Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
141 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Check out some of the pretty gals in Beijing... (Original Post) Playinghardball Mar 2014 OP
gals?? mzteris Mar 2014 #1
Oh Stop it. NYC_SKP Mar 2014 #3
+1 Go Vols Mar 2014 #15
yeah, i know people who've mzteris Mar 2014 #49
lol Go Vols Mar 2014 #61
What can you expect from mzteris Mar 2014 #63
Not starting off well Go Vols Mar 2014 #68
that was meant mzteris Mar 2014 #90
awesome sub thread, thanks! snooper2 Mar 2014 #72
More like "hijacked-thread" if you ask me. PCIntern Mar 2014 #76
Here's a gal chiming in Dude! VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #82
Well, there is a fail here. Raine1967 Mar 2014 #77
This isn't the same and you know it. Warpy Mar 2014 #89
I'm sorry, but I don't mzteris Mar 2014 #91
Oooooooohhhhh! You said "Dick"! nt tblue37 Mar 2014 #109
+2 Jamaal510 Mar 2014 #23
"Guys! Gals!"-sarah Palin ErikJ Mar 2014 #24
oh well - mzteris Mar 2014 #50
Wouldn't be my choice, Feral Child Mar 2014 #33
I'm sorry, but no mzteris Mar 2014 #48
This message was self-deleted by its author panader0 Mar 2014 #74
well, I guess you told me! mzteris Mar 2014 #92
I have deleted my post panader0 Mar 2014 #110
I'm fine with it. Neoma Mar 2014 #106
I am a woman and a feminist--and "gals" doesn't bother me-- though being called a "girl" would. tblue37 Mar 2014 #111
Not agreeing or disagreeing, Reter Mar 2014 #133
Spot on madokie Mar 2014 #123
Cute! Guys and Gals.. is there such Cha Mar 2014 #131
+1... TeeYiYi Mar 2014 #4
As a man that no longer calls himself a feminist because of all the petty complaints, A Simple Game Mar 2014 #20
In this particular case... TeeYiYi Mar 2014 #25
You're over-reacting. Feral Child Mar 2014 #37
I'm not the word police... TeeYiYi Mar 2014 #39
That seems a more reasonable statement Feral Child Mar 2014 #43
+1000. Nt. Lunacee_2013 Mar 2014 #41
How? I do NOT see it... VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #83
Neither do I. Owl Mar 2014 #128
I didn't think you would give me an alternative word. A Simple Game Mar 2014 #101
Take your pick of sexist colloquialisms and knock yourself out, SimpleGame... TeeYiYi Mar 2014 #140
You're probably right with your last sentence. A Simple Game Mar 2014 #141
But but but--I think Pres. Obama is a pretty cool guy. nt tblue37 Mar 2014 #112
And I think this is a pretty cool response...guy or gal! VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #134
you're no longer a feminist mzteris Mar 2014 #51
I don't wish to be associated with the likes of some so called feminists on this board, they A Simple Game Mar 2014 #104
Nope. "Ladies" is definitely not sanctioned. Young women = OK, but NOT "ladies. tblue37 Mar 2014 #113
"Ladies" is a no-no too? What about First Lady? Owl Mar 2014 #129
Grandfathered (grandmothered?) in as a traditional "title.". nt tblue37 Mar 2014 #130
Men who think it is within their purview to declare which issues feminists concern themselves with redqueen Mar 2014 #62
And self proclaimed feminists that leech onto any perceived outrage are A Simple Game Mar 2014 #102
Sure dude. redqueen Mar 2014 #103
As I usually do yours. n/t A Simple Game Mar 2014 #105
You are not alone in that. Jamastiene Mar 2014 #29
I've been told by my African American coworker not to call her a gal wryter2000 Mar 2014 #31
I'm a gal. Have been since I wasn't a baby. loudsue Mar 2014 #30
So you can't use "guys" to informally identify a group of males of mixed ages? elfin Mar 2014 #5
I use guys as a genderless address. Gals is antiquated. Ed Suspicious Mar 2014 #9
Same here on the use of guys and pretty for the Flotus. JimDandy Mar 2014 #19
fwiw, I've been told not to d_r Mar 2014 #99
While my personal proclivities mzteris Mar 2014 #53
+1 theHandpuppet Mar 2014 #18
I'm 69 and I see nothing wrong with that term Plucketeer Mar 2014 #22
Of course not, mzteris Mar 2014 #54
School this ignorant geezer Plucketeer Mar 2014 #126
Nothing like hi jacking tread for your own self centered upaloopa Mar 2014 #32
Exactly n/t godai Mar 2014 #69
For fuck's sake NV Whino Mar 2014 #35
It all starts with respect mzteris Mar 2014 #55
For the record NV Whino Mar 2014 #71
LOL, I honestly have no idea if you are serious or joking. n-t Logical Mar 2014 #36
Ahem. LadyHawkAZ Mar 2014 #47
! opiate69 Mar 2014 #52
so? mzteris Mar 2014 #59
so then you say your son gets to decide what he wants to be called....but YOU step in to tell us VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #84
Well, next time I'm at the White House mzteris Mar 2014 #95
Snork! LadyHawkAZ Mar 2014 #116
You made that thread get edited snooper2 Mar 2014 #73
Number 10 Raine1967 Mar 2014 #78
She ended up editing "gals" to "women"--probably because of this thread. tblue37 Mar 2014 #118
I see sea had no problem with "gals" until the fauxrage here. Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #125
Leave it to you BainsBane Mar 2014 #135
I think you posted to the wrong person LadyHawkAZ Mar 2014 #136
You think wrong BainsBane Mar 2014 #137
I did read it LadyHawkAZ Mar 2014 #138
Please lighten up; I use it, too, and I R one. nt babylonsister Mar 2014 #56
You know I like and respect you mzteris Mar 2014 #60
It's not allowed in the workplace? Says who? And I don't babylonsister Mar 2014 #65
and I am in total agreement with you...this is kneejerk nonsense! VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #85
I'm sorry, but mzteris Mar 2014 #96
not in any place I've worked in mzteris Mar 2014 #87
What you're saying has a lot of merit. Look how time has marginalized other words such as R B Garr Mar 2014 #132
What do you mean it's not allowed in the work place? Sissyk Mar 2014 #114
It's the female for "guys." I think it's suitable for all ages, in a casual context. MADem Mar 2014 #81
Damn, I guess I'm gonna lose a few more points ... oldhippie Mar 2014 #94
Wow. Really? Vashta Nerada Mar 2014 #124
And goodwill to all men. WhiteTara Mar 2014 #127
Gorgeous! Whisp Mar 2014 #2
I'm glad to see Marian Robinson getting out and about Brother Buzz Mar 2014 #6
Jeebus, look at Malia LittleBlue Mar 2014 #7
Malia is absolutely beautiful and Sasha asjr Mar 2014 #21
She looks so much like her father! nt tblue37 Mar 2014 #119
After a long flight I am not smiling like that. iandhr Mar 2014 #8
I might be smiling Mr.Bill Mar 2014 #27
LOL think4yourself Mar 2014 #40
+1 iandhr Mar 2014 #70
Pretty smart gals indeed. n/t eggplant Mar 2014 #10
Nice fix! deurbano Mar 2014 #13
The rest of the thread is just flame bait. Sigh. eggplant Mar 2014 #14
"Pretty" is sexist. Unless you call men that too The Straight Story Mar 2014 #11
"Sexist" is offensive. Orrex Mar 2014 #12
I *totally* think men can be pretty! DeadLetterOffice Mar 2014 #44
only the ignorant think that JI7 Mar 2014 #57
I call men handsome.... VanillaRhapsody Mar 2014 #86
Yep - any one way term is sexist by it's nature The Straight Story Mar 2014 #97
OOOOOOH! The republicans are not going to like this. Chuckie Todd is probably mfcorey1 Mar 2014 #16
"Look at Moochelle traveling on the taxpayers' dime again" tarheelsunc Mar 2014 #34
The lunatics have been pitching a fit in my local rag for a week now. GoCubsGo Mar 2014 #107
Lovely. I'm a 65 year old woman who marched in many protests and burned my bra. OregonBlue Mar 2014 #17
Amen, OregonBlue Glitterati Mar 2014 #120
What will FOX and Rush say this trip cost the U.S. taxpayers? Laf.La.Dem. Mar 2014 #26
5 zillion and thats why corporations can't increase wages for Americans. Iliyah Mar 2014 #45
Eleventy brazillion! nt tblue37 Mar 2014 #121
What is that on Sasha's hand? surrealAmerican Mar 2014 #28
It's a thumb brace. Xithras Mar 2014 #46
Lovely photograph. Feral Child Mar 2014 #38
Is it just me or do the daughters resemble their parents? KansDem Mar 2014 #42
Funny how that works... babylonsister Mar 2014 #58
i think malia looks more like her mother ,especially the high cheekbones JI7 Mar 2014 #66
No, Malia has her dad's eyebrows, smile, and facial structure. I think Sascha resembles her maternal tblue37 Mar 2014 #122
Wow the girls* have gotten so big... one_voice Mar 2014 #64
Sasha will be a teenager this year JI7 Mar 2014 #67
Malia will be old enough to drive... one_voice Mar 2014 #75
Tuned in to see some nice comments on the Obama Family rurallib Mar 2014 #79
As it happens 4 generations of female family members are here at the house tularetom Mar 2014 #80
I'd say I agree with mzteris Mar 2014 #93
Raw: First Lady Arrives in Beijing - VIDEO Tx4obama Mar 2014 #88
Oh darn, you got me on that one!!!! coldbeer Mar 2014 #98
for a second I thought Niceguy1 Mar 2014 #108
Love those gals! zappaman Mar 2014 #100
'Gal' is suddenly an offensive term? Jetboy Mar 2014 #115
Great photo, thanks. n/t LadyHawkAZ Mar 2014 #117
Stunning beauties! n/t Triana Mar 2014 #139

