Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kpete

(72,038 posts)
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 01:32 PM Apr 2014

Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg: “This must be an April Fool’s joke."

This morning the Supreme Court heard arguments in “Perkins vs. Federal Trade Commission,” a case brought by billionaire venture capitalist Thomas Perkins, who claims that under First Amendment’s due process clause the number of votes a person is entitled to cast in an election for congress or the presidency should be proportional to how much that person pays in federal taxes. Several members of the Court seemed receptive. “Sounds sensible,” said Justice Antonin Scalia. “If you pay a million dollars in taxes, you should get a million votes, just like an investor in a corporation. That was the original intent of the Founding Fathers.” Justice Samuel Alito also was impressed. “Obviously, if a corporation has First Amendment free speech rights, a corporation that pays taxes should have voting rights and in proportion to how much it pays in taxes.” Clarence Thomas, who rarely speaks, was jubilant. “No taxation without representation!” he nearly shouted. On the other hand, Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg expressed doubts. “This must be an April Fool’s joke."


https://www.facebook.com/RBReich/posts/770539972958601?stream_ref=1
12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg: “This must be an April Fool’s joke." (Original Post) kpete Apr 2014 OP
But then Mitt Romney wouldn't get a vote! Unfair! Scuba Apr 2014 #1
The good news would be that Exxon and Google would have zero votes. nt okaawhatever Apr 2014 #2
You know, since the 1% hardly ever pay taxes, this might work... joeybee12 Apr 2014 #3
"Us working class schleps would get all the votes!" FiveGoodMen Apr 2014 #5
I wouldn't...nt joeybee12 Apr 2014 #6
I wouldn't either. FiveGoodMen Apr 2014 #7
If this wasn't from Reich' FB page, I wouldn't believe it. I don't snappyturtle Apr 2014 #4
The felonious five are pious jesters, but the joke is on us indepat Apr 2014 #8
It would work if it was the percentage of their worth that they pay in taxes. nm rhett o rick Apr 2014 #9
Kick! nt snappyturtle Apr 2014 #10
Fortunately this is not real dreamnightwind Apr 2014 #11
There's 5 Fools on the Supreme Court Every Month of the Year. Cha Apr 2014 #12
 

joeybee12

(56,177 posts)
3. You know, since the 1% hardly ever pay taxes, this might work...
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 01:34 PM
Apr 2014

Us working class schleps would get all the votes!

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
5. "Us working class schleps would get all the votes!"
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 01:39 PM
Apr 2014

And cast those votes based entirely upon propaganda from the 1%.

Just like now.

FiveGoodMen

(20,018 posts)
7. I wouldn't either.
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 01:43 PM
Apr 2014

But someone keeps voting for jerks who represent the 1% against the rest of us.

Lots of someones.

And if you ask them why, they'll quote a tested catch-phrase they've heard on TV or in church.

Cha

(297,927 posts)
12. There's 5 Fools on the Supreme Court Every Month of the Year.
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 02:19 AM
Apr 2014

Mahalo Judge Ginsburg.. thanks kpete

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Justice Ruth Bader Ginsbe...