Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(71,991 posts)
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 09:43 AM Jan 2014

Jamie Dimon's Raise Proves U.S. Regulatory Strategy is a Joke - By MATT TAIBBI

If you make a big show of punishing someone, and when you're done they still don't think they have a behavior problem, you probably picked the wrong punishment. Every parent on earth knows this implicitly – but does the Obama White House finally get it, too, now, after Jamie Dimon's raise?

....................



Chase's responses to Holder's record penalties have been hilarious. Their first move was to make sure people outside the penthouse boardroom took on all the pain, laying off 7,500 employees and freezing salaries for the non-CEO class of line employees.

Next, Chase's board members sat down, put their misshapen heads together, considered the impact of this disastrous year of settlements, and decided to respond by more than doubling the take-home pay of the executive in charge, giving Dimon about $20 million in salary and equity.

In the end, the fines left the decision-making class of the company not just uninjured but triumphant. Dimon's raise was symbolic of a company-wide boost in compensation following the mass layoffs, as average per-employee expenses rose four percent overall, to $122,653, despite the $20 billion burden imposed upon the firm by the state.



...................

Read more: http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/jamie-dimons-raise-proves-u-s-regulatory-strategy-is-a-joke-20140130#ixzz2rz1eXpUd
Follow us: @rollingstone on Twitter | RollingStone on Facebook

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jamie Dimon's Raise Proves U.S. Regulatory Strategy is a Joke - By MATT TAIBBI (Original Post) kpete Jan 2014 OP
Damn, the banks in this country are so horrendously corrupt. democratisphere Jan 2014 #1
You're not looking at it from the right viewpoint. malthaussen Jan 2014 #16
My 'left' viewpoint is accepted by others. How corrupt is JD? Let me count the MANY WAYS! democratisphere Jan 2014 #28
Proves the government is corrupt. malthaussen Feb 2014 #30
"Corporations are predators." Corporations are corrupt. democratisphere Feb 2014 #31
Heads of corporations are all the same abelenkpe Jan 2014 #17
uh, This Administration has been very good to the bankers cali Jan 2014 #2
Generally true; but they did set out a record fine against Chase el_bryanto Jan 2014 #3
Yes and those fines can be deducted as a business expense on the corporate tax filing.... Swede Atlanta Jan 2014 #7
Also, institutional investors are known as 'dumb money' - closeupready Jan 2014 #11
Crimes were committed, fraud, corruption but no one was held accountable sabrina 1 Jan 2014 #24
They set a record fine against Chase because there was record setting malfeasance. Enthusiast Jan 2014 #26
What Do Jamie Dimon's Cufflinks Tell Us About the Financial-Industrial Complex? Ichingcarpenter Jan 2014 #4
The equal of Diplomatic Immunity. democratisphere Jan 2014 #6
Thanks for the reminder Oilwellian Jan 2014 #8
I think the answer is fairly self-evident, no? truebrit71 Jan 2014 #12
It's not a message; it's a prophecy colorado_ufo Jan 2014 #13
If the Elder Bush gave him those the message is, "Want the CIA to poison your bottled water?" Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #20
K&R.... daleanime Jan 2014 #5
k/r marmar Jan 2014 #9
And the cons ctsnowman Jan 2014 #10
Always happy to read something... polichick Jan 2014 #14
K&R abelenkpe Jan 2014 #15
Fuck fines. These people need to be JAILED. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #18
Would it to be that simple ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #21
Iceland managed to do it. Spitfire of ATJ Jan 2014 #22
They're small, and white. I mean, homogenous. SMC22307 Feb 2014 #35
Funny how the banks didn't take revenge and boycott their money. Spitfire of ATJ Feb 2014 #37
We also did plenty of it in the 80's after the S&L meltdown. snot Feb 2014 #32
Indeed, we did. (n/t) SMC22307 Feb 2014 #36
No ... 1StrongBlackMan Jan 2014 #19
this is why the bailout should have at least had the condition of the top execs resigning yurbud Jan 2014 #23
Greed be thy name. sarcasmo Jan 2014 #25
Like a cult of personality these CEOs are these days. applegrove Jan 2014 #27
K&R'd! snot Feb 2014 #29
K&R woo me with science Feb 2014 #33
Jamie Dimon's a steal. Octafish Feb 2014 #34
kick woo me with science Feb 2014 #38

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
1. Damn, the banks in this country are so horrendously corrupt.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 09:55 AM
Jan 2014

7,500 employees are sacrificed, then Jamie Dimon is insanely rewarded for his in your face, lousy and corrupt leadership. What is wrong with US?

malthaussen

(17,195 posts)
16. You're not looking at it from the right viewpoint.
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 12:04 PM
Jan 2014

Mr Dimon made a lot of money for the company. That is what they want him to do. They would like him to continue doing it.

Corruption? How? A corporation exists to make money. Period.

What's wrong with the US, you ask? Easily answered: we have corporations.

-- Mal

malthaussen

(17,195 posts)
30. Proves the government is corrupt.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:11 AM
Feb 2014

Last edited Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:53 AM - Edit history (1)

Or that its regulations are a joke, which everyone on the JPM board already knows.

