Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
79 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Up With Steve Kornacki: New Jersey/Port Authority/Christie discussion thread (Original Post) TexasTowelie Feb 2014 OP
And the secret is... TexasTowelie Feb 2014 #1
Not a secret, this came out a week or so ago. George II Feb 2014 #58
Kornacki is bringing up why there was a delay in getting the story of misuse of funds going public. TexasTowelie Feb 2014 #2
This guy keeps doing investigative journalism! I am going to faint! How long has it been since we Squinch Feb 2014 #3
I recall extensive investigative journalism on Monica Lewinsky and Chandra Levy. factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #9
Well, yes. Now the question is, do you think there are others like us who find corrupt Squinch Feb 2014 #12
Well, I think maybe so, if it's the viewers' tax dollars that are involved. factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #17
Isn't there always? Squinch Feb 2014 #35
I should have said if they REALIZE their tax dollars are involved and how much. factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #42
And of course they just passed a law that says we can no longer know how much Congresspeople Squinch Feb 2014 #44
Yes, what a TRAVESTY! factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #46
Pisses me off. And where is the press about THAT?? Squinch Feb 2014 #47
I saw a little bit on MSNBC. TexasTowelie Feb 2014 #49
Let me guess: they all voted to slash SNAP and end long term unemployment? Squinch Feb 2014 #51
They're covering the Superbowl. factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #52
And apologizing for saying Republicans are Republicans. Squinch Feb 2014 #54
Yup. n/t factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #55
Oh so we the taxpayers don't get to know where our money goes. This is fucked. SummerSnow Feb 2014 #59
Yep. Snuck into the farm bill was a clause that said that they will no longer Squinch Feb 2014 #63
So if I need foodstamps to feed my children then I'm a lazy socialist. SummerSnow Feb 2014 #65
Right. But when they get tens of thousands in farm subsidies, they are freedom living patriots. Squinch Feb 2014 #66
Exactly. That's why I dump on Michael Isikoff every chance I get. calimary Feb 2014 #69
Oh, thank you very much for that information. factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #71
CL WAS a murder, FGS. Why wouldn't there be an extensive investigation? WinkyDink Feb 2014 #72
The "investigation" I recall was smearing Gary Condit instead of actually investigating. n/t factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #73
How long? How about here.... George II Feb 2014 #57
The first link is just the front page of northjersey.com, or am I missing something? Squinch Feb 2014 #61
The first link is to a page with dozens of articles about the scandal and Christie's.... George II Feb 2014 #64
Back to the Integrity Monitoring Act: TexasTowelie Feb 2014 #4
Ernst and Young being, of course, the accounting firm that told investors that Squinch Feb 2014 #39
I worked with E&Y auditors on a couple occasions TexasTowelie Feb 2014 #43
The people I know who went to work for them, mostly auditors, seemed like Squinch Feb 2014 #45
There was some complaints avebury Feb 2014 #5
Well, I wish they could cover Scott Walker, Rick Scott, etc. but there are only so many hours in a factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #6
