Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:15 PM May 2014

Goldstein: Kerry should "man up" and quit government

for his vote on the Iraq War.

Kerry: Snowden should 'man up' and return to U.S.

Which will cause more suffering? That damned war or Ed Snowden's disclosures?

(Even better, Kerry should "person up" up and quit. What's with the "man up"? Women aren't capable of whatever it is that Kerry seeks?)

62 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Goldstein: Kerry should "man up" and quit government (Original Post) MannyGoldstein May 2014 OP
Did you vote for Kerry in 2004? hrmjustin May 2014 #1
Yes. MannyGoldstein May 2014 #3
Yeah but if he should quit because of the Iraq war why did you vote for him? hrmjustin May 2014 #4
Would you rather have a hand amputated, or a finger amputated? MannyGoldstein May 2014 #6
No I prefer to keep my limbs and digits. hrmjustin May 2014 #8
I *think* I did. nt MannyGoldstein May 2014 #13
Then why is his iraq war vote held against him now but not then? hrmjustin May 2014 #15
Hey How About Those Mets? n/t HangOnKids May 2014 #16
They suck as usual. hrmjustin May 2014 #18
Ahh too bad HangOnKids May 2014 #20
I was raised on the Mets. hrmjustin May 2014 #22
Oh don't be too sure they will go all the way HangOnKids May 2014 #24
Time will tell. hrmjustin May 2014 #26
I've held it against him since it happened. MannyGoldstein May 2014 #19
Then why was it ok for him to be president then but not ok for him to be SOS now? hrmjustin May 2014 #21
My choice was Kerry or Bush. MannyGoldstein May 2014 #27
My point is it seems odd you would say he can't be SOS because of his war vote but he could be hrmjustin May 2014 #29
That is an interesting point you make. zeemike May 2014 #44
If you think that Kerry is not up to the job then that is a legit point to make. hrmjustin May 2014 #46
And what choice did we have? zeemike May 2014 #50
I agree the choices were limited but we made it. hrmjustin May 2014 #52
Why shouldn't it be sulphurdunn May 2014 #41
You people? hrmjustin May 2014 #42
Yes. It is very odd Cali_Democrat May 2014 #43
I just don't get it. hrmjustin May 2014 #45
Think what you like. sulphurdunn May 2014 #49
And that is a legitimate thing to say. hrmjustin May 2014 #51
For the record, most Congressional Democrats voted against the Iraq War Resolution. nt MannyGoldstein May 2014 #54
To be clear are you saying Kerry's vote to go to war disqualifies him to be SOS? hrmjustin May 2014 #55
Clearly it doesn't, because he *is* SOS MannyGoldstein May 2014 #56
Quit because he is doing a bad job or his vote? hrmjustin May 2014 #57
Because of his demonstrated poor judgement when it counted the most, and MannyGoldstein May 2014 #58
We could argue this all night so I will say it is unfair to hold his vote against him as SoS hrmjustin May 2014 #62
Because he's doing a bad job. sulphurdunn May 2014 #59
Well I can not say I am impressed with Kerry myself. hrmjustin May 2014 #61
Same for HRC. n/t PowerToThePeople May 2014 #2
You should Manny up and laugh it off BeyondGeography May 2014 #5
... NuclearDem May 2014 #7
He's just trying to get in touch with the common man, Manny. bemildred May 2014 #9
Demonstrates to which demographic group (male, conservative) the Adminstration is speaking. Maedhros May 2014 #11
If he had tried to be in touch with the common man in 2004 Autumn May 2014 #17
LOL! n/t Aerows May 2014 #28
No question about that in my mind. bemildred May 2014 #36
Snowden tried to join the war to fight in Iraq ProSense May 2014 #10
That's pretty much the same thing as voting as a US senator to go to war. nt MannyGoldstein May 2014 #12
Or you voting for Obama. ProSense May 2014 #14
Goldstein is channeling Ted Cruz Cali_Democrat May 2014 #23
I like beer ... Hitler liked beer Trajan May 2014 #53
who? Egnever May 2014 #25
Rec'd for "person up." I can't stand the noninclusive expression "man up." Louisiana1976 May 2014 #30
Kerry practically defines the word "mediocre" LittleBlue May 2014 #31
Oh? How about THESE trivia questions? Who investigated and exposed IranContra? blm May 2014 #33
Oh please LittleBlue May 2014 #34
Don't forget his stance on Syria... sendero May 2014 #38
IranContra, BCCI, CIA drugrunning and S&Ls were minor shit to you? blm May 2014 #39
You don't oppose a fellow Bonesman. zeemike May 2014 #47
Robert Perry? sulphurdunn May 2014 #37
Robert Parry was a key investigative reporter on some of the IranContra stories. blm May 2014 #40
ah, "manning up"! so *that's* what sarah palin was doing when she quit government! unblock May 2014 #32
"In what respect, unblockie?" KansDem May 2014 #35
Nobody said he should quit before this treestar May 2014 #48
Kerry is living in "a pipe dream more fitting to fantasyland than any serious discussion." Autumn May 2014 #60
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
4. Yeah but if he should quit because of the Iraq war why did you vote for him?
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:20 PM
May 2014

Why shoukd that vote be held against him now when you didn't in 2004?

