when he didn't find any such thing.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
25. Oh, poor Snowden, he is all alone, doesn't matter if he may have placed others in danger.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:12 PM
Jan 2014

Did he consider he might have been putting his life in danger? Why would the US gov't want to enhance Snowden to hero? He might be in danger of losing his life from within his group, he has only been a patsy and in effort to protect their identity they would kill him.

 

Whisp

(24,096 posts)
29. That's right, his own group would more likely prefer that
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:22 PM
Jan 2014

all for The Noble Cause.

oooh, I can hear the wailing and the banners unfurled and baby boys being named Snowden for months to come.



jazzimov

(1,456 posts)
44. And China doesn't want him....
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:02 PM
Jan 2014

and Russia only took him grudgingly.....

But he's a "hero" of the Left? Well, I'm a Leftist and I don't trust him, either.

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
67. Why not?
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 12:03 AM
Jan 2014

Putin never kills anyone, never spies on his people, or holds political prisoners.

We all are suppose to blindly trust Putin.

 

BluegrassDem

(1,693 posts)
39. ooh poor, little baby! Bless his little heart!!
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 10:54 PM
Jan 2014

He should've taken that in consideration before he became a traitor. He's toast and he knows it. It's just a matter of time before justice comes to him.

 

Vattel

(9,289 posts)
43. I would be scared too. The pentagon kills a lot of people. They are good at it.
Tue Jan 21, 2014, 11:02 PM
Jan 2014

The fugitive’s lawyer said Snowden was especially concerned by comments from a US Army intelligence officer that outlined a specific scenario under which the leaker could be discreetly poisoned.

The unnamed army officer told BuzzFeed that Snowden could be “poked” on his way home from buying groceries by a passerby who is actually a US agent.

Snowden “thinks nothing of it at the time (and soon) starts to feel a little woozy,” the US intelligence officer is quoted as saying.

“And the next thing you know he dies in the shower.”

Number23

(24,544 posts)
86. Did you read the comments from NSA and Pentagon officials in the Buzzfeed article?
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:32 AM
Jan 2014

That dude has EVERY SINGLE RIGHT to be scared as hell. If that's what people will say to a news outlet knowing full well that its' going to be published, then God only knows what they are saying behind closed doors.

Number23

(24,544 posts)
82. I read that piece on Buzzfeed.
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:10 AM
Jan 2014

If I was Snowden I'd be fearing for my life too.

To have a large groups of ANYONE wanting you dead would be problematic, but having groups of people that specialize in weapons, covert operations and tactical maneuvering wanting you dead would be beyond horrible. He sure as hell pissed off the wrong group of people.

 

Tierra_y_Libertad

(50,414 posts)
89. How silly. Our peaceloving, honest, honorable, government has never killed anyone.
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:46 AM
Jan 2014

Except for the millions we have killed.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Edward Snowden ‘fears for...