Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Thu May 8, 2014, 11:45 AM May 2014

FCC commissioner asks for delay net neutrality rules

FCC commissioner asks for delay net neutrality rules

by Joan McCarter

(Jessica Rosenworcel), one of the three Democrats on the Federal Communication Commission, has asked for a delay on the proposal by Chairman Tom Wheeler for new neutrality rules. Rosenworcel said the "torrent of public response" hostile to the idea of a pay-for-play fast lane on the internet warranted the delay.

"While I recognize the urgency to move ahead and develop rules with dispatch, I think the greater urgency comes in giving the American public opportunity to speak right now, before we head down this road. <…> I think it’s a mistake to cut off public debate right now as we head into consideration of the chairman’s proposal," Ms. Rosenworcel said. “I think we should delay our consideration of his rules by a least a month," she added.

Another of the Democrats on the FCC, Mignon Clyburn, wrote a blog post Wednesday signaling her opposition to "pay for priority arrangements." Clyburn echoed the concerns Rosenworcel's concerns heard from the public, "tens of thousands of consumers, companies, entrepreneurs, investors, schools, educators, healthcare providers and others have reached out to ask me to keep the Internet free and open."

Opposition also comes from some of the giants of the web, in the form of a letter protesting the FCC's proposed rule. The signers included Amazon, which doesn't often get involved publicly in big policy fights, as well as Google, Facebook, Netflix, Microsoft, Ebay, Yahoo and dozens of other companies. The letter focuses on the innovations of American companies that have "created enormous value for Internet users, fueled economic growth, and made our Internet companies global leaders," stressing that that innovation was possible because of the free and open internet and that the reported proposed rules "represent a grave threat to the Internet."

Daily Kos also filed two letters in opposition to the new rule on behalf of the 6.3 million members and readers of Daily Kos, one submitting the comments and concerns of the 155,870 of you who responded to our petition request. You can read the second letter below...

RE: Proceeding 14-28
Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet

Chairman Wheeler and the Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street, SW
Washington, DC 20554
May 07, 2014

Daily Kos exists as the nation's most vibrant, active online political community because the open Internet exists. Because, like so many innovators over the past two decades, founder Markos Moulitsas could claim an online space, cultivate it, and watch it flourish. Every day, thousands of people interact on the site, tens of thousands take an action—signing an online petition or sending an email—and 6.3 million visitors come to the site for news and for community.

All that exists because Daily Kos doesn't have to pay a premium to share our message, because it's never had to because of Net Neutrality. Daily Kos has never had to worry that, because we often take unpopular and controversial stands, our content could be blocked or demoted by Internet Service Providers. That's because of Net Neutrality.

This proposed rule to allow ISPs to privilege content based on ability to pay would be the beginning of the end of Net Neutrality. It would choke off the entrepreneurial spirit, the innovation that has revolutionized life in the Internet age. Under these rules, telecommunications giants like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon would be able to decide if Daily Kos would be a winner or a loser.

A free and open Internet, in which all content is the driver of free speech, innovation, education, economic growth, and creativity. More and more in the past two decades, it's become the driver of our democracy. Don't let that grind to a halt. Reject Chairman Wheeler's proposed rule and create a rule that truly protects Net Neutrality. These rules need to be built on solid legal authority. And, the surest way to protect net neutrality is to write those rules using Title II of the Telecommunications Act to reclassify broadband as a telecommunications service.

Sincerely, Daily Kos

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2014/05/08/1297841/-FCC-commissioner-asks-for-delay-net-neutrality-rules






Note:

Kos Media, LLC Site content may be used for any purpose without explicit permission unless otherwise specified


3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
FCC commissioner asks for delay net neutrality rules (Original Post) ProSense May 2014 OP
Kick! n/t ProSense May 2014 #1
Another for ProSense May 2014 #2
A Second Large Coalition Calls On White House & FCC To Not Screw Up Net Neutrality ProSense May 2014 #3

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
3. A Second Large Coalition Calls On White House & FCC To Not Screw Up Net Neutrality
Thu May 8, 2014, 04:00 PM
May 2014
A Second Large Coalition Calls On White House & FCC To Not Screw Up Net Neutrality

By Chris Morran

The day after around 150 Internet and tech companies asked FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler to remove discriminatory loopholes from his net neutrality proposal, another large coalition — comprised of everything from consumer advocates to educators to Reddit to… the Harry Potter Alliance — has written to both Wheeler and President Obama, calling for the FCC to drop the controversial plan to allow Internet “fast lanes.”

Once again, the fast lane idea would allow Internet service providers to charge a premium to content companies for better and faster delivery of their data. This sort of prioritizing of content was prohibited under the neutrality guidelines that a federal appeals court gutted earlier this year.

