Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 11:39 AM Feb 2014

Pasco mom sues over attractive arrest photo

A 28-year-old mother of four has filed a lawsuit against a background check website, saying the company used her attractive arrest booking photo for commercial and advertising purposes without compensating her or getting her permission.

Meagan Simmons, of Zephyrhills, filed the lawsuit in Hillsborough County Court against InstantCheckmate.com.

Simmons claims in the lawsuit that the image’s exposure has disturbed her peace of mind, invaded her privacy and caused her mental anguish. The suit seeks monetary damages and an injunction to prevent further use of her picture.

According to the lawsuit, Simmons’ image popped up on countless websites where she was branded “a hot convict.”

http://tbo.com/news/crime/pasco-mom-sues-over-attractive-arrest-photo-20140228/

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Pasco mom sues over attractive arrest photo (Original Post) The Straight Story Feb 2014 OP
I hate it when that happens shenmue Feb 2014 #1
I sonde who owns arrest photos treestar Feb 2014 #2
Admitting my ignorance of the law I'll still offer that Nuclear Unicorn Feb 2014 #13
Well she does look pretty good in the picture. dipsydoodle Feb 2014 #3
i've seen her ad many times, esp on FB, and even here i think! dionysus Feb 2014 #4
This is a follow up to a thread from last may: The Straight Story Feb 2014 #5
i remember that thread, too. nt dionysus Feb 2014 #7
She is now forever a meme, and wants to do playboy LOL snooper2 Feb 2014 #10
They lucked out treestar Feb 2014 #15
Good for her,who wants their life whittled sufrommich Feb 2014 #6
I've seen her photo about a million times. Personally I think using them this way sucks. denverbill Feb 2014 #8
It's wrong for people to do that. LuvNewcastle Feb 2014 #9
I don't think so, then we wouldn't get great pictures like this! snooper2 Feb 2014 #11
Where's his orange jumpsuit? LuvNewcastle Feb 2014 #12
After doing a quick image search, wtf? I'd be pissed too. uppityperson Feb 2014 #14

treestar

(82,383 posts)
2. I sonde who owns arrest photos
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 11:48 AM
Feb 2014

It may be that she has no rights to her own image in that context. It would be interesting to find out how this lawsuit pans out.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
13. Admitting my ignorance of the law I'll still offer that
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 12:39 PM
Feb 2014

while booking photos are public this is a private commercial concern using public property for personal profit. On those grounds alone I would imagine she is entitled to a cease and desist ruling. The company should compensate her for profits derived from using her likeness without her permission.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
15. They lucked out
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 01:47 PM
Feb 2014

They could have used a model.

Or for that matter, a mug shot almost should look bad, so the whole concept is a bit off.

She can use it as springboard for a modeling career. Which would be an odd thing to come out of an arrest, but oh well. The lawsuit gives her some publicity.

sufrommich

(22,871 posts)
6. Good for her,who wants their life whittled
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 11:54 AM
Feb 2014

down to "hot convict" for all the world to see. It's incredibly demeaning.

denverbill

(11,489 posts)
8. I've seen her photo about a million times. Personally I think using them this way sucks.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 12:02 PM
Feb 2014

Using a public record photo should not be allowed for a for-profit website's ads. It's one thing if a news website is posting it as part of an article that will move off it's front page in a day or so. It's quite another for this poor girl to be publicly humiliated year after year.

Any person's image used in an ad should require compensation and agreement from the person.

LuvNewcastle

(16,844 posts)
9. It's wrong for people to do that.
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 12:03 PM
Feb 2014

I don't even think they should post the pictures online at all. If people want to see pictures of people thrown in jail, they should have to go down to the jail and look them up. Just because a person makes a mistake doesn't mean they should be humiliated by those images that can be seen by anybody in the world. It's one thing to post written records, but pictures should remain at the jail and available upon request.

LuvNewcastle

(16,844 posts)
12. Where's his orange jumpsuit?
Fri Feb 28, 2014, 12:29 PM
Feb 2014

The rest of us proles not only look our worst in those mug shots (usually), but they make us change into those awful orange clothes before they take the picture. They might as well make people wear a clown suit. I just don't think it's right to have that shit posted on the internet. Once it's there, it's there forever. Besides, I think people are entitled to a little anonymity in life unless they choose to document it on Facebook like a lot of people do. People aren't going to post pictures of themselves all disheveled and wearing ugly clothes on Facebook anyway.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Pasco mom sues over attra...