General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThought experiment: what if Congress teleworked
I was just doing two things simultaneously: turning on my Outlook out-of-office message because I'm teleworking tomorrow, and reading about how Sen. Roberts (R-Kansas) is facing a serious primary challenge because voters think he's not spending enough time in the state. You can see where this is going...
What if Congress teleworked? What if instead of all coming to DC and living in isolation from reality, they literally just phoned it in? Certainly current technology makes it possible, and given how poisonous current Congressional politics are its hard to get sentimental over any loss of congressional "fellowship." What would the downside be?
cali
(114,904 posts)I don't know that Roberts is a good example. All 3 members of my CD are frequently in state.
think
(11,641 posts)winter is coming
(11,785 posts)They're isolated from reality by money, not geography.
hughee99
(16,113 posts)Do you know how long it's going to take them to fly all over the country trying to cut backroom deals 1 or 2 elected officials at a time, and having the kind of discussions you don't want traveling over public communications?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)There are a couple situations they would have to be in DC.
State of the Union, and swearing ins.
After that it would also make the work of K street that much harder, and I would add, large states, such as mine, should also telecomute, except for state of the state and swearing ins.
RC
(25,592 posts)The lobbyist like to have them all in one place when they offer the bribes. It save them money.
Proud Public Servant
(2,097 posts)or more expensive, anyway, was teh first thing I thought of. Nice to see lots of other people went there, too.