And only so many real investigative journalists. I bet the Walker folks are scrambling right now. kelliekat44 Feb 2014 #10
If, when NJ dies down, Kornacki turns his attention to Wisconsin, his name will be made forever. Squinch Feb 2014 #16
Yes! Yes! Yes! factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #19
Those stories don't get the same degree of coverage avebury Feb 2014 #18
Perhaps some of today's journalists are itching to do this kind of work but can't. factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #20
Rachel has used a couple of local radio reporters in this story. They seem to have pieces Squinch Feb 2014 #22
Remember it was one young guy on a small paper in avebury Feb 2014 #23
Good point. factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #25
The Dissappearance Of... Laxman Feb 2014 #27
Yes, indeed. n/t factsarenotfair Feb 2014 #28
And many states and municipalities have no one watching that wolf in the henhouse. Squinch Feb 2014 #40
my answer to that is 'BENGHAZI' spanone Feb 2014 #26
Lol! Squinch Feb 2014 #56
That was one great but complicated explanation by Steve - at the end of it malaise Feb 2014 #7
Integrity monitors for Sandy relief Sienna86 Feb 2014 #8
Pandora's box Sienna86 Feb 2014 #11
Sandygate, Bridgegate, SummerSnow Feb 2014 #60
The Feds are going to be excavating Sandy fraud for years... Walk away Feb 2014 #13
Kevin Walsh Is The Affordable Housing Advocate.... Laxman Feb 2014 #14
Where can we see the rest of what you wrote? Squinch Feb 2014 #24
It Was A Response To This Thread.... Laxman Feb 2014 #29
The next segment of the show focused on the fact that the Integrity Monitoring Law TexasTowelie Feb 2014 #15
Beyond The Monitor... Laxman Feb 2014 #62
O M G!!! Now news that the FEDS are looking into GWB closing. diabeticman Feb 2014 #21
This scandal keeps spreading just like a sinkhole. avebury Feb 2014 #30
Investigative journalism at its best Justice Feb 2014 #31
I wish he were on more often too, but I wonder if this format gives him time to DO the investigating Squinch Feb 2014 #50
One of the points that came across from one of the guests TexasTowelie Feb 2014 #32
This Is A Problem Inherent In The Process Laxman Feb 2014 #33
Christie was like Willy Wonka with a golden ticket to run for president Justice Feb 2014 #34
Stupid Betty Feb 2014 #36
Correct! Justice Feb 2014 #38
Pascrelli: how did this all happen? Justice Feb 2014 #37
Bob Ingle and Suzy Khumm need to read this Dread Pirate Roberts Feb 2014 #41
First 20 minutes of the show are available now at UP's website: mucifer Feb 2014 #48
Thanks for posting, saw this and turned it on just now. n/t RKP5637 Feb 2014 #53
We Must Strongly Support Mr. Steve Kornacki and His Fine Investigative Journalism bkanderson76 Feb 2014 #67
In Kornacki's case Priebus needs to complain to MSNBC my guess is for now he will lay low. gordianot Feb 2014 #74
The more I hear, the more I wonder why Christie gave that 2 hour press conference Justice Feb 2014 #68
Well I do have to say I feel like taking a shower after watching so many mucifer Feb 2014 #70
KICK for now.. thanks TT Cha Feb 2014 #75
You're welcome. TexasTowelie Feb 2014 #77
Thanks for this thread! pacalo Feb 2014 #76
You're welcome. TexasTowelie Feb 2014 #78
It was the main topic I was hoping to find a discussion about today. pacalo Feb 2014 #79

