General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMother Jones-This Is What a Holy Shit Moment for Global Warming Looks Like
According to two new studies, the collapse of much of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet may now be irreversible. That could ultimately mean 10 feet of sea level rise.
By Chris Mooney
| Mon May 12, 2014 5:07 PM EDT
If you truly understand global warming, then you know it's all about the ice. That's what matters. Planet Earth has not always had great ice sheets at the poles, of the sort that currently exist atop Greenland and Antarctica. In other periods, much of that water has instead been in liquid form, in the oceansand the oceans have been much higher.
How much? According to the National Academy of Sciences, the globe's great ice sheets contain enough frozen water to raise sea levels worldwide by more than 60 meters. That's about 200 feet. And it makes all the sea level rise that we've seen so far due to global warming appear piddly and insignificant.
That's why scientists have long feared a day like this would come. Two new scientific papers, in the journals Science and Geophysical Research Letters, report that major glaciers that are part of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet appear to have become irrevocably destabilized. The whole process may still play out on the scale of centuries, but due to the particular dynamics of this ice sheet, the collapse of these major glaciers now "appears unstoppable," according to NASA (whose researchers are behind one of the two studies).
This Antarctic glacier may be history, says new research. It contains almost two feet of sea level rise, and that's just the beginning. NASA.
Read more @ http://www.motherjones.com/environment/2014/05/west-antarctic-ice-sheet-collapse?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+motherjones%2Fmain+%28MotherJones.com+Main+Article+Feed%29&utm_content=FaceBook
abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)or is that something unique to the US?
n2doc
(47,953 posts)abelenkpe
(9,933 posts)Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)They don't get much press though.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)... to our eternal shame
nomorenomore08
(13,324 posts)Hell, even the Netherlands has Geert Wilders.
hatrack
(59,585 posts)Just another preening, posing little Lord Fauntleroy, heir to the Barony of Ignorantum.
intaglio
(8,170 posts)He is not and cannot be a member of the House of Lords, nor can he use the symbol of a portcullis to imply that he is such a person.
The title has only been in existence since 1957, so not exactly an ancient family ...
mindwalker_i
(4,407 posts)So we can all just go back to watching TV.
Our kids can cover the poles with refrigerators, along with some coal-burning power plants, to keep more from melting.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)not melt in a glass of water?
Climate change deniers who should, and probably do, know better are criminal.
central scrutinizer
(11,648 posts)"When the ice cube in your drink melts, does the glass overflow? No, of course not, so we have nothing to fear from global warming, even if it isn't a socialist hoax." And the dittoheads would nod approvingly, not realizing that most of the ice is sitting on land, not in the water so the analogy is completely wrong.
WinstonSmith4740
(3,056 posts)The analogy is wrong on other levels, also. But since we're talking about RW noise machines here, we shouldn't be surprised that they don't understand that the ice is displacing it's own mass in water, so as it melts, the water level would remain the same in a glass. But along with Bill Kristol and Charles Krauthammer, has this doofus ever been right about anything?
Jerry442
(1,265 posts)Central Scrutinizer is right. Thing is, open water reflects way less of the sun's heat back into space than floating ice, so there is an indirect bad effect.
Of course, if ice supported by land masses melts, then we're straight up screwed.
WinstonSmith4740
(3,056 posts)Scrutinizer is right. And since the Antarctic ice cap IS over land mass (at least the east side is)any melting is going to screw us badly. I think Chris Hayes actually hit it right last night. The republican line all along has been "this isn't happening...BENGHAZI"...now it's, OK it's happening, but it's too late to do anything about it.
DLnyc
(2,479 posts)Calculable Damages: somewhere in the multiple trillions, say $60,000,000,000,000 as a rough estimate.
Wide Class of Individuals Affected: all of humanity, plus all the other species on Earth.
Deep Pockets to Sue: start with Murdoch, Koch Brothers, Exxon Mobil, and a few other big fat perpetrators.
Control-Z
(15,682 posts)I'm really, really for free speech. But when the (republican) leaders of our country, and those who buy them, tell lies for profit causing mass destruction, it should be treated as the criminal act it is. Jail the politicians - fine them their net worth. Sue the billionaires into poverty (jail them too). Use the proceeds for research into clean up.
RVN VET
(492 posts)But the rich control the laws and the enforcement of the laws, and the people are just not into massive mob action -- storming the Bastille, or, in our case, the mansions and towers of Murdoch, Kochs, Adelsons, etc.
We are screwed and the ones bringing it about will all be dead of natural (!!) causes before the finale.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)erronis
(15,241 posts)Bank accounts - hah. Gold, gems - probably also not worth much (unless you can satisfy your hunger with diamonds.)
Survivalist stuff - maybe good for a year or so but eventually most of us will go the way of all flesh.
If we ever get around to prosecuting the schemers and liars that made this situation possible, I don't think fines or even white-collar prisons are adequate punishment.
