Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 01:37 PM Mar 2014

The Data Brokers: Selling your personal information

Steve Kroft investigates the multibillion dollar industry that collects, analyzes and sells the personal information of millions of Americans with virtually no oversight

Over the past six months or so, a huge amount of attention has been paid to government snooping, and the bulk collection and storage of vast amounts of raw data in the name of national security. What most of you don't know, or are just beginning to realize, is that a much greater and more immediate threat to your privacy is coming from thousands of companies you've probably never heard of, in the name of commerce.

They're called data brokers, and they are collecting, analyzing and packaging some of our most sensitive personal information and selling it as a commodity...to each other, to advertisers, even the government, often without our direct knowledge. Much of this is the kind of harmless consumer marketing that's been going on for decades. What's changed is the volume and nature of the data being mined from the Internet and our mobile devices, and the growth of a multibillion dollar industry that operates in the shadows with virtually no oversight.

Companies and marketing firms have been gathering information about customers and potential customers for years, collecting their names and addresses, tracking credit card purchases, and asking them to fill out questionnaires, so they can offer discounts and send catalogues. But today we are giving up more and more private information online without knowing that it's being harvested and personalized and sold to lots of different people...our likes and dislikes, our closest friends, our bad habits, even your daily movements, both on and offline. Federal Trade Commissioner Julie Brill says we have lost control of our most personal information.

Steve Kroft: Are people putting this together and making dossiers?

Julie Brill: Absolutely.

Steve Kroft: With names attached to it? With personal identification?

more
http://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-data-brokers-selling-your-personal-information/
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Data Brokers: Selling your personal information (Original Post) DonViejo Mar 2014 OP
+1 jsr Mar 2014 #1
I have a WAY bigger problem with this, than the government knowing my info. adirondacker Mar 2014 #2
I agree with you completely nt LiberalEsto Mar 2014 #3
Absolutely. One thing that wasn't discussed during the NSA debates was how the gov't or NSA okaawhatever Mar 2014 #4
I have a problem with both Blue_Tires Mar 2014 #6
I oppose both. n/t JoeyT Mar 2014 #8
There is a difference here.. SomethingFishy Mar 2014 #9
Yep. Because when I click on the End User Agreement when I pay my bills... Earth_First Mar 2014 #10
I don't disagree... SomethingFishy Mar 2014 #11
My apologies... Earth_First Mar 2014 #12
No need... SomethingFishy Mar 2014 #13
The fact that our government ever let this happen speaks volumes about Zorra Mar 2014 #5
Every time that Privacy Practices notice gets sent out I cringe dickthegrouch Mar 2014 #7

adirondacker

(2,921 posts)
2. I have a WAY bigger problem with this, than the government knowing my info.
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 01:47 PM
Mar 2014

This should have been a topic DuJour for the last decade.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
4. Absolutely. One thing that wasn't discussed during the NSA debates was how the gov't or NSA
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 01:52 PM
Mar 2014

could buy nearly as much info (maybe more) than they could obtain through their own channels.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
6. I have a problem with both
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 02:30 PM
Mar 2014

I'm just tired of so much national discussion of one while turning a blind eye to the other...

Even Snowden brushed it off as a non-issue(!) when asked about it at SXSW today...One more statement for the "things he should get raked over the coals for" -pile, but he's he golden boy for millions and can do no wrong...

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
9. There is a difference here..
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 04:07 PM
Mar 2014

Not that it's right or wrong but you allow the data mining. Every time you click "accept" on an end user agreement you are telling whoever that they are allowed to mine your data.



Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
10. Yep. Because when I click on the End User Agreement when I pay my bills...
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 04:10 PM
Mar 2014

I should expect that.

Or should I just stop paying my bills and have a Collections Agency collect and disseminate the information?



It's a vicious cycle.

SomethingFishy

(4,876 posts)
11. I don't disagree...
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 04:17 PM
Mar 2014

and I don't like it. But it is what it is.

And as devil's advocate I would say you can still pay your bills with checks by snail mail.

What bothers me about this is that corporations are doing this because they think we are stupid and are trying to sell us something. I get that, we are a greedy money worshipping nation. However the government does it because it doesn't trust it's citizens and wants to keep an eye on them.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
12. My apologies...
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 04:36 PM
Mar 2014

...I'm not trying to snip at you over this.

Just overall fed up with all of it.

Be well...

Zorra

(27,670 posts)
5. The fact that our government ever let this happen speaks volumes about
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 01:52 PM
Mar 2014

its real priorities.

Money trumps human rights and well being yet again.

dickthegrouch

(3,173 posts)
7. Every time that Privacy Practices notice gets sent out I cringe
Mon Mar 10, 2014, 02:39 PM
Mar 2014

All my financial organizations want to share my info with their business partners, affiliates, etc. etc and many of them are telling me whether I can opt-out or not in several major categories.

We've lost the battle, and the war, but it would have been so much simpler if the businesses had been compelled to ask us to opt in in the first place.

I want a tattoo that shuts down any Google glass (or equivalent) device in sight.

And these recent databases of private surveillance cameras available to Law Enforcement, when investigating crimes, bother me a lot too. If LE remembered that one is INNOCENT until proven guilty, it might be less bothersome. However, if they want to treat me as if I were suspect just because I walked in front of a private camera, they'd better be prepared for some major pushback.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Data Brokers: Selling...