Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Lodestar

(2,388 posts)
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 03:04 AM Mar 2014

George Clooney's spy satellite

I just heard Clooney mention this satellite in a recent interview and thought he was kidding. He was not. So I went googling
to learn more and found that this was not 'new' news. Just new to me. I thought it might be new to many DUers too so thought
I'd post anyway. While I support Clooney's cause I'm horrified that private satellites are legal!!! I think we need to redefine "human rights abuses" to include privately funded spying. What say you? Are private spy satellites and drones the future without regulation?
And can laws keep up with technological changes?


Actor and activist funds a hi-tech project that is tracking troops and warning civilians of attacks

... Raymond is director of the Satellite Sentinel Project (SSP), which aims to use advanced satellite imagery to monitor potential human rights abuses in Sudan. And it was all Clooney's idea, turning him from just another Hollywood liberal with a pet cause to a genuine expert and campaigner on Sudan. Together with John Prendergast, another campaigner, Clooney has sneaked repeatedly into the country to document the random bombing of civilians and other atrocities.

http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/mar/24/george-clooney-spies-secrets-sudan

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
George Clooney's spy satellite (Original Post) Lodestar Mar 2014 OP
I dont know if laws can keep up. Egnever Mar 2014 #1
that's such a great thing to do... Kurovski Mar 2014 #2
Private satellites Calista241 Mar 2014 #3
Clooney or his project don't own a satellite muriel_volestrangler Mar 2014 #4
You are over reacting Motown_Johnny Mar 2014 #5
 

Egnever

(21,506 posts)
1. I dont know if laws can keep up.
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 03:13 AM
Mar 2014

Mostly because the people writing the laws are mostly technologically averse. Tech is moving incredibly fast I think most legislation we will get will be kneejerk legislation that causes as many problems as it solves.

Kurovski

(34,655 posts)
2. that's such a great thing to do...
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 03:32 AM
Mar 2014


that I actually deleted my stupid joke about it before posting.

thinking twice before posting is awesome!

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
3. Private satellites
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 07:49 AM
Mar 2014

You do realize that most satellites are owned by private entities. And do we want to restrist our solar system to "government only" access? Other governments will surely allow their citizens and corporations to develop the resources and technology to explore and develop the stars.

Im not saying there shouldn't be oversight, but a blanket ban is short-sighted and ultimately crippling to our country.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,403 posts)
4. Clooney or his project don't own a satellite
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 08:05 AM
Mar 2014

They use satellite photos to find things. Yes, there are satellites that aren't owned by governments. That includes satellites that can take photos - see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite_imagery . They're used for Google Maps, for instance. Are you saying Google Maps shouldn't exist?

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
5. You are over reacting
Fri Mar 21, 2014, 08:19 AM
Mar 2014

Everyone who has used google earth has looked at photos from a private "spy" satellite.

He/they are just using more recent images that we get.


It isn't a big deal. Plus it is saving lives.


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»George Clooney's spy sate...