Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRachel Maddow putting on the table RIGHT now a great case why we should have NEVER gotten rid of the
space program in the U.S.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1376 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rachel Maddow putting on the table RIGHT now a great case why we should have NEVER gotten rid of the (Original Post)
diabeticman
Apr 2014
OP
pscot
(21,024 posts)1. Geez. I was thinking Fairness Doctrine
L0oniX
(31,493 posts)2. I was thinking Glass Steagall.
Benton D Struckcheon
(2,347 posts)4. I'll take Glass-Steagall & the Space Program.
As for the Fairness Doctrine, meh. We still have it, in that the State of the Union always has a response, which is just silly.
rickford66
(5,523 posts)3. space shuttle not the space program
The private space corporations will take over. They of course could never have progressed as far as they have without the years of research and funding of NASA.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)5. The story has been on media
For a week or so. Some of us even pointed that out.