Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

usregimechange

(18,373 posts)
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 03:35 PM Apr 2012

SCOTUS: Strip searches ok for minor traffic offenses

Justice Breyer and the 3 female justices: "In my view, such a search of an individual arrested for a minor offense that does not involve drugs or violence—say a traffic offense, a regulatory offense, an essentially civil matter, or any other such misdemeanor—is an “unreasonable searc[h]” forbidden by the Fourth Amendment, unless prison authorities have reasonable suspicion to believe that the individual possesses drugs or other contraband. And I dissent from the Court’s contrary determination...

In that New York case, the “strip search” (as described in a relevant prison manual) involved: “‘a visual inspection of the inmate’s naked body. This should include the inmate opening his mouth and moving his tongue up and down and from side to side, removing any dentures, running his hands throughhis hair, allowing his ears to be visually examined,lifting his arms to expose his arm pits, lifting his feet to examine the sole, spreading and/or lifting his testicles to expose the area behind them and bending over and/or spreading the cheeks of his buttocks to expose his anus. For females, the procedures are similar except females must in addition, squat to expose the vagina.’” Id., at 46.

Amicus briefs present other instances in which individuals arrested for minor offenses have been subjected tothe humiliations of a visual strip search.... They include a nun, a Sister of Divine Providence for 50 years... They include victims of sexual violence....

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/11pdf/10-945.pdf

Get this to the main page and rattle some cages now!

