General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThere's a Broad Consensus Among Activists Across the Country — Is Social Change Around the Corner?
http://www.alternet.org/activism/theres-amazing-level-consensus-activists-have-across-us-big-issuesFebruary marks the third anniversary of the 2011 revolt in Wisconsin, the occupation of the state capital and mass protests against the attack on workers. Wisconsin was the largest of the protests at that time, but across the United States there were a series of protests against foreclosures, austerity and the unjust economy.
The Wisconsin uprising, along with the Arab Spring and Indignado movement in Europe, inspired Occupy, a revolt that began on Wall Street and spread across the nation. It was a revolt against an economic system big finance capitalism that is causing a corrupt and unfair economy; as well as against a government that serves the interests of the wealthiest before meeting the necessities of the people.
People often want to know what the movement for social and economic justice wants. Occupy Wall Street issued its Declaration of the Occupation of New York City which laid out a series of grievances. But, in addition to knowing what we oppose, we need to define what we stand for. If we do not like big finance capitalism, what will take the place of the current economy?
During the organizing of the occupation in Washington, DC on Freedom Plaza we developed a list of 15 core crisis issues that the country is facing and we outlined solutions to them. These solutions are supported by super-majorities of Americans who, polls show, could rule better than the elites.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)I would make a bet that if any honest polls were taken, 70% of the population would want to move in the direction of social democracy, yet we we have DINOS in office who tell us want we want to hear to get elected and then act in the opposite way once they achieve the power of office. If you want to disagree with me, go look at their records first, starting with the President on down and then argue with me.
newfie11
(8,159 posts)It's a crap shoot on who to vote for.
You listen to their promises but as soon as their safely elected those promises go out the window.
jsr
(7,712 posts)roguevalley
(40,656 posts)I feel it coming, Cleita. The big shots run their mouths, the newspapers are reporting food prices are going up and the pugs are showing themselves to be out criminals. I have hope. Call me irresponsible ... la la la. I can't remember the rest of the words to that song but I am an eternal optimist.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)scenario. I hope my library gets it soon so I can read it, but he has said on his radio show that we are going to have to go through a big economic crash when everything gets turned upside down, then something will be done about it and we will then emerge better. It's just that between those two scenarios there's going to be a lot of suffering especially among the poor as usual.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)pitchforks and torches. I think I would like that to be the symbol of it. Revolution in the most basic level. I will walk all the way from Alaska to help. I am old. I don't care. It is all for the future and young things like all of you.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)74th b'day yesterday, but I certainly had hoped to leave a better world before I died and I think I tried.
roguevalley
(40,656 posts)know that things need fixing, you can't help. HAPPY BIRTHDAY! Every day alive is another chance. Its good not to winter kill as my uncle used to say.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Cleita
(75,480 posts)bkanderson76
(266 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Apparently the die-hard Occupiers at DU don't know about this list of grievances. It's not like we didn't ask often enough about goals and solutions.
And yes, social change is just around the corner.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]Stop looking for heroes. BE one.[/center][/font][hr]
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)And for the same reason the elites also have great incentive to stifle any social change.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)There is research on social media and the press that, for example, before major financial crashes often there is an odd optimism spike...
dotymed
(5,610 posts)We need to implement the same kinds of laws that FDR did, at least. Americans are suffering like never before.
Moostache
(9,895 posts)The rich and powerful NEVER relinquish power or share wealth equitably throughout human history.
From the Pharohs of Egypt to the Khans of the Chinese steppes to the Kings and Queens of Europe to the Emperors of Rome and then China and Russia and other places to the Carpet Baggers of Reconstruction to the Trusts of the 19th century to the Mafia to the Military Industrial Complex to the Communist Party to the modern Wall Street Corporatist state......all of these concentrations of wealth and power share one common denominator - the exploitation of our fellow man's humanity is part of our genetic code...
The sad fact is that humanity is easily fooled and led by fantasy. Too many people are awed by wealth and ostentatious displays of consumerism and the fleeting promise that one day they too will be rich. They wouldn't want anyone coming to take THEIR money and give to the poor THEN, so you better protect the "rights" of the current rich or that fable of future wealth for you will be imperiled don't cha know?!?!?!?!
