Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:24 PM Apr 2014

For The Record: Snowden Gave Classified US Intel to the Chinese. It is a fact.

Ever since this first happened I have gotten the "oh yeah, prove it" response from the Snowdenistas whenever I mentioned it. I got tired of posting it for every low information (that didn't validate their point of view) DUr that claimed I was making shit up. Apparently I have only one more free visit to the paper's site and people are STILL going "oh yeah prove it." So instead of posting it individually for everyone who's google button broke off:

EXCLUSIVE: NSA targeted China's Tsinghua University in extensive hacking attacks, says Snowden

Tsinghua University, widely regarded as the mainland’s top education and research institute, was the target of extensive hacking by US spies this year
Tsinghua University in Beijing, widely regarded as the mainland’s top education and research institute, was the target of extensive hacking by US spies this year, according to information leaked by Edward Snowden.

It is not known how many times the prestigious university has been attacked by the NSA but details shown to the Post by Snowden reveal that one of the most recent breaches was this January.

The information also showed that the attacks on Tsinghua University were intensive and concerted efforts. In one single day of January, at least 63 computers and servers in Tsinghua University have been hacked by the NSA.

http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1266892/exclusive-nsa-targeted-chinas-tsinghua-university-extensive-hacking?page=all

There it is. Snowden went to China and gave a Chinese newspaper the individual servers the US is hacking in China.

