General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOregon Dem DESTROYS TOP DRUG OFFICIAL Who CAN'T SAY If Weed’s Less Addictive Than Meth
SKATING,.......SKATING,......SKATING.......
In Oregon Democrat literally threw up his hands in frustration Tuesday after failing to get a direct answer to his question about marijuanas dangers from the deputy director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy. Rep. Earl Blumenauer (D-OR) asked Michael Botticelli, the drug czars chief deputy, to identify the number of marijuana overdoses reported in the previous five years.
To my knowledge, I dont know if there have been instances of specific overdose-related deaths, Botticelli said.
Blumenauer then asked the drug official in a House Oversight Committee hearing to identify whether marijuana was more dangerous and addictive than cocaine or methamphetamines. I dont think that anyone would dispute the fact that theres relative toxicity related to those drugs, said Botticelli, who reluctantly admitted during the same hearing that marijuana was less dangerous than alcohol. But the lawmaker wasnt satisfied, asking Botticelli again whether marijuana was more dangerous than the other two illegal drugs. I think the conversation minimizes the harm, Botticelli said.
Thats where the conversation turned testy. Im not trying to minimize the harm, Blumenauer said. I just want to know whats more dangerous and addictive. You dont know? As a public health person, one of the things that we look at is not the relative risk of one drug against another, Botticeli said as the lawmakers face clouded over. Let me just say that your equivocation right there, being unable to answer something clearly and definitively when there is unquestioned evidence to the contrary, is why young people dont believe the propaganda, why they think its benign, Blumenauer said.
He continued.
cont'
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2014/02/05/oregon-dem-destroys-top-drug-official-who-cant-say-if-weeds-less-addictive-than-meth/
liberal_at_heart
(12,081 posts)to admit it.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)do exactly that and put drugs into categories, was the big tell.......they have no rational argument, they hide in the existence of the unjust law. These are not unjust men, just unjust laws that they as law enforcers are beholden to uphold.
Timez Squarez
(262 posts)and find a pro-pot DEA administrator who's all for raiding meth houses....
Scuba
(53,475 posts)TexasTowelie
(125,263 posts)Thanks for joining DU.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)it MUST be dangerous!
truedelphi
(32,324 posts)We have to show for it is this ever expanding police state!
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)You think those shiny helicopters and armored vehicles pay for themselves, silly taxpayer?
Glassunion
(10,201 posts)See... Says so right there on the side of it.

This was in my town a couple of years ago. That thing opened a can of rescue, and brought down a world of rescue on the 1 person that needed to be rescued in a hail of police rescue.
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)Rescue you right off your couch, into the warm safety of a locked interrogation room, where we'll forget about you for 5 days until you drink your own urine to survive.

RainDog
(28,784 posts)"My grandparents went to Woodstock
And all I got was this police state."
Warren DeMontague
(80,708 posts)The combination of gravy + train can be extremely addictive.
Segami
(14,923 posts)You may be thinking, Well, Vanguard is only the third largest holder in those media conglomerates, which is no guarantee that theyre calling any shots. Well, the number-one holder of both Viacom and Time Warner is a company called Blackrock. Blackrock is the second largest holder in Corrections Corporation of America, second only to Vanguard, and the sixth largest holder in the GEO Group.
There are many other startling overlaps in private-prison/mass-media ownership, but two underlying facts become clear very quickly: The people who own the media are the same people who own private prisons, the EXACT same people, and using one to promote the other is (or would be, depending on your analysis) very lucrative...
http://darwinbondgraham.wordpress.com/2013/04/25/who-owns-the-private-prison-corporations/
blackspade
(10,056 posts)That's fucked up.
I really does boil down to "follow the money."
ellisonz
(27,776 posts)ohheckyeah
(9,314 posts)on prescription drugs have to do with marijuana? Legalizing marijuana isn't legalizing it for kids.
He made sure he got that in there - the scare tactics.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Throd
(7,208 posts)That was painful to watch.
rurallib
(64,531 posts)jesus fucking christ what an idiot.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)The message he sends is that the public can't handle the truth about marijuana being way less dangerous than meth and coke and cigarettes and alcohol. Us poor saps in the general public will infer that pot is entirely risk-free in any quantity at any age. These people are pathetic. It reminds me of the condescending way Obama has addressed the nation about the war in Afghanistan. God forbid that we should get an honest and serious argument from an elected official about an important issue.
MindMover
(5,016 posts)AAO
(3,300 posts)Stevepol
(4,234 posts)She's really getting a kick out it I think.
frylock
(34,825 posts)xfundy
(5,105 posts)Afraid of an indigenous plant that apparently contains healing properties for some conditions and is documented to make some other conditions easier to take, whether through relieving stress, inducing appetite, or both.
And as for the hypothetical above, "which tastes better, candy or shit..." the only answer he could give is "which pays more?"
Phlem
(6,323 posts)-p
BlueStreak
(8,377 posts)Personally I am not a supporter of marijuana, any more than one is a "supporter of abortion". I believe it is fundamentally wrong to do that to one's brain. Nonetheless, the Congressman makes a solid point that we have made a huge beneficial impact on the tobacco problem without locking anybody up.
When this bureaucrat says that parents can't understand why states are legalizing it, it isn't complicated. Marijuana is a bad habit. it is a poor lifestyle choice. It is an insult to the body. But it shouldn't be a crime any more than smoking a cigarette or having a glass of beer is a crime. And when we continue to imprison people by the millions for this, often with a heavy racial bias, you get a backlash. If this asshole can't understand that, he has no business getting a Federal paycheck.