General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe Frontline documentary on the NSA just finished up..
I feel Snowden made a brave decision to bring this incredibly important story into the limelight..
If one feels that protecting all our constitutional rights to privacy might jeopardize the security of our nation....and is good with this..then he/she should not complain about these infringements..
If one feels that there should be absolutely no infringements on our constitutional rights... then that person must be prepared not to change his mind if there is another national emergency such as 911..
If you guys believe that if a massive intrusion of privacy such as the one that was detailed in tonights program could have prevented 911, would you support this spying program perpetrated by our govt.in collusion with our private communication corporations in todays world...??
Obviously millions have died defending our concept of citizen privacy...But in this period of history it would take only one suit case and a couple of suicidal nuts to reek incredible damage on our country. Completely different circumstance than even 75 years ago...
Im torn between the two suppositions...
Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)I do of a terrorist attack. Not that I believe one can't happen, especially since our policies tend to invite them, but because, as proven time and time again, unregulated power does corrupt and that is what we are living under now.
JonLP24
(29,322 posts)Live and Learn
(12,769 posts)The truth is, I somehow knew this instinctively (or through living and learning the past decades) and can't bear to watch it.
It really sickens me how willing so many are to give up the few rights to privacy we actually have and how few realize the dangers of it (thinking they have nothing to hide) even though history proves them wrong.
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)I spent the last couple of days reading it. I had also read the other book that came out just before his. This one, obviously, has more insider's info. Now, you read articles such as this one in the NYT: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/05/21/business/us-snooping-on-companies-cited-by-china.html and you understand the background much better.
freedom fighter jh
(1,782 posts)We are in real danger of terrorism. But the infringements on our rights are not motivated at mitigating that danger, nor are they likely to do so. Terrorism is just an excuse for government to impose totalitarian measures. We do need protection from terrorism. But violation of our rights is not the way to protect us.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)security apparatus in place. It could have been prevented. We didn't have to have a massive intrusion of privacy. We needed leadership. We needed competence.
KurtNYC
(14,549 posts)specifically says "hijack aircraft"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bin_Ladin_Determined_To_Strike_in_US
Also: