Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

cali

(114,904 posts)
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 12:06 PM Feb 2014

I don't think for a minute that Brewer will sign the bigot bill

she's vetoed similar legislation. the business community is begging her to veto it and even repuke pigs who voted for it are now asking her to veto it.

stupid pieces of pig shit legislators did nothing but get a lot of bad press and look like the moron haters that they are.

congrats, assholes.

27 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I don't think for a minute that Brewer will sign the bigot bill (Original Post) cali Feb 2014 OP
The moneyed class has spoken, and she will obey jsr Feb 2014 #1
Yep. Earth_First Feb 2014 #5
Well, they did get Tea Party cred to put in their campaign literature for all-important primaries... Richardo Feb 2014 #2
I agree. She's a horrible person, but I don't think she's as ... 11 Bravo Feb 2014 #3
lol. good comparisons. and talk about damning with faint praise! cali Feb 2014 #4
Yep. She won't do it for any moral reasons... NYC Liberal Feb 2014 #9
CONFIRMED - they just mentioned on the Stephanie Miller show that bullwinkle428 Feb 2014 #6
4:20; there's a kind of poetic irony to that. n/t cherokeeprogressive Feb 2014 #10
I don't think she will either. sufrommich Feb 2014 #7
She probably won't. HappyMe Feb 2014 #8
She also could let it go into law without her signature. longship Feb 2014 #11
she's just said she'll veto it. Both Flake and McCain very publically cali Feb 2014 #13
If Brewer vetoes it, then can the AZ legislature over-ride her veto? Lex Feb 2014 #12
they won't and I don't think they have the votes even if they wanted to. cali Feb 2014 #14
thanks . . . Lex Feb 2014 #15
can you express yourself with out cursing every other word? Pretzel_Warrior Feb 2014 #16
sure. obviously. but I like to fucking curse. a fucking whole fucking fuckiity fuck shit cali Feb 2014 #21
The bill is pointless. dilby Feb 2014 #17
I'm sure she'll veto it. Those who introduced it and voted for it MineralMan Feb 2014 #18
I wouldn't be shocked if it were planned. ugh. ugh. ugh. cali Feb 2014 #22
It's a mid-term election year. MineralMan Feb 2014 #23
I can't believe that I actually agree with you on something!!! Sheepshank Feb 2014 #19
As I've said before Bombero1956 Feb 2014 #20
Its about the money for Gov. Baconface. There are no laws in AZ preventing LGBT discrimination as is Erose999 Feb 2014 #24
I hope you are right. Jamastiene Feb 2014 #25
They got exactly what they wanted. vi5 Feb 2014 #26
She would sign it if Politicalboi Feb 2014 #27

Richardo

(38,391 posts)
2. Well, they did get Tea Party cred to put in their campaign literature for all-important primaries...
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 12:08 PM
Feb 2014

Instead of governing, they're smearing on their kabuki makeup in every race in the country.

11 Bravo

(23,926 posts)
3. I agree. She's a horrible person, but I don't think she's as ...
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 12:09 PM
Feb 2014

flat-out, brain-dead stupid as say a Michele Bachmann, Marsha Blackburn, or Louie Gohmert.

bullwinkle428

(20,629 posts)
6. CONFIRMED - they just mentioned on the Stephanie Miller show that
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 12:17 PM
Feb 2014

she plans to veto the bill today at 4:20 P.M. MST.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
7. I don't think she will either.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 12:17 PM
Feb 2014

All the vote did was give the morons who woo the Tea Partiers their street cred. Lovely base you got there,GOP.

longship

(40,416 posts)
11. She also could let it go into law without her signature.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 12:50 PM
Feb 2014

By simply doing nothing. That, IMHO, would be a worst case scenerio. Not likely, but that governor is a bit of a wild card.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
13. she's just said she'll veto it. Both Flake and McCain very publically
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 01:09 PM
Feb 2014

said she should. NO way she was going to sign it or let it become law under the extant circumstances.

Lex

(34,108 posts)
12. If Brewer vetoes it, then can the AZ legislature over-ride her veto?
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 12:54 PM
Feb 2014

Or is the point that they won't over-ride her veto so it dies?



dilby

(2,273 posts)
17. The bill is pointless.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 01:18 PM
Feb 2014

Gays are not a protected class under anti-discrimination laws in Arizona, even without this bill businesses can still discriminate based on sexual preference or gender identification in Arizona.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
18. I'm sure she'll veto it. Those who introduced it and voted for it
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 01:23 PM
Feb 2014

have gotten their publicity. Now, she will veto it to save her own ass. It's all a planned thing, I believe.

MineralMan

(146,288 posts)
23. It's a mid-term election year.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 01:32 PM
Feb 2014

Lots of posturing going on by right wing Republicans, and stupid bills like this one are being introduced everywhere by them. Expect much more of this during the run-up to the election.

Positioning themselves for an election campaign is standard practice for these morons. They don't really care whether the bill is passed or nor, or whether a Governor vetoes it. They just want their name on it for their teabagger constituents to see.

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
19. I can't believe that I actually agree with you on something!!!
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 01:25 PM
Feb 2014

I'm pretty sure She is going to make those legislators sweat it out, since so many of them are back tracking too... but will sign in the end.

Bombero1956

(3,539 posts)
20. As I've said before
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 01:27 PM
Feb 2014

She will veto the bill but not for the right reason, she will veto it because of the almighty dollar. Groups who were planning conventions in the state and the possible loss of the Super Bowl.

Erose999

(5,624 posts)
24. Its about the money for Gov. Baconface. There are no laws in AZ preventing LGBT discrimination as is
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 01:38 PM
Feb 2014

this was just about local bigots trying to rack up publicity in an election year.

I suspect the similar law in GA will suffer the same fate. Sound and fury, signifying nothing.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
25. I hope you are right.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 02:11 PM
Feb 2014

That would be nice if the adults would take over and veto more often when legislators go on their anti-gay legislating binges.

 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
26. They got exactly what they wanted.
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 02:14 PM
Feb 2014

They go their hard right/tea party/crazy cred by being able to say "We voted for it!" but then when it's vetoed they don't get any of the blame and it doesn't go against their right wing ratings.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
27. She would sign it if
Tue Feb 25, 2014, 02:29 PM
Feb 2014

There wasn't so much backlash. I "almost" hope she does sign it. Let's see what happens. Arizona is crazy enough. If not Arizona, I'm sure some other Red state will try this.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»I don't think for a minut...