General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLook people - the Iraq War was an honest mistake
Not everyone wanted it, and to be sure some little mistakes were made in interpreting intelligence. But they were honest mistakes. It was all initiated and managed properly, by men and women who love their country. Patriots.
We tortured, killed, and were killed for all the right reasons, and things just didn't work out quite the way we'd hoped other than a lot of the right people making a huge, huge amount of money. But there's nothing wrong with making ginormous money in America off of well-intentioned wars: we don't begrudge the 99% having to make sacrifices so the 1% can buy solid-gold dog houses, because that is who we are.
Schmucks. We are schmucks.
So, to the Purity-Test Left, I ask that you stop the talk of "lying us into war", of "war crimes", of "the need for human decency", and all the rest of your crap that loses elections. No more hatred. No more #%^*ing retarded ideas. Enough from you people.
We must look forward, not back. The future is bright, schmucks.
Regards,
Movin'-forward Manny
840high
(17,196 posts)IRAQ WAR PREDICATED ON A LIE WITH 12 TRILLION $$$ OF DEBT THAT WILL TAKE 20 YEARS TO GET RID OF EXCLUDING USING THE BACKS OF THE 99% INSTEAD OF GWBush And Cheney. WAKE UP AMERICA! BUSH IS LAUGHING HIS ASS OFF.
RobertEarl
(13,685 posts)Never look back.
Because he looked back and then he said it was with good reason that we invaded Iraq and did all that.
Because: Oil.
Dustlawyer
(10,497 posts)not back bull shit. They attack him all day long, but would be in prison for War Crimes if it were not for him. Obama, you should have locked them up when you had the chance!
fleabiscuit
(4,542 posts)That's been covered at DU already. Once a President starts his own righteous, read "warrantless," killings there is no going back.
FORWARD!
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)A little late to the game there, Movin' Manny...
I love me some Operation Iraqi Liberation
Response to PowerToThePeople (Reply #3)
quinnox This message was self-deleted by its author.
Supersedeas
(20,630 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)Rex
(65,616 posts)Looking back slows you down and the monsters might catch you if you do!
quinnox
(20,600 posts)so it wasn't any of the Democrats fault, who voted for it. That is what an Obama-bot told me, believe it or not.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)er imaginary....
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Buns_of_Fire
(17,194 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)help explain Congress's failure to reign in a war crazed vice president.
vssmith
(1,224 posts)Joe Biden
John Kerry, and
Chuck Hagel
pscot
(21,024 posts)will be carved into Mt. Rushmore right next to Ronald Reagan's hair.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)man, but nothing happened.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Well, at least you tried.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)That would be a great demonstration if Cheney ever dared appear in public - with everyone clicking their remote controls at him.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Obama: "I opposed our military intervention there"
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)McCain would have continued it, probably to this day and beyond.
You saying that Obama's ending the war on the timeline he promised, is only slightly better?
former9thward
(32,077 posts)Obama simply promised to follow the Status of Forces agreement which was announced in August, 2008. That agreement said there would be no more U.S. forces after 2011.
http://graphics8.nytimes.com/packages/pdf/world/20081119_SOFA_FINAL_AGREED_TEXT.pdf
If Obama considered Iraq a mistake he should have withdrawn forces in 2009. To ask troops to die for a mistake is immoral. And plenty died under Obama's watch.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)there was quite a lot of TV coverage of his trying to renegotiate it to allow the US to stay longer. We left 'on time' by the SOFA because the Iraqis simply wouldn't agree to let us stick around while at the same time being free to simply shoot civilians without getting in trouble for it.
former9thward
(32,077 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)There's a song about that. I'll have to look it up.
I like this, and after the past decade, it has become my personal motto.
'Actions speak louder than words'!
If actions speak louder than words, why is the pen mightier than the sword?
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)Because writing is an action...
(Six of one, half a dozen of the other... and both as irrelevant and brain-dead as the other)
malaise
(269,157 posts)Rec
Vattel
(9,289 posts)If only he had given this speech the day our mission in Iraq ended:
It's harder to end a war than begin one. Indeed, everything that American troops have done in Iraq - all the fighting and all the dying, the bleeding and the building, and the training and the partnering - all of it has led to this moment of success.
Now, Iraq is not a perfect place. It has many challenges ahead. But we're leaving behind a sovereign, stable and self-reliant Iraq, with a representative government that was elected by its people. . . .
This is an extraordinary achievement, nearly nine years in the making. . . .