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
1. gals??
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:33 PM
Mar 2014

If you're not over 70, I don't think you can use that word. (They get a pass...)

EVEN if it were "appropriate to call ANYONE gals, it would be the young girls, and most DEFINITELY NOT the First Lady and her mother!

"Gals", indeed. What century are you from?

 

NYC_SKP

(68,644 posts)
3. Oh Stop it.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:39 PM
Mar 2014

There's nothing wrong with "gals"; it's a casual counterpart to "guys".

And, while more frequently used by those of the older generations, there's not a damned thing about the term that can be demonstrated to be inappropriate or dismissive, at least not in a universal way.

You don't like it? Then don't use it.

Guys:



Gals:



See?

No problemo!

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
49. yeah, i know people who've
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:29 PM
Mar 2014

used the "n" word - and the "f" word and the "c" word their entire life and see nothing wrong with that either!

Argument fail.

Go Vols

(5,902 posts)
61. lol
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:47 PM
Mar 2014

fail indeed


maybe go attack this thread now: "some gals from du and i met up in colorado springs. every door we come to, we go into a giggle."

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=4693310

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
63. What can you expect from
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:50 PM
Mar 2014

a Tennessee fan?

Nothing sucks like a big orange. (And yes, I said 'suck').

I will address the issue when and how I see fit, btw. It will be a discussion, I assure you. And not an insulting one, either.

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
90. that was meant
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:03 PM
Mar 2014

to be funny. Sorry.

I went to a rival school. I though you would recognize the quote.

My apologies. I was not meant to be "insulting" in any real sense. A good-humoured banter - it IS March Madness, you know! (And no - I'm NOT from Madison and I am NOT a UW fan!)

Raine1967

(11,589 posts)
77. Well, there is a fail here.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:03 PM
Mar 2014

I'm just not sure it's the fail you mean.

This one isn't worth the fight you are looking for, IMO.

Warpy

(111,255 posts)
89. This isn't the same and you know it.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:02 PM
Mar 2014

Word jumpers would eviscerate English and slang English to the point we'd be talking like Dick and Jane books.

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
91. I'm sorry, but I don't
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:04 PM
Mar 2014

"know it".

You may believe that. I don't believe that. To me I "KNOW" it's the same. YOMV.

Feral Child

(2,086 posts)
33. Wouldn't be my choice,
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:43 PM
Mar 2014

but it's a valid choice, and I don't believe for a second that the OP meant it disrespectfully.



We all need to chill and not raise our hackles so easily.

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
48. I'm sorry, but no
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:28 PM
Mar 2014

"gals" is NOT an appropriate "counter-part" to "guys". It's certainly not allowed in the workplace.

It's insulting and women don't like it. Therefore, you should honor that and not use it.



Response to mzteris (Reply #48)

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
92. well, I guess you told me!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:07 PM
Mar 2014

One could consider that a personal attack since I had just politely asked for it not to be used towards me.

Are you always that kind and considerate of others?

If you want to know why it riles me up, you can read my reasons further down. Quite frankly repeating myself over and over - and stating the obvious (to me) - is getting a bit old.

tblue37

(65,341 posts)
111. I am a woman and a feminist--and "gals" doesn't bother me-- though being called a "girl" would.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:22 PM
Mar 2014

ON EDIT: so would "lady" in most (though not *all*) situations.

 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
133. Not agreeing or disagreeing,
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:10 PM
Mar 2014

But what workplace is this? I hear way worse where I work daily. I don't hear "gal" though, because it's a very old fashioned word.

Cha

(297,206 posts)
131. Cute! Guys and Gals.. is there such
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 09:17 PM
Mar 2014

a damn thing as being too politically correct? Yeah, I think so.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
4. +1...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:40 PM
Mar 2014

There was a thread here yesterday with 'gals' in the title. It really did surprise me to see it.

I'm glad I'm not the only one who dislikes the use of that word.

TYY

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
20. As a man that no longer calls himself a feminist because of all the petty complaints,
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:48 PM
Mar 2014

could you please inform me why I should not use the word gal?

Please offer an alternative word of which you would approve.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
25. In this particular case...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:10 PM
Mar 2014

...the use of 'gals' is sexist and condescending. As though looking cute or 'pretty' was their only purpose for being in Beijing.

It's about respect for all people. If you wouldn't talk down to the president, you shouldn't talk down to his wife, children and mother-in-law.

TYY

Feral Child

(2,086 posts)
37. You're over-reacting.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:49 PM
Mar 2014

You can't disenfranchise every word that you personally find offensive. The intent of the OP is to honor a fine group of females representing us internationally.


I dislike trite colloquialisms, but this is a clear case of "Baby...Bathwater".

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
39. I'm not the word police...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:04 PM
Mar 2014

...or arbiter of anyone's personal dictionary. I don't care if you use it. Knock yourself out.

