Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,654 posts)
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 11:10 PM Feb 2014

"An economic school has led to gridlock in Washington"

An economic school has led to gridlock in Washington

By E.J. Dionne Jr at the Washington Post

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/ej-dionne-jr-an-economic-school-has-led-to-gridlock-in-washington/2014/02/09/12de8df0-9020-11e3-b46a-5a3d0d2130da_story.html?tid=pm_pop

"SNIP....................................



Hayek believed, Judt said, that “if you begin with welfare policies of any sort — directing individuals, taxing for social ends, engineering the outcomes of market relationships — you will end up with Hitler.”

But to the contrary, postwar initiatives along Keynesian lines are precisely what prevented both the resurgence of fascism and the collapse of Western Europe into communist hands. For that matter, Keynesian steps also kept the whole world from going into a much deeper and more disastrous slide after the financial crisis of 2008.

Yet today’s conservatives are in thrall to Austrian thinking, and this explains a lot of what is going on in Washington. Broadly popular measures such as raising the minimum wage and extending unemployment insurance — normal, bipartisan legislation during the Keynesian heyday — are blocked on the assumption that people are better off if the government simply keeps its mitts off the market.

It is now difficult for Congress to pass even the kind of spending that all sides once saw as necessary public investment in transportation, research and education. It’s that “road to serfdom” again: Anything government does beyond enforcing contracts and stopping violence is denounced as the first step of a fox trot toward dictatorship.





....................................SNIP"
7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"An economic school has led to gridlock in Washington" (Original Post) applegrove Feb 2014 OP
Wow! I'd point that the U of Chicago "free market" economists riderinthestorm Feb 2014 #1
HUGE K&R laundry_queen Feb 2014 #2
Trickle down might be taught in economics--but not business schools. Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #5
Hm. Not at my school. laundry_queen Feb 2014 #6
Washington the DC. There is more than one Washington. nm rhett o rick Feb 2014 #3
It's their academic cover for greed and selfishness Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #4
They have no problem handing out welfare checks to Corporations FreakinDJ Feb 2014 #7
 

riderinthestorm

(23,272 posts)
1. Wow! I'd point that the U of Chicago "free market" economists
Mon Feb 10, 2014, 11:17 PM
Feb 2014

are our own "home grown" economic terrorists - led by Milton Friedman and friends.

We don't need to point overseas for our own set of disastrous economic policies.




laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
2. HUGE K&R
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 12:22 AM
Feb 2014

I say this as a business student (in Canada) - today's business schools are failing the American people. 'Trickle down' has been roundly disproven and is not even taught anymore in my school. Why is it still taught in the US? Better yet, why are the people in charge of the economy still using 30 year old discarded theories to make economic decisions. Government always has a role to play in the economy. This idiots are making everyone poorer - including the deluded 1%.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
5. Trickle down might be taught in economics--but not business schools.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 01:21 AM
Feb 2014

As someone who went through undergrad business and MBA, I can say that's not their focus. It is, however, focused on maximizing profits with triple bottom line and corporate social responsibility given only cursory attention.

laundry_queen

(8,646 posts)
6. Hm. Not at my school.
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 02:06 AM
Feb 2014

Mind you, my major is accounting (4th year, only electives left) and ethics and corporate responsibility are HUGE for accountants so we have spent a ton of time on those things in courses. They are a bit sensitive after Arthur Anderson, you see. But yeah, maybe my school is different. Learning about maximizing profits is always - ALWAYS - tempered with corporate responsibility. Again, I'm in Canada so, yeah, it's probably different.

Oh, and when I say it's 'not taught' I mean that it's taught as a failure. I learned all about it in every econ, international business and accounting theory class. It's not taught as a viable option for the economy here, is what I mean.

 

Pretzel_Warrior

(8,361 posts)
4. It's their academic cover for greed and selfishness
Tue Feb 11, 2014, 01:18 AM
Feb 2014

Raise corporate income tax to 39% and get rid of corporate welfare. Fucking hypocrites. End corporate welfare and Cayman Island tax dodges.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»"An economic school ...