Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

90-percent

(6,830 posts)
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 08:33 AM Mar 2014

Berkshire Hathaway employs approximately 300,000 people!

I heard that yesterday and did enough internetting to confirm it's true.

That is truly mind boggling for merely a holding company. That's a hell of a lot of bonuses they have to pay out to all those money handling masters of financial extraction!

In truth, that's a stupid generalization. They may actually be nurturing for all the companies they own, especially if it includes companies that actually make tangible things, aka MANUFACTURING, which is one of the best wealth creators you can get. I mean, wealth creators that actually benefit the general economy, rather that creating wealth by arcane financial manipulations that have the intrinsic worth of bottled smoke. I think Warren does things for the long haul, instead of high frequency electronic trading measured in milliseconds, which I consider a magnificent piece of Wall Street perversion.

And if all those employees work as hard as the titans of Wall Street, the bill for the year end bonuses probably approaches the trillions!

-90% Jimmy

5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Berkshire Hathaway employs approximately 300,000 people! (Original Post) 90-percent Mar 2014 OP
But is that including the companies they own? vi5 Mar 2014 #1
" But I'm not sure the example you're using is an accurate one for tha tpoint" 90-percent Mar 2014 #4
Berkshire only has 24 employees working at their headquarters. former9thward Mar 2014 #5
here is a list melm00se Mar 2014 #2
Well they need a lot of brain power to come up with the best tax avoidance schemes... PoliticAverse Mar 2014 #3
 

vi5

(13,305 posts)
1. But is that including the companies they own?
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 08:42 AM
Mar 2014

I've worked for consumer goods companies that are owned by holding companies. We were freestanding companies, had 4 factories full of several hundred manufacturing jobs each across the country and all the attendant positions that come with that (Human Resources, finance, R&D, procurement, marketing, etc.). Technically we were all employees of the holding company and none of us made millions or got big bonuses except the top handful of execs.

At one point I think BH was one of our holding company suitors.

I'm the first to say that people just shuffling money from one place to another and making millions are a blight on our economy and society. But I'm not sure the example you're using is an accurate one for tha tpoint.

Maybe I'm wrong.

90-percent

(6,830 posts)
4. " But I'm not sure the example you're using is an accurate one for tha tpoint"
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 11:21 AM
Mar 2014

I agree with you. That's why I said this in my post: "In truth, that's a stupid generalization. They may actually be nurturing......."

I don't think Warren is a vulture capitalist in the same league as a Mitt Romney, who's predatory debt loading practices are a substantial blight on our embattled middle class.

Thanks for the clarity. I now think the 300,000 is the employees in the companies Berkshire owns. And it may be that the actual holding company has a tiny staff unto itself?

-jim

melm00se

(4,997 posts)
2. here is a list
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 08:56 AM
Mar 2014

(as of June 2011) of the companies that BH owns

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_Berkshire_Hathaway

wouldn't surprise me, at all, that they employ 300,000 people when you factor in all the companies that they own outright.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
3. Well they need a lot of brain power to come up with the best tax avoidance schemes...
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 09:21 AM
Mar 2014
"This particular cash-rich split-off breaks new ground since, to our knowledge, it is the only one in which the investment assets of the distributed subsidiary consist, at least in part, of the stock of the very shareholder to whom the subsidiary's stock is being distributed," Willens wrote on Thursday.[/div
http://www.thestreet.com/story/12529683/1/berkshire-may-avoid-400-million-tax-bill-in-graham-holdings-swap.html
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Berkshire Hathaway employ...