Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

General Discussion

madokie

(51,076 posts) Sun Feb 2, 2014, 05:38 PM Feb 2014

The peckerhead bill oreally is interviewing the President

President isn't taking any shit from his sorry ass either.

On the pre game show now.

3 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

The peckerhead bill oreally is interviewing the President (Original Post) madokie Feb 2014 OP

I don't understand why the president is giving them…. Bonhomme Richard Feb 2014 #1

In this case the president wiped the floor with his sorry ass madokie Feb 2014 #2

I agree that The President did a good job but... Bonhomme Richard Feb 2014 #3

Bonhomme Richard

(9,000 posts)

1. I don't understand why the president is giving them….

Reply to madokie (Original post)

Sun Feb 2, 2014, 05:40 PM

Feb 2014

the time of day. It's as if some keeps hitting you in the leg with a stick and you give them a sword.

madokie

(51,076 posts)

2. In this case the president wiped the floor with his sorry ass

Reply to Bonhomme Richard (Reply #1)

Sun Feb 2, 2014, 05:47 PM

Feb 2014

President Obama can take care of himself on any stage. He done good. Didn't let bill o get by with anything, in fact let it be known that bill o and fox noise is why so many re misinformed.
President O kicked bill O's ass.

Bonhomme Richard

(9,000 posts)

3. I agree that The President did a good job but...

Reply to madokie (Reply #2)

Sun Feb 2, 2014, 05:53 PM

Feb 2014

your average guy doesn't give damn about Benghazi or some made up IRS scandal. The only people that care about that are right wing nut jobs and they are not going to believe anything the President said anyway.

Reply to this discussion