Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMedia Still Fawn Over Paul Ryan’s ‘Big Ideas’
http://fair.org/extra-online-articles/media-still-fawn-over-paul-ryans-big-ideas/Media Still Fawn Over Paul Ryans Big Ideas
Posted by FAIR (Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting)
Media had Paul Ryan dead to rights. The House Republicans weird little anecdote about a boy who didnt want school lunch because a kid with a paper bag lunch has someone who cares for himintended to illustrate his weird big point that leftists offer people a full stomach, but an empty soulwas in tatters.
The Washington Posts Glenn Kessler (3/6/14) discovered that the Wisconsin state legislator from whom Ryan heard the story now says she misspoke. She hadnt talked to the little boy; shed seen, on TV, a man in his late 30s recalling a childhood incident that had nothing to do with school luncheswhich, as it happens, he strongly advocates.
Just days before, the Fiscal Times (3/4/14) reported that a number of the scholars Ryan cited in his critical survey of federal anti-poverty programs believe that he misrepresented or misunderstood their work. In one case, he arbitrarily lopped off part of a studys time frame so as to reduce an evident drop in poverty rates.
Nevertheless, media continue to foreground Ryan and his ideas (Extra!, 6/11), over and against those from more reliable quarters. His critique of poverty programs got a virtually critic-free response in the Washington Post (3/2/14), whose reporter was apparently awed by the bevy of academic literature and federal studies mustered by what one source called Republicans big-ideas guy. The New York Times (3/4/14) called it a blistering analysis, and the Chicago Tribune (3/4/14) said it expands the income inequality discussion that has largely been dominated by Democrats.
When the Congressional Progressive Caucus released its budget a week later, none of these major dailies deigned to mention it. It was written up by the L.A. Times Michael Hiltzik (3/12/14), who noted that it would
ask the wealthiest members of societythose who have benefited the most from the recovery, such as it isto shoulder a larger share of the costs of growing the economy, rather than squeezing the disabled, the elderly, parents of preschoolers, and laid-off schoolteachers and other public employees.
Unlike Ryans stinging 204-page critique (Washington Post, 3/2/14), that idea drew a collective yawn from the elite press corps (FAIR Blog, 3/14/14).
Face the Nations Bob Schiefferwho recently explained (2/16/14) that, unlike someone who went to Harvard, he couldnt understand phrases like income inequality and things like that, and instead would kind of like to hear people talk about jobs and things like thathad no time for a budget plan that had job creation as its centerpiece. The show did, however, have Ryan on that week (3/9/14) to chat about missile defense, punishing Vladimir Putin for invad[ing] Russia and whether Ryan wants to run for president.
The Progressive Caucus plan talked about putting people to work on infrastructure repair, but the New York Times isnt even sure thats a real thing: Are Infrastructure Needs Truly Urgent? was the topic of the papers March 13 Room for Debate feature.
So perhaps media arent driven to challenge Ryans bona fides as a big-ideas guy because they share those big ideas.
In particular, entitlement reformcutting Social Security and Medicare benefits is key to Ryans plans, but no less crucial to elite media, who place it on the short list of what it takes to be a serious politician (Extra!, 1/11).
Indeed, such is the power of the benefit-cutting gospel that reporters cant seem to grasp that most people arent believers. The New York Times (3/4/14) describes Democrats opposing benefit cuts as fearful that giving ground on Social Security would anger the liberal base. That only makes sense if that base is the roughly 58 percent of the US public that opposes such cuts (Kaiser Health News, 1/24/13).
Likewise, when the Progressive Caucus budget proposes a public health insurance option, and an end to war in Afghanistan, its touching on things the public overwhelmingly wants, but corporate media dismiss as unserious.
In this atmosphere, the idea that the government should prioritize jobs, education and healthcare over deficit reduction cant get any oxygen, despite economist Dean Bakers point (AlJazeera.com, 3/10/14) that millions of people are seeing their lives needlessly ruined because the priority is the other way around.
So dont be fooled by occasional gotcha pieces. Corporate media cant afford to scrutinize Ryan too closelylest they be forced to consider that the messengers flaws reflect those of the message.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 489 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Media Still Fawn Over Paul Ryan’s ‘Big Ideas’ (Original Post)
G_j
May 2014
OP
ladjf
(17,320 posts)1. Paul "The Idiot" Ryan. nt
Gothmog
(145,225 posts)2. Paul Ryan is an overrated fraud
Ryan's big ideas are a joke.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)3. Exactly correct. What's more fraudulent than washing clean dishes? n/t