I'm just telling the other poster why I wouldn't choose to use it, since he asked.

TYY

Feral Child

(2,086 posts)
43. That seems a more reasonable statement
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:14 PM
Mar 2014

than your previous posts in this thread.

I'm not trying to pick a fight. Perhaps I misread your posts as harsher than you intended.

No offense.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
83. How? I do NOT see it...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:33 PM
Mar 2014

I do not feel the least bit insulted or condescended to with the word gals...

Sheesh...how ridiculous...

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
101. I didn't think you would give me an alternative word.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:59 PM
Mar 2014

To me and I would assume most people, gal just means a young woman, again please tell me why that is derogatory. If that is your complaint of the day, your life is very good.

Or are you trying to say just because a word specifies a certain gender that it is sexist? Better be careful with your answer.

TeeYiYi

(8,028 posts)
140. Take your pick of sexist colloquialisms and knock yourself out, SimpleGame...
Sat Mar 22, 2014, 05:30 PM
Mar 2014
re: "I didn't think you would give me an alternative word."

It is not my place to approve or disapprove of your personal lexicon. I've done all that I'm willing to do to try to help you. Self-accountability is now, officially, in your court; as it has always been.

The importance of your stubborn self-proclaimed ignorance of accepted social norms is officially on the 21st century back burner. After you're gone, no one will care or even remember how you chose to present yourself in this life.



TYY

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
141. You're probably right with your last sentence.
Sat Mar 22, 2014, 06:08 PM
Mar 2014
After you're gone, no one will care or even remember how you chose to present yourself in this life.


And I would probably be right if I said the exact same thing about you.

So I can't call you a gal but it is fine for you to call me stubborn, and ignorant. Interesting perspective you have on life. Do you even realize the significance of the word stubborn in literature? The word is often used to associate men and mules, so you may not want to use that word again to describe a person, could be perceived as sexist. Ignorance I just assume is an everyday genderless insult so you have my permission to use it.

I have to admit my ignorance about one thing though. Why did you think I would be interested in watching a video of you making copies? No offense but it seemed kind of stereotypical and derogatory to me, but as you say I'm ignorant so you post whatever videos of yourself you want.

Now in finishing up, I have to say that I now feel better about the state of feminism, if the biggest worry for some of the most prominent feminists on DU is the use of the word gal, then the serious problems facing feminism must already be solved.

With young ladies like you (see I did watch the video) on the job we should have all the small problems women face whipped in no time!

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
51. you're no longer a feminist
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:33 PM
Mar 2014

because of "petty complaints"? Oh dear. I didn't know that feminist issues were so petty.

How about women for the women, or girls for the girls - or young ladies. Certainly not gals. And even IF you thought it was "okay" - the first lady and a woman over 60? GMAB.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
104. I don't wish to be associated with the likes of some so called feminists on this board, they
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:07 PM
Mar 2014

succeed only in making the true feminists look petty.

If the issue of the day is whether the word "gals" is a slam on women, then there is no longer a need for a feminist movement anyway.

Now can you give me an honest answer to a serious question? Do you really think the OP meant the word gals to be derogatory?

tblue37

(65,341 posts)
113. Nope. "Ladies" is definitely not sanctioned. Young women = OK, but NOT "ladies.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:30 PM
Mar 2014

At age 63 I am old enough (and have the long-term feminist cred) to know not only that we don't like to be called "ladies," but also WHY we don't. It's because the label is used to insist on "ladylike" (I.e., submissive and constrained) behavior from women.

If you are going to play word police, you need to get it right. Under most circumstances (though not *all*) "gals" is an OK colloquialism--but "ladies" is not.

ON EDIT: "gal" = NOT OK when used to demean, as in "his gal Friday."Just think about where the sobriquet "Friday" comes from. In "Robinson Crusoe" "my man Friday" was racist and oppressive. "His gal Friday" would be used the same way--to suggest subservience and service is owed to someone "superior." Just as "man" is not offensive in "my man Friday," but the phrase itself and its implication is, so too "gal" is not what is offensive about "his gal Friday."

redqueen

(115,103 posts)
62. Men who think it is within their purview to declare which issues feminists concern themselves with
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:48 PM
Mar 2014

are "petty" were never feminist allies to begin with.

A Simple Game

(9,214 posts)
102. And self proclaimed feminists that leech onto any perceived outrage are
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:01 PM
Mar 2014

no friends of true feminists.

Jamastiene

(38,187 posts)
29. You are not alone in that.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:19 PM
Mar 2014

I don't like that word either. The way it is used where I am from is to demean and belittle women, and ESPECIALLY lesbians. "All that gal needs is the right man and she won't be a lesbian any more." That's what they always say. It's the only way it has ever been used toward me in my entire life. I despise that word, naturally.

wryter2000

(46,045 posts)
31. I've been told by my African American coworker not to call her a gal
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:24 PM
Mar 2014

Not that I would. It isn't a word I use.

elfin

(6,262 posts)
5. So you can't use "guys" to informally identify a group of males of mixed ages?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:40 PM
Mar 2014

Sounds like a "rule" devised by a marriage of an intense grammarian and an intense feminist.

