Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJustice Ruth Bader Ginsberg: “This must be an April Fool’s joke."
This morning the Supreme Court heard arguments in Perkins vs. Federal Trade Commission, a case brought by billionaire venture capitalist Thomas Perkins, who claims that under First Amendments due process clause the number of votes a person is entitled to cast in an election for congress or the presidency should be proportional to how much that person pays in federal taxes. Several members of the Court seemed receptive. Sounds sensible, said Justice Antonin Scalia. If you pay a million dollars in taxes, you should get a million votes, just like an investor in a corporation. That was the original intent of the Founding Fathers. Justice Samuel Alito also was impressed. Obviously, if a corporation has First Amendment free speech rights, a corporation that pays taxes should have voting rights and in proportion to how much it pays in taxes. Clarence Thomas, who rarely speaks, was jubilant. No taxation without representation! he nearly shouted. On the other hand, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg expressed doubts. This must be an April Fools joke."
https://www.facebook.com/RBReich/posts/770539972958601?stream_ref=1
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 2315 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (19)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg: “This must be an April Fool’s joke." (Original Post)
kpete
Apr 2014
OP
It would work if it was the percentage of their worth that they pay in taxes. nm
rhett o rick
Apr 2014
#9
Scuba
(53,475 posts)1. But then Mitt Romney wouldn't get a vote! Unfair!
okaawhatever
(9,478 posts)2. The good news would be that Exxon and Google would have zero votes. nt
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)3. You know, since the 1% hardly ever pay taxes, this might work...
Us working class schleps would get all the votes!
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)5. "Us working class schleps would get all the votes!"
And cast those votes based entirely upon propaganda from the 1%.
Just like now.
joeybee12
(56,177 posts)6. I wouldn't...nt
FiveGoodMen
(20,018 posts)7. I wouldn't either.
But someone keeps voting for jerks who represent the 1% against the rest of us.
Lots of someones.
And if you ask them why, they'll quote a tested catch-phrase they've heard on TV or in church.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)4. If this wasn't from Reich' FB page, I wouldn't believe it. I don't
think he would joke about this.
indepat
(20,899 posts)8. The felonious five are pious jesters, but the joke is on us
rhett o rick
(55,981 posts)9. It would work if it was the percentage of their worth that they pay in taxes. nm
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)10. Kick! nt
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)11. Fortunately this is not real
I wasn't sure for awhile, whew.
Cha
(297,927 posts)12. There's 5 Fools on the Supreme Court Every Month of the Year.
Mahalo Judge Ginsburg.. thanks kpete