202 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
For The Record: Snowden Gave Classified US Intel to the Chinese. It is a fact. (Original Post) arely staircase Apr 2014 OP
Yes he did! Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #1
Someone in another thread actually said this wasn't legit because it is arely staircase Apr 2014 #3
They're peddling really hard these days because Comrade Snowie's approval sucks here. Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #41
Another Tail Gunner Joe fan I see. BillZBubb Apr 2014 #127
Comrade? elias7 Apr 2014 #131
Who the fuck knows what kind of state "The New Russia" is today? Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #163
Snowden should love it in modern Russia. Libertarian paradise. Ikonoklast Apr 2014 #200
Dumbest Thread Ever billhicks76 Apr 2014 #48
...^ that 840high Apr 2014 #72
I live in the Washington, DC area... reACTIONary Apr 2014 #112
Your defense of the indefensible is laughable. BillZBubb Apr 2014 #114
Reasonable people may disagree... reACTIONary Apr 2014 #118
Glad that you know some of the good guys. They are anecdotal though. Indefensible GoneFishin Apr 2014 #141
The activites of the NSA... reACTIONary Apr 2014 #144
Total nonsense. Been down that road. Agree to disagree. Good evening. nt GoneFishin Apr 2014 #154
Not According To Russ Tice billhicks76 Apr 2014 #126
The United States government... reACTIONary Apr 2014 #135
Was Just Speaking Hyperbolically To Make A Point billhicks76 Apr 2014 #138
Since you mentioned him twice... reACTIONary Apr 2014 #152
Right on the MONEY! BillZBubb Apr 2014 #113
Then again, some of them may be reACTIONary Apr 2014 #128
What a laugh. BillZBubb Apr 2014 #132
Sez you... reACTIONary Apr 2014 #143
Good Money In Defending NSA billhicks76 Apr 2014 #129
You may have a good point. BillZBubb Apr 2014 #134
New York Times and The New Yorker billhicks76 Apr 2014 #137
Good Report On Bill Moyers billhicks76 Apr 2014 #142
Are you implying something? nt jazzimov Apr 2014 #196
Not With You But Yes It Exists Here Too billhicks76 Apr 2014 #199
It wasn't until you piped up. Tarheel_Dem Apr 2014 #162
I don't use pipes billhicks76 Apr 2014 #169
Well, because to about seven very loud DU'ers... Scootaloo Apr 2014 #179
Eddie also gave classified US intel to al qaeda.. Cha Apr 2014 #136
Hahaha billhicks76 Apr 2014 #168
So you just accused Cha of being a paid poster on DU? eom sheshe2 Apr 2014 #201
This message was self-deleted by its author oldhippie Apr 2014 #202
Snowden says he's defending the constitution... Cali_Democrat Apr 2014 #2
and he has boxes in his garage! arely staircase Apr 2014 #4
Yes, that and the Authoritareenz on DU are working for the Gubmint flamingdem Apr 2014 #102
Worse than the Gubmint... reACTIONary Apr 2014 #116
So you equate a right-wing newspaper with "the Chinese"? grasswire Apr 2014 #5
you have a good point arely staircase Apr 2014 #8
So the Chinese government people can't read the newspapers in their own country? pnwmom Apr 2014 #11
well it was in English arely staircase Apr 2014 #14
whooosh grasswire Apr 2014 #17
No,I got your point. Just thought it was very naive. n/t pnwmom Apr 2014 #20
Funny how the word "naive" Aerows Apr 2014 #73
If there was a document Aerows Apr 2014 #33
But, of course. Beneficiaries of the military-industrial complex, fat from feasting closeupready Apr 2014 #49
It has gotten so ridiculous Aerows Apr 2014 #174
I just think they are wasting their time here. This is a small website, closeupready Apr 2014 #194
Since I have actually dedicated my time Aerows Apr 2014 #195
And who exactly did this revelation harm? truedelphi Apr 2014 #6
I take it from your comment you are privy to all NSA and CIA operations globally. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #7
I take it from yours Aerows Apr 2014 #34
You're DAMNED straight I cheerlead the NSA spying on other nations. THAT'S THEIR JOB! MohRokTah Apr 2014 #38
MohRokTah Aerows Apr 2014 #42
And now when left with no valid argument, you resort to ad hominems and baiting. eom MohRokTah Apr 2014 #43
Would you like a transparent bag or a tranparent box? n/t Aerows Apr 2014 #67
So you believe in a black and white world, like fundies? MohRokTah Apr 2014 #75
Please continue to profess Aerows Apr 2014 #77
And again, you resort to ad hominems and baiting. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #81
Nor fact-based argument. nt SunSeeker Apr 2014 #120
Or wit. Number23 Apr 2014 #171
Glad I missed that thread. SunSeeker Apr 2014 #186
Did you know that when our spy apparatus went full time in the years after WW2... DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2014 #172
"Obama is the President of the United States Aerows Apr 2014 #177
No, it could harm actual US citizens treestar Apr 2014 #71
yeah I am sure the US was just looking at people's grades on the Chinese university server arely staircase Apr 2014 #10
It could easily have an effect on US-Chinese relations treestar Apr 2014 #68
DU rec...nt SidDithers Apr 2014 #9
You lap dog you!! Peacetrain Apr 2014 #12
Thanks for the reminder. nt pnwmom Apr 2014 #13
For the Record...YOU got it wrong again. bvar22 Apr 2014 #15
lol arely staircase Apr 2014 #16
You dodged the point...You posted BOGUS claims. bvar22 Apr 2014 #18
you seem extremely confused about a point of law.... msanthrope Apr 2014 #24
Is the Washington Post writer a traitor? Otelo Apr 2014 #40
Welcome to DU... SidDithers Apr 2014 #99
uh ok arely staircase Apr 2014 #21
Did you READ the atricle YOU linked to, arley? bvar22 Apr 2014 #25
name's arely arely staircase Apr 2014 #27
Start saying Edward Snowden and maybe elias49 Apr 2014 #63
Annnnnd......There we have it. bvar22 Apr 2014 #76
actually your funniest pic is in post 25 nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #185
Don't waste your time with them. Soylent Brice Apr 2014 #46
Hmmm, considering you did not counter his points at all makes me think they are correct. nt Logical Apr 2014 #101
Your thread is now over despite the rolling on the floor smilie. nt Mojorabbit Apr 2014 #155
what? arely staircase Apr 2014 #158
Your op has been debunked. :) nt Mojorabbit Apr 2014 #159
nope arely staircase Apr 2014 #160
Because the Chinese government doesn't read the newspaper? Your illogical msanthrope Apr 2014 #19
They have no less access to the Washington Post. TheKentuckian Apr 2014 #197
Ok....to your first assertion, yes. It matters not to whom or how it is disseminated.... msanthrope Apr 2014 #198
No, reading the article Aerows Apr 2014 #36
Great analysis on the constitutionality of NSA programs Otelo Apr 2014 #22
oh yeah, prove it! Helen Borg Apr 2014 #23
well played nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #26
Actually he gave it to the American People. The other countries just read it too. on point Apr 2014 #28
hey I wouldn't be surprised if someone tried to argue that for real nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #29
for the record... Soylent Brice Apr 2014 #30
I know, right arely staircase Apr 2014 #31
Or from Putin, either. Hekate Apr 2014 #35
I agree with your point about our intel community arely staircase Apr 2014 #58
That's "Snowden" with a capital "S" elias49 Apr 2014 #70
Seriously? (nt) Control-Z Apr 2014 #150
I like it with a lower case S. bravenak Apr 2014 #181
derp. Soylent Brice Apr 2014 #44
KnR Good luck. It's just barely possible that he is the most naive person who ever got entangled.... Hekate Apr 2014 #32
You're missing the whole damned point. And that's a fact. n/t DeSwiss Apr 2014 #37
I heard Snowden once went to the bathroom and DIDN'T WASH HIS HANDS!!! Vashta Nerada Apr 2014 #39
and had boxes in his garage! arely staircase Apr 2014 #51
The Pulitzer voters have clearly ruffled some feathers around here. marmar Apr 2014 #45
this^ Soylent Brice Apr 2014 #47
Well, That Pulitzer certainly provoked a regular Two Minutes of HATE from the NSA protectors. bvar22 Apr 2014 #88
HE DIDNT WIN THE PULITZER!!!!1!!!111! DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2014 #175
If i had not committed any crimes (like espionage or theft), I would never have left Thinkingabout Apr 2014 #50
If I thought I could get a legal trial Aerows Apr 2014 #52
Perhaps it would be best not to make the choice to commit crimes in which would Thinkingabout Apr 2014 #66
so? bowens43 Apr 2014 #53
Domestic US spying is still sleazy and uncalled for AgingAmerican Apr 2014 #54
The NSA, like the CIA, has always been incredibly corrupt, inept, and respects no laws at all Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2014 #55
It just makes them angry Aerows Apr 2014 #60
True. Meantime, they're doing lots of harm. They've been doing harm since forever, and nobody Sarah Ibarruri Apr 2014 #83
He revealed crimes and misconduct Aerows Apr 2014 #56
Telling The Chinese That They Are Being Attacked Is Not The Same As Collected Intelligence Information cantbeserious Apr 2014 #57
he told them how we spy on them arely staircase Apr 2014 #59
He Told The World How The USA Is Spying On All Countries - That Is Whistle Blowing cantbeserious Apr 2014 #61
no it isn't nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #62
Only In Your World - Most Of Us Are Grateful To Know How Corrupt The US Government Has Become cantbeserious Apr 2014 #64
do you disaprove of all US spying? arely staircase Apr 2014 #69
Many Disapprove What The NSA Has Become After 9/11 - Authorized By George Bush And Justified By John Yoo cantbeserious Apr 2014 #79
gotcha but what kind of spying should the US be doing? if any nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #82
You Gotcha Nothing cantbeserious Apr 2014 #87
so nothing. we should never spy on anyone ever arely staircase Apr 2014 #90
Ah The Rhetorical Putting Words In Others Mouths Approach cantbeserious Apr 2014 #95
I asked you what spying we should do and you wrote "nothing" arely staircase Apr 2014 #100
How Deep Down This NonSense Rabbit Hole Do You Want To Go - I Have Eternity - Do You cantbeserious Apr 2014 #104
what? nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #105
Right - What? cantbeserious Apr 2014 #106
You spy on your neighbors? GeorgeGist Apr 2014 #164
no, but then I am not a nation state nor being spied on myself arely staircase Apr 2014 #167
What happens at that University that could have an effect on national security of the US treestar Apr 2014 #65
"Comrade Eddie" Hissyspit Apr 2014 #85
Meh, I think it's funny treestar Apr 2014 #94
Channeling McCarthy won't win you any arguments here. BillZBubb Apr 2014 #125
Don't worry about it treestar Apr 2014 #145
He did not go to China. He shared the files with the POST.One of the media Snowden shared info with Sunlei Apr 2014 #74
he didn't go to China? nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #80
Kinda weird since everybody everywhere reported he went to China. MohRokTah Apr 2014 #92
Unrec for misleading headline. 840high Apr 2014 #78
George W. Bush gave the Chinese and the Russians one of our spy planes gratuitous Apr 2014 #84
Thanks for the Record of history, arely. They're getting sick of Cha Apr 2014 #86
It's amazing how bothered they are by that treestar Apr 2014 #96
For the record, Mi$$ RobMe and others of his ilk sold the Chinese our jobs. For profit. And of the jtuck004 Apr 2014 #89
He gave info to a newspaper. Like the Chinese don't already know their servers are being hacked. harun Apr 2014 #91
all old news huh? nothing to see here huh? arely staircase Apr 2014 #97
The 1950's called, they want their red scare name calling back. (n/t) harun Apr 2014 #170
the 40s called, they want Tokyo Rose back nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #184
The 1930's called, they want their whatever back. closeupready Apr 2014 #192
Good for him. Erich Bloodaxe BSN Apr 2014 #93
It wasn't just a university creeksneakers2 Apr 2014 #110
What the... Let me shove a little reality to your myopic view...most people know by now what I do Drew Richards Apr 2014 #98
sounds like a place we should have been hacking arely staircase Apr 2014 #103
I see what you did there bravo!...i agree but then again they already knew we are fighting back so Drew Richards Apr 2014 #107
There is a difference between them knowing we are trying and knowing we are succeeding. nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #108
You know the whole Cyber Command we built that everyone is upset about because the DIA has Drew Richards Apr 2014 #109
Again that would only be true if you pre-supposed they are stupid and dont know they have been Drew Richards Apr 2014 #111
well, regardless of which of us is right...and I will admitt you seem to know a lot more about arely staircase Apr 2014 #119
I totally understand how you feel...now let me blow your mind... Drew Richards Apr 2014 #123
I considered that in the early days. Could still be true. Unlikely, but now out of the question. nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #124
No shit, Sherlock... Democracyinkind Apr 2014 #115
so what was the point of telling them about it? nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #122
He was telling it to the Post, hence the audience was you, me and our Chinese equivalents. Democracyinkind Apr 2014 #133
Well if you tell the press you tell the Chinese government treestar Apr 2014 #146
Yes! Exactly!! Democracyinkind Apr 2014 #151
Whatever Comrade Snowden did... SoapBox Apr 2014 #117
So now it's the McCarthy-ite "Comrade" ad hominem BillZBubb Apr 2014 #121
Nyet comrade! We need no stinking McCarthy...we have the arts de politic of MAO-MAO Drew Richards Apr 2014 #130
This begs the question: which Mao? DisgustipatedinCA Apr 2014 #182
LOL OMG that was good...Grumpy kitty says there is only one MAO... Drew Richards Apr 2014 #183
As I read all these comments, one thing becomes clear WHEN CRABS ROAR Apr 2014 #139
Sadly true... BillZBubb Apr 2014 #156
WTF are you on about? For The Record: Snowden Gave Classified US Intel to Newspaper Readers cthulu2016 Apr 2014 #140
He should have incorperated first, Then he would only be looking at a fine. Nobel_Twaddle_III Apr 2014 #147
+1 nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #149
My heart bleeds for the poor, beleaguered, NSA and CIA. Tierra_y_Libertad Apr 2014 #148
I love how all these Edward Snowden hate threads elias49 Apr 2014 #153
It is certainly hard to understand the motivation of the Snowden attackers. BillZBubb Apr 2014 #157
because the only thing being discussed on DU arely staircase Apr 2014 #161
Emmanuel really is getting under your skin Fumesucker Apr 2014 #165
... arely staircase Apr 2014 #166
For the record Aerows Apr 2014 #173
Or... gcomeau Apr 2014 #176
In China Aerows Apr 2014 #178
HAIL HYDRA! whatchamacallit Apr 2014 #180
If that is your source Aerows Apr 2014 #187
my source is snowden arely staircase Apr 2014 #189
I have a question Aerows Apr 2014 #190
it is the name the agency gave me nt arely staircase Apr 2014 #193
K Cha Apr 2014 #188
At least he didn't give them our jobs. JEB Apr 2014 #191

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
3. Someone in another thread actually said this wasn't legit because it is
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:34 PM
Apr 2014

supposedly a Murdoch paper. I shit you not. It probably is, but Snowden gave them an interview! I guess they just made up all those quotes and Snowden never called bullshit on them because you know...

Tarheel_Dem

(31,220 posts)
41. They're peddling really hard these days because Comrade Snowie's approval sucks here.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:53 PM
Apr 2014

And it continues to slide. The PR campaign, so far, is a BUST!

Huffpo: "Americans Might Not Support Edward Snowden, But They Support Disclosing Programs"

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/01/edward-snowden-support_n_5071938.html

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
127. Another Tail Gunner Joe fan I see.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:23 PM
Apr 2014

Nothing liking labeling someone "Comrade" to attack your target. Joe McCarthy would be proud.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
200. Snowden should love it in modern Russia. Libertarian paradise.
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 08:28 PM
Apr 2014

If you get screwed by an Oligarch, it was your fault.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
48. Dumbest Thread Ever
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:06 PM
Apr 2014

And pathetic comments too. How about focusing on the real traitors instead of sucking up to the human filth that spy on and blackmail their own people.

reACTIONary

(5,763 posts)
112. I live in the Washington, DC area...
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:08 PM
Apr 2014

... in fact, not that very far from Ft. Meade. Not less than a few of the so called "human filth" you degenerate are among my friends and neighbors. Although I don't work in signals intelligence, a few of the folks I work with have in the past or have family members who do.

They are not traitors. They are not blackmailers. And when they do spy on American citizens it is done in accordance with due process and for good reason.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
114. Your defense of the indefensible is laughable.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:11 PM
Apr 2014

They are spying on Americans WITHOUT DUE PROCESS. The Snowden revelations clearly prove that. And the reasons the NSA put forth are NOT GOOD. They are BS.

reACTIONary

(5,763 posts)
118. Reasonable people may disagree...
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:13 PM
Apr 2014

... in fact, I'd go so far as to say reasonable people WOULD disagree.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
141. Glad that you know some of the good guys. They are anecdotal though. Indefensible
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:50 PM
Apr 2014

activities are being paid for with our own tax dollars, and then lied about.

Glad to hear there are still some good, law abiding players though.

reACTIONary

(5,763 posts)
144. The activites of the NSA...
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 09:00 PM
Apr 2014

... are all authorized by law and are conducted under oversight from all three branches of government. The are not indefensible, rather, they are indispensable.

They are, of course, largely secret activities and thus they cannot be talked about and disclosed in the same frank manner that other government activities are. But secrecy is necessary.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
126. Not According To Russ Tice
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:22 PM
Apr 2014

Yes it's wrong of me to paint with such a broad brush, label an entire group or make such blanket statements. I've met good people in those agencies too. But there were also "good" people in the German government during the Nazi rise and many serial killers are quite polite. So what. The fact is many of these people have blood on their hands and feed a corrupt institution. Your arguments could be used to defend and deplorable government that spies on its own people. 911 was very effective in turning us into scared little sheep.

reACTIONary

(5,763 posts)
135. The United States government...
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:33 PM
Apr 2014

... is not Nazi Germany and my friends, I assure you, are neither serial killers nor war criminals. Corrupt institutions are made up of corrupt individuals, and that does not describe the more than a few people I have known who have worked for the NSA.

My argument certainly could be used to defend our government's signals intelligent programs, including those aspects that occasionally are used against American citizens for legitimate security purposes.

I don't go so far, however, as to claim that they are all quite polite. On the contrary, several of them have been known to be rude!

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
138. Was Just Speaking Hyperbolically To Make A Point
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:41 PM
Apr 2014

There are good people there though...you are correct. Snowden was one of them. So is Russ Tice who was fairly high level and said he was mostly asked to tap our politicians, journalists and judges phones and email to build dossiers on them for "leverage" purposes which is a nice way of saying blackmail.

reACTIONary

(5,763 posts)
152. Since you mentioned him twice...
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 09:42 PM
Apr 2014

... I pulled up the Russ Tice dossier. Looking it over, I was not impressed.

My opinion is that we should be careful about hyperbole on the inter-webz. It isn't always easy to recognize in that context, and there actually are people who will get carried away by it and end up believing it.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
113. Right on the MONEY!
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:08 PM
Apr 2014

The apologists for the Government Snooping State blame the messenger and ignore the message.

reACTIONary

(5,763 posts)
128. Then again, some of them may be
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:23 PM
Apr 2014

... blaming the messenger FOR the message. He did, after all, undermine our national security.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
132. What a laugh.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:27 PM
Apr 2014

Snowden didn't undermine our national security. He embarrassed the national security apparatus. Too bad the government didn't treat him as a whistleblower from the start and forced him to reside in foreign lands.

BTW, your name seems to perfectly fit your politics.

reACTIONary

(5,763 posts)
143. Sez you...
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:52 PM
Apr 2014

... many others, some with the knowledge to asses the damage, would disagree. And have.

“Make no mistake: We are going to be dealing with the fallout from that for all of your careers, and the impact that that has had on our national security will reverberate for decades,” Michael Daniel, special assistant to the president for cyber security, told Naval Academy midshipmen. Snowden compromised sensitive “accesses” used by the National Security Agency to conduct electronic spying, along with “techniques and tools that are no longer available to us,” Daniel said, without elaborating.


BTW, my politics are liberal, democratic, and progressive. I just don't believe that democracy is a suicide pact.
 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
129. Good Money In Defending NSA
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:25 PM
Apr 2014

Anyone need a job? NSA and military contractors are paying good money for online opinion "management". If you like to blog or comment online they are hiring. Paid for with your tax dollars.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
134. You may have a good point.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:31 PM
Apr 2014

I have to admit I am stumped at how people on a supposedly liberal site could fight so hard to kill the messenger rather than deal with the message.

Maybe some are paid to do so.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
137. New York Times and The New Yorker
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:36 PM
Apr 2014

They already write about it. There is a cyber war going on and it's all about opinion management and propaganda. Stratfor, Carlyle Group, KBR and BoozeAllen are major players and they are subcontracted with OUR tax dollars. These people are borderline evil.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
142. Good Report On Bill Moyers
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:50 PM
Apr 2014

Discussing anonymous online commenting and how negative comments give readers polarizing opinions even if they have no idea of the facts of an article. It makes sense for those being written about or the power structures they enjoy to pay people to influence those articles with predetermined comments. Corporations do it all the time when there are articles about their products. The military, intelligence agencies and federal law enforcement use these methods...usually subcontracted and outsourced.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
199. Not With You But Yes It Exists Here Too
Tue Apr 29, 2014, 06:33 PM
Apr 2014

It's much like the phony online, sock-puppet profiles that the New York Times and The New Yorker exposed. They are run by paid military contractor employees outsourced by such agencies as the US military, NSA, republican PACs, corporations and foreign governments that want to improve their image and " MANAGE" public opinion. One person often manages up to 100 fake profiles a day, littering the web and news sites with its " comments". Even if this manager quits, gets fired or promoted the next manager steps in and resumes using those profiles which means even though they are fake they can have thousands of comments attributed to their name because they exist in cyberspace and never die or have their account terminated....they, in fact, usually have more comments in their historical profiles because they are quite active daily because it's a job to them. The worst offender is Strafor but firms like KBR, Booze Allen, and the old Blackwater are heavily engaged. HuffPost had commenters exposed but it's the price of having the gift if the internet I suppose. We just need to be educated, aware and vigilant. Anyone who can't face facts is being naive. This us the way the world works...when money is involved people and corporations do what's in their own interests.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
169. I don't use pipes
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 08:58 PM
Apr 2014

But the fact is NSA is a just a massive blackmail machine since 2002 against politicians, judges, generals and journalists. Read high level NSA analyst Russ Tice's interviews. There aren't enough terrorists to keep tem occupied anyway. As reported, the rest of their time is spent pursuing low level drug offenders for the DEA's Special Operations Division. The Drug War cash cow became unpopular with the people so they just rebranded it into the war on terror. There is a lot of money at stake in this mess which is why, as reported by the New York Times and New Yorker, these agencies are paying outsourced military contractors loads of money to blog and comment on sites like this with paid for, sockpuppet, fake profiles to "MANAGE" public opinion. That's why we need to keep up the good fight but also ignore the rabid ones out here that sound like they grew up in The FoxNews Womb.

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
179. Well, because to about seven very loud DU'ers...
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 09:48 PM
Apr 2014

It's only reason if it makes a Democrat look bad. everything else is a "divisive tactic" that we should "put behind us."

Cha

(296,679 posts)
136. Eddie also gave classified US intel to al qaeda..
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:35 PM
Apr 2014


More Snowden leaks - and this time Al Qaeda is the surveillance target (+video)

".. But what caught my eye in one of the unredacted slides was the mention of Al Qaeda in Iraq being a particular target of the NSA's efforts. The slide reads: "Visual Communicator – Free application that combines Instant Messaging, Photo-Messaging, and Push2Talk capabilities on a mobile platform. VC used on GPRS or 3G networks." The next five words were what the Times tried and failed to redact: "heavily used in AQI Mosul Network."