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
6. Would you rather have a hand amputated, or a finger amputated?
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:22 PM
May 2014

Oh really?

I guess that means you love having fingers amputated.

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
20. Ahh too bad
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:42 PM
May 2014

Come root for the A's they are fucking awesome. Or the Giants! Best records in baseball belong right here in Nor Cal!

 

HangOnKids

(4,291 posts)
24. Oh don't be too sure they will go all the way
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:47 PM
May 2014

Remember the Boston Yankees series? The Rangers have their work cut out for them.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
21. Then why was it ok for him to be president then but not ok for him to be SOS now?
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:43 PM
May 2014

Your op says
Goldstein: Kerry should "man up" and quit government

for his vote on the Iraq War.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
27. My choice was Kerry or Bush.
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:50 PM
May 2014

Is this a trick question?

What is my ossified brain missing here?

I should have voted for Bush? Or not voted?

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
29. My point is it seems odd you would say he can't be SOS because of his war vote but he could be
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:53 PM
May 2014

president.

Nothing changed in those years since his vote and your presidential vote so why say he needs to go over his vote?

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
44. That is an interesting point you make.
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:30 PM
May 2014

You have a choice between the lesser of two evils and you chose the lesser...and then the lesser is elevated to good and you can never complain about them again...once you cast your vote for them they are absolved.

None of us got to vote for SOS...it is a appointed position.

And BTW, I voted for Kerry too in 04...because he was the lesser of the two evil Bonesmen.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
46. If you think that Kerry is not up to the job then that is a legit point to make.
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:36 PM
May 2014

But if the op says he is not qualified to be sos because of his Iraq vote 11 years ago but he voted for the same guy 10 years ago knowing full well how he voted then I say that is hypocritical.

If you want him gone then say it but to say it is because of his Iraq war vote when he voted for him in 2004 is laughable.

zeemike

(18,998 posts)
50. And what choice did we have?
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:55 PM
May 2014

Either good cop or bad cop, one will act nicer but they both will work the same.
I supported Dean in the primary but he did not make it, so I had the choice between a democratic Bonesman or a Republican Bonesman...and my choice does not absolve him of his actions.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
52. I agree the choices were limited but we made it.
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:58 PM
May 2014

His vote shoukd not disqualify him for a job he already has by people eho voted for him for the top job.

The argument that he is not doing a good job is a stronger argument.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
41. Why shouldn't it be
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:15 PM
May 2014

held against him now if it was a bad vote, regardless what of what went down in 2004? Some of you people seem to think that a vote for a politician indentures you to the asshole for life.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
42. You people?
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:26 PM
May 2014

I think it is odd to vote for a guy for president knowing he voted for the war and then a decade later say he can't serve as sos based on that vote.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
45. I just don't get it.
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:31 PM
May 2014

Now if the op said I think he is not a good sos I would say that is point worth arguing.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
49. Think what you like.
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:50 PM
May 2014

Many people still had some faith in and believed that senate democrats knew things they didn't about Iraq in 2003, but that was 11 years ago. One hell of a lot has happened since then, more than enough to change a thinking person's mind about the character of John Kerry.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
51. And that is a legitimate thing to say.
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:55 PM
May 2014

You don't like him and that is fine by me. But his vote should not disqualify him if you thought he was ok for president, but his job performance.

I agree that was the worst decision the senate dems coukd have made. I was pissed ehen Clinton and Schumer voted for it and I let them know.

 

MannyGoldstein

(34,589 posts)
58. Because of his demonstrated poor judgement when it counted the most, and
Thu May 29, 2014, 06:24 PM
May 2014

as contrition for the awful thing he did.

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
62. We could argue this all night so I will say it is unfair to hold his vote against him as SoS
Thu May 29, 2014, 06:40 PM
May 2014

but not when he was up for election.

You think he is doing a bad job then I coukd sympathize but on his Iraq vote I can not hold it against him.

 

sulphurdunn

(6,891 posts)
59. Because he's doing a bad job.
Thu May 29, 2014, 06:30 PM
May 2014

But, it's not his fault. He's just another imperial status quo asshole. What else can one expect from such people?

