Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

malaise

(268,967 posts)
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 02:32 PM Apr 2014

Stowaway, 16, survives flying more than 5 hours in freezing temperatures in WHEEL WELL of plane

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2609270/BREAKING-NEWS-16-year-old-boy-survives-UNHARMED-flying-California-Hawaii-wheel-well.html
<snip>
A 16-year-old stowaway has miraculously survived flying halfway across the Pacific in the wheel well of a flight from California to Hawaii - despite temperatures of -81F (-62C) at 38,000 feet.

The teen was discovered on the tarmac at the Maui airport on Sunday carrying no ID or belongings - apart from a comb - and told the FBI he had run away from home after an argument with his parents.

'Kid's lucky to be alive,' FBI spokesman Tom Simon in Honolulu said on Sunday night.

Among those skeptical about his journey, medical experts said his body would have had to fall into a hibernation-like state - with his heart beating only a couple of times a minute - for him to survive.

----------------------
This kid one one lucky young man. Hope he has a good life.
39 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Stowaway, 16, survives flying more than 5 hours in freezing temperatures in WHEEL WELL of plane (Original Post) malaise Apr 2014 OP
Yet another example that airport security (i.e. the TSA) is a massive joke Kelvin Mace Apr 2014 #1
That's true too but not everyone is a terrorist malaise Apr 2014 #2
Some parents of teens might disagree... Kelvin Mace Apr 2014 #3
ROFL malaise Apr 2014 #5
Are you certain the TSA is responsible Jenoch Apr 2014 #17
Between the TSA, the airports Kelvin Mace Apr 2014 #36
The TSA is not responsible for airport perimeter security Major Nikon Apr 2014 #24
So, no taxpayer funds have been appropriated by these airports Kelvin Mace Apr 2014 #35
No security system is going to be infallible regardless of how much money you throw at it Major Nikon Apr 2014 #37
Not looking for infallibility Kelvin Mace Apr 2014 #38
I'm not disputing any of that Major Nikon Apr 2014 #39
Just plane crazy Orrex Apr 2014 #4
That's a freaking DUzy malaise Apr 2014 #6
He had an abnormal attachment to aviation pinboy3niner Apr 2014 #10
Beats running away with the circus Major Nikon Apr 2014 #25
For runaways, it used to be the go-to place to flea pinboy3niner Apr 2014 #26
Why? Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #7
This is another example of the poor science education students are receiving in US schools LonePirate Apr 2014 #8
Maybe now he'll learn the odds of taking such a stupid risk malaise Apr 2014 #9
well, he had a big falling out with his parents Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #11
He initially hid in the engine compartment but was exhausted. Orrex Apr 2014 #12
You're on a roll malaise Apr 2014 #13
He also ruled out hiding beneath the ailerons ... he was unflappable. 11 Bravo Apr 2014 #18
DUzy! pinboy3niner Apr 2014 #20
Just the altitude should have killed him. mn9driver Apr 2014 #14
is it impossible ? 0 percent chance he could have survived it ? JI7 Apr 2014 #16
Yeah, pretty much zero survivability at that altitude mn9driver Apr 2014 #19
there were other cases where the person died doing this JI7 Apr 2014 #21
Actually, the odds of survival are around 20%. jeff47 Apr 2014 #30
The ones that survived never got to 38000 feet. mn9driver Apr 2014 #33
They said he was unconscious for most of hte trip as in hibernating malaise Apr 2014 #22
I remember seeing this on Hill Street Blues. johnp3907 Apr 2014 #15
So woo saved his life? Rex Apr 2014 #23
No, Woo's in First Class pinboy3niner Apr 2014 #28
Woo's on first base? Rex Apr 2014 #29
Odds of survival are about 20%. jeff47 Apr 2014 #31
Kewl, someone upthread said it was impossible at that altitude. Rex Apr 2014 #32
Amazing what some people will do for frequent flyer miles Major Nikon Apr 2014 #27
related story: Blue_Tires Apr 2014 #34
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
1. Yet another example that airport security (i.e. the TSA) is a massive joke
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 02:35 PM
Apr 2014

Hundreds of billions of dollars since 2001 and a moody teenager can penetrate their security.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
3. Some parents of teens might disagree...
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 02:41 PM
Apr 2014


Seriously though, what happens when some terrorist figures out that the easiest way to get a bomb on an aircraft is in the wheel well?

malaise

(268,967 posts)
5. ROFL
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 02:44 PM
Apr 2014


Good question.

The sad truth is pre-9/11. we'd celebrate this little upstart as an adventurous young man
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
36. Between the TSA, the airports
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 09:48 PM
Apr 2014

and the rivers of cash poured in to 13 years worth of Kabuki Security Theatre, it sure as hell is going to be their fault when a plane goes down.

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
24. The TSA is not responsible for airport perimeter security
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 05:05 PM
Apr 2014

That is the responsibility of whoever owns the airport. In this case the San Jose airport authority.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
35. So, no taxpayer funds have been appropriated by these airports
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 09:46 PM
Apr 2014

for perimeter security?

I'm guessing they all scooped out tons of cash and are still scooping. Also, TSA's excuse when an airliner gets blown out of the sky is going to be, what? We took hundreds of billions and ignored the obvious hole in our security?

(Not jumping on you, just pointing out that TSA's excuse will not hold water. You can be damned sure that should such a thing happen during Obama's remaining time in office the Dems can kiss the house, senate, White House, well pretty much the entire Republic, goodbye).