The aim as described in the documents is to target mobile phone apps that can give away a target's physical location. The utility of this in tracking terrorists hardly needs to be stated. The document describes a program focusing on clear security interests – Al Qaeda in Iraq, now calling itself Al Qaeda in Iraq and the Levant (ISIS) – killed thousands in Iraq during the US-led war there and continues to carry out suicide bombings and attacks on civilians there on a weekly basis. ISIS is also deeply involved in the civil war in Syria, and the groups ties to Al Qaeda make it an obvious security concern for the US.."


snip//

"..But his claim that "none of this has anything to do with terrorism" is not reasonable. That's pure nonsense -- as is his attempt to suggest that any revelations of eavesdropping techniques can't do any harm because terrorists already know all about it. Terrorists may know that the US is trying to spy on them as best it can (just as Germany and France know that). But knowing the precise method is another thing altogether."

MOre..
http://www.csmonitor.com/World/Security-Watch/Backchannels/2014/0130/More-Snowden-leaks-and-this-time-Al-Qaeda-is-the-surveillance-target-video

Never quite made it to Ecuador..
 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
168. Hahaha
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 08:50 PM
Apr 2014

You get paid for this crap? You belong on Faux News. I guess we have to put with disinfo like this when we talk negatively about the very computer adept NSA. I've seen your posts before and they are simply outrageous.

Response to sheshe2 (Reply #201)

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
2. Snowden says he's defending the constitution...
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:33 PM
Apr 2014

....yet lately he's only been revealing US espionage activities against other countries. These activities certainly are not unconstitutional. Intelligence agencies were setup for these activities.

As if China doesn't spy on the US....

reACTIONary

(5,763 posts)
116. Worse than the Gubmint...
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:11 PM
Apr 2014

... the National Endowment for Democracy! They are the ones behind all those human rights film festivals in Ukraine!

grasswire

(50,130 posts)
5. So you equate a right-wing newspaper with "the Chinese"?
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:44 PM
Apr 2014

Oh wait. You waffled.

"For the Record: Snowden Gave Classified U.S. Intel to the Chinese. It is a fact"

then...

"There it is. Snowden went to China and gave a Chinese newspaper the individual servers the US is hacking in China."

So you have copped to the second, and abandoned the first?

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
8. you have a good point
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:50 PM
Apr 2014

I doubt the Chinese government even read the Chinese newspaper in which Edward Snowden announced what Chinese government servers the NSA hacks - given when he was in China trying to get asylum from the Chinese government.

pnwmom

(108,950 posts)
11. So the Chinese government people can't read the newspapers in their own country?
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:53 PM
Apr 2014

And it would never control them, right?

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
14. well it was in English
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:57 PM
Apr 2014

and they probably weren't interested in what Snowden was saying even if any of them could read English.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
73. Funny how the word "naive"
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:27 PM
Apr 2014

seems to substitute for "Not agreeing with your narrative anymore."

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
33. If there was a document
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:39 PM
Apr 2014

written in Sanskrit that tangentially allied Snowden with a cannibal tribe in a remote New Guinea mountain, it would be worthy of literary scholarship. "Snowden supports eating relatives" it would read.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
49. But, of course. Beneficiaries of the military-industrial complex, fat from feasting
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:08 PM
Apr 2014

on all the lucrative government defense contracts, have deployed that attack strategy now for many moons. Not sure how effective it has been.

 

closeupready

(29,503 posts)
194. I just think they are wasting their time here. This is a small website,
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 11:32 PM
Apr 2014

with habitues who are hardcore news junkies and liberals, not really mainstream people, and most people don't search google for links to discussions about current events. But you know, I guess as long as they are throwing their money away, I'm fine with righties trolling our boards, lol.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
195. Since I have actually dedicated my time
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 11:37 PM
Apr 2014

in service to this tiny board, I'm sure I am deemed a "righty". How dare I question the establishment in DC! I'm OK with it, and I encourage them to bring it on.

truedelphi

(32,324 posts)
6. And who exactly did this revelation harm?
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:45 PM
Apr 2014

That would be the more pertinent point.

It is hardly as if this revelation contained the USA's nuke launch codes, the way your headline makes it seem.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
7. I take it from your comment you are privy to all NSA and CIA operations globally.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:47 PM
Apr 2014

Otherwise, you have no clue who may or may not hae been harmed by the release of the intel.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
34. I take it from yours
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:42 PM
Apr 2014

You aren't, and are just providing the rah rah squad.

"Harmed by the release of this "intel" "

What you actually mean is "OMG someone might be politically harmed by this intel".

You have to be kidding me.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
38. You're DAMNED straight I cheerlead the NSA spying on other nations. THAT'S THEIR JOB!
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:45 PM
Apr 2014

And operatives can be harmed by disclosure of international intelligence gathering. Once methods are disclosed, people get hurt.

Had Edward Snowden done nothing other than release the information about domestic surveillance, I'd cheerlead him. HE didn't. He crossed the fucking line and that makes him nothing less than a traitor.

 

MohRokTah

(15,429 posts)
75. So you believe in a black and white world, like fundies?
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:28 PM
Apr 2014

NSA spying on Chinese = carrying out the purpose for their existence.

NSA spying on citizens domestically = unconstitutional

Snowden ratting out NSA spying on citizens domestically = good move, BRAVO.

Snowden revealing operational specifics on ongoing spying efforts directed at other nations = TREASON.

I can walk and chew bubblegum at the same time. Can you?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
77. Please continue to profess
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:30 PM
Apr 2014

These Ideals of yours are amazing. I want to hear more.

Can I subscribe to your newsletter?

Number23

(24,544 posts)
171. Or wit.
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 09:02 PM
Apr 2014

Unless it's totally unintentional. See the "Obama's mom worked for the CIA" thread from a few weeks ago. There aren't enough and in the world for that bit of nonsense.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
172. Did you know that when our spy apparatus went full time in the years after WW2...
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 09:32 PM
Apr 2014

...that one of the first things we did was to overthrow a peaceful country that liked us and wasn't in bed with the Soviet Union? True, this was the CIA under Allen Dulles--the NSA wasn't around yet. I'm not particularly tying my post to Snowden, but I am reminding all to be careful about what you support. The United States doesn't always operate with honor, decency, or honesty--there are a few hundred other examples that help to make the same point.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
177. "Obama is the President of the United States
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 09:44 PM
Apr 2014

that means I do not give a shit, he is President and I do not give a good goddamn what he does in our name because he is President."