BeyondGeography

(39,392 posts)
5. You should Manny up and laugh it off
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:21 PM
May 2014

That's the best I could do. "Man up" was/is 3rd rate for any SoS, especially John Kerry.

bemildred

(90,061 posts)
9. He's just trying to get in touch with the common man, Manny.
Thu May 29, 2014, 02:55 PM
May 2014

He thinks saying things like "man up" is how you do that, you know, pretend to be illiterate and misogynistic?

 

Maedhros

(10,007 posts)
11. Demonstrates to which demographic group (male, conservative) the Adminstration is speaking.
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:10 PM
May 2014

When they speak to their base (liberal, progressive), they tell us to shut up and take it.

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
10. Snowden tried to join the war to fight in Iraq
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:03 PM
May 2014

That was when he still thought whistleblowers should be shot in the balls.

He's mini Greenwald.

 

Cali_Democrat

(30,439 posts)
23. Goldstein is channeling Ted Cruz
Thu May 29, 2014, 03:45 PM
May 2014

He recently called for John Kerry to resign:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/04/29/ted-cruz-john-kerry_n_5231897.html

Goldstein also said he'd rather overturn the election of Obama than the election of Reagan:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=3995915

So Goldstein would rather overturn the election of Obama than the election of Reagan and now Goldstein calls on John Kerry to resign.

This Goldstein guy is one interesting fella....

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
31. Kerry practically defines the word "mediocre"
Thu May 29, 2014, 04:01 PM
May 2014

A man who, let's face it, wouldn't have got where he is without family connections.

50 years from now he'll be a trivia question: Who lost to Chimpy in 2004?

blm

(113,126 posts)
33. Oh? How about THESE trivia questions? Who investigated and exposed IranContra?
Thu May 29, 2014, 04:06 PM
May 2014

Who uncovered BCCI and its funding of global terrorism?

Who uncovered the S&L scandal?

Who exposed CIA drugrunning?

Who did all of those things with most of official DC against him?

You are welcome to name one lawmaker who effected this nation's actual historic record more positively than Kerry has the last 4 decades.

You are also welcome to name your significant accomplishments that made you lift yourself onto that pedestal.

 

LittleBlue

(10,362 posts)
34. Oh please
Thu May 29, 2014, 04:12 PM
May 2014

This is like the "accomplishment" crowd for Obama.

He had two chances in his life to do something great, not some minor shit people barely remember: Beating the Bush mafia, and standing up to a murderous war.

He failed at both. And his vote to authorize a war that killed hundreds of thousands leaves blood on his hands. He has utterly destroyed his legacy.

sendero

(28,552 posts)
38. Don't forget his stance on Syria...
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:04 PM
May 2014

.... I was neutral on him until that. Never heard a word of passion out of his mouth until it was "bomb Syria".

If he would have defended himself against the swiftboat attacks with half the passion, he might have beat the shrub. It will always leave a question in my mind, if all of that stuff was untrue then why not defend yourself? The only possibilities are not pleasant to consider.

Now, I hold him in the same esteem I hold 95% of politicians. You can guess how high that is.

blm

(113,126 posts)
39. IranContra, BCCI, CIA drugrunning and S&Ls were minor shit to you?
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:09 PM
May 2014

Quite the historian, aintcha?

BTW - It was the Dem party charged with beating Bush in 2004 and Kerry performed well even with Clinton praising Bush's military decisions while Kerry was ripping them apart. And Terry McAuliffe did NOTHING to secure the election in the 4 years he had to do so. Instead of rebuilding the party infrastructure and securing the election process in key states like Ohio, he let the party infrastructure remain collapsed. No presidential candidate can fix a party's collapsed infrastructure state by state in the months before the general election.

You are welcome to keep revising history to suit your venom - You certainly aren't a caretaker of history.

blm

(113,126 posts)
40. Robert Parry was a key investigative reporter on some of the IranContra stories.
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:11 PM
May 2014

His reporting was important and contributed to the overall investigation that Kerry launched and pursued on his own on the hill for over a year before he finally forced congress to act on it.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
48. Nobody said he should quit before this
Thu May 29, 2014, 05:47 PM
May 2014

How does Snow get so much devotion? It's getting weird.

This comment, which Kerry has no power to enforce, is that enraging?

Autumn

(45,120 posts)
60. Kerry is living in "a pipe dream more fitting to fantasyland than any serious discussion."
Thu May 29, 2014, 06:34 PM
May 2014

according The Rude Pundit. The Pundit nailed it, and Kerry

http://www.democraticunderground.com/10025021182

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Goldstein: Kerry should &...