General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumshlthe2b
(102,276 posts)Honestly, I wish I had the answer to all this gun insanity.....
sakabatou
(42,152 posts)There may be scenes from Sleeping Dogs coming real.
raccoon
(31,110 posts)NightWatcher
(39,343 posts)I give it a week before the "guns in bars" part of that law starts biting people in the ass. By 'biting people..." I mean shootings and death.
immoderate
(20,885 posts)Will they notice?
--imm
jtuck004
(15,882 posts)RebelOne
(30,947 posts)Now this is a good reason to never go into bars.
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)recall hearing of a shooting in either. Then again I am almost 59 and my memory is not what it used to be.
One thing that may be a factor is demographics and regional attitudes and gun cultures. I would be more wary in GA than MA.
doc03
(35,337 posts)the NRA thought up to energize gun and ammo sales. Maybe we should issue them penis pumps instead.
geckosfeet
(9,644 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)and in some cases, met some training requirement.
An additional 9 states would issue under some circumstances.
Only two states in the union were 'no-issue'.
So uh... yeah.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Or churches
or airports
or schools
or parks
or work
Best just stay home with the door locked and the drapes drawn...
I assume that's what they want unless you're a "gun enthusiast".
SwankyXomb
(2,030 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)" We took a large group of people, armed them, put them in various denomination churches,
and took another large group, equally armed, and put them in various bars.
Then we waited to see the outcome"
Wonder if I could get that study funded?
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)because we couldn't find a place without guns
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)deathrind
(1,786 posts)Society saw back in the 1800's that led to some towns passing firearm banning ordinances inside the town. The regression of our society by a minority of the populace over the last few years is nothing short of astonishing. At some point the majority is going to have to wake up and smack down this silliness once and for all.
Arugula Latte
(50,566 posts)LordGlenconner
(1,348 posts)Hell, maybe that's what they want.
I've given up trying to figure out their lunacy.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)disgusting
AAO
(3,300 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Those are the people who love "Stand Your Ground". I'm outta there if there is even a remote hint of incoming violence... Call me coward.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Personally I think they are so bored with their puny little lives that they need to pretend every moment is some action flick of which they are the star.
trof
(54,256 posts)That's what I think.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)Keep everybody scared and keep the police on a hairtrigger.
Much of the funding is coming from the Koch brothers.
Xolodno
(6,395 posts)Its probably going to take a lot of accidental firings, increased crime, etc. before people wake up.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)and the "price they have to pay for freedumb".
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)NOT to visit.
And it has none to do with the good people of Georgia, just the dumb fucks who pass these laws. (They are a minority)
calimary
(81,265 posts)Enough of them vote for this shit. Enough of them vote for schmucks who rush to push forward this shit. Enough of them vote to send schmucks who want this shit into positions of power, locally, statewide, AND to Washington.
And, sadly, enough of those who COULD vote and comfortably outnumber the aforementioned - to keep those same schmucks OUT OF POWER - turn apathetic and stay home on Election Day.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)suffice it to say, that is a state I am not going to visit anytime soon. The list is getting long and it includes most of the old Confederacy.
Leith
(7,809 posts)GA is where they voted out Max Cleland and voted in Saxby Chambliss. How Georgians can say that they honor the troops, respect soldiers and war heroes, and the rest of their rhetoric - then turn their backs on the real deal = boggles the brain.
Xolodno posted:
Its probably going to take a lot of accidental firings, increased crime, etc. before people wake up.
Even MORE? I don't think that the country could survive too many more. After Newtown, the question is "what the hell will it TAKE?!"
Sorry. I don't mean to single you out, but it will take a LOT to get those with power to wake the eff up.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)And on the map...badda bing!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Because you know, that's the law here.
former9thward
(32,006 posts)All with concealed carry. I guess your travel itinerary is somewhat limited.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)DUers find my saying GUN HUMPERS HAVE WON distasteful ----------- FUCK THEM ALL
spanone
(135,832 posts)he will have blood on his hands.
malaise
(268,998 posts)his base is happy.
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)So glad to get out of that red state. Oh wait ... I moved to Kentucky. Never mind.
AAO
(3,300 posts)You probably have a very good reason, but heck!
lillypaddle
(9,580 posts)but this is where my kid, his wife and my granddaughter live.
AAO
(3,300 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)WA is a blue state. There's nothing in that new law that isn't the case here.
AAO
(3,300 posts)CTyankee
(63,912 posts)be pretty moderate and our Dems pretty liberal. But we DID have a pretty good bunch of liberal Republicans...who woulda thunk it? Lowell Weicker?
Ilsa
(61,695 posts)Minister saying that the law gives a false sense of security, that being in public in Georgia is now more dangerous than ever.
Only 5% have the permits.
