Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BainsBane

(53,010 posts)
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 06:56 PM Jul 2014

The solution is not taking off our tops

and showing our breasts to men who think depriving us of reproductive rights is a big joke. If you want to engage in bodily protest, do one that makes sense. SCOTUS and Hobby Lobby seek to deny women access to birth control. The logical response--besides a consumer boycott, legal, and political action--is to go all Lysistrata. At the very least, refuse to have sex with someone who doesn't take your reproductive rights seriously. If he thinks companies have a right to make your reproductive choices or your reaction is "hysterical" or "hair on fire," that is someone who isn't worthy of intimate relations with you.

38 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The solution is not taking off our tops (Original Post) BainsBane Jul 2014 OP
Pretty much what I said: mindwalker_i Jul 2014 #1
All excellent suggestions. nt BainsBane Jul 2014 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author 1000words Jul 2014 #3
Some on this site BainsBane Jul 2014 #4
Exactly right. That's why I couldn't figure out FEMEN (although that's since been R B Garr Jul 2014 #5
Particularly when you see BainsBane Jul 2014 #15
I just looked through that thread about the topless protest R B Garr Jul 2014 #16
It's a great idea, but human sexuality doesn't seem to work that way. ZombieHorde Jul 2014 #6
Well it seemed like a good idea at the time. Nye Bevan Jul 2014 #7
Ha! Yeah, it usually does. ZombieHorde Jul 2014 #10
Fact is BainsBane Jul 2014 #11
I bet. nt ZombieHorde Jul 2014 #13
none of those guys are ever nice. they are usually creepy and there is good reason JI7 Jul 2014 #19
Just because we have in the past doesn't mean we need to continue to do so BainsBane Jul 2014 #8
So funny. ZombieHorde Jul 2014 #12
Ha, ha, ha! Warren DeMontague Jul 2014 #24
I definitely think people should stop having sex with Republicans. alarimer Jul 2014 #9
and with Dems who think too much like Republicans BainsBane Jul 2014 #17
+1000 smirkymonkey Jul 2014 #14
I cannot even express how much I wish that would happen tkmorris Jul 2014 #18
YES! That is the best response to Hobby Lobby.., GReedDiamond Jul 2014 #20
Who I would most like to practice this BainsBane Jul 2014 #21
i dunno. Scalia, for instance, looks like the most vigorous physical activity he ever gets Warren DeMontague Jul 2014 #22
according to Scalia JI7 Jul 2014 #26
Asshat Warren DeMontague Jul 2014 #30
a flat ass at that BainsBane Jul 2014 #35
the wives are most likely wingnuts, look at the wife of Clarence Thomas and that call JI7 Jul 2014 #23
I tell you, just envisioning Roberts's howdy doody ass in flagrante delicto Warren DeMontague Jul 2014 #25
Scalia is a more frightening image BainsBane Jul 2014 #27
I'm not taking off my top so men can stare gwheezie Jul 2014 #28
You nailed the motivation. It's about losing their grip on power over us BainsBane Jul 2014 #36
Perhaps, imposing equal restrictions on men Live and Learn Jul 2014 #29
Agreed. And sex ed might be needed for some of those men too. Ilsa Jul 2014 #31
Not to draw too fine a point but Nuclear Unicorn Jul 2014 #32
I suspect there are a lot of women BainsBane Jul 2014 #37
So the way to fight the decision is Boom Sound 416 Jul 2014 #33
not with everyone BainsBane Jul 2014 #34
Sure you can do that but why would you be with someone who doesn't dilby Jul 2014 #38

Response to BainsBane (Original post)

BainsBane

(53,010 posts)
4. Some on this site
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:18 PM
Jul 2014

as we've seen today, not that I have sex with any of them. Someone may, however. Or members here may know men who adopt similar attitudes. Regardless, it beats taking off tops, which only incentivizes the men who treat women's rights as trivial.

R B Garr

(16,949 posts)
5. Exactly right. That's why I couldn't figure out FEMEN (although that's since been
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:27 PM
Jul 2014

explained that they were mostly promoting their careers through looks and sensationalism...). Taking off your top is analagous to the Occupy Wall Street protestors taking their rent money and buying some 1% investment bankers lunch with it. You can't be a serious protestor if you are handing over all your power and assets to those you claim to shun. Makes no sense.

BainsBane

(53,010 posts)
15. Particularly when you see
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 08:11 PM
Jul 2014

some of the people who think the reaction to the SCOTUS ruling is a big joke love the idea of a topless protest.

R B Garr

(16,949 posts)
16. I just looked through that thread about the topless protest
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 09:22 PM
Jul 2014

although I'm sure there are more threads of that nature...I see what you mean. Parading topless women around is the answer to everything, of course.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
6. It's a great idea, but human sexuality doesn't seem to work that way.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:31 PM
Jul 2014

People, especially young people, usually don't look for goodness in their potential sex partners. I imagine just about everyone here has had sex with a crazy asshole.

ZombieHorde

(29,047 posts)
10. Ha! Yeah, it usually does.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:46 PM
Jul 2014

I sometimes hear guys complaining about gals who don't date "nice guys (them)," but they sure as hell aren't just looking for niceness in their desired partners. Niceness isn't number one priority for most of us.