We remember the early days: the American units that streaked across the sands and skies of Iraq, the battles from Karbala to Baghdad, American troops breaking the back of a brutal dictator in less than a month.
We remember the grind of the insurgency: the roadside bombs, the sniper fire, the suicide attacks.
From the "triangle of death" to the fight for Ramadi, from Mosul in the north to Basra in the south, your will proved stronger than the terror of those who tried to break it.
We remember the spectre of sectarian violence. Al-Qaeda's attacks on mosques and pilgrims, militias that carried out campaigns of intimidation and campaigns of assassination.
And in the face of ancient divisions you stood firm to help those Iraqis who put their faith in the future. . . .
Just last month some of you - members of the Falcon Brigade - turned over the Anbar Operations Center to the Iraqis in the type of ceremony that has become commonplace over these last several months.
In an area that was once the heart of the insurgency, a combination of fighting and training, politics and partnership brought the promise of peace.
And here's what the local Iraqi deputy governor said: "This is all because of the US. forces' hard work and sacrifice."
That's in the words of an Iraqi. Hard work and sacrifice.
Those words only begin to describe the costs of this war and the courage of the men and women who fought it.
PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)for what the war criminals did to you.
I do not have words to accurately describe my feelings.
Vattel
(9,289 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)It sounded so real, you fooled me...
=)
Vattel
(9,289 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Iraqi's displaced. All Iraqi oil privatized, and $1 Trillion dollars transferred from the lower classes to the 1%.
But not to worry. They figured out an easier way. Bank bailouts. Standby for Bank Bailout: "The Remix" coming to a bank near you in 2016.
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)But what's coming in our future will be real.
Seven billion persons needing more and more resources.
Auntie Bush
(17,528 posts)You forgot your sarcasm thingie. Some schmuck might believe you.
tea and oranges
(396 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Since that would be tagging them as criminals, do you really think Pres Obama would do that? This is the second thread I'm seeing that moronic speculation.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)There will be no pardons because that would be admitting the bush administration committed a crime. That's not going to happen. Whether I'm against them or not is inconsequential.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)the current President or Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld/Powell? And I see you ducked my question - who, other than the "Obama sucks" brigade is even talking about pardons?
Autumn
(45,120 posts)bobduca
(1,763 posts)Autumn
(45,120 posts)For Obama to compare what the Bush administration did to what Putin did just didn't come off that well to me. It was a big WTF for me.
bobduca
(1,763 posts)Where "credibility" means starting illegal wars of aggression, and "fighting terrorism" has come to mean murdering innocent muslims at weddings over the internet.
kenny blankenship
(15,689 posts)Always looking backward, dwelling on the past, instead of looking forward and going along to get along. Obama gets along, therefore he goes along. Just look at where it's got him.
Next up: Vietnam, a noble cause ! Or is it noblest cause?
MindMover
(5,016 posts)a civil war ... just look at what it took this country through for a blowjob ... can you even imagine trying our politicians for war crimes ... It would take forever and be extremely divisive to say the very least ...
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)I think Obama's doing his best to hold America together.
Jackpine Radical
(45,274 posts)Jeez--what would that look like?
And how would it differ from the present?
on point
(2,506 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)GeorgeGist
(25,323 posts)Scuba
(53,475 posts)zeemike
(18,998 posts)And boy did we get parted.
We have a theme song...Don't look back.
I *did* like that song.
No more song analogies please, or at least make them country, or rap, or country rap, leave the classics alone!
-p
zeemike
(18,998 posts)It has a feeling of the time for me.
Please don't tell me there is such a thing as country rap...
RufusTFirefly
(8,812 posts)Way worse.
I for one support our president for defending his predecessor's well-meaning efforts.
I mean, come on, you dreamy pony-coveters. This is the real world. We had no choice!
Besides, if it weren't for our timely intervention, Iraq wouldn't be the paradise on Earth it is today.
Hats off to President Obama!
Our long national nightmare is over.
And to former President Bush, this Bud's for you! (Here, have some pretzels.)
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)If you're a Gen-Xer, its finely-crafted irony. If you're from any other age group, then its sarcasm.
wildbilln864
(13,382 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)And under no circumstances is anyone in polite company allowed to imply that our hapless schmuckery of 2003 in any way represents a pattern of intentional deceit and profiteering that has yet to be properly dealt with in today's society. To do so would be to sink to the absolute depths of Obama-hate and Putin-love.
