General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsChili's Cancels Fundraising for Anti-Vaccination Autism Group
http://io9.com/chilis-cancels-fundraising-for-anti-vaccination-autism-1559627654Thank. Fucking. God.
This stupidity needs to end.
X_Digger
(18,585 posts)Mugu
(2,887 posts)is exactly right.
riqster
(13,986 posts)Research is SO important.
bullwinkle428
(20,629 posts)"That wasn't mentioned in my job description!"
MO_Moderate
(377 posts)I can't imagine why Chili's would support an organization that helps millions of autistic children and their families. Don't they know that believing as they are told is more important than actually helping people?
NickB79
(19,243 posts)This organization does.
There are far better autism awareness groups to donate to that don't promote the return of dangerous diseases AND use REAL science to fight autism.
The repudiation of another anti-vax organization is a good thing.
MO_Moderate
(377 posts)But I do believe all support is needed.
NickB79
(19,243 posts)By making parents think that autism is caused by vaccines and can be cured by chelation therapy, they give parents of autistic children a false sense of hope, a comparatively easy solution, that ends up stunting real therapies that may be more time-consuming and intense BUT are shown to provide real, long-lasting benefits.
They keep researchers bogged down having to prove over and over again that vaccines don't cause autism instead of working on the root causes of it.
And they give prospective parents the idea that they can simply prevent autism by skipping vital vaccinations that will ultimately lead to recurrences of dangerous, sometimes fatal diseases.
The "support" they give to those with autism or autistic children is not support at all.
MO_Moderate
(377 posts)those who must deal with autism on a daily basis.
If you have issues with that, then choose not to eat at Chili's and donate your money some other way. Don't bully Chili's to support your own personal beliefs.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)The stated primary mission is not necessarily the actual primary mission.
An organization that only spends 20% of its money on its "primary mission" is not being truthful about its primary mission.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)National Autism Association
April 4
In 2010, NAA saw a need. We saw children dying and we responded. We created the AWAARE Collaboration, AutismSafety.org, and with everyone's help, we put 10,000 Big Red Safety Boxes into the hands of those at highest risk of wandering away. We're parents and we love our community. Thank you to everyone who believes in us.
#autism #NeverGiveUp
[center][img][/img][/center]
Walk away
(9,494 posts)about what the organization stands for.
MO_Moderate
(377 posts)and I know some who have benefited from its support. The immediate needs of the suffering is more important than some one else's politics.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Okay you do not know what you are talking about.
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/child-adolescent.html
http://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/Concerns/Autism/Index.html
Walk away
(9,494 posts)if 80% goes to the people who run the place then very little money goes to the dangerous propaganda that they spew and even less to individuals.
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)And whooping cough, mumps, etc. Putting out incorrect information is harmful.
There are some kids who can't be vaccinated because they have compromised immune systems. Because of this group and others many kids and adults who could be vaccinated against diseases are not and the decrease in herd immunity puts people with compromised immune systems at risk. Of course the healthy kids not getting vaccinated are also at risk, but not as much, because they likely will fight off the diseases but in the meantime they infect others.
Response to MO_Moderate (Reply #4)
Post removed
Hip_Flask
(233 posts)... It doesn't take away from the fact that he is a batshit crazy asshole who shouldn't be associated with.
Fuck anti-vaxxers and their bullshit...
Response to Hip_Flask (Reply #7)
Name removed Message auto-removed
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)Investigators analyzed 25 genes in postmortem brain tissue of children with and without autism. These included genes that serve as biomarkers for brain cell types in different layers of the cortex, genes implicated in autism and several control genes.
Their findings are published in the online edition of the New England Journal of Medicine.
Building a babys brain during pregnancy involves creating a cortex that contains six layers, said Eric Courchesne, Ph.D., professor of neurosciences and director of the Autism Center of Excellence at University of California, San Diego (UC San Diego).
We discovered focal patches of disrupted development of these cortical layers in the majority of children with autism.
http://psychcentral.com/news/2014/04/07/study-shows-autism-begins-during-pregnancy/68189.html
DebJ
(7,699 posts)(1 in 48 I think it was) he said of course. Pollution.
MO_Moderate
(377 posts)that climate change needs to be addressed. Do we reject millions of dollars in help from orgs who believe it is cyclical rather than man made?
jeff47
(26,549 posts)This is the opposite situation. Giving millions to those who believe it is cyclical, not receiving millions.
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)shanemcg
(80 posts)Is rather than do their own work to get their point of view across (I mean the people that are offended evidently that vaccine might be associated with autism and why would someone be so offended by that?), they have chosen to go the path of ensuring other people don't get to fund raise for an issue that they evidently believe in enough to have done the work to organize. I wonder if it was lots of customers or just a few really loud ones.
Seems like there is a lot of stifling other people's speech these days, rather than doing the heavy lifting of educating people that THEIR POV is the correct one. It's just something I personally don't like.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)or their families.
Check out their most recently available financials.
http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2014/04/national-auti.html
And there is "free speech," and then there is "willfully disseminating known misinformation," and I feel absolutely no obligation to support the latter.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)Anti-Vaxers are dangerous to everyone else's children.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)Those who for one medical reason or another CANNOT get vaccinated and thus depend on herd immunity to keep themselves uninfected.
shanemcg
(80 posts)I don't think giving this group an avenue to fund raise is Chili's endorsement of their cause, nor do I see how Chili's customers are being forced to subsidize something against their will by them allowing this fund raiser.
