Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 08:35 PM Feb 2014

Nebraska Lawmaker Wants Her State To Stop Paying Private Prisons For Empty Cells

Nebraska Lawmaker Wants Her State To Stop Paying Private Prisons For Empty Cells

By Alan Pyke

Promising to keep private prison cells full will be illegal in Nebraska if a proposal from state Sen. Amanda McGill (D) becomes law.

McGill, who is running for higher state office this year, has introduced legislation banning the government from guaranteeing payment to private contractors regardless of the level of service the contractor provide. While that may sound so obvious as to be unnecessary, states often make those kinds of promises to corporations when they privatize public services.

The most notorious examples are private prison contracts that guarantee companies like the Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) a certain minimum occupancy level at prisons, and promise to pay CCA the difference should prison populations sag below that level. Such “lock-up quotas” appear in two-thirds of all prison privatization contracts, according to a report last fall by the anti-privatization group In The Public Interest (ITPI).

McGill’s legislation would ban those kinds of payment guarantees across all state contracts, but is specifically targeted at prison contracts. The bill also would amend the state’s corrections contracting law in a variety of ways to both protect taxpayers and regulate prison companies more tightly....Contracts that force public payments for empty cells give elected officials reason to keep prisons as full as possible, which means criminalizing as many behaviors as possible. The largest driver of America’s incarceration epidemic is the futile, decades-old War on Drugs, but backroom deals with prison companies compound the country’s larger problem.

- more -

http://thinkprogress.org/economy/2014/02/01/3237401/nebraska-prison-contracts-reform/


11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nebraska Lawmaker Wants Her State To Stop Paying Private Prisons For Empty Cells (Original Post) ProSense Feb 2014 OP
I have a radical solution. NaturalHigh Feb 2014 #1
This could backfire with a crooked judge who decides to send everyone Merlot Feb 2014 #2
I remember when a story like that hit the news. NaturalHigh Feb 2014 #3
Yes, that was a good one. n/t pnwmom Feb 2014 #5
What do you mean "backfire"? It is aimed directly at those crooked judges. nt pnwmom Feb 2014 #4
It reads that it's aimed at stopping the payment clauses Merlot Feb 2014 #7
I have a better idea: Brigid Feb 2014 #6
That's exactly what should happen kcr Feb 2014 #8
I agree. But I think they'd wither on the vine if states wouldn't sign that clause. pnwmom Feb 2014 #10
Private prison contracts should be illegal icymist Feb 2014 #9
Kick! n/t ProSense Feb 2014 #11

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
1. I have a radical solution.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 09:36 PM
Feb 2014

This especially applies to my home state of Oklahoma.

Stop sending non-violent drug offenders to prison. Stop locking people up for marijuana possession. Not only would we not need private prisons, we could probably close down some of the state prisons.

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
2. This could backfire with a crooked judge who decides to send everyone
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:52 PM
Feb 2014

to jail just to keep the jails full.

Michael Moores movie "Capitalism: A Love Story" had some kids with minor offenses getting locked up in detention by a crooked judge. Eventually, the judge got his own justice and was put behind bars for taking payoffs from the company that ran the detention center.

NaturalHigh

(12,778 posts)
3. I remember when a story like that hit the news.
Sat Feb 1, 2014, 11:54 PM
Feb 2014

Law and Order SVU did a really good episode about that too.

Merlot

(9,696 posts)
7. It reads that it's aimed at stopping the payment clauses
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:01 AM
Feb 2014

While it does say there will be tighter regulation on judges, it's main focus seems to be the contract payments.

kcr

(15,315 posts)
8. That's exactly what should happen
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:07 AM
Feb 2014

All the private prisons will do in response is ramp up the lobbying for tough on crime to fill the prisons to make up the difference. As long as profit is a motive, there will be a motivation to fill those cells. This legislation won't change that.

pnwmom

(108,977 posts)
10. I agree. But I think they'd wither on the vine if states wouldn't sign that clause.
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 01:25 AM
Feb 2014

They don't want to take the risk of a declining population.

icymist

(15,888 posts)
9. Private prison contracts should be illegal
Sun Feb 2, 2014, 12:17 AM
Feb 2014

If big corporations want to privatize the public sector then the public should not have to subsidize them when they lose money.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nebraska Lawmaker Wants H...