Ed Suspicious

(8,879 posts)
9. I use guys as a genderless address. Gals is antiquated.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:11 PM
Mar 2014

What are you guys doing in this thread? Also, pretty sounds petty and not large enough for the participants on a mission of international relations. Just my opinion, obviously.

JimDandy

(7,318 posts)
19. Same here on the use of guys and pretty for the Flotus.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:43 PM
Mar 2014

Pretty is okay for girls no matter who their parents are, though.

d_r

(6,907 posts)
99. fwiw, I've been told not to
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:28 PM
Mar 2014

call a group that is mixed sexes "guys" because it is insulting to the women. Like saying "you guys" to a mixed sex group.

But to me "gals" does sound like something from the 50's. Might as well say "Lads and Lassies"

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
53. While my personal proclivities
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:36 PM
Mar 2014

might have some bearing -

I'm also bringing to bear my 20+ years in Human Resources. You know, that person who works with issues like Workplace Diversity. Respect for your co-workers. Hostile work environment. Equality. You know, minor little things like that. Words have power. Words hurt people. Maybe they don't hurt you, but if they hurt the other person, then sorry - can't say it.

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
22. I'm 69 and I see nothing wrong with that term
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:59 PM
Mar 2014

Geez-oh! Give us a break! I don't expect folks to define me as a human male when speaking of me.

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
54. Of course not,
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:38 PM
Mar 2014

no offense, but you're 69. You grew up in an era when it was common. Times change. You grew up in a time when other words used to describe other people were very very common. Do you think those words are OK, because you grew up with them? Is it okay for you to continue to use a word that you don't think is hurtful, when you find it is hurtful to someone else?

 

Plucketeer

(12,882 posts)
126. School this ignorant geezer
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:12 PM
Mar 2014

Plz explain the how and why that Gal or Gals is hurtful. I guess the G-word is now the new N-word, eh?

I'm forever pissed that the word Gay was hijacked for a group of folks that should have been happy with a different and better suited label. But no - gay no longer can mean what it did for centuries because some folks looking for a less noxious-sounding label lassoed gay and decided to spoil it for those of us that found it a pleasing descriptor for a particular manner - not lifestyle. And lest anyone's pulse quicken as they jump on me for revenge, I've a son who's a homosexual. I'm fine with his lifestyle and choices. That still doesn't mean I have to quietly stand by while my lexicon is plundered!

NV Whino

(20,886 posts)
35. For fuck's sake
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:49 PM
Mar 2014

The world is going to hell in a hand basket, and you're concerned about the terms, guys and gals and pretty.

Get a life.

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
55. It all starts with respect
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:41 PM
Mar 2014

doesn't it? For each other. Their beliefs. The planet. Other nations. The rights of others. Their feelings.

If we starts being a little more concerned about how we treated each other - and words have power - then maybe we could find our way out of that hand basket, eh?

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
59. so?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:44 PM
Mar 2014

I know lots of African Americans who use the "N" word. Don't tolerate that, either. Neither does my Black son. (And no, he doesn't like the term African American, though he isn't offended by it. Just doesn't want it used to describe him.)

It's an old term that has pervaded in the vocabulary of many for generations. It takes a while to weed it out, sort of like those other offensive terms used to describe people. Some people don't have a problem with it. Okay. Maybe they don't realize others do. I think when some of those to whom you are pointing think about it, some might change their mind. Or more than some. Or maybe not. YMMV.

 

VanillaRhapsody

(21,115 posts)
84. so then you say your son gets to decide what he wants to be called....but YOU step in to tell us
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:36 PM
Mar 2014

what is offense to the FLOTUS. Shouldn't you ask her then?

tblue37

(65,341 posts)
118. She ended up editing "gals" to "women"--probably because of this thread.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:58 PM
Mar 2014

But "gals" is just a colloquialism.

When I was in school, we were penalized for calling children "kids" in speech or writing ("People are not goats!&quot . During my first 15 to 20 years of teaching, I also forbade it in essays written by my college students. Now, though, it doesn't bother me, nor does it bother any of my (English Department) colleagues that I am aware of. In fact, I see "kids" all the time in textbooks and in articles in professional journals, as well as in newspapers and magazines.

"Gals" would still be much too informal for college or professional academic writing, but on an informal discussion board it is not too informal, and it is pretty clearly not intended to demean but rather to reference three generations of women with a label that is not age-restricted. It would seem odd to call Sascha a woman, and even Malia is a bit young for that label, so the OP chose "gals."

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
135. Leave it to you
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:05 PM
Mar 2014

To take a positive thread honoring the First Family and turn it into a petty attack against women who dare speak their minds in public without first seeking permission from men. The outrage.

BainsBane

(53,032 posts)
137. You think wrong
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 11:18 PM
Mar 2014

again, which would have been obvious if you had read the whole sentence in my previous post.