When the internet is forced to use coded messages to communicate the to avoid the oppression of the state, then we will know the change is really imminent...until then though, critical mass is not reached and the change many seek will not come.
fasttense
(17,301 posts)"premised on the idea that people should not cede power to mega-corporations, big finance, or a professional political class. The people have the shared knowledge to help build an economy that works to strengthen communities and build wealth for all, not just a few. We recognize the internal contradictions of big finance capitalism and we have seen the failures of state-based socialism and are seeking to create a new type of economy that is democratized, empowers people to gain control over their economic lives and encourages cooperative solutions that create wealth for ourselves and our communities
.
Economic democracy also emphasizes the commonwealth. The commons includes not only roads, land, water and resources but also the knowledge and technology developed, often with public dollars, which has been built up over generations
.
Economic democracy stands in contrast with neoliberal economics. Neoliberalism privatizes public goods and seeks to commodify everything possible to create profit-centers while cutting public services in the name of austerity."
Now how do we go about implementing it?
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)won't be easy. If you think that entrenched, multi-generational wealth and power will give up that entrenched wealth and power without a fight, I would think you naïve.
As to implementing it, it starts with organization of the working class since they're the ones that actually hold the purse strings of the capitalist system by their labor power. If workers stop working in an organized way (strikes) then that takes the money away from the capitalists. Take away the dollars and you take away the power.
Sienna86
(2,149 posts)What candidate will fit with this social change?
randome
(34,845 posts)2014 is much more important.
[hr][font color="blue"][center]You should never stop having childhood dreams.[/center][/font][hr]
DinahMoeHum
(21,784 posts)Sam1
(498 posts)after we have a Haymarket Massacre.
heaven05
(18,124 posts)the real conscience of the uberwealthy will be revealed and then, MAYBE, people will turn off FAUX news, limpig and beck and do some changes.
Romulox
(25,960 posts)The population is more pacified than ever. Occupy was a diversion from any meaningful action.
marble falls
(57,080 posts)Dustlawyer
(10,495 posts)OWS did help some things, but it was too fractured and distracted by too many issues that are merely symptoms of the root problem, our politicians, Republican and Democrats are bought off! We need to DEMAND Complete Campaign Finance Reform and Publicly Funded Elections! This should be our only focus until it is achieved. Make no mistake, it will be strongly opposed and they are ready this time. OWS caught them off guard. They will not make that mistake again.
If we can solve the root problem of campaign corruption and lobbyists, we will have Representative Democracy back. Then we can accomplish the real reforms needed to make this a more egalitarian society. We can break up the big banks and media conglomerates that have been controlling our society and defeating Democracy. None of this will happen without unity, organization and commitment. It remains to be seen if we can muster what we need to get this done. My guess is that it will take things getting a lot worse before this could happen.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)deposits and floats between Chase depositors and return transactions unless they approve of the transactions first. Chase must gives its permission to its depositors and investors. These changes are to take place at the end of March 2014 (with another update by letter then). Banks have been acquiring large sums of cash at each bank. Sounds like a Stock Market Crash is coming. Capitalism of Stockholder and Board Members of Corporations are readying themselves for something!
This is in reply to your last sentence above. Watch for the adjustments to quantitative easing to break the union/balance between capitalism and socialism.
http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052748704312104575298652567988246
Quantitative Easing vs. Confiscation/Control of Deposits
OWS vs. Stockholders and Corporate Board Members (who are not investing in the economy)
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)I wish I'd bookmarked them as I saw them posted here....would be interesting to get them all into one thread.
seveneyes
(4,631 posts)If a majority of people are to clearly understand the problem and solution, it needs to be clearly defined. It must be short and simple, without complicated and trendy buzzwords, and focused on the major crisis needing attention. Most people don't even know or understand what is being sought.
socialist_n_TN
(11,481 posts)In most cases they refused to even NAME the real enemy. Here in Nashville when I lobbied for naming capitalism as the problem, I was told it was a "strategic" move to NOT actually use the name.
Leaving aside the fact that not naming an enemy is a TACTIC and not strategy, it made it difficult to actually craft realistic and actual tactics for fighting FOR the various reforms. Add to that the obsessive need for consensus, as opposed to majority, rule and you have a recipe for a flashy, but ultimately ineffective, movement.