85 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
SCOTUS: Strip searches ok for minor traffic offenses (Original Post) usregimechange Apr 2012 OP
Have I mentioned today how much I despise these 5 goat fuckers. nt Guy Whitey Corngood Apr 2012 #1
Probably not one-half as much as indepat Apr 2012 #11
Thats why I always keep a .357 magnum DocMac Apr 2012 #2
a real upside to childbirth--- BlancheSplanchnik Apr 2012 #76
Lol. But it seems they would still find it. nt DocMac Apr 2012 #84
And Kennedy joined them in this total BS? What are they Ilsa Apr 2012 #3
I fear that might be the case. nt raouldukelives Apr 2012 #12
Probably an intimidation tactic to subdue protesters. Baitball Blogger Apr 2012 #56
Absolutely. This a full on power play BanzaiBonnie Apr 2012 #71
The following is a long video but Chris Hedges snappyturtle Apr 2012 #78
I don't see anything wrong with this Ezlivin Apr 2012 #4
You can't hide - they will get you any and every way the can. Smilo Apr 2012 #20
I was going to ask if you were joking newspeak Apr 2012 #61
If ya got nothing to hide then why not spread 'em?!! Zalatix Apr 2012 #69
worse president left an even worse supreme court. spanone Apr 2012 #5
In 2000 some were concerned about Roe v Wade. It turns out there were a lot of other issues libinnyandia Apr 2012 #6
George W. caduceus111 Apr 2012 #67
Guilty until proven innocent felix_numinous Apr 2012 #7
........ marmar Apr 2012 #8
What constitutes reasonable? A cop wanting to? TheKentuckian Apr 2012 #9
thats what alec wants to be rid of the police force so they hire private security leftyohiolib Apr 2012 #17
Yes, they're driving the law into the ground so people will run to another strongman. Fascism 101. freshwest Apr 2012 #28
Maybe but Pinkertons aren't an extension of the state. TheKentuckian Apr 2012 #83
Is this for real Politicalboi Apr 2012 #10
Unreal... truebrit71 Apr 2012 #13
WTF is the matter with these 5 - visual strip search of a nun Smilo Apr 2012 #14
Is this still the United States of America, or RoccoR5955 Apr 2012 #15
Who's speaking out against this? ananda Apr 2012 #16
Just us, for now, we have to get this out there and let all of those folks know, it's up to us usregimechange Apr 2012 #18
Justice Breyer, he wrote a dissent. n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #32
Such an important question. woo me with science Apr 2012 #65
I can see the new training manual ... ... bayareaboy Apr 2012 #19
Well I can see you won't get the job of writing the manual Smilo Apr 2012 #21
Vile and disturbing decision. nt BlueIris Apr 2012 #22
As a nurse in a county jail I am fine with this. Lunabelle Apr 2012 #23
Note that the decision concerned inmates that are "committed to the general population of a jail". PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #27
Which ones are those, please? Cerridwen Apr 2012 #43
Can be anything you're arrested for if they decide to place you in 'general population'. PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #46
Thank you. n/t Cerridwen Apr 2012 #50
um... society is NOT a jail fascisthunter Apr 2012 #40
Planned an arrest? slampoet Apr 2012 #63
alerted n/t unionworks Apr 2012 #64
lol great minds, and all that n/t Occulus Apr 2012 #73
Post removed Post removed Apr 2012 #74
for "minor offenses" ? Lifelong Protester Apr 2012 #24
I suppose it works on disorderly conduct. provis99 Apr 2012 #26
That has certainly happened before. Big bubba loves his job. freshwest Apr 2012 #31
No, the decision concerns inmates that are "committed to the general population of a jail". n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #34
so if your mother or daughter forgets to pay a traffic ticket and a warrent is issued for her arrest notadmblnd Apr 2012 #42
I wouldn't be ok with them being placed in the "general population". n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #44
if they are arrested and processed, where do you think they would place them? notadmblnd Apr 2012 #45
A holding cell until I can rush right down and bail them out ? n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #47
It's good to have that sort of flexibility when it comes to ones job or other notadmblnd Apr 2012 #48
That's what this case was about BanzaiBonnie Apr 2012 #72
Is it fascism YET? marybourg Apr 2012 #25
right wing idea of freedom arely staircase Apr 2012 #29
good summary usregimechange Apr 2012 #33
comment following CNN story: "Awesome. I never liked my civil rights anyway." Liberal_in_LA Apr 2012 #30
At least we've still got our freedoms(tm)... Jon Ace Apr 2012 #35
Wow, do these guys even care about the damage they Rex Apr 2012 #36
They Vant a Fatherland! fascisthunter Apr 2012 #38
Homeland not good nuff? Rex Apr 2012 #66
Your Paperz Pleazzzzzzzzzze..... fascisthunter Apr 2012 #37
That's so 20th Century and German and European cr8tvlde Apr 2012 #53
Buttocks, bitte kenny blankenship Apr 2012 #77
“Mere factual innocence is no reason not to carry out a death sentence properly reached” TransitJohn Apr 2012 #39
Write your legislators and mediblast usregimechange Apr 2012 #41
What's next? The death penalty for parking tickets? mmonk Apr 2012 #49
Stoning for being a rape victim IDemo Apr 2012 #52
States most likely to hand out a traffic ticket: ohheckyeah Apr 2012 #51
Rhode Island makes up for it in parking tickets, $30 per person yearly in the 90's slampoet Apr 2012 #62
In the la-and of the free kath Apr 2012 #54
Supreme Court Justices aren't exempt, are they? Baitball Blogger Apr 2012 #55
Scalia should have been arrested for Public drunkeness in Providence a couple years back. slampoet Apr 2012 #57
That's what I'm talking about. Baitball Blogger Apr 2012 #58
Seems unlikely that a Supreme Court Justice will end up in the 'general population'. n/t PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #60
Absolute Power corrupts absolutely. Baitball Blogger Apr 2012 #70
Btw the Justice Department argued that the strip searches in question didn't violate 4th amendment. PoliticAverse Apr 2012 #59
this decision barbtries Apr 2012 #68
I think strip searches are ok if your going to jail. Jail for a traffic ticket, not so much. Devil_Fish Apr 2012 #75
I believe this is what the repubs would refer to as "a slippery slope" issue... TruthBeTold65 Apr 2012 #79
You can't touch my gun, but you can touch my genitals? Baitball Blogger Apr 2012 #82
On Top Of All Of This DallasNE Apr 2012 #80
wish i could rec this post - it's curious timing this ruling came down now nashville_brook Apr 2012 #81
WTF??? Odin2005 Apr 2012 #85

indepat

(20,899 posts)
11. Probably not one-half as much as
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 05:05 PM
Apr 2012

I. An anus and testicles or vagina search for doing 36 on a 35mph-zone seem right in there with their other odious rulings.

