General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHomeowner Who Shot Unarmed Elderly Man With Alzheimer’s Wandering His Property Won’t Be Charged
BY NICOLE FLATOW ON FEBRUARY 28, 2014 AT 3:28 PM
The Walker County, Ga., District Attorney said Friday he will not press charges against the homeowner who shot and killed an elderly man wandering on his property. 72-year-old Ronald Westbrook, who has Alzheimers disease, had been walking around the Chickamauga area, a rural neighborhood in north Georgia, when he walked onto Joe Hendrixs property at around 2:30 a.m. Hendrixs fiancée called 911 and a deputy was dispatched. But before he arrived, Hendrix took matters into his own hands, walking out the front door and firing three or four shots at Westbrook, one of which hit him in the chest.
snip
In an email to ThinkProgress, Franklin explained his decision not to charge Hendrix: In interviews immediately after the shooting, Hendrix claimed he acted in self-defense. In Georgia, the prosecution bears the burden of disproving a self defense claim beyond a reasonable doubt. After looking at the facts from Hendrix perspective, it would be impossible to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Hendrix did not reasonably act in self defense.
He later confirmed that he was referring to particularly robust protections for homeowners known as the Castle Doctrine, which allows deadly force without a duty to retreat to protect the home.
Georgia is one of many states with aggressive provisions that permit deadly force in self-defense, both inside and outside the home. Walker County Sheriff Steve Wilson told the Times Free Press in Chattanooga, Tenn., that he expected the district attorney to consider Georgias Stand Your Ground law in deciding whether to press charges. In my personal opinion, I believe that [Hendrix] should have stayed inside the house, Wilson said. Did he violate any laws by exiting the house? No.
http://thinkprogress.org/justice/2014/02/28/3347801/district-attorney-wont-charge-resident-shot-dead-elderly-man-alzheimers-property/
It seems that the NRA and their supporters have crafted laws which put the right to shoot someone above all other rights, shooting victims no longer have any rights because a gun toting killer can take every last one of their rights away in an instant and call it "self defense". No matter how absurd that claim of self defense is, their right to kill has been given priority over our right to life.
SoCalNative
(4,613 posts)would make someone fear for their life...
Skittles
(153,160 posts)Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)People today shoot first and think later. We're becoming a nation of deadly cowards IMO.
frylock
(34,825 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)erpowers
(9,350 posts)The guy in that case might actually go to jail. How can he claim they were a threat? They were just sitting in a car. After he discharged the first shot they tried to turn the car around. There seems to have been no reason for him to continue shooting.
chrisa
(4,524 posts)Had the man tried to break into his house, it would be iffy. Going outside and shooting? No.
Rule one is - stay inside. Seriously - even in a real home invasion: Don't go outside!
pipoman
(16,038 posts)Not going outside means either stay and fight or give in to the intruder. I'm not sure always staying in the house is a hard and fast rule that should be followed..
chrisa
(4,524 posts)There's a chance they might not be able to get in, or will be scared off. Running out and attacking an intruder is just dumb. Of course, if they get in you probably want to run outside (the other way), but running outside to confront someone on your property is giving up a place of advantage and safety (your house).
If you can't get out and are armed, your house is much safer than outside in the dark facing an unknown number of attackers. You know your house and it's choke points. Running into the darkness is stupid and can get you ambushed/killed.
I don't understand the people that run out and confront someone that's outside. Just stay in your house as long as you can!
Peregrine Took
(7,413 posts)ThoughtCriminal
(14,047 posts)Skittles
(153,160 posts)sickening
Jake Stern
(3,145 posts)Claimed that if they had charged the guy then millions of women and disabled people would be afraid to defend themselves.
So now the way to support shoot-at-will gun laws is to hide behind women and the disabled?
What does RKBA MEAN?
Blue_Adept
(6,399 posts)erpowers
(9,350 posts)Thank you for the information and the link.
d_r
(6,907 posts)And shot him in the yard.
sorefeet
(1,241 posts)and shot 3 or 4 times, killing an old man who didn't have a clue. Kind of like a stray dog. Another state off my travel list. Some of these states scare the fuck out of me.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)I live in an urban area. Transients walk through my yard quite often. I have even found broken pipes and needles before. Also, old ladies looking for their cats tend to be drawn to my garage. Sometimes it is a little freaky and I do not quite like it, but I would not walk outside and shoot anyone for walking through or looking for their cat.
pipoman
(16,038 posts)The alternative to the prosecution's burden of proving it wasn't self defense is the homeowner having to prove it was, an equally difficult task with a whole series of problems associated with it too.
From the description of the incident in the story it seems plausible that the prosecution could prove a reasonable person wouldn't be in fear of being killed or seriously injured. Not sure what circumstances would be that would keep them from trying.
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)Apparently you can snuff out a life at will even though you know the police are enroute.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)that previously only got to get their rocks off by blowing away stray cats and dogs that wander into their yards. Now they get to do it to stray humans.
Bettie
(16,107 posts)Did anyone really think he'd be charged?
We're a right to kill nation now*.
*Right to kill is limited to white males, anyone else will be prosecuted and likely convicted.
Logical
(22,457 posts)This idiot home owner was not threatened at all. If this man kicked in his front door I would understand, but wandering around his yard is not a threat.
Call the damn police and wait in your house.
rock
(13,218 posts)!
Loudly
(2,436 posts)Gothmog
(145,231 posts)Texas has expanded the castle doctrine to include personal property. You can kill someone who is trying to steal your property in Texas