Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Triana

(22,666 posts)
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 04:01 PM Feb 2014

The Food Stamp Capital of the U.S. is WHITE and REPUBLICAN



In spite of the prevailing stereotypes and assumptions about who uses SNAP Food Stamp benefits the most in the United States, the highest usage is not in Compton, Queens, nor the South Side of Chicago. Instead, a city that is 99.22% white and 95% Republican comes in the lead. Owsley County, Kentucky is a community of about 5,000, residents earning the lowest median household income in the country outside of Puerto Rico, according to the U.S. Census.

The decline in the profits from coal, tobacco and lumber industries led to a harsh toll being taken on the community.

Cale Turner, county executive of Owsley County told ABC back in 2010 that economic hardships have led to a high incidence of drug addiction.

“Those with drug addictions end up in prison without effective treatment. And it happens over and over in this community. The drug problem continues to get worse every year.”



THE REST:

http://politicalblindspot.com/the-food-stamp-capital-of-the-u-s-is-white-and-republican/
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Food Stamp Capital of the U.S. is WHITE and REPUBLICAN (Original Post) Triana Feb 2014 OP
Some of the worse abusers of food stamps indirectly is the Walton family. Thinkingabout Feb 2014 #1
this is using people in an ugly way. cali Feb 2014 #2
+1 MMcGuire Feb 2014 #5
Isn't it ironic? Beacool Feb 2014 #3
It isn't exactly bluer than blue here rbrnmw Feb 2014 #4
Because they blame those "other" people for causing the problems that put the white man in the okaawhatever Feb 2014 #12
it's religion here and some of them just hate everybody rbrnmw Feb 2014 #13
or "look like them" for that matter... VanillaRhapsody Feb 2014 #27
And they will continue to vote against ... butterfly77 Feb 2014 #14
Those photos reek of poverty tourism. LeftyMom Feb 2014 #6
Message auto-removed Name removed Feb 2014 #7
I think the lead photo is a stock photo. I don't know about the one with the girl in the dress. nt okaawhatever Feb 2014 #18
And Sen. Rand Paul recently asked "anyone ever get a job from a poor person?" JaneyVee Feb 2014 #8
Perfect response. Jamaal510 Feb 2014 #20
Given the headline it is odd there is nothing in the article about food stamp usage. former9thward Feb 2014 #9
From skeptic.com: okaawhatever Feb 2014 #15
Actually no. former9thward Feb 2014 #17
Your correct, I should have said very Republican states. Because the post mentioned that okaawhatever Feb 2014 #19
Well there is no "south side of Chicago." former9thward Feb 2014 #22
I don't understand what you're saying. You'd like to see the percents of the various cities. okaawhatever Feb 2014 #25
Having lived in the city of Chicago I know that vast areas of the south side are poor. former9thward Feb 2014 #26
I think the post was more about rebutting a common claim from the Republicans. When you have a okaawhatever Feb 2014 #30
The issue is they are using poor people and twisting, at best, facts joeglow3 Feb 2014 #28
This just shows it's more about economic class than race. brush Feb 2014 #10
The party of shame. n/t Orsino Feb 2014 #11
To be fair rbrnmw Feb 2014 #16
In a republicon area where their reps vote against Cha Feb 2014 #21
They are told it's all President Obama's fault rbrnmw Feb 2014 #23
that's true.. brainwashed suckers Cha Feb 2014 #29
Maybe if they just decriminalized drugs Nevernose Feb 2014 #24

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
1. Some of the worse abusers of food stamps indirectly is the Walton family.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 04:08 PM
Feb 2014

Because of the low wages to their employees, they qualify for food stamps a d other safety net programs. Makes more profits for the owners.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
2. this is using people in an ugly way.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 04:19 PM
Feb 2014

I understand it's in response to racism, but all it does is pit desperately poor people against each other and stereotype.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
4. It isn't exactly bluer than blue here
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 04:29 PM
Feb 2014

When you go to the Job and Family Service Office here there are always more than 2 vehicles with some kind of right-wing type bumper stickers on them on any given day. You always tell who they are because they won't speak to other applicants and they are looking at others with smirks or outright contempt on their faces. I may get brave one day and ask them why they look at the rest us like that when they are there for the same damn thing we are. These applicants 9 times out of 10 are white MEN.

okaawhatever

(9,469 posts)
12. Because they blame those "other" people for causing the problems that put the white man in the
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 07:00 PM
Feb 2014

food stamp office. The difference between you and him is that you realize that Republican "supply side" economics, two ward, and massive bank fraud have caused the problems in this country. The white man thinks he's a victim of Obama, immigrants, liberals, and whoever else he dislikes. That is exactly why poor whites vote Republican. It gives them someone to blame.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
13. it's religion here and some of them just hate everybody
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 07:05 PM
Feb 2014

who doesn't think like them we should all love their perception of God and guns or leave "their" Country.

 

butterfly77

(17,609 posts)
14. And they will continue to vote against ...
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 07:06 PM
Feb 2014

their own interests because they think somehow they are better than others.

LeftyMom

(49,212 posts)
6. Those photos reek of poverty tourism.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 04:38 PM
Feb 2014

I've spent a lot of time in rural KY.

The homes are scrupulously clean. They certainly don't have 200 rusty pots piled up in the kitchen for some crazy reason.

People who barely seem like they could walk put in huge, orderly gardens, and can their harvest. People who know they'll need to live off of their home canning keep kitchens clean enough for brain surgery.