Prophet 451
(9,796 posts)McDiggy
(150 posts)Unfortunately, crazy and stupid isn't unique to the US.
DirkGently
(12,151 posts)... that now the deniers are just smoothly shifting gears to say that now it's to late too anything.
We are at the mercy of our own idiots.
Johonny
(20,848 posts)claiming if only they hadn't politicized the issue. When push comes to shove and the full effects can't be ignored they won't accept an ounce of blame for doing nothing they will instead shoot the messenger. They've been doing now for 30 years on this issue.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)and even our own POTUS's efforts seem focused largely on mitigating the impacts rather than preventing the actual catastrophe.
Incredibly sad, humanity giving up without a fight, it's just too inconvenient, can't be bothered, not politically expedient, etc.
I say we fight it with all we have, if nothing else it will buy more time, and you never know, things that appear impossible sometimes become possible when enough people work hard enough.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)These glaciers are a big loss, for sure, but I don't think they're the whole game, there are plenty of eventualities we could hope to avoid or greatly postpone if we fight climate change.
If I'm wrong about that (and I don't think I am), it would be better to go down doing everything in our power to correct things, rather than doing nothing but feeble attempts at impact mitigation.
I'm no expert o this, have read a lot of articles about it as has most everyone else. It's my understanding one of the things we need to work to prevent is frozen methane release, from tundra melt and from the seafloor.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...than the one we were born on...
Even if we were to stop burning ALL fossil fuels right now, no cars, no planes, no coal or gas-powered electrical plants there's enough carbon that hasn't yet impacted the global temperature that we're STILL screwed anyway. Couple that with the fact that Big Oil has on its books now, in easily recoverable oil, FIVE TIMES more carbon than scientists agree would cause a minimum of a two degree increase in global temperature. Of that two degrees we have already increased 0.8 of it, so we have to find a way to persuade Big Oil to keep 80% of their known assets IN THE GROUND.
Never mind stopping the methane releases from tundra melt, or the seafloor....none of that will matter unless we can get Big Oil to only pump 20 of their known deposits.
I have absolutely zero confidence that will happen.
We are screwed. Right now. Start looking at adapting to a radically different world because this one is toast.
stillwaiting
(3,795 posts)It is their raison d'être.
Too many of them really, really, REALLY do hate us. They have no understanding that they have been purposefully manipulated, created through propaganda, to be this way to protect the wealth and power of a very tiny number of individuals. They are the portion of the population that Jay Gould said could be easily hired to kill the other half of the working population. They have very little autonomy, and they are perfectly controllable due to their authoritarianism.
And, they will gladly let the planet go to hell if they can observe liberals/leftists getting upset over it. Also, the Rapture occurs when the planet is falling apart, and I think it's extremely likely that many of these people relish the prospect of the planet going straight to hell. This means Jesus will be here shortly no doubt.
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)raouldukelives
(5,178 posts)All of it. Every struggle ever faced by mankind. Each small and hard fought step of enlightenment. Each inroad into the rights of humanity and each threshold crossed by our brightest minds?
The words of our favorite writers, the art of the great masters, the music of the most gifted, the blood and sacrifice of those who came before us?
The Aspen and the Blue Jay? The Salmon and the Redwood? All the various forms of flora and fauna that give us a glimpse at the true meaning of beauty?
All of it is going down the tubes at a record pace.
Is it worth us ending weekend trips to the mall? The world of celebrity and athletic events? Gobbling up resources and spewing pollution for no other reason than dulling of the senses for a few hours or a few extra dollars to spend on your death bed?
Can we, the people of today, join together and actually achieve something meaningful? Perhaps the only meaningful act of our short existence?
Nope.
Dows up!
TimeToEvolve
(303 posts)i suppose it will be interesting to see how it goes.
LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)time, right on target! Thanks for posting this!
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)I love George Carlin.
MyUncle
(924 posts)Below is text from the original article.
"It is, again, important to emphasize that just because these glaciers may have passed the "point of no return" does not mean that dramatic sea level rise happens tomorrow. There is a limit to how fast glaciers and ice sheets can move, and the Science paper emphasizes that the entire process may take several hundred years and possibly as much as a millennium."
morningfog
(18,115 posts)We chose long ago to ignore it. It is far too late now.
G_j
(40,367 posts)WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)hobbit709
(41,694 posts)My theory is that the human race seems to have survived so far despite itself.
riqster
(13,986 posts)"My theory is that the human race seems to have survived so far despite itself."
I'd say that theory has one whole helluva lot of evidence supporting it.
Uncle Joe
(58,359 posts)Thanks for the thread, Lady Freedom Returns.
maced666
(771 posts)Antarctic sea ice extent for April 2014 reached 9.00 million square kilometers (3.47 million square miles), the largest ice extent on record by a significant margin.
Following near-record levels in March, a slightly higher-than-average rate of increase led to a record April ice extent, compared to the satellite record since 1978.
