General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWould any liberal defend an Olympics in 1988 Pretoria or Johannesburg?
Somehow I doubt it. I think comparisons to 36 Berlin are premature and I hope they stay that way, but a comparison to 1988 Johannesburg seem pretty spot on.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)Putin to Hitler. It is getting pretty hysterical out there.
dsc
(52,160 posts)the question is will Putin or his successor in 2017 be similar to Hitler in 39? We don't know if he will. I suspect he won't have actual concentration camps but I do think he will have some pretty awful prisons and some pretty brutal takedowns of gays.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)I hope that won't change either now or in the immediate future, I'm pretty sure it won't. But here's hoping!
JI7
(89,248 posts)because the world has changed.
but his own people are ones who suffer and that's what the issue is.
Russia has a gigantic military. Nukes, tanks, high tech fighter jets, advanced weaponry of all kinds, etc. If Putin was a mad man, he could easily start World War III.
JI7
(89,248 posts)but regardless of that his own people are still suffering.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)strength. It still even tops China. Only the USA is higher ranked.
http://www.globalfirepower.com/
I fear for what will happen to LGBTs once Sochi is in the rear view mirror.
We all should.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)No thanks, Putin can go fuck himself.
Exultant Democracy
(6,594 posts)Boycotts only hurt the athletes in the end.
go west young man
(4,856 posts)It's about standing up not rolling over and crying foul.
TheMathieu
(456 posts)Igel
(35,300 posts)Once planned, though, they'd have gone on. Provided that all member countries' athletes were permitted to play on an even footing.
The 1980 boycott was fairly controversial. The Olympics are a kind of peace movement, fraternal organizations competing in athletics instead of on the battlefield. So when the host country invaded another country, this was rather a direct challenge to the Olympics' core goals, not a late external addition to or repurposing of the Olympic goals.
Provided that gay athletes are permitted to participate in a safe environment and on an even keel, Russia's attitude may be contemptible but the charter's upheld. It's no worse than letting Qatar participate after discriminating against Jewish athletes. Both are discrimination, but if Russia doesn't actually do anything bad (or through intentional negligence allows something bad to happen) neither is "affecting the Olympics".
Worse was when the Lebanese judo team refused to practice in the same area as Israeli athletes at the last Olympics. That was overt discrimination that affected the Olympics, albeit in a minor way. It was countenanced and enabled by many, even though the majority, IIRC, condemned it.
dsc
(52,160 posts)heck African nations boycotted in 76 over New Zealand, whose rugby team had played in South Africa, not being kicked out of the Olympics.
Pretzel_Warrior
(8,361 posts)dsc
(52,160 posts)I think the comparison is quite fair. The government in Russia is literally about to take the children of gays away.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)La Lioness Priyanka
(53,866 posts)i think the sentiments behind oppression are similar. Should we tolerate laws that openly oppress a stigmatized group? Probably not.
Donald Ian Rankin
(13,598 posts)I suspect that South Africa in 1988 would have, if not barred black athletes and black spectators, made life so difficult for them as to be tantamount to it.
It has been claimed in advance that, while Russia may persecute its own gay citizens, in will not interfere with gay people attending the games. If that turns out to be true, I don't think a comparison to apartheid is wholly fair.