It's a sorry argument, but that seems to be what it has degenerated to.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
71. No, it could harm actual US citizens
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:27 PM
Apr 2014

Unless you think we have no right to defend ourselves? You really think other countries are pussy cats?

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
10. yeah I am sure the US was just looking at people's grades on the Chinese university server
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:53 PM
Apr 2014

nothing related to arms control or Chinese hacking of our own computers. nah. they were just sitting around the NSA rolling on the floor laughing at sophomores who flunked biology.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
68. It could easily have an effect on US-Chinese relations
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:25 PM
Apr 2014

Why did Comrade Eddie wish to harm those? That has nothing to do with allegedly unconstitutional collection of metadata with a warrant.

Peacetrain

(22,870 posts)
12. You lap dog you!!
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:54 PM
Apr 2014
sorry.. someone in another thread is saying people who question Snowden's tactics are lapdogs for Obama.. I just could not resist

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
15. For the Record...YOU got it wrong again.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 05:58 PM
Apr 2014

Did you READ the article YOU cited?

"It is not known how many times the prestigious university has been attacked by the NSA [font size=3]but details shown to the Post by Snowden[/font] reveal that one of the most recent breaches was this January."



How can you miss something in plain Black & White?
It is right there in the 2nd paragraph, fer gawds sake.
You really should read the stuff before you link to it.
That will save you from future embarrassments, like today.

Snowden gave this information to "The Post",
NOT the Chinese Government.
The editorial Board at The Post decided to publish it.

Your claim that Snowden gave this information to the Chinese is now [font size=3]OFFICIALLY DEBUNKED.[/font]
...though that fact that old arely staircase has once again posted BOGUS information to DU
will not matter to some.

On Edit:
http://www.scmp.com/news/china/article/1266892/exclusive-nsa-targeted-chinas-tsinghua-university-extensive-hacking?page=all
The Link YOU provided above so that everyone reading this thread can easily verify for themselves that you posted and easily disprovable FALSE claim.


 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
24. you seem extremely confused about a point of law....
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:18 PM
Apr 2014

The law simply does not care how Edward Snowdon made intelligence available to the Chinese government.

The fact that it was made available either through a newspaper or through other means is a crime.

You seem to be confused about the fact that just because he went and talked to a reporter this somehow made it some type of arm's length third party transactions and therefore was not a violation of the law.... you are incorrect.

Take a look at the Daniel Ellsberg prosecution.... it didn't matter that he went to newspapers.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
21. uh ok
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:08 PM
Apr 2014

63 computers and servers in Tsinghua University in Beijing

and

Chinese University of Hong Kong

and

focusing much attention on so-called “network backbones”,

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
25. Did you READ the atricle YOU linked to, arley?
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:21 PM
Apr 2014

Apparently not,
because it states in clear, English print,
right there in the 2nd Paragraph that Snowden gave the information to The Post.

So your claim that "Snowden Gave Classified US Intel to the Chinese" is absolutely [font size=3]DEBUNKED[/font] ...again.


BTW: That is exactly what legitimate Whistle Blowers do.
They pass the information to accredited Media Outlets,
and their editorial boards decided what to publish.

BTW2: I'm is favor of letting foreign universities KNOW that the NSA is hacking their computers.
You DO know that China is a MFN Ally?



*Rampant Government Secrecy and Democracy can not co-exist.

*Persecution of Whistle Blowers and Democracy can not co-exist.

*Government surveillance of the citizenry and Democracy can not co-exist.

*Secret Laws and Democracy can not co-exist.

*Secret Courts and Democracy can not-co-exist.

*Our Democracy depends on an informed electorate.

You either believe in Democracy, and government accountable TO The People,
or you don't.
It IS that simple.




bvar22

(39,909 posts)
76. Annnnnd......There we have it.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:29 PM
Apr 2014

ALL you got are funny photos and BOGUS claims.

If you have any integrity,
you could go back and Edit your OP so that it reflects the truth,
and not bogus figments of your fevered imagination.


Another FAIL.
The information in the linked article
contradicts the claims made by the OP.

SEE!
I got funny pix too!

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
19. Because the Chinese government doesn't read the newspaper? Your illogical
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:08 PM
Apr 2014

assertion that this has somehow been debunked makes no sense.

If I steal classified intelligence regarding covert surveillance of another government.... and I make it available to that government... it is a crime. Understand that the law does not care how you made it available.

Thats what you seem to be missing in this analysis..... The law simply does not care how he made this intelligence available. It's still a crime.

TheKentuckian

(25,011 posts)
197. They have no less access to the Washington Post.
Tue Apr 22, 2014, 12:35 AM
Apr 2014

With this logic if anyone ever releases classified information to the press they have then given classified information to the Chinese, who we are not at war with and in fact have very close ties.
In fact, they enjoy most favored nation status so they cannot be reasonably defined as an enemy. I'm pretty sure we weren't borrowing from Hitler.

The foaming at the mouth is silly.

 

msanthrope

(37,549 posts)
198. Ok....to your first assertion, yes. It matters not to whom or how it is disseminated....
Tue Apr 22, 2014, 06:05 AM
Apr 2014

As to your second assertion...Jonathan Pollard.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
36. No, reading the article
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:43 PM
Apr 2014

doesn't support the narrative that there is a vast conspiracy to undermine President Obama

Because Snowden showed that there have been violations since ... President Bush did them, too.

Hekate

(90,496 posts)
35. Or from Putin, either.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:43 PM
Apr 2014

I mean, how can we live with ourselves.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Now having said that, for the record I would like to state that the US has an awful lot of housecleaning to do in our own intel community. Our hands are not clean.

But that does not mean we just give away the store to nations that are -- and again I repeat myself for the umpteenth time -- Not Our Friends. If you believe they are, I have a big purple dinosaur for you to spend the rest of your life watching on teevee.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
58. I agree with your point about our intel community
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:19 PM
Apr 2014

I even give snowden credit for getting the ball rolling to end metadata collection. but he also committed espionage for the Chinese and is now doing Russian propaganda. he could have been a hero but he chose another path.

 

bravenak

(34,648 posts)
181. I like it with a lower case S.
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 09:50 PM
Apr 2014

snowden. Like that. Just sayin'.
Or cheese faced twit. My fave. Just sayin'.
Or putins werkzeug. Thats a good one.