Now get out there and 'create jobs'...
pscot
(21,024 posts)unemployment would be 37% rather than 7%. I guess we should be grateful, but I'm not.
We could concentrate on healthcare, education and green development instead.
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)cprise
(8,445 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)I really, really thought Obama would be different on foreign policy. As Dubya once said, "fool me twice, won't get fooled again."
Victor_c3
(3,557 posts)I'm one of the disabled veterans produced by this war. I've repeated my story multiple times on this forum, but simply put I joined the Army when I was 17 in 1997 and I was totally gullible for believing that our politicians would only use our military to make the world a better and safer place around the world. I still want to believe that, but I've come to realize that I was lied to my entire youth and that is not what our military is actually used for. I grew up in a right leaning household and saw events of the late 80s and early to mid 90s through that slant. I believed the first Gulf War was justified as was our role in Bosnia and Kosovo. I never believed I would be involved in a war like Iraq and, due to my own ignorance and naivety, I got a front row seat to that war. I don't know what I was thinking. I sought out a position as an Infantry Officer and was placed as one when I graduated college in 2002.
I was completing my various training schools during the buildup to the war on Iraq at Fort Benning, GA when the war broke out in April 2003 and I landed a role as an Infantry Platoon Leader in Iraq from Fed 2004 through March 2005. I never believed that our war on Iraq was justified and I made it know to my commander about two-thirds of the way through our deployment during my annual review meeting. Based on my actions up to that point, my commander was totally shocked that I wasn't a "believer". I was rated as one of the top Lieutenants in the battalion.
I guess I have nothing really to say other than I was there and I have way more blood on my hands than I care to have. I'm sorry for going along with the war and I'm sorry for a lot of stuff that I'm not going to get into right now. Just don't forget that many people who fought in the war are victims too. They were lied to and deceived and found themselves doing things they were morally against too.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)TBF
(32,090 posts)for me it was watching my dad come back injured from Viet Nam. He was much like you. In the early 60s he left his small town with the idea that he was doing something admirable for his country. Since then we've learned much more about Viet Nam (and he and my uncles learned a lot while they were there as well - especially the ones who worked as MPs).
I believe you.
LuvNewcastle
(16,856 posts)Our country should never put our citizens in the position you were in without a damn good reason. It was totally unnecessary, and it disgusts me that any of our 'leaders' are trying to make excuses for it now. It would have been better if the President had issued an apology for that war rather than have said what he said. Sickening.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)You volunteered to risk your life in defense of your country. In return, it is our duty as civilian citizens to ensure that we don't put you in harm's way unless it's absolutely necessary.
We failed in that duty.
frylock
(34,825 posts)I am so, so sorry.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)There's only one political issue that we strongly disagree on. *I* think that *all* young adults should be drafted into the military, he does not.
I want this because I believe that the only way we can possibly stop old Americans from sending young Americans to die is to make sure their young Americans who suffer and die, too. The Clintons, the Bushes, the Obamas, the Romneys... they'll do what they can to keep their kids out of the military. Today, it's the 99% that serve as canon fodder. Add the 1% and things will change in a big way.
Thank you for wanting to defend us. I wish that good impulse had been put to better use by our society, and that you had not suffered. But I feel blessed that you, and others like you, have that good impulse to help out. And I hope that I can and will do a little to help, too.
libodem
(19,288 posts)I just want to hug you and hold you and make it better. I have sons and this touched my heart. I'm all puddled up now.
JustAnotherGen
(31,879 posts)And I don't blame you. Just like I don't blame my dad for Korea or Vietnam either. You were just doing your job.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)insulting the freepers to their faces, and half of them are guffawing and lapping it up.
It would be an easy thing to do, but it wouldn't be to help them, it would be to demoralize them.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Indeed, a total inability to exhibit cognitive dissonance is just about the prime characteristic of wingnuts.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cognitive_dissonance
Manny's posts are so amusing to some of us and so enraging to others of us precisely because he zeroes in on portions of the cognitive dissonance that is a large part of our political culture here in the USA.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)Colbert makes fun of Republicans and conservatives, and sometimes they don't even know he's doing it. However, underneath the persona Colbert is a liberal.
Manny makes fun of Democrats and liberals, and sometimes they don't even know he's doing it.
I don't agree with Obama on this issue either, I just don't think a passive-aggressive OP that insults Democrats and liberals is the way to go about it.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)Can't say the same for the writer of the OP.