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
37. No security system is going to be infallible regardless of how much money you throw at it
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 10:20 PM
Apr 2014

There are hundreds of airports all across the US which run scheduled airline service, some of which you can drive on to with no restrictions. Should we secure those at great expense? The Dallas/Fort Worth airport alone is bigger than the island of Manhattan. Should we spend billions turning massive land areas into impenetrable fortresses? Even if we did, you can fly a $10,000 aircraft on to every single one of them with the exception of Washington National and nobody is going to question you.

So we can certainly play 'what if' all day long. The reality is it hasn't happened, but regardless of how determined we are to prevent it, if someone is determined enough, it will happen.

 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
38. Not looking for infallibility
Tue Apr 22, 2014, 09:49 AM
Apr 2014

just sensible behaviour.

We have wasted Scrooge McDuck-sized vaults of cash on the ILLUSION of security while ignoring actual security.

What is going to make us safer: TSA agents sexually abusing men women and children looking for bottles of "liquids" that are 0.1 ounces above the legal limit, or posting one agent at each plane to insure that no one sticks a bomb in the wheel well?

The sad reality is that 90% of "security" is simply abusing the public so you can "be seen" providing "security".

Major Nikon

(36,827 posts)
39. I'm not disputing any of that
Tue Apr 22, 2014, 11:47 AM
Apr 2014

But in this case I don't see any fault of the behavior of TSA. The airport is owned and operated by the city of San Jose, which receives federal funding and oversight from the Dept of Transportation, a completely separate department of government from TSA. The plane itself is supposed to be inspected by the airline before flight.

pinboy3niner

(53,339 posts)
10. He had an abnormal attachment to aviation
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 03:04 PM
Apr 2014

Which escalated to his becoming an abnormal attachment to aviation.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
7. Why?
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 02:52 PM
Apr 2014

This isn't the type of thing done on a lark...More often than not the "landing gear stowaway" is someone is desperate and out of options trying to escape a violent or oppressive country...

EDIT: Out of the documented cases (including this one), landing gear stowaways are batting 24 for 100

http://www.nbcnews.com/business/travel/dead-wheel-well-stowaway-went-undiscovered-7-flights-f6C10287982

LonePirate

(13,419 posts)
8. This is another example of the poor science education students are receiving in US schools
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 02:56 PM
Apr 2014

The kid obviously knew nothing about the environmental health risks he survived while he hitched that ride.

malaise

(268,967 posts)
9. Maybe now he'll learn the odds of taking such a stupid risk
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 03:01 PM
Apr 2014

It does take some special kind of dumb to even attempt scaling an airport fence let alone stowing away in an aircraft wheel well.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
11. well, he had a big falling out with his parents
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 03:05 PM
Apr 2014

so when you factor in the angst-y teen emotions, his mind wasn't in the right place anyway, even if he did know the science...(I don't know if the kid was being a moron or if he was escaping abuse)

http://news.yahoo.com/16-old-survives-wheel-well-maui-flight-041150318.html

mn9driver

(4,425 posts)
14. Just the altitude should have killed him.
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 04:02 PM
Apr 2014

38000 feet is lethal, even for a fairly short time. Five hours is way outside any chance. There's more to this than is being reported.

mn9driver

(4,425 posts)
19. Yeah, pretty much zero survivability at that altitude
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 04:46 PM
Apr 2014

At that low pressure, his lungs would release, not absorb, oxygen. Every breath would lower the oxygen level of his blood.

JI7

(89,248 posts)
21. there were other cases where the person died doing this
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 04:55 PM
Apr 2014

i wonder if he got on the plane some other way but because it would expose their lack of security check they are just claiming this happened.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
30. Actually, the odds of survival are around 20%.
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 05:42 PM
Apr 2014
http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/explainer/2003/12/do_jet_stowaways_ever_survive.html

(Article is from 2003, so stats are probably slightly different today)

Few hopeful refugees attempt wheel-well arrivals every year. In 2000, for example, the FAA counted 13 such stowaways, three of whom survived. In 2001, six tried to enter the United States in such a fashion, with no survivors. In 2002, five perished and one survived. (The wheel-well survival rate since 1947 is 20.3 percent.) The death estimates may be low, as some bodies may have tumbled out into water or remote areas, never to be recovered.

mn9driver

(4,425 posts)
33. The ones that survived never got to 38000 feet.
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 05:48 PM
Apr 2014

Their aircraft happened to stay lower for other reasons. I don't recall anyone ever surviving at that altitude. If it really happened as described, then something isn't being reported. 38000 feet for 5 hours pretty much equals certain death.

malaise

(268,967 posts)
22. They said he was unconscious for most of hte trip as in hibernating
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 04:56 PM
Apr 2014

Sounds strange but the airpost has video of him scaling the wall and heading for the aircraft

johnp3907

(3,730 posts)
15. I remember seeing this on Hill Street Blues.
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 04:10 PM
Apr 2014

A disgraced coroner talked about his past moment of glory when he figured out how a man froze to death on a warm day. He'd fallen out of the wheel well of the plane he'd stowed away on.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
32. Kewl, someone upthread said it was impossible at that altitude.
Mon Apr 21, 2014, 05:47 PM
Apr 2014

I figured he must have been surrounded in a cocoon of woo.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Stowaway, 16, survives fl...