Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 02:28 AM Jul 2014

Nine out of 10 people in Edward Snowden's NSA intercepts were not targets

http://www.smh.com.au/world/nine-out-of-10-people-in-edward-snowdens-nsa-intercepts-were-not-targets-20140706-zsxv0.html#ixzz36fON3FZr

Washington: Ordinary internet users far outnumber legally targeted foreigners in the communications intercepted by the National Security Agency from US digital networks.

Nine out of 10 account holders found in a large cache of intercepted conversations, which former NSA contractor Edward Snowden provided to The Washington Post, were not the intended surveillance targets but were caught in a net the agency had cast for somebody else.

Many of them were Americans. Nearly half of the surveillance files, a strikingly high proportion, contained names, email addresses or other details that the NSA marked as belonging to US citizens or residents. NSA analysts masked, or "minimised", more than 65,000 such references to protect Americans' privacy, but nearly 900 additional email addresses were found unmasked in the files, which could be strongly linked to US citizens or residents.

There are discoveries of considerable intelligence value in the intercepted messages – but also collateral harm to privacy on a scale that the Obama administration has not been willing to address.

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Nine out of 10 people in Edward Snowden's NSA intercepts were not targets (Original Post) Luminous Animal Jul 2014 OP
Ordinary internet users far outnumber legally targeted foreigners Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #1
Kick. Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #2
Kick again. Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #3
Another take on it n2doc Jul 2014 #4
That's a great article. Thanks n2doc riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #8
This thread is mighty quiet eh? Kick! nt riderinthestorm Jul 2014 #5
Keerickets. Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #6
Hobby Lobby Puzzledtraveller Jul 2014 #7
Are we safe yet? K&R Tierra_y_Libertad Jul 2014 #9
The original WaPo article Luminous Animal Jul 2014 #10
Another important bit from the article... ljm2002 Jul 2014 #11
Kick bobduca Jul 2014 #12

Luminous Animal

(27,310 posts)
10. The original WaPo article
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 01:29 PM
Jul 2014
http://www.washingtonpost.com/world/national-security/in-nsa-intercepted-data-those-not-targeted-far-outnumber-the-foreigners-who-are/2014/07/05/8139adf8-045a-11e4-8572-4b1b969b6322_story.html

If Snowden’s sample is representative, the population under scrutiny in the PRISM and Upstream programs is far larger than the government has suggested. In a June 26 “transparency report,” the Office of the Director of National Intelligence disclosed that 89,138 people were targets of last year’s collection under FISA Section 702. At the 9-to-1 ratio of incidental collection in Snowden’s sample, the office’s figure would correspond to nearly 900,000 accounts, targeted or not, under surveillance.

(snip)

In the interview, Snowden said he did not need to circumvent those controls, because his final position as a contractor for Booz Allen at the NSA’s Hawaii operations center gave him “unusually broad, unescorted access to raw SIGINT under a special ‘Dual Authorities’ role,” a reference to Section 702 for domestic collection and Executive Order 12333 for collection overseas. Those credentials, he said, allowed him to search stored content — and “task” new collection — without prior approval of his search terms.


“If I had wanted to pull a copy of a judge’s or a senator’s e-mail, all I had to do was enter that selector into XKEYSCORE,” one of the NSA’s main query systems, he said.


(snip)

In an ordinary FISA surveillance application, the judge grants a warrant and requires a fresh review of probable cause — and the content of collected surveillance — every 90 days. When renewal fails, NSA and allied analysts sometimes switch to the more lenient standards of PRISM and Upstream.

ljm2002

(10,751 posts)
11. Another important bit from the article...
Sun Jul 6, 2014, 03:28 PM
Jul 2014

...is this one:


As recently as May, shortly after he retired as NSA director, Gen. Keith Alexander denied that Snowden could have passed FISA content to journalists.

(...)

“They didn’t touch the FISA data,” Alexander replied. He added, “That database, he didn’t have access to.”

(...)

The NSA has released an e-mail exchange acknowledging that Snowden took the required training classes for access to those systems.


The article is worth reading in its entirety. Here we have another case where Alexander clearly lied, and where Snowden appears to be telling the truth -- he took the required training, so it's plausible that he was authorized to access those records, as he has claimed. Anyway, the Washington Post obtained the information for this article from Snowden, demonstrating that he did, in fact, have access to it.
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Nine out of 10 people in ...