Hekate

(90,496 posts)
32. KnR Good luck. It's just barely possible that he is the most naive person who ever got entangled....
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 06:37 PM
Apr 2014

...in global politics.

But that beggars the imagination.

marmar

(77,042 posts)
45. The Pulitzer voters have clearly ruffled some feathers around here.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:02 PM
Apr 2014

It's kind of amusing, in a tragicomic way.


bvar22

(39,909 posts)
88. Well, That Pulitzer certainly provoked a regular Two Minutes of HATE from the NSA protectors.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:37 PM
Apr 2014


They ARE on the Wrong. Side. of. History,
and many of them now KNOW that
but don't have the ego strength to admit it.

Their desperation has gotten embarrassing, like THIS thread
where the linked article contradicts the claim made by the OP.
How Pathetic.


You will know them by their WORKS.
 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
175. HE DIDNT WIN THE PULITZER!!!!1!!!111!
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 09:41 PM
Apr 2014

at least that's what I kept reading in GD last week. Apparently there are those who think the Post's and Guardian's gardening sections or puzzle pages get credit for breaking the NSA story.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
50. If i had not committed any crimes (like espionage or theft), I would never have left
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:13 PM
Apr 2014

The US, would stay and prove the "false charges" are wrong. But on the other hand I would have tried to peddle my take to other countries.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
52. If I thought I could get a legal trial
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:15 PM
Apr 2014

being held in humane conditions and then getting tried for my "crimes" I'd agree with you.

If I thought I'd be sent to a hell hole never to be heard from again? Hell no, I'd take whatever asylum I could get while revealing misconduct by the government.

Thinkingabout

(30,058 posts)
66. Perhaps it would be best not to make the choice to commit crimes in which would
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:24 PM
Apr 2014

Cause one to be put in a hell hole to never be heard from again. It would be a legal trial, there is not a need to have an illegal trial, they have evidence. Bring him back and see who.is wrong.

 

AgingAmerican

(12,958 posts)
54. Domestic US spying is still sleazy and uncalled for
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:16 PM
Apr 2014

No amount of smearing the messenger makes it otherwise.

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
55. The NSA, like the CIA, has always been incredibly corrupt, inept, and respects no laws at all
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:17 PM
Apr 2014

Even reading over what wikipedia says about the NSA is terrifying:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Security_Agency

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
60. It just makes them angry
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:20 PM
Apr 2014

like the emotional toddlers they are that people realize that all they know is "throw poo at opponent to make my poo look more strong".

Sarah Ibarruri

(21,043 posts)
83. True. Meantime, they're doing lots of harm. They've been doing harm since forever, and nobody
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:33 PM
Apr 2014

ever puts them under some sort of control.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
56. He revealed crimes and misconduct
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:18 PM
Apr 2014

He reasonably discerned that he would be prosecuted for revealing crimes.

If that is your idea of a spy, then your idea of a patriot is one I do not adhere to.

cantbeserious

(13,039 posts)
79. Many Disapprove What The NSA Has Become After 9/11 - Authorized By George Bush And Justified By John Yoo
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:30 PM
Apr 2014

eom

treestar

(82,383 posts)
65. What happens at that University that could have an effect on national security of the US
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:24 PM
Apr 2014

is another interesting question. True, why did Comrade Eddie reveal that? It's not "spying on Americans."

Hissyspit

(45,788 posts)
85. "Comrade Eddie"
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:35 PM
Apr 2014

That is so ugly. Brings to mind the ugliest of tactics from all the ignorant far right-wingers throughout my 50 years of living in the United States. And you don't have a clue, or do you?

treestar

(82,383 posts)
94. Meh, I think it's funny
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:43 PM
Apr 2014

I do not attribute all the hullabaloo you seem to attribute. He's a public figure. By his own choice. We're not calling him a commie. Just pointing out that he's a Russian now.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
125. Channeling McCarthy won't win you any arguments here.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:21 PM
Apr 2014

Odd that you would choose to use a tried and true right wing tactic to smear someone. Or maybe it isn't so odd.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
145. Don't worry about it
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 09:05 PM
Apr 2014

Nobody cares if Eddie is a communist nowadays. We realize he's a libertarian. We are just teasing him that he's Russian now.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
74. He did not go to China. He shared the files with the POST.One of the media Snowden shared info with
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:28 PM
Apr 2014

NSA is so flush with billions of OUR Federal money. The contracted businesses probably have their thousands of 'for profit' contractor employees 'hacking' into any computer they can get into.

Who the heck knows, those 'for profit' contractors probably paid bonus pay, by the number of hacked computers.

Cha

(296,679 posts)
86. Thanks for the Record of history, arely. They're getting sick of
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:37 PM
Apr 2014

"comrade eddie"? What's sickening is ignoring the facts of comrade eddie to pump up the little putin puppet.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
96. It's amazing how bothered they are by that
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:44 PM
Apr 2014

And how they think we'll feel bad about it? They should recognize that pity for comrade eddie is not something that's going to convince us.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
89. For the record, Mi$$ RobMe and others of his ilk sold the Chinese our jobs. For profit. And of the
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:38 PM
Apr 2014

two, I think Snowden did far less harm to the non-paranoid among us, the private equity folks much more. Info spilled about security postures in IT is dated, by definition, and begins to lose value and diminish as soon as it is revealed - at least it does anywhere that security is really a concern.

On the other hand,the damage done by the .001 %ers continues to hurt people, leaving many of them, and their children, little more than the opportunity to be serfs for their entire life.

I'd still rather have Snowden as a co-worker or neighbor.

harun

(11,348 posts)
91. He gave info to a newspaper. Like the Chinese don't already know their servers are being hacked.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:39 PM
Apr 2014

Who cares?

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
97. all old news huh? nothing to see here huh?
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:45 PM
Apr 2014

I'm sure they know we are trying. Thanks to Comrade Eddie they know we could do it successfully and what specific servers we were getting in to.

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
93. Good for him.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:42 PM
Apr 2014

The fact that our government is hacking universities, no matter in what country they exist, is shameful.

creeksneakers2

(7,470 posts)
110. It wasn't just a university
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:05 PM
Apr 2014

There were other activities there, including a communication system through which lots of other things could be hacked.

Drew Richards

(1,558 posts)
98. What the... Let me shove a little reality to your myopic view...most people know by now what I do
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:46 PM
Apr 2014

For a living...

For the record I am a backbone engineer and voice provisioner...

Your article that you cite as Gospel is, to be kind, a one sided piece of crap snowden hit piece.

