Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

applegrove

(118,642 posts)
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 01:25 AM Feb 2014

Railroads Agree To Wide-Ranging Safety Measures For Crude Oil Shipments After Derailments

Railroads Agree To Wide-Ranging Safety Measures For Crude Oil Shipments After Derailments

by MATTHEW BROWN and JOAN LOWY at AP, Huffington Post

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/02/21/railroad-crude-oil-safety-measures_n_4831766.html?&ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000067

"SNIP.......................................



Since 2008, the number of tanker cars hauling oil has increased 40-fold. Federal records show that's been accompanied by a dramatic spike in accidental crude releases from tank cars.

While the severity of recent accidents has raised safety concerns, transportation officials point out that over the past decade, derailments have decreased by 47 percent.

Hamberger of the railroad association said the industry has put a priority on safely transporting crude, and will live up to the agreement with the government.

"Number one it's better for safety, and number two their reputation is on the line," he said.



.......................................SNIP"
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Railroads Agree To Wide-Ranging Safety Measures For Crude Oil Shipments After Derailments (Original Post) applegrove Feb 2014 OP
But, but, but I thought the market will properly regulate business!!! (sarcasm) applegrove Feb 2014 #1
They worked with the government, elleng Feb 2014 #4
And make it look like government didn't make them do it. That it doesn't qualify applegrove Feb 2014 #5
Right, and elleng Feb 2014 #6
Posted here, with some detail: elleng Feb 2014 #2
Thanks Elleng applegrove Feb 2014 #3

applegrove

(118,642 posts)
1. But, but, but I thought the market will properly regulate business!!! (sarcasm)
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 01:27 AM
Feb 2014

Seriously...it seems like the industry is trying to get out ahead of government regulation...so nobody can use it as a good example of government regulation working or what?

elleng

(130,895 posts)
4. They worked with the government,
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 01:45 AM
Feb 2014

with which they deal every day on safety etc. issues, DOT/FRA, and here, rrs recognized problems likely if they fail to take public action.

They probably discussed what they can do quickly, and may have come to agreements on long-term 'fixes' so, as you suggest, it will be less likely they will be required to do things they don't want to do.

applegrove

(118,642 posts)
5. And make it look like government didn't make them do it. That it doesn't qualify
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 01:49 AM
Feb 2014

as government regulation the vast, vast majority of people can agree on and would like.

elleng

(130,895 posts)
6. Right, and
Sat Feb 22, 2014, 01:52 AM
Feb 2014

there are a few geographical problem areas cooking now, that is, people in some localities, west coast I think, are complaining about upcoming anticipated increased oil shipments, so this will likely be used to try to defuse such complaints.

edit: One example: http://www.lakependoreillewaterkeeper.org/oil-by-rail.html

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Railroads Agree To Wide-R...