Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Right-Wingers Are Amping Up Their War on Science and Reality
http://www.alternet.org/belief/how-right-wingers-are-amping-their-war-science-and-realityNo longer content just to claim to be skeptical of scientific findings they find disagreeable, Republican politicians have moved on to a more alarming anti-science strategy: confuse the public about what science even is, claiming its just someones opinion and ignoring the importance of evidence.
Marco Rubios recent remarks about climate change epitomize this new era, with conservative politicians deciding that science is whatever they say it is. I don't agree with the notion that some are putting out thereincluding scientiststhat somehow, there are actions we can take today that would actually have an impact on what's happening in our climate, Rubio told ABCs Jonathan Karl. I do not believe that human activity is causing these dramatic changes to our climate the way these scientist are portraying it, he added.
By making climate change a matter of what he believes or agrees with, Rubio was implying that climate change is a matter of opinion and not of evidence or fact. Theres the old saying, Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not his own facts. Conservatives have figured out a workaround: redefine the facts as opinions, and by golly, now you get to have your own facts!
James Taranto of the Wall Street Journal was even more blunt in asserting that scientific findings should be regarded as more opinion than fact in his defense of Rubio, portraying Rubio as a rebel for refusing to submit to scientific authority. In a sleight of hand, Taranto portrayed the debate as one of scientists simply asserting, from authority, and Rubio as just someone disagreeing. But Rubio isn't disagreeing with the opinions of scientists; hes disagreeing with the conclusions derived from the evidence. Even if all the climate change scientists died tomorrow, the planet would still be heating up. This isnt a matter of one persons opinion versus another. Its a man being presented with facts and refusing to believe them.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 578 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (4)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Right-Wingers Are Amping Up Their War on Science and Reality (Original Post)
xchrom
May 2014
OP
Republicans and American Right Wingers have severe problems with thought processes.
gordianot
May 2014
#1
gordianot
(15,237 posts)1. Republicans and American Right Wingers have severe problems with thought processes.
The Scientific method is beyond them. As witnessed on 2012 election night data, logical thought, outcomes are beyond their grasp. They live in a pretend world to believe what they believe ushers in a new dark age. They threaten human survival.
Champion Jack
(5,378 posts)2. Can you say desperate…?