TexasTowelie

(112,185 posts)
1. And the secret is...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:04 AM
Feb 2014

new information about Sandy recovery funds and the misuse of funds.

First mention is $6 million for the senior citizen housing center development in Belleville and his efforts to curry favor in Essex county.

He is building slowly...

TexasTowelie

(112,185 posts)
2. Kornacki is bringing up why there was a delay in getting the story of misuse of funds going public.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:12 AM
Feb 2014

A. Integrity Monitor Act of 2013 passed by New Jersey Legislature passed and effective immediately as of March 27, 2013 monitored by state treasury department. This was spurred on by the controversy with the cleanup fund with AshBritt to remove debris at a higher cost than other contractors. The treasury department was supposed to monitor every project/grant over $5 million and report it to state AG and state comptroller.

A database was supposed to track those expenditures but after Christie signed the Integrity Monitor Act he vetoed the Web Transparency Act. Christie essentially buried the tracking of those expenditures.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
3. This guy keeps doing investigative journalism! I am going to faint! How long has it been since we
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:17 AM
Feb 2014

have seen that?

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
12. Well, yes. Now the question is, do you think there are others like us who find corrupt
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:28 AM
Feb 2014

municipal contracts and contractors fascinating? Enough of us to make the networks think it's worthwhile?

factsarenotfair

(910 posts)
17. Well, I think maybe so, if it's the viewers' tax dollars that are involved.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:34 AM
Feb 2014

Also, there's probably some sexual hanky panky in any big political scandal, too.

factsarenotfair

(910 posts)
42. I should have said if they REALIZE their tax dollars are involved and how much.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:29 AM
Feb 2014

Members of Congress getting farm subsidies, for example.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
44. And of course they just passed a law that says we can no longer know how much Congresspeople
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:31 AM
Feb 2014

get in farm subsidies.

TexasTowelie

(112,185 posts)
49. I saw a little bit on MSNBC.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:39 AM
Feb 2014

I can't remember if it was Ed or Lawrence; however, the story does not get a lot of traction and there are several lawmakers in Texas that receive farm subsidies.

factsarenotfair

(910 posts)
52. They're covering the Superbowl.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:40 AM
Feb 2014

They are even giving more time to coverage of Superbowl ads than to the Farm Bill.

SummerSnow

(12,608 posts)
59. Oh so we the taxpayers don't get to know where our money goes. This is fucked.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:03 AM
Feb 2014

But Rethugs , Baggers etc cry too much govt, slash foodstamps. Bullshit.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
63. Yep. Snuck into the farm bill was a clause that said that they will no longer
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:08 AM
Feb 2014

publicize the names of the recipients of farm subsidies, many of whom are Congress people, or their biggest contributors.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
66. Right. But when they get tens of thousands in farm subsidies, they are freedom living patriots.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:15 AM
Feb 2014

That's just how it works.

calimary

(81,267 posts)
69. Exactly. That's why I dump on Michael Isikoff every chance I get.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 12:32 PM
Feb 2014

The much-vaunted "investigative reporter" - who NOW goes on camera to opine, and spin, and "analyze", and he keeps repeating the phrase "what we don't know - is WHY."

Well, fuck, Isikoff, you're supposedly an "investigative reporter" and you were all over the Monica thing like a cheap suit. You had juicy new shit on that every time the red light turned on at the top of every TV camera, delivered with a gossipy sidelong smirk on your face. What, if anything, have you dug up here, 'eh????? Aren't YOU as an alleged "investigative reporter," supposed to be digging around and coming up with some substantive answers as to "WHY"? Forcryingoutloud, I can sit here and do that all day - that is, repeat the phrase "what we don't know - is WHY" and not get paid some princely sum for being an on-camera talking head, because I'm a total civilian now and have no sources anywhere and no access 'cause I'm completely out of the business and have been for years. YOU, on the other hand, are supposedly IN that job because you're an "investigative reporter," still supposedly on the beat, still supposedly with all kinds of access to all kinds of people who'll take your phone calls because you're famous and on TV, and years of source-cultivating behind you - AS, supposedly, an "investigative reporter."

So where are the goods, then? Why haven't you come up with anything meaty here? Why haven't you been digging and probing and working your sources to FIND OUT THE ANSWERS TO THAT "WHY"???? What are they paying you for? Because from what I've seen of your on-camera work since then, frickin' ANY rank amateur with no investigative experience or sources can do what you're doing these days.

I've said before, and I'll say it again - until it sticks: this is a guy who can't investigate his way around the inside of a paper bag unless there's a stained blue dress and a Clinton involved. I think he lives way down inside the pockets of the GOP. All he knows is obsessing on Democrats and sex. He's contributing NOTHING in the christie investigation. He's come up with SQUAT so far. I think that's because he's not really trying to. I suspect his "sources" "got nuthin'" on this. I suspect one of his close pals had to be ken starr. The VAST majority of them are undoubtedly republi-CON, and most of 'em by now are probably christie fans/apologists. So they're not gonna have the goods, or if they do, they're not gonna cough 'em up. Those republi-CONS all stick together and circle the wagons - unless or until their own necks are in nooses (like David Wildstein's is now).

