Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

1monster

(11,012 posts)
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:15 PM Jan 2014

Clerical Error In Child Support Payments Leads To Six-Month Jail Sentence For Clifford Hall

Are private prisons behind this law and this judge? From everything I've heard, "Texas justice" is an oxymoran...

also video at link

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/01/21/child-support-error_n_4637465.html?1390319219&icid=maing-grid7%7Chtmlws-main-bb%7Cdl1%7Csec1_lnk3%26pLid%3D432808

Due to a clerical error, Texas father Clifford Hall received a bill charging him nearly $3,000 in overdue child support last year. Hall quickly repaid the amount, even paying an additional $1,000 to balance his debt. But despite his repayment, Hall was sentenced to six months in jail. He and his attorney Tyesha Elam joined host Nancy Redd to share his story on HuffPost Live.

Errors in the automated child support withdrawal amounts from Hall's paycheck caused a payment shortage, but when Hall discovered this imbalance, he worked to pay it immediately.

Elam explained, "I assumed as soon as he brought me the receipt catching him up as well as the letter advising him of the overpayment, I thought, 'oh this one will be easy.' I'm thinking, 'let me let the opposing counsel know and we'll be done with this matter.'"

"But the opposing counsel informed me that she wasn't willing to settle the case. She wanted $3,500 in attorney's fees and she was confident from this judge that she could get it. So she refused to settle. So we had to move forward."
17 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Clerical Error In Child Support Payments Leads To Six-Month Jail Sentence For Clifford Hall (Original Post) 1monster Jan 2014 OP
This has been debunked. Snopes says it's false. Arkansas Granny Jan 2014 #1
I love snoops! Perfect when my BS detector goes off! nt Logical Jan 2014 #2
It has not been debunked. That suggests that this case doesn't exist. The facts are in dispute. stevenleser Jan 2014 #4
It's pretty simple, steve...he owed back child support, and a contempt motion msanthrope Jan 2014 #6
the crucial elements of it have been debunked. this is MRA propaganda. geek tragedy Jan 2014 #7
Can you reply with a link or PM me with backup for that please. nt stevenleser Jan 2014 #9
it's from the Snopes article. geek tragedy Jan 2014 #12
Msanthrope sent me the case details below. I'm pretty curious now. I want to see if stevenleser Jan 2014 #14
if you click on tab "services/notices" at the link msanthrope posted geek tragedy Jan 2014 #15
Thanks, yes, will read all of that. Sometimes the full story isn't in court docs though. stevenleser Jan 2014 #16
All that Snopes debunked was that he was jailed for over paying his child support... 1monster Jan 2014 #8
But he didn't make up the 'arrears.' He made up the amount originally asked for in April of last msanthrope Jan 2014 #11
The prior thread on DU debunked this charlatan. He deserved his contempt charge, msanthrope Jan 2014 #3
Can you PM me the info. The Snopes link above is pretty convoluted. nt stevenleser Jan 2014 #5
Here's the docket.... msanthrope Jan 2014 #10
Got it. Thanks. Looks like there is a Guardian Ad Litem in this case. I would like to talk to that stevenleser Jan 2014 #13
The GAL shouldn't talk to you. I will tell you my opinion of the case, after seeing Mr. Hall msanthrope Jan 2014 #17
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
4. It has not been debunked. That suggests that this case doesn't exist. The facts are in dispute.
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:27 PM
Jan 2014

Even Snopes isn't completely sure what happened here as they make clear at the end of their piece.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
6. It's pretty simple, steve...he owed back child support, and a contempt motion
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:32 PM
Jan 2014

was filed in April of last year. He paid up his support before his court date, but that didn't clear him of the contempt proceeding. Which he lost, badly.

So now he owes fees. Plus whatever child support accrued between April and now that he didn't pay.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
7. the crucial elements of it have been debunked. this is MRA propaganda.
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:33 PM
Jan 2014

However, available court records indicate that Hall was straightforwardly held in contempt of court for failure to pay child support in a case which had a motion for contempt dating back to April 2013 (and a court document briefly glimpsed in the Houston television news report about the case shown above displays a header indicating Hall was indeed held in contempt for "for failure to pay child support&quot . The information presented in news accounts indicating that Hall owed nearly $3,000 in back child support and that the child's mother had incurred $3,000 in attorney's fees trying enforce their court agreement suggest that this was an long-running and/or ongoing support issue rather than a sudden and recent one.


 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
12. it's from the Snopes article.
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:43 PM
Jan 2014

As a general rule, deadbeat parents are only exceeded by prominent Republicans in driving the nails into their own palms. They have an entire playbook of excuses they deploy before and after a judge orders them to pay child support.

$3000 over a one year period for child support is not a clerical error, nor would a modification be made without notice to him, etc etc.

Rather the much more mundane case of deadbeat parents who pay up child support only when threatened with jail.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
14. Msanthrope sent me the case details below. I'm pretty curious now. I want to see if
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:46 PM
Jan 2014

I can get in touch with the Guardian ad litem and see what she has to say.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
15. if you click on tab "services/notices" at the link msanthrope posted
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:51 PM
Jan 2014

you'll see that enforcement motions were filed against this guy in 2008 and 2010, with a motion for contempt coming in 2013. Along with several other post-judgment motions being made.

You can register with the site and download documents from there.

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
16. Thanks, yes, will read all of that. Sometimes the full story isn't in court docs though.
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:54 PM
Jan 2014

The attorney assigned to the child is usually a goldmine of backstory info.

1monster

(11,012 posts)
8. All that Snopes debunked was that he was jailed for over paying his child support...
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:37 PM
Jan 2014

And that was never the allegation.

The video does show a receipt indicating that he had paid over $1,000 in advance when he made up the nearly $3,000 in arrears.

Snopes gave precious little information in regards to his sentence of 180 days stating that they were unable to uncover the reasons for that.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
11. But he didn't make up the 'arrears.' He made up the amount originally asked for in April of last
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:43 PM
Jan 2014

year. Now he owes more. His docket is pretty clear....he defied the August ruling to pay.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
3. The prior thread on DU debunked this charlatan. He deserved his contempt charge,
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:27 PM
Jan 2014

and he will be paying those fees.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
10. Here's the docket....
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:40 PM
Jan 2014
http://www.hcdistrictclerk.com/edocs/public/CaseDetails.aspx?Get=GAGmiKYJXIeXCSoZ5iOBYvg91olAynWFNN7hx+xIWy3+5YguaIDmPlZ8lzE0V/SkidFBaTM4ztGHbfFF3ilzT9+vrhjQ3KZagbyUtEOKTM8=

And if you run his name in Harris County, you also get his tax suits.

Looks like he got served with the contempt motion in April of last year, lost in August, and now, in January, though he was going to make everything better by paying the amount asked for in April. Not how it works.
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
13. Got it. Thanks. Looks like there is a Guardian Ad Litem in this case. I would like to talk to that
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:45 PM
Jan 2014

person. Wonder if they would talk to me.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
17. The GAL shouldn't talk to you. I will tell you my opinion of the case, after seeing Mr. Hall
Wed Jan 22, 2014, 01:54 PM
Jan 2014

and his attorney, and reviewing the docket....

Mr. Hall is not truthful about the circumstances that have landed him in hot water. I cannot imagine, from the filings from his own attorney, that he was unaware that he owed money, that he was being taken to court, and that he faced both custodial and child support issues.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Clerical Error In Child S...