I heard that Carter voted for this law. True?
glowing
(12,233 posts)When they pass these laws, it's not just old, Middle Aged white dudes trying remain relevant that will be able to carry these weapons around.
For the "family values" party, they sure don't have many values I find appealing for my family. Do they even understand how far off the reservation they are living? It's rather rhetorical of a question; they have insulated themselves in a bubble and really can't see how crazy and nutty they've become.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)it allows carry only in the unsecured areas of the airport. For instance, if I am carrying, and I drop someone off at the departures curb, without this law, I'd be breaking the law if I have a gun on my person.
This brings Georgia's laws into perfect parity with the laws of Washington state.
(Also, 9/11 involved box cutters, not firearms, in case you were wondering.)
glowing
(12,233 posts)Most people I know don't like these nutso's having weapons.. They tend to shoot u over popcorn and text msgs in movie theaters... There's just no reason to running around with weapons unless u are up to no good. The one person I know of that has a concealed weapons permit, does so because his job involves illegal activities... And this is thru hearsay... Never have seen it. So, if u aren't a drug dealer, WTF do u need a weapon at church or an airport or a school for? U just don't!
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)is about 20%. (Households with firearms.)
I have had occasion to be out and about, carrying a firearm, and get a call from someone to come pick them up at the airport. Without that law here in Washington, my options would be;
1. Return home, lock up gun, proceed to airport.
2. Park outside the airport and make the person walk to me.
3. Risk getting caught committing a felony.
4. Refuse to pick the person up.
It's stupid. There is no reason to prohibit the carry of a firearm anywhere on the property of an airport OUTSIDE the secured areas of the airport, that doesn't apply to every square inch of the planet.
For those of us with carry permits, we may have occasion to pass through the various areas you cited. I'm an atheist, so I don't go to church, but if I did, I might wish to carry to and from the church. Without this law, I would then have to leave the gun in my car. Ask the nation's current Drug Czar how that works out, leaving guns in cars. (Hint: some scumbag has former Seattle Police Chief Gil Kerlikowske's gun.)
This might catch you by surprise, but most drug dealers don't carry guns, because getting caught is an automatic sentence multiplier with mandatory minimums, usually in the decadal range.
Having, carrying firearms does not disqualify me or others, as Progressives, Democrats, etc.
doc03
(35,337 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)If I didn't (and we both know damn well I didn't), if you have a honest question, rather than a false dichotomy, I'll be happy to give you an honest answer.
doc03
(35,337 posts)if I leave my yard. If I did I would move someplace safer.
Skittles
(153,160 posts)*NEVER*
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)On some philosophical level I suppose you could tie it to 'fear', the same way I 'fear' fire, and thus have smoke alarms and fire extinguishers in my home.
But do I live in a constant state of fear of fire? No, not really. I have taken reasonable precautions.
So too for personal security.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)I have since moved. There was a woman stabbed and raped a few blocks from my home a month ago, but that was an aberration. Mostly due to the employer, having only one person on at close, requiring employees to park in the alley behind the store. Stupid with a side helping of reckless endangerment for the employees.
Most of the time I do not carry at all. Certainly not to work as my employer does not allow weapons, of any sort for any reason, and I accept that. And I do not leave firearms in my car unattended.
About the only time I carry anymore is when I am out and about in the woods, where there are in fact, predators and not even any cell coverage. I don't think that unreasonable. Though, I could probably get by with just some bear spray, to be honest.
lpbk2713
(42,757 posts)Tens of thousands of people go through there daily.
Sure, that's gonna work out dandy.
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Same rules.
AAO
(3,300 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)And yes, those rules are in full force. Even after the passage of this law.
CatWoman
(79,302 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Is pointing out the accurate effect of this law a problem for you somehow?
Quelle horreur that someone might point out this doesn't mean you can carry everywhere in any manner at all times.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)ironic in the Bible belt.
SevenSixtyTwo
(255 posts)to Washington state armed. We've flown to many places and simply checked our firearms with the TSA. I've been armed for over 30 years. Never a problem. Definitely not the mayhem predicted here.
toby jo
(1,269 posts)That'd be the folks who have murder rates of say, 10 or 12 a year with guns.
Politicalboi
(15,189 posts)We know you can become the bad example of why guns should stay at home. I wish guns didn't exists, but the cats out of the bag on that.
Crunchy Frog
(26,587 posts)doc03
(35,337 posts)damned well prepared to use your gun. Most people aren't.
Zorra
(27,670 posts)Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)It sure looks like he's fiddling with the state.
lovemydog
(11,833 posts)arm them, and televise it!
raccoon
(31,110 posts)planes at Atlanta airport to get to wherever you're coming or going.
So, which part of the airport are the guns allowed in?