George II

(67,782 posts)
57. How long? How about here....
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:55 AM
Feb 2014

...

http://www.northjersey.com/news/governor_christie_nj_gwb.html

Check out THIS story:

http://www.northjersey.com/news/ny_metro/030312_Ex-blogger_is_Governor_Christies_man_inside_the_Port_Authority.html

Where were all these bandwagon jumpers back in March 2012 (almost 2 years ago!) ???

Kornacki has been on MSNBC for a couple of years, never a peep about New Jersey politics. Now all of a sudden he's all over it?

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
61. The first link is just the front page of northjersey.com, or am I missing something?
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:06 AM
Feb 2014

And the second link, the older article, just says that Wildstein is Christie's man inside the Port Authority.

It talks about some unsavory politicization of a post that shouldn't be political, but it doesn't suggest that anything illegal was going on.

None of that was secret.

George II

(67,782 posts)
64. The first link is to a page with dozens of articles about the scandal and Christie's....
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:10 AM
Feb 2014

...."agenda", going back to at least early 2012, two years ago.

Christie denied that he knew much about Wildstein and they weren't very close. The second link from March 2012 belies that protestation.

TexasTowelie

(112,185 posts)
4. Back to the Integrity Monitoring Act:
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:22 AM
Feb 2014

Each integrity monitor is supposed to report at the beginning of each quarter. The reports are supposed to be sent from the Treasury Department to the Legislature. The Legislature has not received the quarterly reports required by law.

The $68 million contract to HGI that was terminated, but nobody knows whether either the $6 million Belleville contract or the HGI contract ever had an integrity monitor assigned to them for oversight purposes.

The NJ Treasury Department is now saying that no reports were due and they refused to respond to requests about the monitoring program. Ernst & Young offered to provide services as an integrity monitor. Treasury apparently delegated a significant role to E&Y to monitor the projects. Meanwhile, E&Y hired Todd Christie as director of the firm's Northeast Practice Market Team.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
39. Ernst and Young being, of course, the accounting firm that told investors that
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:24 AM
Feb 2014

Lehman Brothers was A-OK right before it went down in a ball of flames because it was so overinvested in crap derivatives, that everyone knew were crap.

Also, the Ernst and Young whose employees were convicted in 2010 of conspiracy to defraud the government, tax evasion, obstruction of the IRS and false statements to the IRS for creating and testifying to the IRS about the legitimacy of absolutely illegitimate tax shelters it had developed for high net worth investors.

So those are the guys who Christie thinks are appropriate to be "integrity monitors."

These guys are just filthy.

TexasTowelie

(112,185 posts)
43. I worked with E&Y auditors on a couple occasions
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:29 AM
Feb 2014

when I worked in both the private and public sectors. All that they cared about was whether that was a piece of paper to sign off as documentation for a project. There was never any concern as to whether the process worked or a correct answer (or reasonable) answer was obtained. The auditors have only minimal experience and their team leaders are people that managed to stick around for two to three years to rise through the ranks.

I was never impressed with any of their employees and even told them up front that I had no respect for them after working with them.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
45. The people I know who went to work for them, mostly auditors, seemed like
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:34 AM
Feb 2014

worker ants who were worked around the clock to the point of such exhaustion that there was no way they could be thorough or careful. So it wouldn't be that difficult for higher ups to hide what they want to hide from their peons, and get all the paperwork done the way their clients wanted, with no intentional wrongdoing on the part of those worker ants.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
5. There was some complaints
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:22 AM
Feb 2014

on Real Time that MSNBC is only focusing on Christie and the NJ scandal to the detriment of other news stories.

My response to that is that Kornacki is schooling journalists in the country on how they should be doing their job. If all journalists where digging in and investigating news stories then there would be real reporting from coast to coast. People are starved for real news and real reporting not propaganda (at least the non-Faux news crowd).

factsarenotfair

(910 posts)
6. Well, I wish they could cover Scott Walker, Rick Scott, etc. but there are only so many hours in a
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:24 AM
Feb 2014

day and SO MUCH to cover on the NJ scandal.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
16. If, when NJ dies down, Kornacki turns his attention to Wisconsin, his name will be made forever.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:33 AM
Feb 2014

As it is, I want to send him inappropriate fan letters.

