General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsGoldstein: Kerry should "man up" and quit government
for his vote on the Iraq War.
Kerry: Snowden should 'man up' and return to U.S.
Which will cause more suffering? That damned war or Ed Snowden's disclosures?
(Even better, Kerry should "person up" up and quit. What's with the "man up"? Women aren't capable of whatever it is that Kerry seeks?)
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Only because of the alternative.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Why shoukd that vote be held against him now when you didn't in 2004?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Oh really?
I guess that means you love having fingers amputated.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Can you answer my question?
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Come root for the A's they are fucking awesome. Or the Giants! Best records in baseball belong right here in Nor Cal!
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)The NY Rangers are winning so I got that.
HangOnKids
(4,291 posts)Remember the Boston Yankees series? The Rangers have their work cut out for them.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Can't speak for others.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Your op says
Goldstein: Kerry should "man up" and quit government
for his vote on the Iraq War.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Is this a trick question?
What is my ossified brain missing here?
I should have voted for Bush? Or not voted?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)president.
Nothing changed in those years since his vote and your presidential vote so why say he needs to go over his vote?
zeemike
(18,998 posts)You have a choice between the lesser of two evils and you chose the lesser...and then the lesser is elevated to good and you can never complain about them again...once you cast your vote for them they are absolved.
None of us got to vote for SOS...it is a appointed position.
And BTW, I voted for Kerry too in 04...because he was the lesser of the two evil Bonesmen.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)But if the op says he is not qualified to be sos because of his Iraq vote 11 years ago but he voted for the same guy 10 years ago knowing full well how he voted then I say that is hypocritical.
If you want him gone then say it but to say it is because of his Iraq war vote when he voted for him in 2004 is laughable.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Either good cop or bad cop, one will act nicer but they both will work the same.
I supported Dean in the primary but he did not make it, so I had the choice between a democratic Bonesman or a Republican Bonesman...and my choice does not absolve him of his actions.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)His vote shoukd not disqualify him for a job he already has by people eho voted for him for the top job.
The argument that he is not doing a good job is a stronger argument.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)held against him now if it was a bad vote, regardless what of what went down in 2004? Some of you people seem to think that a vote for a politician indentures you to the asshole for life.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)I think it is odd to vote for a guy for president knowing he voted for the war and then a decade later say he can't serve as sos based on that vote.
Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)actually, it's totally ridiculous.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)Now if the op said I think he is not a good sos I would say that is point worth arguing.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)Many people still had some faith in and believed that senate democrats knew things they didn't about Iraq in 2003, but that was 11 years ago. One hell of a lot has happened since then, more than enough to change a thinking person's mind about the character of John Kerry.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)You don't like him and that is fine by me. But his vote should not disqualify him if you thought he was ok for president, but his job performance.
I agree that was the worst decision the senate dems coukd have made. I was pissed ehen Clinton and Schumer voted for it and I let them know.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)I just think he should person up and quit.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)as contrition for the awful thing he did.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)but not when he was up for election.
You think he is doing a bad job then I coukd sympathize but on his Iraq vote I can not hold it against him.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)But, it's not his fault. He's just another imperial status quo asshole. What else can one expect from such people?
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)PowerToThePeople
(9,610 posts)BeyondGeography
(39,392 posts)That's the best I could do. "Man up" was/is 3rd rate for any SoS, especially John Kerry.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)bemildred
(90,061 posts)He thinks saying things like "man up" is how you do that, you know, pretend to be illiterate and misogynistic?
Maedhros
(10,007 posts)When they speak to their base (liberal, progressive), they tell us to shut up and take it.
Autumn
(45,120 posts)he might have won.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)I voted for him then, but that will be the last time.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)That was when he still thought whistleblowers should be shot in the balls.
He's mini Greenwald.
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)ProSense
(116,464 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)He recently called for John Kerry to resign:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/29/ted-cruz-john-kerry_n_5231897.html
Goldstein also said he'd rather overturn the election of Obama than the election of Reagan:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3995915
So Goldstein would rather overturn the election of Obama than the election of Reagan and now Goldstein calls on John Kerry to resign.
This Goldstein guy is one interesting fella....
Trajan
(19,089 posts)Therefore: Trajan = Hitler
Yes ... I see your point ...
Egnever
(21,506 posts)Louisiana1976
(3,962 posts)LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)A man who, let's face it, wouldn't have got where he is without family connections.
50 years from now he'll be a trivia question: Who lost to Chimpy in 2004?
blm
(113,126 posts)Who uncovered BCCI and its funding of global terrorism?
Who uncovered the S&L scandal?
Who exposed CIA drugrunning?
Who did all of those things with most of official DC against him?
You are welcome to name one lawmaker who effected this nation's actual historic record more positively than Kerry has the last 4 decades.
You are also welcome to name your significant accomplishments that made you lift yourself onto that pedestal.
LittleBlue
(10,362 posts)This is like the "accomplishment" crowd for Obama.
He had two chances in his life to do something great, not some minor shit people barely remember: Beating the Bush mafia, and standing up to a murderous war.
He failed at both. And his vote to authorize a war that killed hundreds of thousands leaves blood on his hands. He has utterly destroyed his legacy.
sendero
(28,552 posts).... I was neutral on him until that. Never heard a word of passion out of his mouth until it was "bomb Syria".
If he would have defended himself against the swiftboat attacks with half the passion, he might have beat the shrub. It will always leave a question in my mind, if all of that stuff was untrue then why not defend yourself? The only possibilities are not pleasant to consider.
Now, I hold him in the same esteem I hold 95% of politicians. You can guess how high that is.
blm
(113,126 posts)Quite the historian, aintcha?
BTW - It was the Dem party charged with beating Bush in 2004 and Kerry performed well even with Clinton praising Bush's military decisions while Kerry was ripping them apart. And Terry McAuliffe did NOTHING to secure the election in the 4 years he had to do so. Instead of rebuilding the party infrastructure and securing the election process in key states like Ohio, he let the party infrastructure remain collapsed. No presidential candidate can fix a party's collapsed infrastructure state by state in the months before the general election.
You are welcome to keep revising history to suit your venom - You certainly aren't a caretaker of history.
zeemike
(18,998 posts)Especially one with the pedigree of a Bush.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)blm
(113,126 posts)His reporting was important and contributed to the overall investigation that Kerry launched and pursued on his own on the hill for over a year before he finally forced congress to act on it.
unblock
(52,436 posts)KansDem
(28,498 posts)treestar
(82,383 posts)How does Snow get so much devotion? It's getting weird.
This comment, which Kerry has no power to enforce, is that enraging?
Autumn
(45,120 posts)according The Rude Pundit. The Pundit nailed it, and Kerry
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025021182