BainsBane

(53,010 posts)
11. Fact is
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:48 PM
Jul 2014

Those guys are rarely nice. That's just what they say because they don't have a lot of luck with women.

JI7

(89,235 posts)
19. none of those guys are ever nice. they are usually creepy and there is good reason
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:18 AM
Jul 2014

why they can't get anyone to be with them.

BainsBane

(53,010 posts)
8. Just because we have in the past doesn't mean we need to continue to do so
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:40 PM
Jul 2014

I wish those five male justices' wives would give some serious thought to this.


A pre-screening interview, for example:

alarimer

(16,245 posts)
9. I definitely think people should stop having sex with Republicans.
Tue Jul 1, 2014, 07:41 PM
Jul 2014

Or maybe that's their problem already.

They sound like people who are deeply ashamed of their natural urges.

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
18. I cannot even express how much I wish that would happen
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:11 AM
Jul 2014

Unfortunately women continue to be attracted to, and have sex with, utter morons. It baffles me, and they always end up sad and angry, but they do it anyway.

Edited to add: Men do this too. We SHOULD seek out out honest, loyal, intelligent and independent companions but instead we drool after the worst of the lot. We really can be our own worst enemy.

GReedDiamond

(5,310 posts)
20. YES! That is the best response to Hobby Lobby..,
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 01:28 AM
Jul 2014

...and any other other "closely held" CorpoRats who go down that road, I have yet to see!!

Great Post.

BainsBane

(53,010 posts)
21. Who I would most like to practice this
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 02:30 AM
Jul 2014

are the wives of the five justices and the yahoos in charge of Hobby Lobby.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
22. i dunno. Scalia, for instance, looks like the most vigorous physical activity he ever gets
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 02:54 AM
Jul 2014

Is drooling in his soup.

JI7

(89,235 posts)
26. according to Scalia
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:49 AM
Jul 2014

<Challenged about his views on sexual morality, Justice Scalia surprised his audience at Harvard University, telling them: "I even take the position that sexual orgies eliminate social tensions and ought to be encouraged." >


http://www.theguardian.com/world/2004/oct/01/usa.oliverburkeman

JI7

(89,235 posts)
23. the wives are most likely wingnuts, look at the wife of Clarence Thomas and that call
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:07 AM
Jul 2014

she made to Anita Hill.

wingnuts or total idiots and in most cases both.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
25. I tell you, just envisioning Roberts's howdy doody ass in flagrante delicto
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 03:39 AM
Jul 2014

Is enough to turn anyone off of sex for good, i should think.

gwheezie

(3,580 posts)
28. I'm not taking off my top so men can stare
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:00 AM
Jul 2014

It makes no sense to me.
I don't think withholding sex would work either since no decent woman had sex with a rightwing loon anyway. And I think that gets to a basis of why many rightwing loons are so hellbent on controlling women and reproduction. They've admitted this. There aren't enough loons being born. Very few woman are finding old white tea bags attractive. Since we can control our reproduction support ourselves buy propert own business etc.the one advantage to having a relationship with an old rightwing loon had been removed.
Women do not need a man to protect us, support us or feed us. This is the source if the outrageous behavior. There are plenty of men who appreciate us as full human beings. Since the rightwing old men are finding less women who are forced to form relationships with them. They are dying off
So no I won't take my top off. It only encourages creepy loons.

BainsBane

(53,010 posts)
36. You nailed the motivation. It's about losing their grip on power over us
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:13 PM
Jul 2014

and they will use any means to try and reimpose it.

Live and Learn

(12,769 posts)
29. Perhaps, imposing equal restrictions on men
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 04:03 AM
Jul 2014

would work even better.

Why should men be allowed to go topless when women can't? Why should women be subject to topless men that might make women lose their ability to control themselves?

Why should men be guaranteed equal rights if women aren't? And so on...

Or, how about getting rid of gender determinations/articles in legislation, all together and replacing them all with gender neutral descriptions?

Ilsa

(61,688 posts)
31. Agreed. And sex ed might be needed for some of those men too.
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 05:10 AM
Jul 2014

My guess is that alot of men don't understand enough physiology and how different methods of birth control work. That's why they shrug it off.

Nuclear Unicorn

(19,497 posts)
32. Not to draw too fine a point but
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 07:21 AM
Jul 2014

how can they miss not getting something they were never going to get in the first place? All the men (and women) supporting the HL case? Yeah, I wasn't going to be having sex with any of them. And if they decide to change their minds I still won't be having sex with them.

BainsBane

(53,010 posts)
37. I suspect there are a lot of women
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:20 PM
Jul 2014

partnered with conservative or insensitive men who see the issue very differenltly from those men.

dilby

(2,273 posts)
38. Sure you can do that but why would you be with someone who doesn't
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 06:24 PM
Jul 2014

respect your rights in the first place.

I think a better solution would be for women to stage a no work protest day. Just all women who are offended by this ruling get together and not show up for work for 1 day to show these people what it looks like when they are missing half their workforce.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The solution is not takin...