Wouldn't you love to see him go after the Koches?

avebury

(10,952 posts)
18. Those stories don't get the same degree of coverage
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:34 AM
Feb 2014

because there is no one of the caliber of Kornacki working those stories like a dog with a bone. Most journalists now a days just tow the corporate line they are true journalists. Kornacki is the exception not the rule in this day in age.

factsarenotfair

(910 posts)
20. Perhaps some of today's journalists are itching to do this kind of work but can't.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:38 AM
Feb 2014

Not on the networks, but maybe on the local level. I cannot believe how worthless network "news" is.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
22. Rachel has used a couple of local radio reporters in this story. They seem to have pieces
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:39 AM
Feb 2014

of information that no one else does.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
23. Remember it was one young guy on a small paper in
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:40 AM
Feb 2014

NJ that started out with an innocuous story that took off. This is the guy who caught Rachel Maddow's attention and, as we say, the rest is history. Rachel Maddow and Steve Kornacki grabbed onto the story and look at where we are now.

It goes to show that sometimes one unknown person can make a difference in journalism.

Laxman

(2,419 posts)
27. The Dissappearance Of...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:43 AM
Feb 2014

statehouse reporters in many states brought about by the demise of many newspapers or their budget cutbacks is a significant contributor to corruption at the state level. NJ still has several robust, (but not as robust as they were 10 years ago) dailies who keep an eye on Trenton. Something needs to fill the void in the states where this doesn't exist.

malaise

(268,998 posts)
7. That was one great but complicated explanation by Steve - at the end of it
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:26 AM
Feb 2014

Christie's brother just happens to be a Director of the Accounting Firm that's supposedly monitoring Sandy money projects.
The assembly/legislature has not seen a piece of paper linked to how the money is being spent following the law that was introduced to monitor the money. There was no fugging monitoring.



The men who hate government were looting the Federal Aid - they're all going down - it will take time but this will be fun. Arrogance, hubris and a big pot of money will do them in every time.

Sienna86

(2,149 posts)
8. Integrity monitors for Sandy relief
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:26 AM
Feb 2014

Wow. Steve Kornacki is doing a great job. He is what a journalist should be: a tenacious fact-finder.

Sienna86

(2,149 posts)
11. Pandora's box
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:28 AM
Feb 2014

Christie and those involved in misuse of the public's trust in New Jersey must be squirming. This is going far past Bridgegate.

Walk away

(9,494 posts)
13. The Feds are going to be excavating Sandy fraud for years...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:29 AM
Feb 2014

Christie may end up in jail and he will definitely be leaving office before this term is over. Can we send his brother up the river as well?

New Jersey has needed a good flush for decades. The crooks who have been killing us with the highest property taxes in the country while they destroy our schools, break our unions and starve our working poor are about to be exposed and expelled.

The biggest problem in NJ is that the crooks are so bad on both sides of the political aisle that the people didn't have a chance. But it took a Republican to be so greedy and power hungry that his actions stood out in a cesspool of graft and threats.

In the end, Christie and Sandy may be the best things to happen to this state.

Laxman

(2,419 posts)
14. Kevin Walsh Is The Affordable Housing Advocate....
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:30 AM
Feb 2014

I was writing about here:

The first chunk of money that came from the Federal government for Sandy relief required an "Action Plan" on how the money was going to be spent. Along with all the expensive shore mansions in places like Mantaloking, there were a lot of very affordable homes in places like Union Beach and Keansburg that were trashed as well as many rental units. Christie's first version of the action plan contained no provisions for rebuilding affordable units. This was contrary to HUD policy. NJ's own current affordable housing laws have been in limbo since Christie took office and basically eliminated the Council on Affordable Housing. Its also part of the reason why we only have 5 Supreme Court justices right now, but that is a story for another day.