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
60. You know I like and respect you
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:45 PM
Mar 2014

but this is NOT an acceptable word anymore. It is demeaning and sexist. It's not allowed in the workplace. That should tell you something.

babylonsister

(171,065 posts)
65. It's not allowed in the workplace? Says who? And I don't
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:56 PM
Mar 2014

see it as demeaning or sexist at all. Some people seem to worry about the wrong things; I think this is one of them.

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
96. I'm sorry, but
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:12 PM
Mar 2014

you're not in a position to dictate what I find offensive. And I'm pretty offended that you called my heartfelt beliefs "kneejerk nonsense". But what else should I expect, eh? I'm just a "gal" after all. . .

mzteris

(16,232 posts)
87. not in any place I've worked in
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:53 PM
Mar 2014

since the 80's. Well - that was that beer distributor I worked for. They called women a lot worse things, though. But hey, I was a single mom and desperate for a job so I just shut the hell up and tried to keep my dignity intact. I did have the occasional one-on- one conversations with a few of the less cretinous ones who did sorta kinda get it and they made an attempt to change their language. And you know what? With a small change in a word, there was a change in behaviour, too. Funny how that works. The other employees who had no inclination to change? They treated "gals" like - well you know how they treated them. How they liked to "talk about" treating me and any other female withing earshot. They also used every epithet and inappropriate word to describe anyone not like themselves in the book.

The other companies, though - nope. Corporations with real HR departments and training programs that tackle diversity (what people used to call "sensitivity training" with such derision). Now we have sexual harassment and workplace violence training. Even "how to recognize the signs of domestic abuse" training for supervisors. How to treat others with respect.

If we don't worry about the "little things", we will never reach parity. Why do you think there is still such inequity in pay for the same job? Why do you think there are fewer VPs and SR VPs and Presidents, and CEO's and Board members? Fewer Governors and Senator and Congress - er - men - state or federal? Fewer mayors. Fewer council members.

If we're allowed to be dismissed as "girls", then why should we ask for the respect to treated as equal adults?

People used to call a certain ethnic group "boy", too, and everyone was A-OK with that for a very very long time. No one "meant" anything by it. It wasn't an "insult". It wasn't supposed to be "demeaning". It was just the word you used to describe a certain group of people. And yeah, I do truly believe the issue here is the same.

You're a woman, not a "girl" for which "gal" is slang - only - IMO - more insulting. You deserve respect for the life you've lived. You don't see it as disrespectful, but I respectfully disagree. YOMV.

R B Garr

(16,953 posts)
132. What you're saying has a lot of merit. Look how time has marginalized other words such as
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 10:01 PM
Mar 2014

calling a woman a "broad" or a "dame". You just don't hear those words anymore as they are generally deemed to be derogatory nowadays. I'm sure there is a whole history behind the demise of those words, but I'm just talking in general terms. In any event, you've explained your position very well, and I think what you're saying makes a lot of sense.

Personally the use of "gal" doesn't set off any alarm bells for me. I guess I've always considered it rather regional or very casual, but I can see that based on your frame of reference for the word, it could be considered derogatory. The use of the word sets up a negative image based on your experience with it, and what you've said makes sense.

Now, just don't call me Toots, lol.

Sissyk

(12,665 posts)
114. What do you mean it's not allowed in the work place?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:45 PM
Mar 2014

I work in HR also, EEO/DBE Liaison. I use guys and gals in training all the damn time.

It may be demeaning and sexist to you, but not to the majority of the population.

But, it is allowed in the workplace.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
81. It's the female for "guys." I think it's suitable for all ages, in a casual context.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:19 PM
Mar 2014

Maybe not baby "gals"--but teens-and-up, sure, why not?

Gentlemen and Ladies...that's from centuries past, too, but we still use it.

There are words that are used when insult is intended;that said, it is quite obvious to any sentient being reading the OP that, in the context of the comment, no insult is suggested or intended.

 

oldhippie

(3,249 posts)
94. Damn, I guess I'm gonna lose a few more points ...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:09 PM
Mar 2014

.... on the Ideological Purity Test.

If I don't get a passing score will I be kicked out of the Party? Would I have to vote Republican?

Jesus, the things we argue about amaze me sometimes.

WhiteTara

(29,711 posts)
127. And goodwill to all men.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:48 PM
Mar 2014

Makes you throw up a bit if you find sexism ingrained.

FLOTUS is very elegant and both a woman and a lady....hardly someone I would call a "gal" if you're not her "gal pal." Of course, women as a whole are not afforded much respect or dignity.

Brother Buzz

(36,427 posts)
6. I'm glad to see Marian Robinson getting out and about
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:41 PM
Mar 2014

She seems to fly under the radar and is mostly portrayed as the steady as a rock homebody. Live it up gal, you deserve it!

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
7. Jeebus, look at Malia
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 12:42 PM
Mar 2014

Just a kid during 08, now nearly a woman. She must be pushing 6 feet tall.

