General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsDidn't the Bundy Family acknowledge the legitimacy...
...of the Federal government when they accepted their first Federal welfare in 1877 in the form of 160 acres of free land?Can they later recant their acknowledgement without renouncing any claim to their homestead?
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)When they paid before. That's how some old bill collectors get you. You make a small payment once, and then they got you back. You acknowledge your debt.
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)I tried days ago to get the point across about the years, decades actually, that the Bundys did pay....I got nothing but grief back. Obviously, folks just don't think. imho
snappyturtle
(14,656 posts)hundred years between the homesteading of the 160 acres and the beginning of fees for grazing. If you listen closely to what Bundy says, I think what he is saying is that the federal gov't (BLM) isn't the best steward of the land. That point is on point, imho, of what the group of western lawmakers was saying in a meeting held last week in Utah.
http://www.sltrib.com/sltrib/politics/57836973-90/utah-federal-lands-states.html.csp
Western lawmakers gather in Utah to talk federal land takeover
More than 50 political leaders from nine states convened for the first time to talk about their joint goal: wresting control of oil-, timber -and mineral-rich lands away from the feds.
"Its simply time," said Rep. Ken Ivory, R-West Jordan, who organized the Legislative Summit on the Transfer for Public Lands along with Montana state Sen. Jennifer Fielder. "The urgency is now."
Utah House Speaker Becky Lockhart, R-Provo, was flanked by a dozen participants, including her counterparts from Idaho and Montana, during a press conference after the daylong closed-door summit. U.S. Sen. Mike Lee addressed the group over lunch, Ivory said. New Mexico, Arizona, Nevada, Wyoming, Oregon and Washington also were represented
More...........