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)You must be using that urban dictionary again for your definition of liberal.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)and calling them "schmucks".
That is a pretty big insult IMO.
And you know full well I disagree with the RW urban dictionary words used against liberals and Democrats like "moonbats" and "Obamabots".
I've been on DU a long-time. I'm a proud moonbat but I would never use that word against other liberals or call them scmucks (even in a passive-aggressive ironic way).
Capt. Obvious
(9,002 posts)I couldn't find your post(s) about it again but I believe it was you positing on the origins of emoprog firebagger.
It was ABL blog (Granted, some more obscure blog could predate ABL) that brought those terms to the fore in 2009.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)It's all fun and games.
Manny does a good job of pointing out hypocrisy, but I think he's laughing at *all* of us on this site.
I could be wrong, I am a well known conspiracy theorist!
(Not really that well known, but it sounded more impressive).
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)He's even laughing at Manny.
In the end, we are all funny, and all tragic. We are all schmucks, too - especially Manny. i'm not joking about that: I wish I was.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)The few, the proud, the utterly looney.
This place cracks me up, it's one of the few things keeping me from taking off and nuking the entire site from orbit.
Just to be sure.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)Yeah, that's it.
CJCRANE
(18,184 posts)but I think the gratuitous self-inflicted insults in the OP are unnecessary.
Enthusiast
(50,983 posts)[URL=.html][IMG][/IMG][/URL]
snort
(2,334 posts)Mission Accomplished!
Scuba
(53,475 posts)LuvNewcastle
(16,856 posts)marble falls
(57,204 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)The two parties are not the same and only lazy thinkers use that argument.
Scuba
(53,475 posts)We get the same foreign policy, the same economic policy, the same energy policy, both parties wanting to cut the social safety net with the difference being 'how much'.
That ain't different enough.
leftynyc
(26,060 posts)any President has are his nominations to the federal bench, that's the issue I vote on. Anything else can be undone by subsequent presidents or congress. A republican president would never have let the tax break for the wealthy to expire or even mention raising the minimum wage so no, they're not the same economically, a republican president would never even mention alternative energy so no they're not the same on energy policy and a republican president would have SHREDDED the safety net so they're not alike there either.
TBF
(32,090 posts)and I see the wheels spinning as folks try to spin this one into something we'll accept.
xchrom
(108,903 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)http://www.democraticunderground.com/10024732240
That one went viral on Facebook.
Enjoy.
marble falls
(57,204 posts)bobduca
(1,763 posts)Dragonfli
(10,622 posts)He'll be back when that mission is accomplished.
marble falls
(57,204 posts)n2doc
(47,953 posts)trusty elf
(7,401 posts)[IMG][/IMG]
RandoLoodie
(133 posts)"He tried to kill my daddy." - Shrub
Progressive dog
(6,918 posts)RandoLoodie
(133 posts)Progressive dog
(6,918 posts)So Putin does get free passes forever because Iraq.
RandoLoodie
(133 posts)But the United States certainly has no business lecturing anyone about invading anything.
We lost that moral high ground (if this country ever had it) about a decade ago.
Progressive dog
(6,918 posts)Should the USA just withdraw from world affairs, ignore violations of international law,and refuse to stand by our European allies, because we invaded Iraq? That is what you are claiming.
RandoLoodie
(133 posts)those are the words you are putting in mouth.
I only said what I said.
Progressive dog
(6,918 posts)it was perfectly understandable. There is no need to put words in your mouth, you are doing fine.
RandoLoodie
(133 posts)hang in there.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)Progressive dog
(6,918 posts)you alerted on yourself.
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)In an alternative reality.
Is this the best you can do?
Progressive dog
(6,918 posts)what you said in this one, unless you just mean that you saw an opportunity to complain about President Obama and you took it..
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Boxerfan
(2,533 posts)I am not going to forgive forget or change my tune. The #1 repeat #1 failure of President Obama was not holding the bad actors accountable. Because they ARE war criminals...
This is some stupid popularity trick-RighT?
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)The bombings have stopped. Israel is no longer threatened... it was worth it.