Ilsa

(61,712 posts)
3. And Kennedy joined them in this total BS? What are they
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 04:12 PM
Apr 2012

preparing for? Everything is being "redesigned" to treat and condition the public to be passive, fearful conformists. If you get arrested protesting, you are treated with the same disdain as a convicted murderer. I can't help but wonder if this excessive stripping of rights and dignity is to prepare us for something ugly that the powers-that-be know is coming.

Baitball Blogger

(46,777 posts)
56. Probably an intimidation tactic to subdue protesters.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 10:29 PM
Apr 2012

Is this for the legislature to overturn with new legislation?

It's been obvious for a long time that our Supreme Court Justice is too partisan to be objective.

Ezlivin

(8,153 posts)
4. I don't see anything wrong with this
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 04:12 PM
Apr 2012

If you leave your domicile for any reason, then you have to expect to come under suspicion.

It's the only way to make this country safe again!









newspeak

(4,847 posts)
61. I was going to ask if you were joking
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 11:23 PM
Apr 2012

and then I saw the "sarcasm: thingy. Because, you know, there are people in this country who would gladly give up any and all rights they have as long as they are protected from "the bad people" (whoever they are).

libinnyandia

(1,374 posts)
6. In 2000 some were concerned about Roe v Wade. It turns out there were a lot of other issues
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 04:20 PM
Apr 2012

that Roberts and Alito have made evil decisions on.

felix_numinous

(5,198 posts)
7. Guilty until proven innocent
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 04:44 PM
Apr 2012

the new normal. I never thought I would live to see these times--the trajectory these people want to put this country on is sickening. We are being ruined by psychopaths who get off on abusing people--and going along with abuse just allows it to continue and escalate.

TheKentuckian

(25,035 posts)
9. What constitutes reasonable? A cop wanting to?
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 04:49 PM
Apr 2012

When are we going to defund the police? If we don't we'll get rolled.

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
17. thats what alec wants to be rid of the police force so they hire private security
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 05:39 PM
Apr 2012

no more needs to worry about pesky laws. this sc(R)otus nds to be disbanded

TheKentuckian

(25,035 posts)
83. Maybe but Pinkertons aren't an extension of the state.
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 02:49 PM
Apr 2012

Everyone is less bound by the law and that arrangement is net less advantageous for those that use such tools to enforce their control. Pinkertons don't have default community support and fewer tools to regulate the society.

Pinkertons promote overreach and indicate a loss of popular suffrage. Almost certainly the aura of superiority takes a major hit. Lots of chaotic instability is introduced, David needs that when dealing with Goliaths. You aren't going to beat them metaphorically running the ball up the middle.

 

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)
10. Is this for real
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 04:58 PM
Apr 2012

South Parks TSA is getting closer and closer all the time. Toilet Safety Administrartion. Must get asshole checked, and wear seat belt on toilet.

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
14. WTF is the matter with these 5 - visual strip search of a nun
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 05:24 PM
Apr 2012

we need to start stripping these clowns.

They really do not think about repercussions - this is why we have Citizen's United (stupid name).

I really think that these 5 believe they are running a dictatorship.

 

RoccoR5955

(12,471 posts)
15. Is this still the United States of America, or
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 05:33 PM
Apr 2012

is it the Police Stated of America?
Inquiring minds want to know!

bayareaboy

(793 posts)
19. I can see the new training manual ... ...
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 05:51 PM
Apr 2012

If the suspect does not comply with in 10 seconds after the first order, then Tase as much as you want.

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
21. Well I can see you won't get the job of writing the manual
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 06:05 PM
Apr 2012

you are far too generous - if they have not stripped nekkid by the time the oaf-fiser counts to 3 then that's just you asking fer it.

Lunabelle

(454 posts)
23. As a nurse in a county jail I am fine with this.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 06:12 PM
Apr 2012

It is for the protection of the officers, the staff and other inmates. If you are arrested and taken to jail you could have planned this arrest in order to bring contraband to another inmate. All offenders when coming into jail should be considered as potentially violent. What if a violent offender is arrested on a simple traffic stop? Does his strip search get suspended just because he was arrested for a minor offense this time?

If you have never worked corrections, then you really don't know what you are talking about when it comes to strip searches. It is for our protection, and quite frankly I am worth it.

