General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTPP is all about numbers not jobs. The numbers are
US has 280 million customers, while India has 1 billion plus, China has 1 billion plus, the rest of Asia has 2 billion plus.
So who has the loudest voice in these meetings, not the US. We are just a blip in the world customer base. Also we only produce and sell models for others to copy and sell back to us at 1/2 the price.
We are in a new era where productivity can only produce jobs for 30-50% of the world population.
So what ever we can get from the TPP is better than nothing.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Mika
(17,751 posts)CK_John
(10,005 posts)Mika
(17,751 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Bill, is that you? Go tell Hillary you fell off the wagon again.
CK_John
(10,005 posts)X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)It's two dimensional economic thinking in a three dimensional world. Somebody articulate, like Elizabeth Warren or Paul Krugman, have to speak up about it in public.
Armstead
(47,803 posts)Why not push for a return to more domestic manufacturing of products for domestic markets?
India has 1 billion plus consumers. Seems to justify making investments in plants that make cars for Indian consumers, that are based in their own economies and conditions. Likewise for the US.
That would be a way to lift all boats, rather than the current form of "free trade" corporate globalization that is dragging all workers (and consumers) down to the lowest level.