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Western ice sheet?
brett_jv
(1,245 posts)The 'extent' of the 'surface area' of the ice sheet is friggin' irrelevant.
What matters is 'how MUCH' ice is there. The ice sheets have three dimensions, not two. The third one, DEPTH, is pretty friggin' important in the equation. And the 'extent' doesn't CALCULATE THAT.
Derp.
blkmusclmachine
(16,149 posts)protect them from the 99%.
riqster
(13,986 posts)I have acquaintances who actually say that. Scary shit.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)gtar100
(4,192 posts)1. Manipulate media and government for self preservation.
2. Rapture out before the shit hits the fan.
3. Colonize the moon or Mars.
Sadly, none of their "brilliant" ideas include actually fixing problems here on Earth.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Stephen Hawking called for a massive investment in establishing colonies on the Moon and Mars in a lecture in honour of NASA's 50th anniversary. He argued that the world should devote about 10 times as much as NASA's current budget - or 0.25% of the world's financial resources - to space.
The renowned University of Cambridge physicist has previously spoken in favour of colonising space as an insurance policy against the possibility of humanity being wiped out by catastrophes like nuclear war and climate change.
brett_jv
(1,245 posts)ALL sustenance for the people living on these colonies would have to come from EARTH.
Both scenarios he describes, where Earth was entirely depopulated due to nuclear war or climate change, would unquestionably involve the deaths of the people on the colonies as well, because they either a) could get no supplies anymore from earth, or b) they would die if they came BACK to earth.
Maybe, MAYBE this plan could work if the world population was wiped out due to a virus that killed everyone in a matter of weeks, and then was itself killed off due to a lack of living hosts ... in that case, we could potentially repopulate the earth from the people on the colonies, but with as many problems as we currently KNOW we face, it seems like a ridiculous expense for that extremely unlikely scenario ... it'd be much smarter/cheaper to plan for keeping a population alive here on Earth, with underground facilities built for that purpose.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)is the exhibit I remember)!
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)The future ain't bright.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Assholes.
If the nation had just listened to Carter.....
IronLionZion
(45,438 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)...so that means Al Gore is full of shit...
lobodons
(1,290 posts)problem solved.
DallasNE
(7,403 posts)Given that 71% of the earth's surface is covered by water. Greenland and Antarctica only represent a small percentage of earths surface and the glaciers only represent a small percentage of those land masses (especially Antarctica) so just how thick are those ice sheets that they can raise the sea level by what is being forecast? I just can't see how the mathematics works out.
hatrack
(59,585 posts)Average ice depth is 1.2 miles, and in some areas is substantially deeper. Only about 2% of the continent is ice-free (mostly the Antarctic Peninsula and associated islands).
So, collectively, we're talking about millions of cubic miles of ice. Not all of it will melt, and even WAIS will take decades, possibly centuries to melt down. Even rapidly retreating glaciers only move so fast.
That said, a volume of ice that large will inevitably push sea levels higher, and thermal expansion of water as the oceans warm will only increase the height of the rise.
davidthegnome
(2,983 posts)Consider how it wasn't really all that long ago that human flight was believed to be an impossibility. The earth was flat. Rome ruled the world.
How on earth did such a simple, idiotic species as we humans manage to build the pyramids? How did we manage to colonize most of the known world? How the heck did we ever get men on to the moon? So many things that were believed to be impossible we proven not only possible, but became reality. The will to live - and human curiosity and energy... they are powerful, very powerful things. While there is this immense greed and ignorance that threatens our earth... this selfish bigotry and cruelty, this lack of compassion and understanding... that is not all that we are.
We are also very capable of nobility of spirit, of great kindness, generosity, forgiveness. We can accomplish amazing things, climb the highest mountains, sail across the deepest oceans, create works of art and beauty that bring tears even to the eyes of the powerful narcissists that rule us.
I would say... don't give up on the fight before it's over. Before it's really begun. The closer we come to dooms day, the further we accelerate our destruction, the more the urgency will grow in the hearts and minds of the populace, and when enough people are hurting... I believe we will come together to solve problems. Climate change is not necessarily an end to all that we have accomplished. It could instead be a new beginning that teaches us to take better care of our world, to work together for it's benefit. We may in time create technology that can resolve even this kind of immense potential disaster.
If we all do all that we can to combat this destruction, we can make a headway. We can inspire others by leading through our examples. We can demonstrate, in our own lives, that we give a damn about our planet.
All the doom and gloom is terribly dramatic and a bit frightening, but it is by no means set in stone. Don't be afraid - be encouraged to do something about it. Being human can be a rotten thing, but it can also be pretty damn awesome.
dreamnightwind
(4,775 posts)Thank you for this post.
LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)on the future of the planet. Recycling, composting, considering their lives with purpose, making our voices heard. It feels overwhelming, but we can make change.
Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)Quantess
(27,630 posts)Matariki
(18,775 posts)toby jo
(1,269 posts)If we can herd them into their underground bunkers, let the water pour in, we could be good