While it does mention the fact that Tsinghua is one of the "primary" backbone nodes in China's internet it completely fails to mention that for YEARS this University has been identified as the largest concentrated list of IP's that have been hacking our entire Nations and others Nations networks, government AND civilian...hell many of my customers have them completely blacklisted for years now...they are that fucking bad...its a University with entire floors full of student hackers working loosely for the state...

With that glaring omission I have to ask WTF is your agenda in posting this piece of shit hit piece?


Never mind I really don't give a ....

Whether Snowden is a hero or villain I will let history sort it out....kinda like Jimmy Carter...i'm sure there are many that used to say he was a terrible president until you then look at his record and then he turns out to be in the top 20 best of all times...and truly a gentleman and true statesman.

Drew Richards

(1,558 posts)
107. I see what you did there bravo!...i agree but then again they already knew we are fighting back so
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:54 PM
Apr 2014

Is there really that much harm? All his report to the post did is make it more public knowledge?

Drew Richards

(1,558 posts)
109. You know the whole Cyber Command we built that everyone is upset about because the DIA has
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 07:59 PM
Apr 2014

It looks to the untrained eye like the bridge of the enterprise?

We created those in direct retaliation to the increased attacks and...the design is actually the most efficient design there is for a NOC/Threat Assessment Center...and I have been in quite a few...

Drew Richards

(1,558 posts)
111. Again that would only be true if you pre-supposed they are stupid and dont know they have been
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:07 PM
Apr 2014

Hacked...

Unless you're an agent neither of us can say for sure what they already know. Again I think you see it as more damning and critical a disclosure than I.

But hey we are all entitled to our own opinions...good deal.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
119. well, regardless of which of us is right...and I will admitt you seem to know a lot more about
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:13 PM
Apr 2014

systems than I do. but the fact we have been successful at hacking those servers was classified. snowden had no right to go to a foreign country and publicly announce it. and unlike the domestic phone metadata, there is no whistleblower/ethical justification.

Drew Richards

(1,558 posts)
123. I totally understand how you feel...now let me blow your mind...
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:18 PM
Apr 2014

What if...just what if...this is all a Psyops game and all the information he is divulging is antiquated, non-essential or false...but we may never be told...because that's exactly how psyops succeeds?

LOL just something twisty to think about...

Democracyinkind

(4,015 posts)
115. No shit, Sherlock...
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:11 PM
Apr 2014

So you've actually proven that Snowden told a Chinese newspaper that the US counterhacked Tsinghua University, which has been known as a base of Chinese hacking operations against american cyber-infrastructure ever since it installed its first dial-up modem?

The Chinese must have been shocked! SHOCKED, I tell you. If it weren't for Snowden, they would never have suspected that such a thing was possible! And MULTIPLE SERVERS!!! Who could have conceived of such a thing! Snowden is the Moriarty of traitors, no doubt!!1!11!!

Democracyinkind

(4,015 posts)
133. He was telling it to the Post, hence the audience was you, me and our Chinese equivalents.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:30 PM
Apr 2014

Snowden seems to think that there's a need to inform the world that those who hack are hacked back... It seems to be a pet peeve of him, as evidenced by the whole Russian episode.

It's no coincidence that he started with the Tsinghua information last summer, as Tsinghua was much discussed as a perpetrator of cyberattacks against "US interests". It was a matter of setting the record straight, that it's a cat and mouse game rather than a tale of lions and lambs. Personally, I found the idea that this needed to be pointed out ridiculous, but the last year on DU - with multiple such threads as this one - has disabused me of that notion.

I find your logic quite amusing - the way you use "them" to mingle the press and government - following it would have the curious unintended consequence of revealing the fact that Snowden is actually sharing his info with the NSA when he talks to western media. Ponder that

treestar

(82,383 posts)
146. Well if you tell the press you tell the Chinese government
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 09:06 PM
Apr 2014

along with everyone else. This line of attack is illogical, as is the crying about us calling poor Eddie "comrade." Proves what he has done has become more and more obviously indefensible.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
121. So now it's the McCarthy-ite "Comrade" ad hominem
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:18 PM
Apr 2014

Real nice on a place called "Democratic Underground". I would expect that sort of reactionary drivel on a right wing site. After all, to them McCarthy using that tactic was splendid.

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
182. This begs the question: which Mao?
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 09:51 PM
Apr 2014

Is this the cat responsible for the Mao-Mao Uprising, or the one in China responsible for the Clumpable Revolution?

Which leads to the further question...who IS The MAO Inhibitor?

WHEN CRABS ROAR

(3,813 posts)
139. As I read all these comments, one thing becomes clear
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 08:47 PM
Apr 2014

All of the red white and blue conditioning seems to have worked.

Nobel_Twaddle_III

(323 posts)
147. He should have incorperated first, Then he would only be looking at a fine.
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 09:17 PM
Apr 2014

.
Loral was accused of transferring technology to China in 1996. The incident arose as a result of an investigation into the launch failure of Intelsat 708, a Space Systems/Loral–built satellite. In a 2002 agreement with the State Department and Department of Justice the company agreed to pay $20 million in fines to settle the matter and to improve its compliance procedures. In the agreement Loral officials neither admitted nor denied the government's charges, but Loral executives acknowledged "the nature and seriousness of the offenses alleged by the department in the draft charging letter, including the risk of harm to the security and foreign policy interests of the United States", and stated that they wished to make amends through the payment of restitution. Schwartz subsequently released a statement accepting "full responsibility for the matter" and portrayed the incident as an error by a single Loral employee

 

elias49

(4,259 posts)
153. I love how all these Edward Snowden hate threads
Sun Apr 20, 2014, 09:51 PM
Apr 2014

seem to end badly. But keep trying by all means. You don't seem to have anything else to do.

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
157. It is certainly hard to understand the motivation of the Snowden attackers.
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 12:36 AM
Apr 2014

Some have suggested they are paid agents. I don't know about that but I definitely wouldn't put it past the national security apparatus. Making the discussion about Snowden and not the crimes of the ever expanding police state appears to be an effective strategy.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
173. For the record
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 09:35 PM
Apr 2014

You are either an NSA insider to have such knowledge or ......... I'll leave you to determine that one since you can get evidence out of thin air.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
189. my source is snowden
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 11:14 PM
Apr 2014

I will grant you that he isn't credible. But he did give an interview and say those things. Maybe he is adouble agent and feeding the chinese bullshit for the NSA.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»For The Record: Snowden G...