“We strongly urge the Federal Communications Commission to reconsider and abandon efforts to adopt rules that would harm — rather than preserve — Net Neutrality,” reads the letter, signed by groups including Free Press, ACLU, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and our colleagues at Consumers Union. “The open Internet is a forum for free speech, innovation, civic engagement and the exercise of our basic rights. The Internet achieved this status because it was created on a platform governed by the principle of nondiscrimination.”

<....>

Here is the full text of the letter and the full list of those groups who signed:

Dear President Obama and Chairman Wheeler:

We are writing to express our support for a truly free and open Internet. We strongly urge the Federal Communications Commission to reconsider and abandon efforts to adopt rules that would harm — rather than preserve — Net Neutrality.

The open Internet is a forum for free speech, innovation, civic engagement and the exercise of our basic rights. The Internet achieved this status because it was created on a platform governed by the principle of nondiscrimination.

In 2010, the FCC attempted to incorporate this principle into its open Internet rules. Those rules were thrown out earlier this year, leaving Internet users in limbo while the FCC decided its next move.

Now, instead of restoring this important principle of nondiscrimination, the Commission’s proposal would make things even worse. It would reportedly propose rules that would enable phone and cable Internet service providers (ISPs) to discriminate both technically and financially against fledgling online companies,
independent media outlets, nonprofit organizations and anyone else with a website. These policies would create troubling incentives for ISPs to create “artificial scarcity” to extract new sources of revenue. The result will be a two-tiered Internet: a fast lane for those willing or able to pay for it, and a dirt road for the rest of us.

This is discrimination pure and simple. It is the opposite of a free and open Internet.

President Obama, in 2007 you told the world, “I am a strong supporter of Net Neutrality,” rightfully asserting “that one of the best things about the Internet … is that there is this incredible equality there.”

And Chairman Wheeler, last fall you wrote that “[o]ne of the signal achievements of this latest great information revolution — our network revolution — is how the results of its diffused control and increased autonomy produce ‘innovation without permission.’”

We wholeheartedly agree with both statements. Internet service providers should not be in the business of picking winners and losers online. But the proposal the FCC is currently considering gives ISPs the power to do exactly that, which is why it must be abandoned. Instead, the Commission must propose and adopt legally sound rules that keep the Internet an open and nondiscriminatory platform for speech and innovation.

Sincerely,
Access
American Civil Liberties Union
Appalshop, Inc.
Art
Beyond Sight
Center for Environmental Health
Center for Media Justice
Centre College
Citizens for Sanity
ColorOfChange
Common Cause
Consumers Union
Council on American-Islamic Relations
CR Consulting
CREDO Mobile
Daily Kos
Defending Dissent Foundation
Demand Progress
Democracy for America
Diversified Media Enterprises
Electronic Frontier Foundation
Engine Advocacy
Entertainment Consumers Association
Evanston Community Television
FAIR
Fight for the Future
Free Press
Free Software Foundation
Future of Music Coalition
Glocal
Greenlining Institute
Greenpeace USA
Hackers & Founders
Harry Potter Alliance
Institute for Local Self-Reliance
Just Foreign Policy
LAMP (Learning About Multimedia Project)
Latino Print Network
LatinoRebels.com
Louder Media Alliance
The Media Consortium
Media Equity Collaborative
Media Literacy Project
Media Matters for America
Media Mobilizing Project
MoveOn.org Political Action
Museums and the Web
The Nation
National Alliance for Media Arts + Culture
National Association of Black Journalists
National Association of Hispanic Journalists
National Association of Latino Independent Producers
National Hispanic Media Coalition
Netroots Foundation
New America Foundation’s Open Technology Institute
New Moon Girls
NTEN
Occupy Network
OpenMedia.org
Pacific University
Park Center for Independent Media, Ithaca College
Participatory Politics Foundation
PEN American Center
The People’s Press Project
Personal Democracy Media
PopularResistance.org
Presente.org
Progressive Change Campaign Committee
Prometheus Radio Project
reddit
Reel Grrls
RootsAction.org
Savvy System Designs, Inc.
SOA Watch San Francisco
St. Paul Neighborhood Network
The Stonewall Chorale Student Net Alliance
SumOfUs
Tarakali Education
TheUpTake.org
ThoughtWorks
Tin House
Tully Center for Free Speech at Syracuse University
United Church of Christ Office of Communication, Inc.
Upwell Women In Media & News
Women’s Institute for Freedom of the Press
Women’s Media Center
Writers Guild of America East
X-Lab

http://consumerist.com/2014/05/08/a-second-large-coalition-calls-on-white-house-fcc-to-not-screw-up-net-neutrality/


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»FCC commissioner asks for...