General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMonsanto's Roundup may be linked to fatal kidney disease, new study suggests
<snip>
The new study was published in the International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.
Researchers suggest that Roundup, or glyphosate, becomes highly toxic to the kidney once mixed with hard water or metals like arsenic and cadmium that often exist naturally in the soil or are added via fertilizer. Hard water contains metals like calcium, magnesium, strontium, and iron, among others. On its own, glyphosate is toxic, but not detrimental enough to eradicate kidney tissue.
The glyphosate molecule was patented as a herbicide by Monsanto in the early 1970s. The company soon brought glyphosate to market under the name Roundup, which is now the most commonly used herbicide in the world.
The hypothesis helps explain a global rash of the mysterious, fatal Chronic Kidney Disease of Unknown etiology (CKDu) that has been found in rice paddy regions of northern Sri Lanka, for example, or in El Salvador, where CKDu is the second leading cause of death among males.
Furthermore, the studys findings explain many observations associated with the disease, including the linkage between the consumption of hard water and CKDu, as 96 percent of patients have been found to have consumed hard or very hard water for at least five years, from wells that receive their supply from shallow regolith aquifers.
The CKDu was discovered in rice paddy farms in northern Sri Lanka around 20 years ago. The condition has spread quickly since then and now affects 15 percent of working age people in the region, or a total of 400,000 patients, the study says. At least 20,000 have died from CKDu there.
<snip>
http://rt.com/news/monsanto-roundup-kidney-disease-921/
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)I don't ever use Roundup on my property or let any landscape service use it like they always want to.
Pretty depressing all the farms that use it to clear fields or clear brush they spray it from airplanes.
These Corps should be paying for every nations healthcare, they have caused so much health damage to everyone.
villager
(26,001 posts)Heck, when these same companies even have cheerleaders at a self-styled "Underground" -- never mind their ownership of those who make "laws" -- our remaining option is yours: Boycott their products.
And of course, these same good corporate citizens are trying to make that impossible, too....!
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)them out of business. We do not use their products either. They should be banned imho.
bvar22
(39,909 posts).....have been forever banned from our place.
In 2006, Starkraven & I sold everything,
moved to The Woods,
and started growing our own.
So far, so good.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=268x2601
MindMover
(5,016 posts)Sunlei
(22,651 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Need a neighbor?
bvar22
(39,909 posts)There are some downsides to living in the Rural South,
but we have found them more than overbalanced by the benefits.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)My dad had an old farm that he rented, @100 ac. It was awesome.
We must have had 4 ac of garden at the time.
My dad lived along the Harpeth near another DUer which was super awesome.
villager
(26,001 posts)Well done!
bvar22
(39,909 posts)The Daffodils are 6" high, and should be blooming in a couple of weeks.
THAT means that our non-GMO Asparagus,
grown without RoundUp or other toxic chemicals is next,
with Strawberries right behind THAT.
Harvesting Asparagus.... It just seems so WRONG!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/11593181
Truth is,
Health Concerns about toxic chemicals, Industrial pollution, cancer, hormones, anti-biotics, steroids... all that aside,
we would do this for the TASTE only.
villager
(26,001 posts)How dare you!
mopinko
(70,099 posts)it's a hypothesis that has not even been seriously examined. it is a correlation.
arsenic and cadmium can jack you up pretty good all by themselves. and although they posit exposure routes, they have shown no such thing in practice.
seems like it would take some serious epidemiology to reach anything like this conclusion.
villager
(26,001 posts)"The possible role played by glyphosate-metal complexes in this epidemic has not been given any serious consideration by investigators for the last two decades. Furthermore, it may explain similar kidney disease epidemics observed in Andra Pradesh (India) and Central America. Although glyphosate alone does not cause an epidemic of chronic kidney disease, it seems to have acquired the ability to destroy the renal tissues of thousands of farmers when it forms complexes with a localized geo environmental factor (hardness) and nephrotoxic metals."
The key being "not given any serious consideration by investigators..."
Or, of course, regulators.
And given how widespread the use of the stuff is, and all the environmental havoc being wreaked in general, it's time for that serious consideration to start.
There doesn't appear to be any data. They didn't measure glyphosate in ground water...
Also, the citations used to support the alleged toxicity are highly suspect, to be kind: Carrasco (71) and Seralini (72,73,74).
Bonx
(2,053 posts)We can do the science later. Maybe.
KT2000
(20,577 posts)if the world becomes dependent upon roundup ready crops at the cost of 15% of the population where there is hard water.
The consequences of corporate government. They won't be held liable for this either.
villager
(26,001 posts)DhhD
(4,695 posts)KT2000
(20,577 posts)it's a useful site.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)blackspade
(10,056 posts)Or will we have to wait another 10-20 years and thousands more deaths before Monsanto moves on to another toxic substance?
villager
(26,001 posts)...it on your cornflakes!
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Jakes Progress
(11,122 posts)Big chem even has supporters here on DU. Apologists who use every little loophole and trick to excuse evil incarnate. Let alone the congress critters who show up at the Monsanto faucet for their fill up.
You can kill a million people legally if you can make a profit on it.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)I'm cynical enough to realize that they will quit manufacturing it only when they replace it.
geardaddy
(24,926 posts)vkkv
(3,384 posts).. doesn't always work out so well for people.
See:
Housing loan deregulation bubble crash
Bank Bailout
Health insurance in the U.S.
Stock market crash
Gulf oil spill
Alaska oil spill
Fracking
Bankrupt private charter schools
Shell-Texaco in the Amazon
Dow Chem in India
Intentionally mis-labeled oil sludge train car accident in Quebec.
Historically, what is good for business mostly stiffs people for profit, kills the environment for profit and then Wall St steals your money.
Pretty obvious, isn't it?
pnwmom
(108,977 posts)The new findings intensify a debate about so-called inerts the solvents, preservatives, surfactants and other substances that manufacturers add to pesticides. Nearly 4,000 inert ingredients are approved for use by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
SNIP
Until now, most health studies have focused on the safety of glyphosate, rather than the mixture of ingredients found in Roundup. But in the new study, scientists found that Roundups inert ingredients amplified the toxic effect on human cellseven at concentrations much more diluted than those used on farms and lawns.
One specific inert ingredient, polyethoxylated tallowamine, or POEA, was more deadly to human embryonic, placental and umbilical cord cells than the herbicide itself a finding the researchers call astonishing.
SNIP
Roundup has one of the most extensive human health safety and environmental data packages of any pesticide that's out there, said Monsanto spokesman John Combest. It's used in public parks, it's used to protect schools. There's been a great deal of study on Roundup, and we're very proud of its performance.
SNIP