Cerridwen

(13,260 posts)
43. Which ones are those, please?
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 07:37 PM
Apr 2012

Could you perhaps post types of infractions/charges, etc. that might have one "committed to the general population of a jail".

Thanks. You seem so much more knowledgeable than I could ever be.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
46. Can be anything you're arrested for if they decide to place you in 'general population'.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 08:09 PM
Apr 2012

Generally you get moved into the 'general population' from a holding cell if you are going to
be in jail longer than a brief amount of time (i.e. a few hours).

In some states you can be arrested for not wearing a seat belt. If you are taken to jail
and can't post bail or get anyone else to post bail for you in a reasonable amount of time
you could be placed in the general population awaiting appearance before a judge.

The question decided in the case was :

Can they strip search everyone placed in the general population or only those new inmates they have reason to
suspect might have contraband hidden in body cavities?

The court decided 5-4 that they can strip search everyone placed in 'general population' even if they were arrested
for a minor offense and even if they are only being held 'temporarily'.

Response to Lunabelle (Reply #23)

Lifelong Protester

(8,421 posts)
24. for "minor offenses" ?
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 06:22 PM
Apr 2012

does this mean at the side of the road if you are pulled over for speeding? What's stopping them (police) from saying, "heck, what a boring shift, think I'll pull over a speeder and strip search 'em".

It's one thing if you are in jail and on your way to being charged, it's another thing to say that law enforcement can strip search for any offense.
 

provis99

(13,062 posts)
26. I suppose it works on disorderly conduct.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 06:24 PM
Apr 2012

See a hot blonde you want to oogle as a cop? Cite her with disorderly conduct, take her to the police station, and search her vagina to your heart's content!

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
42. so if your mother or daughter forgets to pay a traffic ticket and a warrent is issued for her arrest
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 07:36 PM
Apr 2012

and is picked up in a routine traffic stop, you are ok with her being violated in this manner?

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
45. if they are arrested and processed, where do you think they would place them?
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 07:46 PM
Apr 2012

I can guarantee it wouldn't be the employee break room.

notadmblnd

(23,720 posts)
48. It's good to have that sort of flexibility when it comes to ones job or other
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 08:17 PM
Apr 2012

commitments. Right now, my sister is out of the country, she wouldn't have the flexibility to come bail me out.

BanzaiBonnie

(3,621 posts)
72. That's what this case was about
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 11:21 AM
Apr 2012

The passenger in a car stopped for speeding, demand ID, unpaid parking ticket or minor infraction of some sort. Strip search. He was in jail (general population for a number of days) moved to another jail, strip searched again.

Then they found out it was a clerical error. Oopsie, that fine HAD been paid.


This whole thing is about power ~ abuse of power.

arely staircase

(12,482 posts)
29. right wing idea of freedom
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 06:28 PM
Apr 2012

you have the right to be strip searched for a traffic violation

you have the right to die of a curable disease

you have the read the bible and wave the flag.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
36. Wow, do these guys even care about the damage they
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 07:13 PM
Apr 2012

do to society? We have 5 domestic terrorists trying to make sure women are treated worse then they were yesterday. America, we were a land of laws at one time...now all we do is what the wealthy tell the politicians tell us to do!

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
66. Homeland not good nuff?
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 01:23 AM
Apr 2012

They gave us another ginormous bloated monster to possibly compete with the MIC one day! Why can't we be happy with that!?!?!

cr8tvlde

(1,185 posts)
53. That's so 20th Century and German and European
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 08:54 PM
Apr 2012

...we ex-Puritans fleeing for religious freedom, ex-liberators saving the European Continent from repression and brutality fand for democracy and human rights, lecturers and arbiters of other nations's human rights,and refined it to USA 2012 by our 9 brightest scholors ... paraphrased ...

"Forget your papers, we don't care whether you're a citizen or not, you have no right to ask what you did wrong, if anything, take off your clothes and underclothes in front of the nice camera. We'll get back to you."

ohheckyeah

(9,314 posts)
51. States most likely to hand out a traffic ticket:
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 08:35 PM
Apr 2012

After crunching the numbers, the National Motorists Association found that the state most likely to hand out a traffic ticket is Florida, followed closely by Georgia and Nevada. The state where drivers are least likely to get a traffic ticket is Montana.