For some.
lumberjack_jeff
(33,224 posts)tclambert
(11,087 posts)It makes me smile to think of it. Then I sigh, realizing it will never happen, that America is NOT a land where "no one is above the law."
lillypaddle
(9,581 posts)it goes on forever.
polichick
(37,152 posts)Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Maedhros
(10,007 posts)"We train young men to drop fire on people, but their commanders won't allow them to write "fuck" on their airplanes because it's obscene! " -- Colonel Walter Kurz, Apocalypse Now
Sure, we destroyed Iraq, killed and displaced millions. We continue to blow up innocent women and children in third world countries because they look like they might be with someone acting like a "terrorist." But don't insult the President! That's horrible!
raccoon
(31,119 posts)annabanana
(52,791 posts)Get to know the guy...
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)santamargarita
(3,170 posts)No apology or lame ass excuse can never make up all the people Bush murdered!
Puzzledtraveller
(5,937 posts)Richardo
(38,391 posts)The oh-so-ironic-aren't-I-witty schtick is beyond tiresome.
And the answer is no, not witty. "Witless" comes to mind.
sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)Whenever I see an OP written by someone I don't want to read, I just pass it by, definitely don't read it and never post a comment in it to tell everyone that I was forced to read it.
It's simple, next time you see Manny's name on an OP, don't click on it.
Phlem
(6,323 posts)black and white is definitely not nuanced.
-p
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Sheesh! Pony up a little something!
bobduca
(1,763 posts)Corruption Inc
(1,568 posts)despite how many times its perpetrators and defenders wish it to be so.
mike_c
(36,281 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)Arkana
(24,347 posts)Jesus, how many people around here lack critical-thinking skills? At NO POINT does Obama defend the war as a good thing. He never, ever, ever, ever, EVER said that it was. He was attempting to point out that even when America is at its WORST (and using the Iraq incursion as an example), that we attempted to get an international coalition (which we did, for however brief a time it was) and we did not forcibly annex Iraq the way Putin is doing to Crimea. Therefore, Putin's analogy is false.
It really is remarkable. I've never met a more stubborn group of people than the Angry Brigade here on this forum. Instead of allowing facts to shape your opinion, you have decided to form an opinion then twist the facts to fit it instead.
You have decided--DECIDED--that Obama is a warmongering, neocon, Bush-lite asshole, and despite all the evidence to the contrary, you will interpret anything that is not "sufficiently" condemning or combative in nature that comes out of the President's mouth--whether it is about health care, foreign policy, or the opposing party--to mean that he's in league with those Bush-era chickenhawk assholes. You know what other political demographic thinks in unvarying shades of black and white?
Yeah. That's right. You know the answer.
You folks are too smart not to have critical reading skills, so please, for the love of whatever God you worship, stop pretending you don't have them for the sake of manufactured outrage.
I realize this post won't last long, but I felt like writing it because I'm sick to death of people shooting first and asking questions later.
frylock
(34,825 posts)are you fucking shitting me?!!
Autumn
(45,120 posts)I think it was a lot more than bribes or lies. The world seemed to cower before a man who had difficulty speaking a coherent sentence at times.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)Even the smallest of countries strong-armed/bribed into token participation by threats from the State Department to withhold aid. Moldova - 24; Tonga - 55; Iceland - TWO! What a pathetic international joke that "coalition" was!
DevineBovine
(26 posts)I always enjoy your posts, MannyGoldstein.
Thank you.
Kablooie
(18,641 posts)The plan was to drive out Sadaam's regime, replace it with a puppet government and take over the oil fields.
Their honest mistake was thinking they had the competence to do this.
Divernan
(15,480 posts)Baitball Blogger
(46,757 posts)grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)kath
(10,565 posts)thanks for giving me a chuckle in the midst of all the sickening threads here by the pompom squad.
Spitfire of ATJ
(32,723 posts)gollygee
(22,336 posts)I can't see that in the link those words lead to.
Gothmog
(145,553 posts)Remember that President Obama is a lawyer and a law professor. What President Obama did in his speech was to distinguish the Iraq war from the situation in Crimea. Here is a simplified explanation of this concept. http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/distinguish
Distinguish
To set apart as being separate or different; to point out an essential disparity.
To distinguish one case from another case means to show the dissimilarities between the two. It means to prove a case that is cited as applicable to the case currently in dispute is really inapplicable because the two cases are different.
The Iraq war is a very different situation compared to the conduct of Russia in annexing Crimea. In his speech, President Obama did not defend the Iraq war but merely explained why the Iraq war was not relevant to the conduct of Russia in annexing Crimea.
As a lawyer, there is a huge difference here.
grahamhgreen
(15,741 posts)Torture is worse than a referendum, right?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)That's better than a referendum, right?