People have a right to think that autism is on the rise due to vaccinations. They have a right to organize and raise funds to spread their ideas. If they are so wrong and stupid show them that by doing the same for your POV, rather than making the other people shut up. Seems the right thing to do from my POV.
Other people can't take vaccines, so other people should be forced to, even though they believe they could be doing grave damage to themselves of their children? I don't think any one should be forced to do anything like that, just like I don't believe the govt has the right to tell you with what you may treat yourself.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)completely uniformed about the dangers the anti-vaxx crowd pose to society as a whole.
I am also going to assume that you really do understand the difference between belief (using [commonly accepted and extensively researched] vaccines could be causing grave damage to themselves or their children) and fact (using [commonly accepted and extensively researched] vaccines DOES NOT ACTUALLY cause grave damage to themselves or their children in the vast majority of cases, barring those who are allergic to ingredients in the vaccines).
Further, I will assume that you are fully aware that state laws allow for religious exemptions from vaccines, as well as medical ones for allergies and such. They do not, however, allow for exemptions because a person chooses to believe patently untrue statements made by fraudulent parties and bogus 'researchers.'
Based on the above, I shall therefore lastly assume you a troll, bid you a good day, and wish you a pleasant and hopefully brief stay here at DU.
shanemcg
(80 posts)I'm going to assume some things about you too I guess.
But one thing we know for sure is you're an authoritarian who THINKS they know it all.
Oh, yes, people that don't vaCcinate are such a danger to you. Should they be locked up in camps or just be given the choice of take the shot or execution? We already know they shouldn't be allowed to express their point of view, right?
I can only assume that lots and lots of right wingers who weren't totally insane decided they must be Democrats, juding by a lot of things alleged Democrats post these days.
Just so I'm clear, a person must not only want to force vaccinate people, but shut them up besides to be a good Democrat these days?
Thanks for the warm welcome and wishes.
DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)Thank you for proving my point about trolling.
Off to the ignore bin with you.
Good lord...
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Well, I suppose promoting junk science that leads to outbreaks of preventable diseases among people who come into contact with 'anti-vaxxers' spreading easily preventable diseases is offensive.
But really, stupidity should be 'stifled' when it comes to public health. Science is not a 'debate'. There actually are 'right' and 'wrong' answers, not simply 'fair and balanced' nonsense. Reality actually matters, not the opinions of the ignorant. They can go fight over whether or not 'Honey Boo Boo' should be on tv.
jeff47
(26,549 posts)Anti-vaxxers are trying to kill people.
That isn't a "free speech" issue. It isn't a POV issue. It is bullshit made up by a doctor seeking to market his vaccine to replace the MMR vaccine, which was picked up by a celebrity. There is utterly zero evidence.
And the anti-vaxxers want people to die for it.
One of the enduring errors in our society is the belief that when people disagree, they only do so out of ignorance.
That simply isn't true. A right-winger will not suddenly turn to the left when you show him that "welfare" families are not Cadillac-driving-T-bone-scarfing-lazy moochers. In fact, showing him example after example will just harden his belief - you must be hiding the "real" ones.
Similarly, the "vaccines cause autism" crowd is not formed from ignorance. It's formed from the belief that there must be an answer as to why their perfect little snowflake is autistic. So something must have poisoned them. You show them data that proves mercury-based preservatives can't be the cause, and they'll assume you're hiding the real data to protect "big pharma".
There is no education that can fix deeply-held erroneous beliefs.
MrNJ
(200 posts)Warpy
(111,257 posts)Most of it was spent on anti vaccination rubbish. Well, that and "administrative overhead."
It's a scam with an Orwellian name.
People aren't "offended" when scientific illiterates try to blame autism on vaccines, they're outraged because first, the science has been done and the kid was autistic in the womb and second, the whole blame-the-wrong-thing is just as bad as when psychiatrists blamed it on cold mommies and the kids don't get any of the correct help, and third, their unvaccinated kids are out there spreading diseases to kids who can't be vaccinated because they're on chemo for cancer.
Chelation is dangerous and does not work unless the kid has heavy metals poisoning.
I'm sorry to break it to you, but facts trump belief. That's not stifling anybody's free speech, it's just pointing out who is an ass when they exercise it and this organization is full of asses.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)DeadLetterOffice
(1,352 posts)Go surf their webpages for a bit. Their first listed "cause" of autism is vaccinations, and they support chelation therapy. Both of which are completely unsupported by legitimate research.
According to one source (http://lizditz.typepad.com/i_speak_of_dreams/2014/04/national-auti.html), 80% of the organization's income goes to salaries, fundraising, and financing their annual conference, the Speakers List of which "reads like a Who's Who in Autism is Vaccine Injury."
saidsimplesimon
(7,888 posts)in greater numbers without vaccination will always be significantly greater than the lives saved. (That's assuming there are those who may be "allergic genetically" to toxins in the vaccines.)
DeSwiss
(27,137 posts)Agreed.
Tikki
(14,557 posts)The first 2 children were vaccinated as babies
the 3rd and 4th children have never been vaccinated.
Tikki
Moonwalk
(2,322 posts)...aunt and mother typical. None were vaccinated.
But, ultimately, our personal experience doesn't prove anything because we're a small sample. Larger samples, however, have been done and they have shown that vaccines have no effect one way or the other.
Tikki
(14,557 posts)As far as I know, no one has asked either parent why their third child is autistic and yet unvaccinated...
Tikki
Archae
(46,327 posts)4 generations, 5 kids, 7 grandchildren 7 great-grandchildren.
All were vaccinated.
None are autistic.
It's my family.