General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHouse GOPer Calls Glenn Greenwald 'A Thief Selling Stolen Material'
For personal gain, hes now selling his access to information, thats how theyre terming it," House Intelligence Committee Chair Mike Rogers (R-MI), said after a hearing that included discussion of the national security leaks, Politico reported.
"A thief selling stolen material is a thief.
Rogers alleged that "other nations' press services" had provided information indicating that Greenwald had put the Snowden documents up for sale.
For his part, Greenwald firmly denied the accusation in another interview with Politico. He has been working as a freelance journalist under contract, he said, not selling the documents.
TPM
hobbit709
(41,694 posts)JRLeft
(7,010 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)And if this is the direction Congress is really going then any reporter getting paid for a story is similarly in jeopardy.
Every thinking citizen who cares about a free press should be alarmed.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)the selling of information, stolen or otherwise?
Mind you ... I am not taking a position that gg is selling the documents.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)As I read it, Rogers is trying to chill Greenwalds reporting on the NSA documents.
Rogers is making stuff up to interfere with Greenwald is how I read it.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)gg is selling articles about the documents ... the allegations is gg is selling the, or access to the, documents.
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)He, of course, provides no proof. And really it makes no sense. Greenwald's byline has been on media reports around the world whenever the NSA docs that are in his posession are used in that report.
There has been no "wild card" reporting. That is, there has been no reports done by a journalist or news agency NOT confirmed to have access.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)Is it really that hard for you to believe that a journalist would sell access to documents that they have in their possession/control?
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)And it should be easy to get that evidence. One signed affidavit would do.
G_j
(40,367 posts)you know, saying that people who don't like Greenwald must love Mike Rogers?
Not going there, because that kind of argument is intellectually dishonest, and just plain idiotic.
Now if he said he liked Greenwald....
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)mother earth
(6,002 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I think it's an interesting but not necessarily valid argument.
whatchamacallit
(15,558 posts)When they agree with republicans it's a "mature bipartisan stance".
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)some liberal hero supposedly did something that they like.
There's a new thread out now praising Bernie Sanders for cutting food stamps.
1StrongBlackMan
(31,849 posts)on the rare occasion that I find myself agreeing with a republican ... on anything ... I just say to myself, "Wow ... I agree with that republican on that" and then continue my argument with my fellow Democrats. What I don't do is run to a Democratic message board trumpeting that I agree with a republican ... as if citing my agreement with a group that I find so wrong, so often, will increase my rightness on a particular issue.
But that is just me!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)from warrantless search and seizure.