Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

treestar

(82,383 posts)
1. That is the subject of much thought
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 12:06 AM
Feb 2014

Did the voters elect someone for him/her to use their judgment, or just to vote for what they'd want? In New England they had the town halls and expected the representative to vote as a majority did there, regardless of what the representative thought.

But of course any district has many voters, so "what they want" is all over the place. Should the representative vote by poll, real, Gallup or just use their best judgment as they had been chosen by the voters to do so?

Not as easy as I bet you thought.

kentuck

(111,089 posts)
2. Are there some Party "principles" that voters can depend on their leaders to support?
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 12:10 AM
Feb 2014

Without taking a poll or asking for a judgement call?

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
3. Should one's philosophy follow from one's politics,
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 12:15 AM
Feb 2014

or should one's politics follow from one's philosophy?

Isoldeblue

(1,135 posts)
4. But there is no simple answer :)
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 12:22 AM
Feb 2014

It depends on the issue involved. There are some things that I don't know enough about, so hopefully the leader I voted for does.

Such as the way Obama handled the Syria crisis. I certainly don't know all the factors involved in foreign diplomacy and relations. And he came through in an admirable way.

But if I do know about an issue,like say mental health, having worked in the field for years, I will voice my opinion and hope he/she listens. Here the people's wishes should be followed, because it is one that is up close and personal to many in the population.

The ideal would be a give and take, respecting each other. But we don't live in an ideal world, either. So what "should" be, rarely matters.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
6. Not simple at all, really...
Fri Feb 21, 2014, 12:51 AM
Feb 2014

Both models have arguments for them and against them.

On the one had, obviously the "demo-" part of "democracy" suggests leaders should give a lot of deference to the will of the people. On the other hand, the "-cracy" part of "democracy" reminds us we have elected leaders and agents, not simply a national poll proxy. There are times leaders should do what they see as right regardless of a popular opinion they think is wrong (FDR preparing for WWII in the face of national unwillingness, LBJ pushing the civil rights act, etc.), and there are times when leaders should follow the will of the people against their own preferences. The trick is knowing which is which, and, unfortunately, these only tend to be judged later by whether they worked or not.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A simple question?