Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

alp227

(32,019 posts)
Fri May 9, 2014, 04:51 PM May 2014

Portland considering smoking ban in more than 200 public parks

Portland is considering a smoking ban in all city parks, according to Commissioner Amanda Fritz's office.

The parks board, a volunteer citizen-run advisory group, is examining what it would take to ban cigarettes and other smokable tobacco products in the city's public parks. The board has discussed a potential ban several times this year, most recently at a meeting Wednesday.

Fritz asked the board to look at a potential ban.

The parks board appointed a committee to analyze whether a ban was necessary and what a policy might look like. "We're just trying to get our facts and information down," said Andy Nelson, board chairman.

full: http://www.oregonlive.com/portland/index.ssf/2014/05/portland_considering_smoking_b.html

I wish there was a Constitutional Amendment that said:

No person shall be compelled to breathe foreign substances that said person does not consent to internalizing. (Just putting my pseudo-legalese skills out there, heh heh.)

18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Portland considering smoking ban in more than 200 public parks (Original Post) alp227 May 2014 OP
How are you being forced to breathe smoke? Travis_0004 May 2014 #1
If I'm on a walk and suddenly encounter cigarette smoke w/o warning. nt alp227 May 2014 #3
What would you do if a hippo farted near you? hobbit709 May 2014 #5
comparing smokers to hippos now? alp227 May 2014 #10
Educate, don't prohibit. 1000words May 2014 #7
I don't consent to vehicle emissions, manufacturing emissions, pipoman May 2014 #2
perfumes, air fresheners, lawnmowers, petroleum wax candles burning PeaceNikki May 2014 #13
Lawnmowers do make noise, so you know to avoid them. alp227 May 2014 #18
There are all sorts of place you can't smoke in San Francisco and you know what? Sivafae May 2014 #4
No person shall be compelled to breathe foreign substances that said person does not consent to... lame54 May 2014 #6
I wish they would do that in the state parks on Kaua'i.. people smoke and Cha May 2014 #8
Pet cause of the centrist dem betterdemsonly May 2014 #9
What about everyone else's right to not breathe others' filth? alp227 May 2014 #11
Makes me wonder what other things you want banned because you don't like it. hobbit709 May 2014 #14
You're outdoors for god sakes. betterdemsonly May 2014 #16
So what if "There is no evidence outdoor smoke does anything to anyone"? alp227 May 2014 #17
I say we round up all the smokers and kill them. name not needed May 2014 #12
Good, smokers drop their butts everywhere. It is sick. nt Logical May 2014 #15
 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
1. How are you being forced to breathe smoke?
Fri May 9, 2014, 06:09 PM
May 2014

Unless the park is 20 square feet, I'm sure they are plenty of places you can go and not be breathing in smoke.

alp227

(32,019 posts)
10. comparing smokers to hippos now?
Fri May 9, 2014, 07:53 PM
May 2014

Humans can adjust to other humans' needs. Animals not so sensitive.

 

pipoman

(16,038 posts)
2. I don't consent to vehicle emissions, manufacturing emissions,
Fri May 9, 2014, 06:12 PM
May 2014

Human body emissions. ..give me a minute I'll think of a few more. ..or, if we are talking about harmful emissions, people smoking outside are quite down the list...

PeaceNikki

(27,985 posts)
13. perfumes, air fresheners, lawnmowers, petroleum wax candles burning
Fri May 9, 2014, 07:57 PM
May 2014

bonfires, firepits, leaf burning, body odor, deodorant, scented lotions or oils

alp227

(32,019 posts)
18. Lawnmowers do make noise, so you know to avoid them.
Sat May 10, 2014, 01:27 AM
May 2014

And bonfires are a hell of a lot more obvious than cigarette smoking, whose smoke spreads long distances outdoors and invades everyone else's breathing room.

Sivafae

(480 posts)
4. There are all sorts of place you can't smoke in San Francisco and you know what?
Fri May 9, 2014, 06:41 PM
May 2014

No one cares. You might get one uptight biddy who must come and shake her finger at you. But no one really cares, especially the people who are supposed to enforce such laws.

Stop making laws you won't enforce people.

lame54

(35,287 posts)
6. No person shall be compelled to breathe foreign substances that said person does not consent to...
Fri May 9, 2014, 07:09 PM
May 2014

so much for driving

Cha

(297,187 posts)
8. I wish they would do that in the state parks on Kaua'i.. people smoke and
Fri May 9, 2014, 07:14 PM
May 2014

foul up the air.. sure.. but, they also leave their damn butts all over the beach and beach park. I spent some time yesterday picking up their litter since they won't.

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
9. Pet cause of the centrist dem
Fri May 9, 2014, 07:36 PM
May 2014

like Bloomberg and Rahm. It is a way of moralizing against the lower classes. Real progressives like the sort the run Seattle focus on things like higher minimum wage.

alp227

(32,019 posts)
11. What about everyone else's right to not breathe others' filth?
Fri May 9, 2014, 07:54 PM
May 2014

1 non-smoker has more rights to breathe clean air than 3 smokers getting to smoke.

 

betterdemsonly

(1,967 posts)
16. You're outdoors for god sakes.
Sat May 10, 2014, 01:14 AM
May 2014

You don't breath smoke unless you want to. There is no evidence outdoor smoke does anything to anyone. You could apply the same rules to all outdoor places. That would be prohibition. What about maryjane smoke. Should Co make that Maryjuana illegal again?

This crusade is based on no evidence what so ever. It is about denormalization/stigmatization or whatever.

alp227

(32,019 posts)
17. So what if "There is no evidence outdoor smoke does anything to anyone"?
Sat May 10, 2014, 01:25 AM
May 2014

Even if that were the case, I have the right to have my respiratory health respected and not to breathe others' filthy substances that I do not consent to inhaling.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Portland considering smok...