People are ridiculously generous even when they have nothing. I've visited distant relatives who literally raided their pantry and sent me away with a bag of commodity food because they had nothing else to give. Saying no is not an option.

Response to LeftyMom (Reply #6)

 

JaneyVee

(19,877 posts)
8. And Sen. Rand Paul recently asked "anyone ever get a job from a poor person?"
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 04:52 PM
Feb 2014

UH, APPARENTLY YOU DID!

former9thward

(32,106 posts)
9. Given the headline it is odd there is nothing in the article about food stamp usage.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 05:02 PM
Feb 2014

No numbers whatsoever.

okaawhatever

(9,469 posts)
15. From skeptic.com:
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 07:13 PM
Feb 2014

If we take a look at the latest statistics from 2010, 52.08% of the population in Owsley County received SNAP benefits, ranking Owsley behind Shannon County, SD (59.33%), Todd County, SD (55.08%) and Wade Hampton, AK (54.13%). If we go back to 2008 and earlier, Owsley County was indeed in the "lead", but the three other counties passed Owsley in 2009 when it comes to number of recipients per population count.


It appears this article originated sometime before the results of the 2010 census came out. Owsley is also only about 96% white now. Some are trying to make a claim about the dollar value of each recipient, but I didn't take the article to mean anything about amount per recipient, only number of recipients according to population.

Another interesting thing is that although the numbers no longer have Owsley in the lead, they have fallen as their non-white population has increased. Another oops there it is for the Republican party.

The argument probably holds though, because the counties that are now ahead of Owsley are also in very white, very Republican areas.

former9thward

(32,106 posts)
17. Actually no.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 08:29 PM
Feb 2014

I am always suspicious of broad based allegations. Shannon County is entirely within the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. Todd County is entirely within the Rosebud Indian Reservation. Wade Hampton, AK is 93% Native American and 5% white.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wade_Hampton_Census_Area,_Alaska

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shannon_County,_South_Dakota

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todd_County,_South_Dakota

okaawhatever

(9,469 posts)
19. Your correct, I should have said very Republican states. Because the post mentioned that
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 08:40 PM
Feb 2014

the high percentage of food stamps didn't occur in Compton or South Side Chicago I was referring to the fact that the states where this occurred don't have a large population of African-Americans, once again proving the Republican talking points are wrong.

former9thward

(32,106 posts)
22. Well there is no "south side of Chicago."
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 08:46 PM
Feb 2014

It is part of the city of Chicago. We don't know what the percent is on the south side or any other area of large cities. I would like to see a link to the percents of the various cities and counties. So far I have not seen or found one.

okaawhatever

(9,469 posts)
25. I don't understand what you're saying. You'd like to see the percents of the various cities.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 09:09 PM
Feb 2014

Are you talking about the ethnic make up of those cities? Are you trying to claim that they may have higher snap recipients than the others listed? There is a south side of Chicago. There's a south side of anything three dimensional. It may not be an official city, county or statistical area but it doesn't mean the term isn't used. Besides, I heard it in a song.....

former9thward

(32,106 posts)
26. Having lived in the city of Chicago I know that vast areas of the south side are poor.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 09:13 PM
Feb 2014

SNAP usage would be very high and covering hundreds of thousands of people who vote straight Democratic. The idea of tying SNAP usage with Republicans or Democrats is a non-starter.

okaawhatever

(9,469 posts)
30. I think the post was more about rebutting a common claim from the Republicans. When you have a
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 09:19 PM
Feb 2014

Presidential candidate for your party who publicly states that Obama's voters only want "free stuff" and are "takers" you open the door to this kind of backlash.

 

joeglow3

(6,228 posts)
28. The issue is they are using poor people and twisting, at best, facts
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 09:15 PM
Feb 2014

To try and score a political point. Leave it to the right to use the poor to walk on. It is unbecoming of us.

brush

(53,925 posts)
10. This just shows it's more about economic class than race.
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 06:41 PM
Feb 2014

People (white, black, brown, whatever) without opportunity turn to whatever outlets are available, and quite often it's crime and/or drugs.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
16. To be fair
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 07:16 PM
Feb 2014

Their kids deserve to eat as much as mine I just wish they were not so easily led by republican tea party rhetoric It is heartbreaking because they are low information voters some don't have cable tv but have talk radio which in some ways is more toxic than faux news Many have never owned a computer. I have been to this part of the Country many times my first love lived in an area like this. It was mostly Democratic back then. So sad to see their minds so twisted by hate speak spewed by rightwing radio.

Cha

(297,877 posts)
21. In a republicon area where their reps vote against
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 08:43 PM
Feb 2014

SNAP benefits.

And, they vote for them.. they must not really like their food assistance from the US Government.

rbrnmw

(7,160 posts)
23. They are told it's all President Obama's fault
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 08:50 PM
Feb 2014

They probably don't know that their Rethuglican Reps voted against their SNAP benefits.

Nevernose

(13,081 posts)
24. Maybe if they just decriminalized drugs
Sun Feb 16, 2014, 08:54 PM
Feb 2014

It would go a big step in the right direction. We could refocus the resources spent on undercover cops, informants, incarceration, helicopters, drug dogs, high seas interdictments, cash payments to every country in a South America, lawyers, courts, parole and probation, and god knows what else to treatment and education.

If someone wants to use drugs, they're going to use drugs. With all that shit I just listed, drugs are cheaper and more plentiful than at any time in almost a hundred years.

Incarceration -- the drug war itself -- has ruined far more lives and ruined far more communities than the actual drugs have, and this article is a case in point.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Food Stamp Capital of...