Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

dsc

(52,160 posts)
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 09:39 PM Feb 2014

Would any liberal defend an Olympics in 1988 Pretoria or Johannesburg?

Somehow I doubt it. I think comparisons to 36 Berlin are premature and I hope they stay that way, but a comparison to 1988 Johannesburg seem pretty spot on.

20 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Would any liberal defend an Olympics in 1988 Pretoria or Johannesburg? (Original Post) dsc Feb 2014 OP
I'm glad to see someone note the ridiculousness of the hyperbole of comparing quinnox Feb 2014 #1
The fact is he is similar to what Hitler was in 36 in many important ways dsc Feb 2014 #2
Well, at least he isn't trying to conquer Europe, kill millions, and starting a World War quinnox Feb 2014 #3
that's a shitty ass standard to live by, the fact is that he couldn't do all of that now JI7 Feb 2014 #4
Sure he could quinnox Feb 2014 #5
he could start it but he wont win JI7 Feb 2014 #9
Well, let's hope we never have to find out. Russia is still ranked as #2 in the world for military quinnox Feb 2014 #11
Yep. TheMathieu Feb 2014 #10
And some pretty great gay bars. go west young man Feb 2014 #19
I am boycotting this one. Rex Feb 2014 #6
As a black person watching Carl Lewis and Ben Johnson kick ass in Johannesburg would have been sweet Exultant Democracy Feb 2014 #7
Someone who gets it. go west young man Feb 2014 #20
No one worthy of the label. nt TheMathieu Feb 2014 #8
They wouldn't have been planned there in the first place. Igel Feb 2014 #12
Of course they wouldn't dsc Feb 2014 #13
Not even remotely in the same category Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #14
really dsc Feb 2014 #15
What is the acceptable level of state sponsored persecution?/nt DemocratSinceBirth Feb 2014 #17
while i dont think apartheid and what is happening in Russia is exactly the same at all La Lioness Priyanka Feb 2014 #16
I don't think that the comparison is wholly apt, but I may yet be proved wrong. Donald Ian Rankin Feb 2014 #18
 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
1. I'm glad to see someone note the ridiculousness of the hyperbole of comparing
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 09:41 PM
Feb 2014

Putin to Hitler. It is getting pretty hysterical out there.

dsc

(52,160 posts)
2. The fact is he is similar to what Hitler was in 36 in many important ways
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 09:46 PM
Feb 2014

the question is will Putin or his successor in 2017 be similar to Hitler in 39? We don't know if he will. I suspect he won't have actual concentration camps but I do think he will have some pretty awful prisons and some pretty brutal takedowns of gays.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
3. Well, at least he isn't trying to conquer Europe, kill millions, and starting a World War
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 09:50 PM
Feb 2014

I hope that won't change either now or in the immediate future, I'm pretty sure it won't. But here's hoping!

JI7

(89,248 posts)
4. that's a shitty ass standard to live by, the fact is that he couldn't do all of that now
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 09:55 PM
Feb 2014

because the world has changed.

but his own people are ones who suffer and that's what the issue is.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
5. Sure he could
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 09:58 PM
Feb 2014

Russia has a gigantic military. Nukes, tanks, high tech fighter jets, advanced weaponry of all kinds, etc. If Putin was a mad man, he could easily start World War III.

 

quinnox

(20,600 posts)
11. Well, let's hope we never have to find out. Russia is still ranked as #2 in the world for military
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 10:04 PM
Feb 2014

strength. It still even tops China. Only the USA is higher ranked.

http://www.globalfirepower.com/

Exultant Democracy

(6,594 posts)
7. As a black person watching Carl Lewis and Ben Johnson kick ass in Johannesburg would have been sweet
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 09:59 PM
Feb 2014

Boycotts only hurt the athletes in the end.

Igel

(35,300 posts)
12. They wouldn't have been planned there in the first place.
Sat Feb 8, 2014, 10:18 PM
Feb 2014

Once planned, though, they'd have gone on. Provided that all member countries' athletes were permitted to play on an even footing.

The 1980 boycott was fairly controversial. The Olympics are a kind of peace movement, fraternal organizations competing in athletics instead of on the battlefield. So when the host country invaded another country, this was rather a direct challenge to the Olympics' core goals, not a late external addition to or repurposing of the Olympic goals.

Provided that gay athletes are permitted to participate in a safe environment and on an even keel, Russia's attitude may be contemptible but the charter's upheld. It's no worse than letting Qatar participate after discriminating against Jewish athletes. Both are discrimination, but if Russia doesn't actually do anything bad (or through intentional negligence allows something bad to happen) neither is "affecting the Olympics".

Worse was when the Lebanese judo team refused to practice in the same area as Israeli athletes at the last Olympics. That was overt discrimination that affected the Olympics, albeit in a minor way. It was countenanced and enabled by many, even though the majority, IIRC, condemned it.

dsc

(52,160 posts)
13. Of course they wouldn't
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 07:27 PM
Feb 2014

heck African nations boycotted in 76 over New Zealand, whose rugby team had played in South Africa, not being kicked out of the Olympics.

dsc

(52,160 posts)
15. really
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 07:54 PM
Feb 2014

I think the comparison is quite fair. The government in Russia is literally about to take the children of gays away.

 

La Lioness Priyanka

(53,866 posts)
16. while i dont think apartheid and what is happening in Russia is exactly the same at all
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 07:56 PM
Feb 2014

i think the sentiments behind oppression are similar. Should we tolerate laws that openly oppress a stigmatized group? Probably not.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
18. I don't think that the comparison is wholly apt, but I may yet be proved wrong.
Sun Feb 9, 2014, 09:07 PM
Feb 2014

I suspect that South Africa in 1988 would have, if not barred black athletes and black spectators, made life so difficult for them as to be tantamount to it.

It has been claimed in advance that, while Russia may persecute its own gay citizens, in will not interfere with gay people attending the games. If that turns out to be true, I don't think a comparison to apartheid is wholly fair.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Would any liberal defend ...