Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
Thu May 15, 2014, 01:17 PM May 2014

White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel

By Justin Sink - 05/05/14 02:40 PM EDT

The White House suggested Monday it may not cooperate with a new House select committee investigating the terror attack in Benghazi.

Press secretary Jay Carney said that the White House has "always cooperated with legitimate oversight," but called the new probe a “highly partisan effort to politicize” the deadly attack.

"If you look at even what some Republicans have said, it certainly casts doubt on the legitimacy of an effort that is so partisan in nature," Carney said.
"I don't think there are many people, including some Republicans… who believe that this is necessary after seven congressional committees and multiple investigations," he added.

Carney refused to answer questions directly about whether the White House would cooperate, but he noted that there had been 13 congressional hearings, 50 member-and staff briefings, and over 25,000 pages of documents produced over the September 11, 2012 terror attack, in which four Americans were killed.



Read more: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/205216-white-house-may-not-cooperate-with-benghazi-probe#ixzz31o0egDzE

6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House may not cooperate with Benghazi select panel (Original Post) DonViejo May 2014 OP
Well, they do Turbineguy May 2014 #1
I think that would be a mistake Lee-Lee May 2014 #2
They don't have the high ground on this and Gman May 2014 #3
But, but the email by a staff underling is the smoking gun, right? Republicans need to point the Fred Sanders May 2014 #4
Gee I seem to recall.... Aladeen2016 May 2014 #5
They should just send Hillary to rip them to shreds like she did at the last hearing. And the phrase Erose999 May 2014 #6
 

Lee-Lee

(6,324 posts)
2. I think that would be a mistake
Thu May 15, 2014, 01:32 PM
May 2014

It will just give them way too many sound bites- "what are they hiding", "if you have nothing to hide why won't you cooperate".

I say play nice. Super nice. Give them every single thing they ask for, then more, ahead of when they ask for it and make them look like total asses when there is not a damn thing new that comes up.

Stonewalling just plays right into their narrative that something is being hidden.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
3. They don't have the high ground on this and
Thu May 15, 2014, 01:38 PM
May 2014

people have moved on. There's an old saying that says "never play the other man's game". That's appropriate here.

Fred Sanders

(23,946 posts)
4. But, but the email by a staff underling is the smoking gun, right? Republicans need to point the
Thu May 15, 2014, 01:38 PM
May 2014

gun at their own heads, figuratively speaking and that smoke you see is the propaganda fire they lit, wafting back into their own desperate faces.

Aladeen2016

(6 posts)
5. Gee I seem to recall....
Thu May 15, 2014, 03:27 PM
May 2014

a certain someone and his VP refusing to appear before the house on any hearings
about, you know, FUCKING 9/11!

Erose999

(5,624 posts)
6. They should just send Hillary to rip them to shreds like she did at the last hearing. And the phrase
Thu May 15, 2014, 04:44 PM
May 2014

"kangaroo court" should be used in all pressers and other communications related to these hearings.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»White House may not coope...