Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

LuckyTheDog

(6,837 posts)
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 09:29 AM Jul 2014

Narrow decision? Hobby Lobby decision likely to open a legal floodgate

When the Supreme Court ruled Monday that Hobby Lobby, a craft store chain owned by a Southern Baptist family, could opt out of the Affordable Care Act’s mandate to cover specific types of contraception for employees, it may well have set in motion a raft of similar challenges. The language of conservative Justice Samuel Alito’s majority opinion may have sounded narrow--it confined the decision to “closely held” businesses--but the precedent it set is likely not.

The ruling only applied to four types of contraception: the “morning-after” pills Ella and Plan B, and two intrauterine devices (IUDs), referred to by people who object to them as “abortifacients.” The ACA’s contraception mandate stipulates sixteen forms of contraception must be provided, so Hobby Lobby will still have to provide twelve other contraceptive methods to their employees. But Lyle Denniston of SCOTUS Blog says all sixteen contraceptives may be easy targets for future cases.

“Depending upon how lower courts now interpret the Hobby Lobby decision, companies that fit within the Court’s ‘closely held company’ bracket and offer religious objections could be spared from having to provide any of those services through their employee health plans,” Denniston wrote.

MORE HERE: http://wonkynewsnerd.com/hobby-lobby-decision-likely-open-legal-floodgate/




5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Narrow decision? Hobby Lobby decision likely to open a legal floodgate (Original Post) LuckyTheDog Jul 2014 OP
I want to become a sole corporation.... Historic NY Jul 2014 #1
The USSCt made clear the next day COLGATE4 Jul 2014 #2
Thank you redqueen Jul 2014 #3
The media all ran, almost falling down in their haste COLGATE4 Jul 2014 #4
Since health insurance is part of our compensation, LiberalLoner Jul 2014 #5

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
2. The USSCt made clear the next day
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:04 AM
Jul 2014

that this ruling applies to all contraceptives, not just the four mentioned in the original decision. The 'it doesn't apply to 16' is a myth.

COLGATE4

(14,732 posts)
4. The media all ran, almost falling down in their haste
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 11:12 AM
Jul 2014

to convince the public that the decision 'really wasn't so bad, no big deal, only affects 4 contraceptive methods'. So much so that the USSCt published their clarification the very next day, making clear to all that, no, they really meant all forms of contraception.

LiberalLoner

(9,761 posts)
5. Since health insurance is part of our compensation,
Wed Jul 2, 2014, 12:15 PM
Jul 2014

Does this mean corporations can also dictate what we are allowed to buy with our other compensation (wages)?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Narrow decision? Hobby Lo...