Here is the full list of states:
(ranked from most likely to ticket drivers to least likely)

1) Florida
2 tie) Georgia
2 tie) Nevada
4) Texas
5) Alabama
6) Missouri
7) New York
8) North Carolina
9) District of Columbia
10) New Jersey
11) Louisiana
12) Arizona
13) Mississippi
14) California
15) Maryland
16) Iowa
17) Washington
18) Oklahoma
19) South Carolina
20) Indiana
21) Tennessee
22) Illinois
23) Ohio
24) Kansas
25) Michigan
26) Colorado
27) Delaware
28 tie) Minnesota
28 tie) Virginia
30) Massachusetts
31) Pennsylvania
32) Connecticut
33) Arkansas
34) Wisconsin
35) Vermont
36) Kentucky
37) New Hampshire
38) Hawaii
39) Rhode Island
40) Utah
41) Oregon
42) New Mexico
43) Nebraska
44) Idaho
45) West Virginia
46) Maine
47) Alaska
48) South Dakota
49) North Dakota
50) Wyoming
51) Montana

slampoet

(5,032 posts)
62. Rhode Island makes up for it in parking tickets, $30 per person yearly in the 90's
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 12:10 AM
Apr 2012

That's EVERY person. not just drivers.

Baitball Blogger

(46,777 posts)
55. Supreme Court Justices aren't exempt, are they?
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 10:25 PM
Apr 2012

Statistically speaking, in the next twenty years at least one of the Supreme Court Justice should be subjected to this kind of search. I mean, assuming the police doesn't play favorites.

Baitball Blogger

(46,777 posts)
70. Absolute Power corrupts absolutely.
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 10:58 AM
Apr 2012

This is headed in that direction. People like Scalia feel they're above the law and never have to worry about being burdened by it. Liberal judges are more empathetic. Scalia is our Borgia Pope. He's going to make a mistake that no one will be able to defend.

PoliticAverse

(26,366 posts)
59. Btw the Justice Department argued that the strip searches in question didn't violate 4th amendment.
Mon Apr 2, 2012, 10:34 PM
Apr 2012

The brief filed can be read here:
http://sblog.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/08/10-945bsacUnitedStates.pdf

You can see who opposed the searches (filed for/in support of the petitioner ) and who supported them (for/in support of respondent) and their arguments
here: http://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/florence-v-board-of-chosen-freeholders-of-the-county-of-burlington/

barbtries

(28,821 posts)
68. this decision
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 08:10 AM
Apr 2012

caused a deep feeling of dread to come over my body. MY body!
it can't be said enough: reelect the president! this court needs to change before we become a frankly fascistic police state. clear and present danger.

 

Devil_Fish

(1,664 posts)
75. I think strip searches are ok if your going to jail. Jail for a traffic ticket, not so much.
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 11:41 AM
Apr 2012

In jail inmates deserve an expectation of safety. The strip search insures that no wepons get it. I do not think, however, that some one deserves to go to jail for a traffic ticket, or for protesting, or for excercising their constitutional right to freedom of pecefull assembly.

TruthBeTold65

(203 posts)
79. I believe this is what the repubs would refer to as "a slippery slope" issue...
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 12:58 PM
Apr 2012

but I am sure they really don't care as long as you aren't touching their guns or their religion.

DallasNE

(7,404 posts)
80. On Top Of All Of This
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 01:22 PM
Apr 2012

This was a driving while black case. The person involved was even the passenger and had documentation showing that authorities agreed that the outstanding ticket had already been paid. None of that mattered. He had to spend 6 days in jail with 2 strip searches all over an error in the records. Strip searchs are now legal, even in cases of wrongful arrest stemming from a driving while black stop. This decision goes along side Dred-Scott as wrongfully decided.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
81. wish i could rec this post - it's curious timing this ruling came down now
Tue Apr 3, 2012, 01:35 PM
Apr 2012

with the trayvon situation still developing. insult to injury. threat to injury. it's matters like this that really make me want to leave this country. i don't see things getting better. they're getting worse.

this court is going to overturn the new deal, and send the country into an even bigger crisis than we're already in.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»SCOTUS: Strip searches ok...