A corporation cannot be "corrupt" because a corporation does not exist to serve the public and is not subject to public oversight. It exists to make money for its shareholders and is answerable only to them.

Now, laws and regulations may be enacted to restrict the ability of the corporation to fulfill this single task. When the corporation violates these laws or regulations, they are not "corrupt," they are "criminal," and should be made to answer as criminals.

If the government chooses not to make these corporations answer for their criminal activity, or cuts a deal whereby the consequences of such activity do not outweigh the advantages of the criminal activity, then it is the government that is corrupt, not the corporation. It is the government which is not living up to a minimal expectation, namely to protect the citizens from predators.

Corporations are predators. At best, symbiotic organisms, but only if held carefully in check. This we have manifestly failed to do.

-- Mal

democratisphere

(17,235 posts)
31. "Corporations are predators." Corporations are corrupt.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:20 AM
Feb 2014

"A corporation cannot be "corrupt" because a corporation does not exist to serve the public and is not subject to public oversight. It exists to make money for its shareholders and is answerable only to them."

This "New World Order" corporate mission statement clearly defines where corporations have gone horribly wrong. Companies and corporations used to exist to "serve the public" (customers) by providing quality products and services at reasonable prices. The "New World Order" corporate view trashes the public (customers) by providing cheap and low quality products and services at ever increasing outrageous prices so that the IDOLIC and LAUDED shareholder can reap all the wealth and benefits. Corporations are parasites that are sucking the life out our economy, standard of living, families, national security and the like. That in itself is corrupt.

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
17. Heads of corporations are all the same
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 12:05 PM
Jan 2014

Last year over 300 artists were laid off from dreamworks, their jobs offshored and then the very top gave themselves raises. It's a pattern that's been going on for the last 15-20 years in pretty much every industry.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
2. uh, This Administration has been very good to the bankers
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 09:57 AM
Jan 2014

President Obama is a good friend to corporations. It's so absurd not to recognize this fact.

el_bryanto

(11,804 posts)
3. Generally true; but they did set out a record fine against Chase
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 09:59 AM
Jan 2014

It doesn't seem to have had the desired effect, and Obama has no stomach for going further.

Bryant

 

Swede Atlanta

(3,596 posts)
7. Yes and those fines can be deducted as a business expense on the corporate tax filing....
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 10:38 AM
Jan 2014

These guys will never personally suffer when it comes to monetary fines.

As we saw here they will lay people off, reduce bonuses for all but the very top of the top, reduce salaries and benefits and, if necessary, take it out on their shareholders.

They will personally always be sure they are protected and will continue to be the fat cats in a new gilded age.

The problem with large corporations like this is that the largest shareholders are usually institutional investors who are in league with management. So there will never be a real opportunity for the average shareholder to vote to hold the management team accountable.

The other side of this is...for investors if the company can shrug this off by screwing everyone else and continue to bring home profits and increased share value, shareholders really don't care.

We are in a new "me, me, me" age that has no room for what is right and wrong, what is moral or immoral. It is all about money and more money. It is a disease and for many of us we see it as the sin of greed.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
11. Also, institutional investors are known as 'dumb money' -
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 11:20 AM
Jan 2014

big money looking for good returns, and easily fleeced.

sabrina 1

(62,325 posts)
24. Crimes were committed, fraud, corruption but no one was held accountable
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:52 PM
Jan 2014

Fines are for misdemeanors not massive crimes that destroy millions of lives. This country should have done what Iceland did. THAT is how you handle crimes against the people, and their handling of it has ensured that no Banker, like Dimon eg, is going to be rewarded for the corruption.

They factor in fines as part of doing business which is to me, a pre-meditation of corruption.

Bailing them out was the stupidest thing to do.

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
21. Would it to be that simple ...
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 12:19 PM
Jan 2014

I'm pretty sure that someone going to jail will not be enough ... it must be the Dimons of the world and/or their enabling Board of Directors.

The problem is send them to jail for what? The legal system (rightfully) holds that in order to jail someone, one must PROVE that they engaged in, had knowledge of, or willfully ignored, wrong doing. That would be a pretty easy case to prove for any number of lower/mid-level employees; but a much harder case to bring against the actual shot callers.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
35. They're small, and white. I mean, homogenous.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 01:57 PM
Feb 2014

Won't work in the United States.

Those are a couple of excuses offered up by some on DU...

 

1StrongBlackMan

(31,849 posts)
19. No ...
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 12:13 PM
Jan 2014

I would say Dimon's raise says less about the regulatory system than it gives lie to the whole concept of Board of Directors' serving as the protectors of share-holder value.

The simple fact is some villains (in this case, the Chase Board for giving and Dimon in taking, the raise) do not modify their conduct, i.e., learn, from punishment. This is no different from any other recidivism matter; for some, no matter the punish, they will re-offend.

I do, however, agree that until the Dimons and the Boards of Directors pay a personal cost, their conduct, and attitude, is likely to change.

yurbud

(39,405 posts)
23. this is why the bailout should have at least had the condition of the top execs resigning
Fri Jan 31, 2014, 01:20 PM
Jan 2014

and having their passports revoked pending the filing of charges.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jamie Dimon's Raise Prove...