Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(268,987 posts)
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 06:27 PM Apr 2014

Is a pattern emerging? Executions postponed by Fed Judge-What's the source of the drugs

http://time.com/47192/texas-execution-tommy-lynn-sells-drug/
<snip>
A Texas federal judge has postponed death sentences of two murderers until officials divulge the source of the execution drugs

A federal judge in Texas Wednesday halted the scheduled execution of a serial killer and another condemned man until the state reveals to their attorneys the source of the drugs that will be used to end their lives.

“We hope that the Texas Department of Criminal Justice will finally decide to comply with the law, and cease attempting to shroud in secrecy one aspect of their job that, above all others, should be conducted in the light of day,” said attorneys for the plaintiffs in a joint written statement.
22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Is a pattern emerging? Executions postponed by Fed Judge-What's the source of the drugs (Original Post) malaise Apr 2014 OP
How sick in the head does one have to be to support capital punishment? Jake Stern Apr 2014 #1
Very sick malaise Apr 2014 #2
It is good to see that not everybody in a robe is bloodthirsty. nt Jake Stern Apr 2014 #5
It's favored 60-35 Amak8 Apr 2014 #3
Doesn't matter if it's supported 99-1 it's still sick. Jake Stern Apr 2014 #4
Popularity and justice meet only rarely-- and then, only by coincidence... LanternWaste Apr 2014 #22
Not "sick in the head", just misguided. Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2014 #6
Degree of evil is no excuse for the state to engage in murder. Jake Stern Apr 2014 #7
I like the way you reason. malokvale77 Apr 2014 #8
Thank you! Jake Stern Apr 2014 #9
How can that be? kcr Apr 2014 #10
Execution is not murder, and using a loaded word is not an argument. Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2014 #11
You call it a "loaded word" I call it my "opinion" Jake Stern Apr 2014 #19
Unjustifiable I agree with, but criminal? Donald Ian Rankin Apr 2014 #21
So Joseph Stalin didn't murder millions because it was legal at the time? Major Nikon Apr 2014 #20
Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the decision countryjake Apr 2014 #12
Good grief malaise Apr 2014 #13
Can you believe the lightning speed they overturned that ruling? countryjake Apr 2014 #14
No surprise - Texas is notorious for executing people malaise Apr 2014 #15
I just hope the lethal drugs they're using don't take half an hour to work... countryjake Apr 2014 #16
The answer is yes davidpdx Apr 2014 #17
Gov. Jay Inslee, for one. Last month he said no executions while he's in office. countryjake Apr 2014 #18

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
1. How sick in the head does one have to be to support capital punishment?
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 06:39 PM
Apr 2014

It makes me want to vomit when someone cheers an execution.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
4. Doesn't matter if it's supported 99-1 it's still sick.
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 06:49 PM
Apr 2014

I imagine Roman gladiator fights were widely supported but that doesn't mean they were right.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
22. Popularity and justice meet only rarely-- and then, only by coincidence...
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 01:03 PM
Apr 2014

One might guess that if we stuck with polling, slavery in America may have lasted well into the twentieth century.

Popularity and justice meet only rarely-- and then, only by coincidence...

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
6. Not "sick in the head", just misguided.
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 06:59 PM
Apr 2014

There are some people out there who have done some really sickeningly horrible things; cheering their executions is entirely understandable. I think that many of the more vehement opponents of the death penalty haven't grasped just how evil some (and thereby hangs the rub) of its victims are - I don't know if you're one of those, but there are certainly many who are.

While I'm opposed to the death penalty, on the grounds that it will inevitably sometimes be misapplied and I don't think that executing innocent people is a price worth paying for executing guilty ones when imprisonment is a perfectly good option, if it could be applied infallibly I would think very seriously about supporting it.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
7. Degree of evil is no excuse for the state to engage in murder.
Wed Apr 2, 2014, 07:09 PM
Apr 2014

For the record I DO grasp just how evil some are and still I oppose state sanctioned murder.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
11. Execution is not murder, and using a loaded word is not an argument.
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 03:41 AM
Apr 2014

Murder is a crime; if an execution is legal then it is not murder. There *are* good arguments against the death penalty; I've just advanced one. But calling it "state sanctioned murder" is an attempt to circumvent rational argument by using a loaded and inaccurate word.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
19. You call it a "loaded word" I call it my "opinion"
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 11:05 AM
Apr 2014

which happens to be that capital punishment IS unjustifiable and criminal, and seeing as it's done in my name and with my tax dollars, I have every right to call it whatever appropriately derisive name I choose.

Donald Ian Rankin

(13,598 posts)
21. Unjustifiable I agree with, but criminal?
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 12:42 PM
Apr 2014

What law is it breaking?

When you say criminal, do you mean that you think it *ought* to be criminalised, or that you think it currently *is* criminal in America? And if the latter, what do you mean by "criminal" - legal executions certainly don't fit the usual definition of the word.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
20. So Joseph Stalin didn't murder millions because it was legal at the time?
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 11:26 AM
Apr 2014

While "state sanctioned murder" might be an oxymoron, I don't believe it's all that inaccurate. When the state executes people knowing inevitably some will be innocent, murder seems to be a pretty good description.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
12. Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the decision
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 04:52 AM
Apr 2014
Execution is back on for serial killer with S.A. ties
http://www.mysanantonio.com/news/local/article/Texas-executions-stayed-over-drug-source-5370603.php

A Houston federal judge on Wednesday blocked the executions of two condemned killers who argued that the state's failure to disclose details about the drugs that will be used to kill them violated their constitutional rights.

But hours later, the Fifth U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the decision, putting the Thursday execution of serial killer Tommy Lynn Sells back on schedule.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
14. Can you believe the lightning speed they overturned that ruling?
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 05:37 AM
Apr 2014

I respect the judge, too, this morning.

She must be spinning; the claim was that they threw out her decision so fast precisely because the execution was scheduled for today.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
16. I just hope the lethal drugs they're using don't take half an hour to work...
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 06:20 AM
Apr 2014

like that guy they put thru agony in Ohio. His family has a lawsuit against the state now and I'm hoping Ohio won't throw out the case.

McGuire execution lawsuit called similar to failed cases
http://www.toledoblade.com/Courts/2014/02/18/McGuire-execution-lawsuit-called-similar-to-failed-cases.html

davidpdx

(22,000 posts)
17. The answer is yes
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 06:39 AM
Apr 2014

And many governors have stopped executions in their states. I know Oregon isn't the only one, I just can't think of the others off the top of my head.

I hate to say it in this way, but the botched execution recently pretty much proved the point about executions being brutal.

It will be interesting to see if the pressure is kept on individual states about the type of drugs they use and where they are coming from.

countryjake

(8,554 posts)
18. Gov. Jay Inslee, for one. Last month he said no executions while he's in office.
Thu Apr 3, 2014, 06:52 AM
Apr 2014

Washington currently has nine men on Death Row and Gov. Inslee said that by calling for this moratorium, he hopes to reopen the debate, get people thinking.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is a pattern emerging? E...