Journalists Aren't the Big Fans of Leaks That They Used to Be

[DonViejo]

ERIC LEVENSON

Compared to ten years ago, today's journalists believe exposing government hypocrisy is more important than ever. Yet, they are less approving of the use of confidential documents to expose that hypocrisy, according to a study from Indiana University School of Journalism (PDF).

That aversion to revealing unauthorized secrets is just one of the many intriguing conclusions from the online survey of more than 1,000 journalists who work across print, digital news, TV, and radio. The survey dates back more than 40 years, asking journalists a series of questions in 1971, 1982, 1992, 2002, and 2013, giving a good overview of the trends in the journalism culture and business.

One of the most surprising developments over that period over the past ten years, is the steep decline in the percentage of journalists who say that using confidential documents without permission "may be justified." That number has plummeted from about 78 percent in 2002 to just 58 percent in 2013. In 1992, it was over 80 percent.



That's even more notable given that the survey took place from August to December of last year, not long after Edward Snowden became a household name for stealing classified documents that revealed the extent of NSA surveillance. The journalists who worked with him to share that information with the public won the Pulitzer Prize last month.

more
http://www.thewire.com/national/2014/05/journalists-arent-big-fans-of-leaks-like-they-used-to-be/361818/

[djean111]

1. Our tax dollars at work! Nothing like fear to tamp down the exposure of wrong-doing.

Because, I understand, the government has to do bad things for our own good, or something like that.