Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Chris Christie investigates self, finds self not guilty. OJ Simpson, Sandusky, Tsarnaev next? (Original Post) stevenleser Mar 2014 OP
Is he still looking for the real boss of Bridgegate? BeyondGeography Mar 2014 #1
LMAO, I think so. He has promised to berate and belittle them on national television once he tracks stevenleser Mar 2014 #2
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #3
Plausible? That's not a stretch given a boolean set of results. Both accept/reject are plausible. nt stevenleser Mar 2014 #6
Palin did the same thing...also found self "Not Guilty" n/t Sheepshank Mar 2014 #4
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #5
If memory serves me, by several someone elses Sheepshank Mar 2014 #9
Message auto-removed Name removed Mar 2014 #11
going back to my original post, she found herself not guilting of anything..just like Christie Sheepshank Mar 2014 #12
You must remember that we are a country of laws................... wandy Mar 2014 #7
He can celebrate by taking a selfie! oldandhappy Mar 2014 #8
LMAO. Well played! stevenleser Mar 2014 #10
 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
2. LMAO, I think so. He has promised to berate and belittle them on national television once he tracks
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 04:54 PM
Mar 2014

them down!

Response to stevenleser (Original post)

 

stevenleser

(32,886 posts)
6. Plausible? That's not a stretch given a boolean set of results. Both accept/reject are plausible. nt
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 05:09 PM
Mar 2014

Response to Sheepshank (Reply #4)

Response to Sheepshank (Reply #9)

 

Sheepshank

(12,504 posts)
12. going back to my original post, she found herself not guilting of anything..just like Christie
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 07:00 PM
Mar 2014

when she conducted an investigation on herself, she came up with a non guilty finding....do you have a problem with that statement? why the diversions? Are you denying that she was investigated by several someones? as for the finding of those other investigations .... look it up for yourself.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
7. You must remember that we are a country of laws...................
Thu Mar 27, 2014, 05:20 PM
Mar 2014

There are laws that apply to us folk.
Their are laws that apply to the rich, famous and powerful.

This 'trivial' bit of underhanded dealing will in no way damaged Chris Christie's chances to be the Teapublican nominee for president.

Just as long as Sheldon Adelson and the Koch brothers can agree that he will serve in their best interest.

followed by many words not commonly found in the bible.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Chris Christie investigat...