Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

muriel_volestrangler

(101,316 posts)
Thu May 1, 2014, 02:26 PM May 2014

Court agrees with David Cameron's brother that his legal aid cuts prevent a trial proceeding

Fraud trial halted due to lawyers' boycott over legal aid cuts

A senior crown court judge has formally halted a complex fraud trial because expert defence barristers are refusing to represent the defendants in protest at 30% cuts in legal aid fees.

The unprecedented decision by Judge Anthony Leonard QC to stay the proceedings against five men in an alleged land bank fraud has thrown into doubt at least eight other financial prosecutions including Libor rate-fixing cases.

The prime minister's brother, Alexander Cameron QC, represented the defendants on a pro-bono basis, arguing that they could not receive a fair trial and that the case should be stopped rather than merely being adjourned.
...
Leonard's ruling will put pressure on the justice secretary, Chris Grayling, who has pushed through deep legal aid cuts in the face of fierce opposition from the legal profession. The Financial Conduct Authority, which brought the prosecution, is considering appealing against the decision.

http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/may/01/fraud-trial-halted-lawyers-legal-aid-cuts


That'll be a fun family gathering the next time ...
2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court agrees with David Cameron's brother that his legal aid cuts prevent a trial proceeding (Original Post) muriel_volestrangler May 2014 OP
If that was a complex fraud trial involving an alleged land bank fraud dipsydoodle May 2014 #1
Depends if they held on to the money, I suspect muriel_volestrangler May 2014 #2

dipsydoodle

(42,239 posts)
1. If that was a complex fraud trial involving an alleged land bank fraud
Thu May 1, 2014, 07:11 PM
May 2014

Last edited Fri May 2, 2014, 05:03 AM - Edit history (1)

then I'm not sure what the defendants were doing on legal aid anyway given it was hardly likely to have been a two bob scam.

General details of the background to such scams here http://www.fca.org.uk/consumers/scams/investment-scams/land-banking

Fighting the blight of UK land scams since 2004 http://www.propertyscam.org.uk/

It would seem to me that in this instance a situation has been contrived in order to draw attention to changes in the legal aid budget.

muriel_volestrangler

(101,316 posts)
2. Depends if they held on to the money, I suspect
Thu May 1, 2014, 08:01 PM
May 2014

Channel 4 News thought there was a minimum of 1,000 hours preparation needed, let alone the time in court - at barristers' rates, you need to be seriously rich to pay that yourself. People involved in dubious financial deals often lose a lot of money as well as obtain it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Court agrees with David C...