Cute family.

eggplant

(3,911 posts)
14. The rest of the thread is just flame bait. Sigh.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:27 PM
Mar 2014

It is a nice photo of nice people on this first day of spring.

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
11. "Pretty" is sexist. Unless you call men that too
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:16 PM
Mar 2014

Complimenting women without them asking you to compliment them means you want them in unnatural ways.

Or something like that.

DeadLetterOffice

(1,352 posts)
44. I *totally* think men can be pretty!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:15 PM
Mar 2014

And I often refer to them as such.
Now I'm wondering if that makes me an equal opportunity objectifier?

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
97. Yep - any one way term is sexist by it's nature
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:24 PM
Mar 2014

and only used by straight white privileged males who need some educating on how to properly address others.

If you are not part of that group you may use whatever terms you like since you cannot offend others (those in the above group cannot be offended).

It gets complicated - you need to read a textbook and take some college classes to understand it all.

mfcorey1

(11,001 posts)
16. OOOOOOH! The republicans are not going to like this. Chuckie Todd is probably
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:31 PM
Mar 2014

mad because the press could not go. Let the bashing (as we know it will ) begin.

tarheelsunc

(2,117 posts)
34. "Look at Moochelle traveling on the taxpayers' dime again"
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:47 PM
Mar 2014

Seriously, if you want to play a drinking game, go to a right wing "news" site (or CNN, same thing really) and drink to every mention of "Moochelle." Actually, don't do that, I don't want to be held liable when someone dies of severe alcohol poisoning.

GoCubsGo

(32,083 posts)
107. The lunatics have been pitching a fit in my local rag for a week now.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:16 PM
Mar 2014

It's like clockwork. I wish they'd give it a fucking rest already. I never heard a peep from these assholes when the Bushes went on one of their umpteen vacations, and they sure as hell never complained when Shit-for-Brains took Laura along to any international summits. And, it was nothing but crickets when the Tequila Twins got tossed out of Uruguay, or wherever the hell it was, for being drunk and disorderly. I'm getting really sick of them.

OregonBlue

(7,754 posts)
17. Lovely. I'm a 65 year old woman who marched in many protests and burned my bra.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 01:37 PM
Mar 2014

A product of the 60's and the sexual revolution in the U.S. I don't consider "Gals" outdated or insulting nor do I consider calling them "Pretty" offensive. They are pretty. People, get a grip.

 

Glitterati

(3,182 posts)
120. Amen, OregonBlue
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:02 PM
Mar 2014

speaking as another product of the 60s.

Yes, they are pretty! Malia is going to be an absolutely stunning woman soon.

Iliyah

(25,111 posts)
45. 5 zillion and thats why corporations can't increase wages for Americans.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:18 PM
Mar 2014

Beautiful group of young ladies!

Xithras

(16,191 posts)
46. It's a thumb brace.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:18 PM
Mar 2014

The White House has officially given it a "No Comment", but the unofficial story is that she hurt it playing basketball at school.

Feral Child

(2,086 posts)
38. Lovely photograph.
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 02:53 PM
Mar 2014

I'd REC if not for the thread-jack below. Sorry, but the pettiness displayed is embarrassing.

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
42. Is it just me or do the daughters resemble their parents?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:11 PM
Mar 2014

Malia looks a little like the President, and Sasha looks a little like the First Lady.

I first noticed when the Obamas sent out their 2011 Christmas card--


JI7

(89,249 posts)
66. i think malia looks more like her mother ,especially the high cheekbones
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:00 PM
Mar 2014

but you can see some of the pres in her also.

sasha doesn't look that much like either parent. i think because she has a more full chubby face. i think she may take after her grandmother.

tblue37

(65,341 posts)
122. No, Malia has her dad's eyebrows, smile, and facial structure. I think Sascha resembles her maternal
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 08:06 PM
Mar 2014

grandmother as a young woman (I saw a pic once a long time ago).

Here is a picture of Madelyn Dunham as a young woman:

