Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 01:29 PM Feb 2014

Something the evangelical right and the progressive left have in common. Not so good.

From Ronald Reagan up to George W. Bush, and particularly George W. Bush. the evangelical right has thought their time had come. Finally they had a friend in Washington. They had sunk a lot into this string of miscreants and believed, with some good reason, that it was their votes that had put pious men in high Office. But it didn't work out so well for them. They got little for their support and have become disenchanted with Washington once again. Make no mistake about it, Republicans needed, and still need, the evangelical vote to get into office.

On the other side of that mirror sit the Democrats, and our counterpart to the right's prayer section are our liberal progressives. These folks are not to be confused with their lunatic cousins, the Libertarians. These are the good people who demand compasionate and equal social policy at the same time that they call or economic justice and a more patient foreign policy.

Since the abandoned Presidency of Lyndon Johnson the Democratic Presidents have treated the progressive wing of the Democratic Party even more poorly than the Republicans treated their choir. No Republican gets off stage without having at least once sung the praises of Jesus of Nazareth (sorry Mitt, Jesus of Salt Lake City comes up a little short) but nearly never do you hear a Democrat voicing a word of support for any Progressive policy.

And the Evangelicals have abandoned support of Republicans at the poll booths. 2016 is coming and the Democrats can not win seats in the House, Senate, and certainly not the Presidency without the support of Progressives.

As my old friend Dicky commented about it, 'snub my ass at 16 birthday parties in a row and see what kind of present I bring you on your 17th'.

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
1. Progressives are a negligible portion of the voting population
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 01:44 PM
Feb 2014

Except of course when Democrats lose whereupon it's entirely the fault of progressive voters.

Obligatory Fuck Nader!



Fumesucker

(45,851 posts)
5. Find somone that both the conservatives and the pragmatic moderate centrists hate
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 01:51 PM
Feb 2014

There's an excellent chance that person will be a progressive.

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
6. Probably has something to do with moving forward, not backwards, on social and fiscal policy.
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 01:55 PM
Feb 2014

Is it too much to at least not go backwards?

Look at the plight of the working man over the last 35 years, from the first day of the Reagan Presidency until this day, to see what moving backwards means.

mike_c

(36,281 posts)
3. I largely stopped voting for dems ten years ago....
Mon Feb 3, 2014, 01:49 PM
Feb 2014

Most simply don't represent me. Why should I support them? The only response I ever get to that question is some variant of the "lessor of two evils" meme, i.e. a vote for one party that doesn't represent me is a vote against another party that doesn't represent me. This is democracy?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Something the evangelical...