Christie was forced, after a law suit was immediately filed by affordable housing advocates in the state, to re-work his action plan and put in some rhetoric about building affordable units. Rather than actually build new units, he has re-purposed Sandy money to currently planned developments, like this one and one in Belleville. It did nothing to foster Sandy recovery and nothing to replace the affordable housing destroyed by Sandy. This is bad on so many fronts. It is perversion of the Sandy money by not using for its intended purpose and pay-offs in the form of enabling pet projects to go forward.


I was actually going to write about this today if I had the chance. This is all about the hijacking of the process and the money for Christie's benefit.

Laxman

(2,419 posts)
29. It Was A Response To This Thread....
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:51 AM
Feb 2014

last night. http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4423240. This needs a little more thorough explanation to make it understandable, but this is the crux of what they have been doing with Sandy money.

TexasTowelie

(112,185 posts)
15. The next segment of the show focused on the fact that the Integrity Monitoring Law
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:31 AM
Feb 2014

that was passed in March 2013 was ignored and violated repeatedly through the remainder of 2013 due to the lack of oversight. While I understand the difficulty of complying with new regulations and most of the fault belongs with the NJ Dept. of Treasury, the outsourcing of the process to E&Y is questionable and ultimately the governor has responsibility to assure that the agencies comply with the law. The fact that the database transparency law was vetoed and the lack of monitoring lends to charges of malfeasance and corruption.

Laxman

(2,419 posts)
62. Beyond The Monitor...
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:07 AM
Feb 2014

every public official in NJ MUST fill out a form each year that has the following questions:

2. Please list below any professional relationship with any person, firm, association, partnership, corporation or other business organization, including any subsidiary or related company thereof, that has sought or been awarded a public contract with your agency or any agency with which you have involvement in the procurement process. Include both the name of the business organization and the nature of the professional relationship.

and

3. Please list below any personal relationship with any principal officer or director of any firm, association, partnership, corporation or other business organization, including any subsidiary or related company thereof, that has sought or been awarded a public contract with your agency or any agency with which you have involvement in the procurement process. Include the name of the principal officer or director, the name of the business organization and the nature of the personal relationship.

Chris Christie/Todd Christie, Lori Grifa/Wolff & Samson, Jeff Chiesa/Wolff & Samson, and many others seem to have an issue here.

avebury

(10,952 posts)
30. This scandal keeps spreading just like a sinkhole.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:51 AM
Feb 2014

I hope that, at some time, Kornacki will put together a flow chart (updated regularly of course ) on all of his findings. It is becoming harder to keep track of everything. And I don't think that he is even close to figuring out where this will all go.

Justice

(7,188 posts)
31. Investigative journalism at its best
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:53 AM
Feb 2014

Steve has great tone and presentation, he does not grandstand. I wish he were on at night during the week. The tie into Ernst and young and Todd Christie's is stunning.

Squinch

(50,949 posts)
50. I wish he were on more often too, but I wonder if this format gives him time to DO the investigating
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:39 AM
Feb 2014

If he had to fill up an hour 5 nights a week, we might not be seeing the same kind of depth that he does now.

So in the end, I say, he ain't broke.

TexasTowelie

(112,185 posts)
32. One of the points that came across from one of the guests
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:58 AM
Feb 2014

(I didn't get her name) is that eventually someone has to evaluate and decide which projects will be approved and occur. For all the complaints that the federal government programs are not responsive to public and subject to fraud, the same things can occur if the projects are approved at a lower level.

After all, all politics is local.

Laxman

(2,419 posts)
33. This Is A Problem Inherent In The Process
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:05 AM
Feb 2014
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4405119

When Hurricane Sandy Hit, the conservative republicans were reticent to allocate large sums of money to recovery efforts. Unfortunately, every story like this makes their miserly and callous response seem prudent. Sandy money, allocated through Community Development Block Grants, were designed to be spent in a number of ways to address the myriad of Sandy's effects. It was a once in a generation investment to recover and at the same time reduce vulnerability for the future. It was not to be doled out for any project that could even marginally be linked to Sandy. Belleville suffered some flooding in a largely industrial and commercial area along the tidal Passaic River. This project was nowhere near the flooding. This project has no connection with the flooding or its effects. This is an example of how Christie has utilized this pot of money for personal political effect, not well considered recovery measures.