https://www.google.com/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiv0Tk-SCtsTwFU0QgcHCPt8wL581pEOpFzhrOlNE452zGMZntz9fEE87cJJFk29YysAvdIkJsAYjpdr6Zdbi6jS-xkK1Hviv0fnc7reqXiQ9vbJkyhDrlOtFL6tMb4o8rj32ND5ASCqb1B2_1IYXfgZbeYbfIW4VTALzZeT2LpCFx2hujnONxYG1LbnN5QVhdnB0DE5UHBrHXxrEDJlDH_13SioIrzVT3MHK6-Tf3xUtPeF2ZBtgzpe1--WidtJk51sh6DdoWI5HpYm-uNHDORRDx91gubL_1wCC9C-oBRd1LVmYuUI4WbyOgEsESmVWuDQ4SOEG1D6AfymD62-gFAFM0McUu05SgLuUuMPMoGOmnY2rzae0gLU1xNKMLri3Munh6LyNQZCaKq3r4XtI89636MlGRU42kttsYUaHR5nQLef2Ku7OK6YQd2I5mDpIiR-0idwE0mCyd9eSTx3vH8H3rlNzgmiHKzt-qJ_1iOwtu97SYUxRUwhkQFy2WzW_1dYZqbURa9adhbVoyJWbn_1y44Fg51KAmmo5t9rueh8OrEKuSkZtP5Nl3drASpPSerEoWQbo2fibrTSwFJD8vGXeTjR-2B7Vf2SU_1JXPvWPbhPQBrFdGs2j49GNXsuNlE70MJcW297U-GXRsnybRmmoXFod9rw4uKhY3FnP6wHcb3Ltogt3Y46H8BPOf0DF9pIC29dFg7CrFzGYs7oJiyYEFKV3PlNilxOijk2QtKFedtD4JhXpX6LewDUYDXmsAJUCE4ZhUh0I8QRLnDTthxokFutFSnBdjFe4V19JWUGXWUsxIplUXXABuFF_1sLVuHQ4xIHyKJnUxFrTJr64DYYxID_1YajIXOO1Jsqpqm06Mb_1ckdKO03HUu2ABb1RYjXAbH7sJKydq0mCeN9r7861pEKMSCNnQI_1ftaFmtvWB-47vSmn10pwnTrdauAmAsjGBZ1YaEiqTDR8zPdEWuxsxLH-raGf6tK1lm42n31owtQAINMp6Vu9qpcbtIl6IctXIms1eTcwIVgKq90w51xtcLZXA1zmKHge3ut0gOXmHky5nODx58gV3VuvHdNL-Ql_1PRGm-STwY33F72Ni1aYpILDF1s79F5RqoOj-h82-Wpt02cToSSSeggY6_1INyLHUMY16LzPHTxcJbuHZyiPbwj8sbpxYTy2dkboBdc_1Gr1tHLNwsiA-DwBNsDeL3TNBiXey3HFgOC9F_1CBhXPO9KPQUfjNexaDmbbW-3-qR5Jko6qq4v8fGzGrp0wSdzV9cNelAq_1VI6_1bFXKRLEOruVOrmzseeDV0N7jN3k5KhQ2BuTgzCZx2m9aaql-FLoDoaqKUGr3GKfwjfW15B9C8CoEc633GOIg8k0ST8hQ

BTW, autocorrect changed "Dunham" to "Suntan"! Glad I caught that.

one_voice

(20,043 posts)
64. Wow the girls* have gotten so big...
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 03:56 PM
Mar 2014

they're turning into lovely young women before our eyes.

What can you say about the First Lady.

Ms. Robinson is looking good too.


*girls--I'm referring to the kids.

JI7

(89,249 posts)
67. Sasha will be a teenager this year
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 04:04 PM
Mar 2014

malia will turn 16.

the first time the nation saw them was in 2004 and they were both small enough to be picked up .

i guess as one gets older it feels like time goes by faster. chelsea is closer to my age and those years seem longer to me.

rurallib

(62,414 posts)
79. Tuned in to see some nice comments on the Obama Family
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:10 PM
Mar 2014

was disrupted by some demonstrators.

They represent America well.

Sure do kind of miss those cute kids from a decade ago. I hope they are well grounded and the celebrity does not affect their lives too badly. And I really hope the vile, vicious attacks of the right on their father don't bother them too much.

My impression from afar is that their parents are doing the best they possibly can to make sure they learn to be humble both by word and deed.

tularetom

(23,664 posts)
80. As it happens 4 generations of female family members are here at the house
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 05:13 PM
Mar 2014

So I asked them all for their reaction to being called a "gal"

Great granddaughter - "I like it"

Granddaughter - "Better than when they call me a bitch"

Daughter - "I haven't been called a gal for years. In our office everybody is called a 'guy'. I'd like to think people know I'm a female"

Wife - "What kind of @*!& are you reading on line?"

mixed results I guess.

coldbeer

(306 posts)
98. Oh darn, you got me on that one!!!!
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 06:28 PM
Mar 2014

When I clicked on the thread it took
me a mili-second. I knew I been had!!!
LOL. It didn't even load!

gals in China I thought, what!!!

Niceguy1

(2,467 posts)
108. for a second I thought
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:20 PM
Mar 2014

I was going to see some hot Chinese gals, too lol.

Instead it was just an argument over the word gal, . Lol

Jetboy

(792 posts)
115. 'Gal' is suddenly an offensive term?
Thu Mar 20, 2014, 07:47 PM
Mar 2014

Ok, I won't use that term to refer to you particular individuals. Now please don't ever refer to me as a guy or dude. Of course anyone else can, just not you perm-o-fended human beings.

Gal?!?!?!?!

for *&^%$)# sake I wish you people were kidding but I know you're not!

We can't even agree to disagree-no- I'm anti-feminist for using the term gal. Fine. My motto is 'do what's right and forget 'em'. Forget you!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Check out some of the pre...