That's a kind of kooky argument. Pollard has already served nearly 30 years in prison. Snowden fled and is living the good life in Russia. (It must be good, I presume, or at least better than the life under the nefarious spymasters and overlords here.)
Wouldn't the more apt comparison be between Pollard and Manning? Both were working in the military, in intelligence. Both stole classified documents and handed them to foreign entities, one state, one organizational, which released it to states. (Well, sort of the same, but not quite.) Both were sentenced to prison time.
I would be happy to release Pollard after all this time if I thought it would be useful in negotiating some really important point that would end, at long last, the Israeli - Palestinian dispute. But I don't think we're even close to that. They should probably hold on to him at least until Netanyahu is gone from office. My understanding is that Pollard is ill, though (and up for parole next year), so maybe they're not giving up much if they think he's really ill and not going to last.
Finally, wouldn't another question be: how can you support Manning or Snowden while condemning Pollard? All of them saw themselves as "whistleblowers" (I know people will reject that moniker for Pollard, but I bet you anything he thought he was doing what he did for noble reasons.)
= new reply since forum marked as read