Using the block grant process was a requirement created by the republican congress to keep the federal government out of the hair of the states (most disasters tend to occur in very republican environs).

Justice

(7,188 posts)
34. Christie was like Willy Wonka with a golden ticket to run for president
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:10 AM
Feb 2014

Like it or not, he was a formidable candidate. All he had to do is oversee the Sandy rebuild in NJ to show how government works well - he would have been able to use it against conversations and tea party candidates. What a complete idiot he is. My spouse says he had the objective to be president and let his people implement what they thought was a strategy to get him there. I cannot believe he surrounded himself with such stupid people.


Bush's people - Cheny, Rove are evil but not stupid. Christie's people are stupid.

Justice

(7,188 posts)
37. Pascrelli: how did this all happen?
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:20 AM
Feb 2014

Says they better tell now (Christie's people) because when they (state legislature and feds) find out later it will be far worse for you (meaning Christie's people).

Dread Pirate Roberts

(1,896 posts)
41. Bob Ingle and Suzy Khumm need to read this
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 10:27 AM
Feb 2014

and it will all start to make sense. This is the chain of custody they were talking about.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024364984

Wolff & Samson's stock in trade is public access and influence. In this particular administration, that reach goes directly to the Governor's office. So what they do, after politely leaving the decision maker level, is start to work their way up the chain of command and try to pressure the decision maker from above. David Samson and their law firm have the ear of the governor in NJ. They have a very close relationship. So word goes to the governor's office and he uses his "people", in this incidence the Commissioner of the Department of Community Affairs and his Lieutenant Governor, to apply the pressure. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't. Sometimes just the word from above is enough to change the decision makers mind. Sometimes there is more leverage available. Promises of promotion. Threats of firing. They've been used by this administration in attempts to get their way. Here, a fund of billions of dollars in much needed Sandy aid provides the leverage. Rockefeller and Wolff & Samson never need to make a threat or make the deal or apply pressure. Christie and his people did it for them. It's just how they operate.


Wolff & Samson excelled at lining up the ducks for their clients in Trenton. They would set it up, stand back and let the public officials at DEP, DCA, EDA and the governor's office make it all happen. Like that old game Mouse Trap. They would build the contraption, start the ball rolling and watch the machine work.

gordianot

(15,238 posts)
74. In Kornacki's case Priebus needs to complain to MSNBC my guess is for now he will lay low.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 01:57 PM
Feb 2014

Christie in many ways is the epitome of Republican politics, this time squashed before it really got started. There are plenty of Republican machines ready to step in with some National Republican build up probably with similar issues. Expect any investigation or comparison to Christie to elicit howls complaint from Republicans. They still have not recovered from Nixon's demise and fought real journalism since that day (why Fox News was created).

Justice

(7,188 posts)
68. The more I hear, the more I wonder why Christie gave that 2 hour press conference
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 12:02 PM
Feb 2014

Kornacki ended with the note that he and his former Wildstein employee colleague agreed - Christie's confrontional words against Wildstein were a huge mistake - Wildstein is fiercely loyal but also a formidable enemy.

And, when the music stops, Wildstein always makes sure he has a seat.

mucifer

(23,542 posts)
70. Well I do have to say I feel like taking a shower after watching so many
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 12:34 PM
Feb 2014

sleazy lawyers on that show.

I did like the info about Wildstein. Hopefully, that brilliant sleazy guy can take down christie.

pacalo

(24,721 posts)
79. It was the main topic I was hoping to find a discussion about today.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:38 AM
Feb 2014

There's lots of good information in this thread & I particularly appreciate your recaps from the show.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Up With Steve Kornacki: ...